Youwerecreated
VIP Member
- Nov 29, 2010
- 13,273
- 165
- 83
- Thread starter
- #101
Still, no one is addressing the main question.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Excuse me but the part I quoted was not about pentacene was it? It was a reference to how long ago the image of an individual atom was captured.
That article delves into the fact that it has been easier to see individual atoms than is has molecules. as it says in the very first paragraph
Maybe you should read it before you assume I haven't.
Don't feel so smug now do you?
Are you missing my point of the post, all of those have to happen for your theory to be true.
Or unless i am mistaken of what you quoted.
What theory are you talking about.
You stated that scientists have never seen an atom. All I did was point out your error.
Your question is foolish irrelevant, illogical and your concept of demanding answers from people who do NOT pay allegiance to YOUR order of demands for respect, without showing ANY respect for people who think differently, (more logically) than you do?Beneficial mutations are rare do you disagree ? ALL MUTATIONS ARE EQUALLY POSSIBLE! Mutations are mutations, "beneficial" is determined by the evolutionary concept of "natural selection"! NATURAL SELECTION That is the concept of several random events happening simultaneously. I think you failed to comprehend that no one species, just as no one thunderstorm, no one snowstorm, no one volcanic eruption, happens in isolation. The same with mutations. Sorry you missed this point in science.
There are far more neutral and harmful mutations then beneficial mutations which makes the theory wrong.You need a net gain of beneficial information and thats not the case. There are over 4,500 genetic disorders and how many beneficial genes that came from a mutation ?
Mutated genes do not have a very good chance of surviving in the genepool. BULLSHIT.........depends upon the environment, and the actual mutation. 99% of mutations have ABSOLUTELY NO EFFECT upon the species!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Where do you folks manufacture facts? Some garage in Israel or Germany or Los Angeles? This is the kind of thinking that would have killed mulatto children born to white females. Very much filled with fallacies. (Actually, all WHITE children are descended from Africans, skin color is a beneficial mutation, a well-documented DNA evolutionary series, several thousand years to finish) to skin color. Light skinned people survive winters in disease ridden far northern areas of the planet MUCH MORE OFTEN AND BETTER than do darker skinned people, this "MUTATION" being beneficial for lighter skinned people in Norway, England, France, etc, about 30,000 (40-20K) years ago.
This is my last response for the last time until someone attempts to answer my question this thread should be dead soon.
......
So after shooting down Ross' claim that if any ONE of his 42 "evidences" were off life would not exist, using the very example YOU chose, you want to cut and run.That's pure BS because our days are getting longer, by 1 thousandth of a second every day, which is about a second every 3 years. So using your 6,000 year old Earth, a day was about 23 1/2 hours long during creation.
Well wait til we hit to the 25th hour.
I only am interested in the one question I posted, that only one person has attempted to answer and failed miserably, respectfully.
Thank You.
Your question is foolish irrelevant, illogical and your concept of demanding answers from people who do NOT pay allegiance to YOUR order of demands for respect, without showing ANY respect for people who think differently, (more logically) than you do?Beneficial mutations are rare do you disagree ? ALL MUTATIONS ARE EQUALLY POSSIBLE! Mutations are mutations, "beneficial" is determined by the evolutionary concept of "natural selection"! NATURAL SELECTION That is the concept of several random events happening simultaneously. I think you failed to comprehend that no one species, just as no one thunderstorm, no one snowstorm, no one volcanic eruption, happens in isolation. The same with mutations. Sorry you missed this point in science.
There are far more neutral and harmful mutations then beneficial mutations which makes the theory wrong.You need a net gain of beneficial information and thats not the case. There are over 4,500 genetic disorders and how many beneficial genes that came from a mutation ?
Mutated genes do not have a very good chance of surviving in the genepool. BULLSHIT.........depends upon the environment, and the actual mutation. 99% of mutations have ABSOLUTELY NO EFFECT upon the species!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Where do you folks manufacture facts? Some garage in Israel or Germany or Los Angeles? This is the kind of thinking that would have killed mulatto children born to white females. Very much filled with fallacies. (Actually, all WHITE children are descended from Africans, skin color is a beneficial mutation, a well-documented DNA evolutionary series, several thousand years to finish) to skin color. Light skinned people survive winters in disease ridden far northern areas of the planet MUCH MORE OFTEN AND BETTER than do darker skinned people, this "MUTATION" being beneficial for lighter skinned people in Norway, England, France, etc, about 30,000 (40-20K) years ago.
This is my last response for the last time until someone attempts to answer my question this thread should be dead soon.
......
Hardly are you in a position to make DEMANDS upon other, more rational thinkers
It was ROSS who said that if any ONE was off then no life would not exist. YOU then picked what YOU thought was the strongest argument, and I shot a hole through it big enough to drive a Mac Truck through, and then like a typical Neo-Superstitionist you moved the goal post and then claimed victory.So after shooting down Ross' claim that if any ONE of his 42 "evidences" were off life would not exist, using the very example YOU chose, you want to cut and run.Well wait til we hit to the 25th hour.
