Nearly 1000 Record Low Temperatures Set

[Wildman]

Why do you think that the physics of GHGs is any differant for those made by man, and those created by geological events? Are you truly so stupid that you think that nature differentiates on the basis of manmade and nature created?

Because man adds like .00000000001% to it.

Are you purposely lying, or are you just that fucking stupid? Man has raised the CO2 level to 400 ppm from 280 ppm, it has not been that high for several million years. We have raised the CH4 from 700 ppb to over 1800 ppb. On the decade level, CH4 is over 100 times as effective of a GHG as CO2.

are you purposely lying, or are you just that fucking stupid? who were the people who were keeping those records "several million years" ago, you liberals are very prone to saying/typing some of the most stupid shit i have ever heard/read any where on this Earth.

 

[Old Rocks]

​

The Earth will decide what temperature she wants, when she wants, and how she wants. This has been the case for 4 billion years. Why do some think something man-made in the last 50 years can change that?

Why do you think that the physics of GHGs is any differant for those made by man, and those created by geological events? Are you truly so stupid that you think that nature differentiates on the basis of manmade and nature created?

Speaking of stupidity, how about the so called thought leaders who were not finding scientific correlation in their data to support their hypothesis so they skewed/manipulated the data to support their cause to keep people like you perpetuating a hypothesis as absolute scientific fact?

So, what you are saying is that virtually all of the scientists on this planet are in on a conspiracy to create fraudulent data to support the hypothesis of global warming? For there is not one scientific society on earth, not even in Outer Slobovia, that disputes that the warming is a fact, and a clear and present danger. Nor one National Acedemy of Sciences of any nation. Nor one major University.

And many here are providing on a daily basis articles from peer reviewed journals showing evidence of the warming and the dangers that it is creating, while all you guys provide is unsupported flap-yap and spews from frauds like Monkton.

 

[Old Rocks]

Because man adds like .00000000001% to it.

Are you purposely lying, or are you just that fucking stupid? Man has raised the CO2 level to 400 ppm from 280 ppm, it has not been that high for several million years. We have raised the CH4 from 700 ppb to over 1800 ppb. On the decade level, CH4 is over 100 times as effective of a GHG as CO2.

are you purposely lying, or are you just that fucking stupid? who were the people who were keeping those records "several million years" ago, you liberals are very prone to saying/typing some of the most stupid shit i have ever heard/read any where on this Earth.

Well, one would not expect an ignoramous like you to be aware of proxies that geologists routinely use to determine many facts concerning past times.

http://www.awi.de/index.php?id=1731&type=123&filename=awi.pdf

AOL Search

Paleoclimates

Now, of course, you will not even look at any of this. It might damage your willfull ignorance. But there is a lot of information just in those three sites, and even more in sites on USGS and NOAA pages. With a computer in the home, there is no reason for anyone to be bone ignorant.

 

[Old Rocks]

Because man adds like .00000000001% to it.

Are you purposely lying, or are you just that fucking stupid? Man has raised the CO2 level to 400 ppm from 280 ppm, it has not been that high for several million years. We have raised the CH4 from 700 ppb to over 1800 ppb. On the decade level, CH4 is over 100 times as effective of a GHG as CO2.

are you purposely lying, or are you just that fucking stupid? who were the people who were keeping those records "several million years" ago, you liberals are very prone to saying/typing some of the most stupid shit i have ever heard/read any where on this Earth.

See the above, dumb ass. Guess you were born in a barn and kept there. Ever finish the third grade?

 

[skookerasbil]

The whole extreme weather stuff has been 100% debunked.


The Fantasy of Extreme Weather | Behind The Black



It is simply one of the latest bomb throwing ruse's amped up by the climate OCD's........following all the other crap like drought, snow, hurricanes etc........all of which were BS bomb throwing attempts that got blown to shit.

 

[flacaltenn]

Are you purposely lying, or are you just that fucking stupid? Man has raised the CO2 level to 400 ppm from 280 ppm, it has not been that high for several million years. We have raised the CH4 from 700 ppb to over 1800 ppb. On the decade level, CH4 is over 100 times as effective of a GHG as CO2.

are you purposely lying, or are you just that fucking stupid? who were the people who were keeping those records "several million years" ago, you liberals are very prone to saying/typing some of the most stupid shit i have ever heard/read any where on this Earth.

Well, one would not expect an ignoramous like you to be aware of proxies that geologists routinely use to determine many facts concerning past times.

http://www.awi.de/index.php?id=1731&type=123&filename=awi.pdf

AOL Search

Paleoclimates

Now, of course, you will not even look at any of this. It might damage your willfull ignorance. But there is a lot of information just in those three sites, and even more in sites on USGS and NOAA pages. With a computer in the home, there is no reason for anyone to be bone ignorant.

