Youwerecreated
VIP Member
- Nov 29, 2010
- 13,273
- 165
- 83
- Thread starter
- #41
1. DNA IS a molecule. The pattern of that molecule is indeed a code for transcription. It is not a language, unless all codes are languages, and they are not.You are not addressing anything pertaining to the logic of scientific discovery. At all.
You need to apply it if you want to talk to scientists. If that's not what you want, then don't learn it.
But, your approach has nothing at all to do with the logic of scientific discovery even though you are talking about science.
Your choice, though, of course.
Ok this is the atheist riddle.
1) DNA is not merely a molecule with a pattern; it is a code, a language, and an information storage mechanism.
2) All codes are created by a conscious mind; there is no natural process known to science that creates coded information.
3) Therefore DNA was designed by a mind.
If you can provide an empirical example of a code or language that
occurs naturally, youve toppled my proof. All you need is one.
Perry Marshall
Information Theory and DNA vs. Atheists « Cosmic Fingerprints
Fail.
2. The sequence of the nucleotides in a strand of DNA is not determined by a mind, rather it is determined by a series of biochemical reactions in an organism.
Fail.
3. As (1) and (2) fail, (3) fails as well.
Any and all codes are forms of communication,as is language,sign language, and all forms of communication came about by a mind. If you can show one that didn't you have proven this argument wrong, But not until then.