I only am interested in the one question I posted, that only one person has attempted to answer and failed miserably, respectfully.
Thank You.
One out of 42, if that is a football game you got whipped.
Not exactly new, but fully supported by science.My views will need to be adjusted just a little. I will post the link where you can listen to the audio version which i enjoyed thouroughly or you can read the entire article.
New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God
A Seminal Presentation by Astrophysicist Dr. Hugh Ross, given in South Barrington, Illinois, April 16, 1994
Hugh Ross - Origin of the Universe
There is NO "NEW SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE"
There is only another con artist with a Ph.D. refuting ALL logical and factual evidence for evolution of biological species. and there is a poster here who:
REFUSES TO ENGAGE in DEBATE!
REFUTES FACTS ONLY with OPINION!
MAKES FUN of fellow POSTERS
REFUSES TO engage in logical thought
REFUSES TO read links, view and hear videos
I will be asking that such a dishonest, immature, illogical and disrespectful poster be banned from this site.
I will be circulating a petition for this to happen within the next 3-10 hours, on all forums, in all locations.
Dishonesty, and disingenuousnes should NOT be rewarded on these boards.
Who will join with me to get "YOUWERECREATED" IP number( sent to you if you request it) and geographic location (sent to you as well) removed permanently from here.
We are sick and tired of people here to waste our time. We are here for serious, adult conversation, with people who actually read books, actually understand the adult concept of debate.
YOUWERECREATED obviuosly does NOT understand how to behave as an adult.
Join with me to eliminate this waste of time on our web site and on our planet. Such scum is such a waste of time.
It was ROSS who said that if any ONE was off then no life would not exist. YOU then picked what YOU thought was the strongest argument, and I shot a hole through it big enough to drive a Mac Truck through, and then like a typical Neo-Superstitionist you moved the goal post and then claimed victory.So after shooting down Ross' claim that if any ONE of his 42 "evidences" were off life would not exist, using the very example YOU chose, you want to cut and run.
Thank You.
One out of 42, if that is a football game you got whipped.
You fool no one!
It was ROSS who said that if any ONE was off then no life would not exist. YOU then picked what YOU thought was the strongest argument, and I shot a hole through it big enough to drive a Mac Truck through, and then like a typical Neo-Superstitionist you moved the goal post and then claimed victory.So after shooting down Ross' claim that if any ONE of his 42 "evidences" were off life would not exist, using the very example YOU chose, you want to cut and run.
Thank You.
One out of 42, if that is a football game you got whipped.
You fool no one!
Not exactly new, but fully supported by science.My views will need to be adjusted just a little. I will post the link where you can listen to the audio version which i enjoyed thouroughly or you can read the entire article.
New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God
A Seminal Presentation by Astrophysicist Dr. Hugh Ross, given in South Barrington, Illinois, April 16, 1994
Hugh Ross - Origin of the Universe
There is NO "NEW SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE"
There is only another con artist with a Ph.D. refuting ALL logical and factual evidence for evolution of biological species. and there is a poster here who:
REFUSES TO ENGAGE in DEBATE!
REFUTES FACTS ONLY with OPINION!
MAKES FUN of fellow POSTERS
REFUSES TO engage in logical thought
REFUSES TO read links, view and hear videos
I will be asking that such a dishonest, immature, illogical and disrespectful poster be banned from this site.
I will be circulating a petition for this to happen within the next 3-10 hours, on all forums, in all locations.
Dishonesty, and disingenuousnes should NOT be rewarded on these boards.
Who will join with me to get "YOUWERECREATED" IP number( sent to you if you request it) and geographic location (sent to you as well) removed permanently from here.
We are sick and tired of people here to waste our time. We are here for serious, adult conversation, with people who actually read books, actually understand the adult concept of debate.
YOUWERECREATED obviuosly does NOT understand how to behave as an adult.
Join with me to eliminate this waste of time on our web site and on our planet. Such scum is such a waste of time.
It was ROSS who said that if any ONE was off then no life would not exist. YOU then picked what YOU thought was the strongest argument, and I shot a hole through it big enough to drive a Mac Truck through, and then like a typical Neo-Superstitionist you moved the goal post and then claimed victory.So after shooting down Ross' claim that if any ONE of his 42 "evidences" were off life would not exist, using the very example YOU chose, you want to cut and run.
Thank You.
One out of 42, if that is a football game you got whipped.
You fool no one!
Lady you have proven to be a very bitter person that can't seem to stand anything that contradicts your religion.
If they think i should leave that is their call.
If so this is just another example of someone trying to shut down the truth.
Take your so called B.S. degrees and shove them where the sun don't shine. I think you're a fraud. I challenged you to produce your credentials and i would present mine, what did you do ,you disappeared.
By the way i would put my school for the sciences up against yours any day. The University of Arizona. But you already new that though didn't you. So where did get your so called B.S. degrees ?
I take that back you probably are the queen of BS.
You MIGHT find out that tomorrow morning you do NOT have access to this web site, and that you are being sued for millions for your allegations against me.