I've got 30 paleo studies that say it was warmer during the Med. Warm Period.. Those studies were NEVER MEANT to be combined to form a GLOBAL avg temp for 1300 BC. But yet --- your clowns are attempting to do that over and over again.. And they continue to get caught fabricating a faulty conclusion.. Claims are REPEATEDLY made that we know the Global Avg temp not only for 1300BC but for 1301 and 1340 and 1350 BC --- thus we can determine the RATE of the ancient warmings and coolings. NONE of that is indicated in the proxy science..

Divining temps from tree rings in Scandiv. and mudbug borrows in the Congo do NOT result in a GLOBAL AVG estimate with the TIME RESOLUTION or ACCURACY needed to make your case.. A large fraction of Climate Scientists also doubt the claims being made from Paleo proxy studies of temperature.. ESPECIALLY to try and create a Global average to compare to the modern era Global warming..

You should know this.. But your BELIEFS override your scientific rigor and discipline..

 

[Kosh]

Why do you think that the physics of GHGs is any differant for those made by man, and those created by geological events? Are you truly so stupid that you think that nature differentiates on the basis of manmade and nature created?

Because man adds like .00000000001% to it.

Are you purposely lying, or are you just that fucking stupid? Man has raised the CO2 level to 400 ppm from 280 ppm, it has not been that high for several million years. We have raised the CH4 from 700 ppb to over 1800 ppb. On the decade level, CH4 is over 100 times as effective of a GHG as CO2.

Note the AGW propaganda has worked on this one.

CO2 does not drive climate, never has.

AGW is a money maker and as long as these scientists can afford their Bently's on the backs of using propaganda over real science they will continue to do so.

 

[Old Rocks]

are you purposely lying, or are you just that fucking stupid? who were the people who were keeping those records "several million years" ago, you liberals are very prone to saying/typing some of the most stupid shit i have ever heard/read any where on this Earth.

Well, one would not expect an ignoramous like you to be aware of proxies that geologists routinely use to determine many facts concerning past times.

http://www.awi.de/index.php?id=1731&type=123&filename=awi.pdf

AOL Search

Paleoclimates

Now, of course, you will not even look at any of this. It might damage your willfull ignorance. But there is a lot of information just in those three sites, and even more in sites on USGS and NOAA pages. With a computer in the home, there is no reason for anyone to be bone ignorant.

I've got 30 paleo studies that say it was warmer during the Med. Warm Period.. Those studies were NEVER MEANT to be combined to form a GLOBAL avg temp for 1300 BC. But yet --- your clowns are attempting to do that over and over again.. And they continue to get caught fabricating a faulty conclusion.. Claims are REPEATEDLY made that we know the Global Avg temp not only for 1300BC but for 1301 and 1340 and 1350 BC --- thus we can determine the RATE of the ancient warmings and coolings. NONE of that is indicated in the proxy science..

Divining temps from tree rings in Scandiv. and mudbug borrows in the Congo do NOT result in a GLOBAL AVG estimate with the TIME RESOLUTION or ACCURACY needed to make your case.. A large fraction of Climate Scientists also doubt the claims being made from Paleo proxy studies of temperature.. ESPECIALLY to try and create a Global average to compare to the modern era Global warming..

You should know this.. But your BELIEFS override your scientific rigor and discipline..

Really???????????????? But you are to shy to post them?

Proxy-based reconstructions of hemispheric and global surface temperature variations over the past two millennia

From the US National Academy of Science.

 

[Old Rocks]

Because man adds like .00000000001% to it.

Are you purposely lying, or are you just that fucking stupid? Man has raised the CO2 level to 400 ppm from 280 ppm, it has not been that high for several million years. We have raised the CH4 from 700 ppb to over 1800 ppb. On the decade level, CH4 is over 100 times as effective of a GHG as CO2.

Note the AGW propaganda has worked on this one.

CO2 does not drive climate, never has.

AGW is a money maker and as long as these scientists can afford their Bently's on the backs of using propaganda over real science they will continue to do so.

Gotta love the stupid asses that flap-yap this kind of stupid shit.

 

[Zona]

The Earth will decide what temperature she wants, when she wants, and how she wants. This has been the case for 4 billion years. Why do some think something man-made in the last 50 years can change that?

Because we can now fly to the stars. Because we can do so many things we couldn't do over the last million years. You know, like have so many cars on the road at the same time now spewing shit into the air.

