A good example is the ironically named "fairness doctrine" where radical democrats tried to enact legislation that would force right wing talk radio to give out left wing propaganda. It doesn't work the other way around.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes well, now we know why he didn't want to post the link. He would rather have us believe that it applies to everyone and that there are immediate consequences. Typical propaganda technique . I would agree that jail time is ridiculous, but if an employee charged with the care of patients disrespects them, tere should be consequencesI'm going to chime in here. The reason for the reluctance to post the link is because the above paragraph gives a slanted, sensationalized and incomplete account of the law.Commiefornia. It is now a crime, punishable by jail time and a fine, to refer to someone by other than their pronoun of choice...of which I believe there are an even dozen, at last count.Hate crime: [noun]: If a prevailing majority population hates what you are saying or doing and wants to control you by legally preventing you from saying or doing it and attaching corresponding legal penalties to infractions of the pertinent enacted laws, then each of those offending words and/or actions you may say or do constitute a hate crime.
You know, this has happened before, is happening now, and can happen again…
— Spero
Remember. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
Comments?
Where has that occurred?
New California law allows jail time for using wrong gender pronoun, sponsor denies that would happen
First of all it only applies to heal care workers in residential facilities
Secondly, it reads as follows :
Among the unlawful actions are “willfully and repeatedly” failing to use a transgender person’s “preferred name or pronouns” after he or she is “clearly informed of the preferred name or pronouns.”
Its about protecting people dignity. You people should try a little honesty some time.
I actually looked it up myself, I just wanted to see if RWNJ would ever bother to provide evidence for his claim.
I oppose the law; the idea that jail time is even possible for not using the gender pronoun of someone else's choice is ludicrous to me, even if it is never enforced that way.
Are blacks and whites equal or not?
You obviously don't understand the concept of a hate crime. If the white beat the black guy while shouting the N word it is a hate crime ON TOP OF ASSAULT because it is intended to intimidate all black people. OF course killing someone is more serious but your using a false equivalency type of logical fallacy here.The term "hate" crime is really fucking dumb. Would a white guy beating a black guy be more of a hate crime than a white guy killing his wife cause she nagged him too much? Which one is more hateful? IMO, the second one.
Again, you don't get it. It's about motive which adds another dimension to the crime. And if it were a black guy running over white people I would say the same thingOr, let's say a white guy runs over a bunch of black people in his car. Is that any worse than him running a bunch of white people over? If we're all equal as humans then the only answer is no because it's still people being run over, so why punish it differently? Are blacks and whites equal or not? Pick a lane.
Bovine excrement. It was an attempt to force the media to present all points of view. It was to apply equally to left leaning mediaA good example is the ironically named "fairness doctrine" where radical democrats tried to enact legislation that would force right wing talk radio to give out left wing propaganda. It doesn't work the other way around.
More bovine excrement. How the fuck can you make such a gross generalization about how " the left sees it"?? We are not all the same. I for one would consider it a hate crime.A person I know had the unfortunate fate of walking into a "black" bar while being white. He was beaten up while showered with racial slurs and hate.
The left doesn't see that as a hate crime, because there is no way to convert that into stealing the taxpayer's money, which is all the left really cares about....
. I for one would consider it a hate crime.
That is just as fucking stupid as stupid gets. YOU don't know me, and if you think that you do you're an imbecile. I for one would consider it a hate crime.
You say that, but you lie a lot, and if you were with all your leftist pals, you'd side with them that "hating whitey" is "progressive."
That is just as fucking stupid as stupid gets. YOU don't know me, and if you think that you do you're an imbecile
That is just as fucking stupid as stupid gets. YOU don't know me, and if you think that you do you're an imbecile. I for one would consider it a hate crime.
You say that, but you lie a lot, and if you were with all your leftist pals, you'd side with them that "hating whitey" is "progressive."
Progressive pile of crap said..."That is just as fucking stupid as stupid gets. YOU don't know me, and if you think that you do you're an imbecile"
We don't need to know you. Don't want to. But your own words condemn you. Sucks to be you. Oh dear. That was hateful, wasn't it? Ask me if I care. LOLOL!!
Progressive pile of crap said..."That is just as fucking stupid as stupid gets. YOU don't know me, and if you think that you do you're an imbecile"
I forgot who posted it, but someone posted a brilliant essay on how progressive liberals are able to believe two contradictory things at the same time. It was pretty interesting.Progressive pile of crap said..."That is just as fucking stupid as stupid gets. YOU don't know me, and if you think that you do you're an imbecile"
Yes. He didn't know you. Yet from that position he forms an opinion about you & then uses that to justify verbally assaulting you just for having an opinion. But somehow "that isn't hate speech or prejudice".
you can't make this stuff up.
I forgot who posted it, but someone posted a brilliant essay on how progressive liberals are able to believe two contradictory things at the same time. It was pretty interesting.
Progressive pile of crap said..."That is just as fucking stupid as stupid gets. YOU don't know me, and if you think that you do you're an imbecile"
Yes. He didn't know you. Yet from that position he forms an opinion about you & then uses that to justify verbally assaulting you just for having an opinion. But somehow "that isn't hate speech or prejudice".
you can't make this stuff up.
YOU are the minority, not them, idiot.....I do not need their protection but minorities do.Come now, Children. A "hate crime" is a crime that is motivated by animus toward a group that is "protected" under U.S. law, because of gender, race, ethnicity, or religion. In many states, sexual orientation is also protected, as well as "gender identity," and other gender/sex-related conditions.
The insidious factor in the creation of Hate Crimes is that it opens up the possibility (and even likelihood) that if the Feds don't like the outcome of a state prosecution for the underlying crime - say, an aggravated assault - then the Feds can come in and prosecute the VERY SAME ACT under a Civil Rights statute, as a "hate crime."
And they tell us that this is not Constitutionally-prohibited double-jeopardy.
Heterosexual white males don't like "hate crime" laws because they are the only ones who are not "protected."