If you were a smart person, you would stop posting now, because your IP address and your childish posts have been recorded for the last 15 days. If you ever threatened any human being living in the USA, ( as I recall you have done at your IP address) you could face millions in fines, time in jail, and your IP address can be investigated for any other crimes which might have been committed from that address.
You are in deep deep trouble, by the way I(we) are man an woman, and we have 1000+ threatening posts from your IP address..lots of evidence that will be admitted in a court, so if you want to make a fool of yourself and spend 5 years in prison for your posts, threats, and factual failures, slanderous statements......go for it!!! Continue to post this evening! The FBI will be watching you! Contiue
You were already told how that happens - horizontal (lateral) gene transfer.Your question is foolish irrelevant, illogical and your concept of demanding answers from people who do NOT pay allegiance to YOUR order of demands for respect, without showing ANY respect for people who think differently, (more logically) than you do?Beneficial mutations are rare do you disagree ? ALL MUTATIONS ARE EQUALLY POSSIBLE! Mutations are mutations, "beneficial" is determined by the evolutionary concept of "natural selection"! NATURAL SELECTION That is the concept of several random events happening simultaneously. I think you failed to comprehend that no one species, just as no one thunderstorm, no one snowstorm, no one volcanic eruption, happens in isolation. The same with mutations. Sorry you missed this point in science.
There are far more neutral and harmful mutations then beneficial mutations which makes the theory wrong.You need a net gain of beneficial information and thats not the case. There are over 4,500 genetic disorders and how many beneficial genes that came from a mutation ?
Mutated genes do not have a very good chance of surviving in the genepool. BULLSHIT.........depends upon the environment, and the actual mutation. 99% of mutations have ABSOLUTELY NO EFFECT upon the species!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Where do you folks manufacture facts? Some garage in Israel or Germany or Los Angeles? This is the kind of thinking that would have killed mulatto children born to white females. Very much filled with fallacies. (Actually, all WHITE children are descended from Africans, skin color is a beneficial mutation, a well-documented DNA evolutionary series, several thousand years to finish) to skin color. Light skinned people survive winters in disease ridden far northern areas of the planet MUCH MORE OFTEN AND BETTER than do darker skinned people, this "MUTATION" being beneficial for lighter skinned people in Norway, England, France, etc, about 30,000 (40-20K) years ago.
This is my last response for the last time until someone attempts to answer my question this thread should be dead soon.
......
Hardly are you in a position to make DEMANDS upon other, more rational thinkers
Oh boy,skin color is a benefit if you want to believe that go ahead. If you want to believe that bacteria building antibiotic resistance is a benefit go ahead. I believe you 're desperate and reaching.
So now tell me how this proves mutations will produce a destinct new organism ?
Do you understand the difference in adapting and Macro-evolution ?
Human life existed millions of years ago when days were much shorter than 20 hours.So after shooting down Ross' claim that if any ONE of his 42 "evidences" were off life would not exist, using the very example YOU chose, you want to cut and run.Well wait til we hit to the 25th hour.
I only am interested in the one question I posted, that only one person has attempted to answer and failed miserably, respectfully.
Thank You.
Really where ?
The Extreme Precision of Physical Constants
Going back in history, we can measure the time when the Earth was rotating every 20 hours. When the Earth was rotating once every 20 hours, human life was not possible. If it rotates once every 28 hours, human life will not be possible. It can only happen at 24 hours.
Hugh Ross - Origin of the Universe
Human life existed millions of years ago when days were much shorter than 20 hours.So after shooting down Ross' claim that if any ONE of his 42 "evidences" were off life would not exist, using the very example YOU chose, you want to cut and run.
Thank You.
Really where ?
The Extreme Precision of Physical Constants
Going back in history, we can measure the time when the Earth was rotating every 20 hours. When the Earth was rotating once every 20 hours, human life was not possible. If it rotates once every 28 hours, human life will not be possible. It can only happen at 24 hours.
Hugh Ross - Origin of the Universe
Time for Neo-Superstitionists to move the goalposts again.
You were already told how that happens - horizontal (lateral) gene transfer.Your question is foolish irrelevant, illogical and your concept of demanding answers from people who do NOT pay allegiance to YOUR order of demands for respect, without showing ANY respect for people who think differently, (more logically) than you do?
Hardly are you in a position to make DEMANDS upon other, more rational thinkers
Oh boy,skin color is a benefit if you want to believe that go ahead. If you want to believe that bacteria building antibiotic resistance is a benefit go ahead. I believe you 're desperate and reaching.
So now tell me how this proves mutations will produce a destinct new organism ?
Do you understand the difference in adapting and Macro-evolution ?
Link?You were already told how that happens - horizontal (lateral) gene transfer.Oh boy,skin color is a benefit if you want to believe that go ahead. If you want to believe that bacteria building antibiotic resistance is a benefit go ahead. I believe you 're desperate and reaching.
So now tell me how this proves mutations will produce a destinct new organism ?
Do you understand the difference in adapting and Macro-evolution ?
Informational genes are less likely to be horizontally transferred so how is that making your point ?