100 years ago, not so much.

Technology, ain't it great...How many animals are now extinct now but flourished 100 years ago?

 

[manonfire]

Yet who states that changing is bad? the tundra of Canada becomes a viable option for agriculture.

 

[skookerasbil]

I always crack up when I post this gem up >>>>


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBO2IstMi2A]CO2 is a trace gas. - YouTube[/ame]



It really does serve to illustrate the level of nut in the AGW folks.




But this whole debate is nothing but internet chatter..........hobby stuff. Nobody cares. Been going on for at least 2 decades and is having zero impact in the real world.

 

[Old Rocks]

OK. Only 400 ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere. How can that possibly do us any harm?

Say you weigh 200 lbs. That's about 90,000 grams. So, with a ratio of 1/90,000, a gram of potassium cyanide cannot possibly harm you. That is the logic of this kind of silly reasoning.

 

[Old Rocks]

Yet who states that changing is bad? the tundra of Canada becomes a viable option for agriculture.

Interesting. And what do we do in between the time that the present farmlands are unproductive and the tundra is drying out? Also, how do you propose to divide Canada's tundra among the American farmers that have lost their farmland? What about the people in Bangladesh who's farmland with be under salt water?

You silly asses repeat the damndest, dumbest idiocies. Really shows a contemptable lack of thought.

 

[RollingThunder]

Nearly 1000 Record Low Temperatures Set As Another Round of Arctic Air Forecast To Deep Freeze The U.S.

Now remember folks this is weather not climate change.

Much like hot temperature can be used to indicate climate change.

Much like a series of tornado could be used to indicate climate change.

Much like melting glacier can be used used to indicate climate change.

It should be obvious that cold temperature are nothing but weather and indicate nothing. But warm temperatures are a sure indication of CC.

What an incredibly idiotic OP. You dimwitted denier cult dingbats are sooooo ignorant and gullible. Some denier cult blogger trumpets the fact that there have a thousand record cold temperatures recorded recently as a fierce winter storm sweeps across the country but, since this is propaganda and not science reporting, he ignores the context that gives meaning to that statistic and deceives you gullible denier cultists into thinking that new record cold temperatures somehow refute AGW. LOL.

In fact, it is the ratio of record setting hot days to record setting cold days over the course of a year or a decade that is significant. That ratio has been shifting steadily towards more record hot days and nights than record cold days and nights over the last four decades. A study done several years ago found that the ratio had shifted from 1:1, as it would be if there were no global warming and no rising temperature trend, to more than 2:1 more record hot days than record cold days.

Last year, 2012, was the hottest year on record in the USA, with most of the country suffering through brutal heat waves, and over the course of the year, 34,008 new record highs were set, compared to only 6664 record lows. A study published in September of 2012 found that thus far at that point in 2012:
25 states had high to low-temperature record ratios of 10:1 or greater. Fourteen had a ratio of greater than 20:1, three states had greater than a 40:1 ratio, and none had less than a 1:1 ratio. Ohio topped the list with 49 high-temperature records for every record low. Nationally, through August 31, record highs were outpacing record lows by a 7 to 1 margin.

(source)

The shifting odds in favor of more daily record high temperatures being set compared to daily record low temperatures. Credit: Climate Central.
(source)

 

[flacaltenn]

Nearly 1000 Record Low Temperatures Set As Another Round of Arctic Air Forecast To Deep Freeze The U.S.

Now remember folks this is weather not climate change.

Much like hot temperature can be used to indicate climate change.

Much like a series of tornado could be used to indicate climate change.

Much like melting glacier can be used used to indicate climate change.

It should be obvious that cold temperature are nothing but weather and indicate nothing. But warm temperatures are a sure indication of CC.

What an incredibly idiotic OP. You dimwitted denier cult dingbats are sooooo ignorant and gullible. Some denier cult blogger trumpets the fact that there have a thousand record cold temperatures recorded recently as a fierce winter storm sweeps across the country but, since this is propaganda and not science reporting, he ignores the context that gives meaning to that statistic and deceives you gullible denier cultists into thinking that new record cold temperatures somehow refute AGW. LOL.

In fact, it is the ratio of record setting hot days to record setting cold days over the course of a year or a decade that is significant. That ratio has been shifting steadily towards more record hot days and nights than record cold days and nights over the last four decades. A study done several years ago found that the ratio had shifted from 1:1, as it would be if there were no global warming and no rising temperature trend, to more than 2:1 more record hot days than record cold days.

Last year, 2012, was the hottest year on record in the USA, with most of the country suffering through brutal heat waves, and over the course of the year, 34,008 new record highs were set, compared to only 6664 record lows. A study published in September of 2012 found that thus far at that point in 2012:
25 states had high to low-temperature record ratios of 10:1 or greater. Fourteen had a ratio of greater than 20:1, three states had greater than a 40:1 ratio, and none had less than a 1:1 ratio. Ohio topped the list with 49 high-temperature records for every record low. Nationally, through August 31, record highs were outpacing record lows by a 7 to 1 margin.

(source)

The shifting odds in favor of more daily record high temperatures being set compared to daily record low temperatures. Credit: Climate Central.
(source)

That's strange because the news at Climatecentral.org in 2013 is very different..

For First Time in 20 Years, Cold Records May Beat Warm | Climate Central

 

[RollingThunder]

That's strange because the news at Climatecentral.org in 2013 is very different..

For First Time in 20 Years, Cold Records May Beat Warm | Climate Central

LOLOLOL.....amazing how you can ignore everything you don't want to see, fecalhead. How do you manage to rationalize the phrase "For First Time in 20 Years" in your denier cult fantasyland?

Let's look at some of the things in the article you cited that you hope we'll all ignore.

For First Time in 20 Years, Cold Records May Beat Warm
December 2nd, 2013
By Andrew Freedman
(excerpts)

With a large chunk of the U.S. having endured one of the coldest Thanksgiving holidays in years and even more brutally cold weather in the forecast over the next few days, 2013 is poised to have daily record lows outnumber daily record highs for the first time in 20 years. That’s a stark reversal from last year — the warmest year on record in the U.S. — when record daily highs dwarfed record lows by a staggering 4-to-1 ratio. It’s also a stark reminder of the vagaries of short-term natural variability set against the backdrop of long-term global warming. While 2013 is unusual in the context of the past two decades, periods of relatively cold weather — including Arctic outbreaks — are still to be expected in a warming world, studies show.

According to statistics from the National Climatic Data Center, the U.S. had 9,023 daily record high temperatures through Dec. 1, compared to 9,932 daily record lows. About 1,000 cold temperature records were set or tied during the last week alone. Meanwhile, last year at this time, that ratio stood at about 5-to-1 in favor of record daily highs, with 32,232 record daily highs through Dec. 1, 2012, compared to just 6,234 record daily lows during that same period. Even with the cold snap in the U.S., the world has continued to see above-average temperatures overall, with 2013 expected to wind up among the top 10 warmest on record. The last month to have global average surface temperatures below the 20th century average occurred in February of 1985.

So, last year saw a four to one ratio of record highs to record lows, with approximately 32,000 highs compared to only 6200 lows. This year, because the unstable jet stream has driven so much Arctic air farther south, the record cold days, JUST HERE IN THE USA, NOT THE REST OF THE WORLD, are back to an almost 1:1 ratio, with 9932 record lows compared to only 9023 record highs. If this change continued for ten years or so, or was happening worldwide, it would be significant, but it won't and it isn't. We have many more heat waves in our future.

 

[flacaltenn]

Knock yourself out Tinkerbelle. It makes no difference. There is NO runaway planetary emergency apparent. You can safely come out of your Dad's basement and dance with the forest fairies..

 

[RollingThunder]

Knock yourself out Tinkerbelle. It makes no difference. There is NO runaway planetary emergency apparent. You can safely come out of your Dad's basement and dance with the forest fairies..

Actually, little fecalhead, there is a very real and very serious ongoing planetary emergency that is quite apparent to a majority of the population and to virtually the entire world scientific community. Only brainwashed retards and dupes like yourself and those with a vested interest in the profits from the sales of fossil fuels are able to pretend that there is no climate change crisis happening.

 

[skookerasbil]

Knock yourself out Tinkerbelle. It makes no difference. There is NO runaway planetary emergency apparent. You can safely come out of your Dad's basement and dance with the forest fairies..

Actually, little fecalhead, there is a very real and very serious ongoing planetary emergency that is quite apparent to a majority of the population and to virtually the entire world scientific community. Only brainwashed retards and dupes like yourself and those with a vested interest in the profits from the sales of fossil fuels are able to pretend that there is no climate change crisis happening.

same tired crap s0n......but the landscape doesn't change for guys who think like you!!!


Go take a gander through the thread "PROOF THE SKEPTICS ARE WINNING".......almost 100 pages of pwn. ......and while all the BS AGW bomb throwing threads go away, THAT one exists perpetually on this forum and always will!!! Always at or near the top of the page while all these other meathead threads fall into the internet netherworld.


Nobody thinks there is a climate change crisis s0n.