Nearly 1000 Record Low Temperatures Set

[Freewill]

Nearly 1000 Record Low Temperatures Set As Another Round of Arctic Air Forecast To Deep Freeze The U.S.

Now remember folks this is weather not climate change.

Much like hot temperature can be used to indicate climate change.

Much like a series of tornado could be used to indicate climate change.

Much like melting glacier can be used used to indicate climate change.

It should be obvious that cold temperature are nothing but weather and indicate nothing. But warm temperatures are a sure indication of CC.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Some tool boasted that there's been 1200 record highs and that he bet I didn't know that.

Well it was June and I reminded him there's only 365 days in a year.

It went over his head.

Leftist can't think, they just can't

 

[LeftofLeft]

The Earth will decide what temperature she wants, when she wants, and how she wants. This has been the case for 4 billion years. Why do some think something man-made in the last 50 years can change that?

 

[Old Rocks]

http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_October_2013_v5.6.png

 

[Old Rocks]

The Earth will decide what temperature she wants, when she wants, and how she wants. This has been the case for 4 billion years. Why do some think something man-made in the last 50 years can change that?

Why do you think that the physics of GHGs is any differant for those made by man, and those created by geological events? Are you truly so stupid that you think that nature differentiates on the basis of manmade and nature created?

 

[Avorysuds]

The Earth will decide what temperature she wants, when she wants, and how she wants. This has been the case for 4 billion years. Why do some think something man-made in the last 50 years can change that?

Why do you think that the physics of GHGs is any differant for those made by man, and those created by geological events? Are you truly so stupid that you think that nature differentiates on the basis of manmade and nature created?

Because man adds like .00000000001% to it.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The Earth will decide what temperature she wants, when she wants, and how she wants. This has been the case for 4 billion years. Why do some think something man-made in the last 50 years can change that?

Why do you think that the physics of GHGs is any differant for those made by man, and those created by geological events? Are you truly so stupid that you think that nature differentiates on the basis of manmade and nature created?

CO2 follows rising temperatures not the other way round. We keep asking you to provide evidence via an experiment that what you claim happens.

 

[Old Rocks]

The Earth will decide what temperature she wants, when she wants, and how she wants. This has been the case for 4 billion years. Why do some think something man-made in the last 50 years can change that?

Why do you think that the physics of GHGs is any differant for those made by man, and those created by geological events? Are you truly so stupid that you think that nature differentiates on the basis of manmade and nature created?

Because man adds like .00000000001% to it.

Are you purposely lying, or are you just that fucking stupid? Man has raised the CO2 level to 400 ppm from 280 ppm, it has not been that high for several million years. We have raised the CH4 from 700 ppb to over 1800 ppb. On the decade level, CH4 is over 100 times as effective of a GHG as CO2.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Why do you think that the physics of GHGs is any differant for those made by man, and those created by geological events? Are you truly so stupid that you think that nature differentiates on the basis of manmade and nature created?

Because man adds like .00000000001% to it.

Are you purposely lying, or are you just that fucking stupid? Man has raised the CO2 level to 400 ppm from 280 ppm, it has not been that high for several million years. We have raised the CH4 from 700 ppb to over 1800 ppb. On the decade level, CH4 is over 100 times as effective of a GHG as CO2.

Then science will have no problem creating an experiment that proves your contention, one that can be repeated.

 

[OODA_Loop]

"The debate is over the earth has fever" - Al Gore

 

[Old Rocks]

The Earth will decide what temperature she wants, when she wants, and how she wants. This has been the case for 4 billion years. Why do some think something man-made in the last 50 years can change that?

Why do you think that the physics of GHGs is any differant for those made by man, and those created by geological events? Are you truly so stupid that you think that nature differentiates on the basis of manmade and nature created?

CO2 follows rising temperatures not the other way round. We keep asking you to provide evidence via an experiment that what you claim happens.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeYfl45X1wo]CO2 experiment - YouTube[/ame]

How do we know more CO2 is causing warming?

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

http://www.pcc.edu/about/events/sustainability-training/documents/co2-aquariums-greenhouse.pdf

http://www.starhop.com/library/pdf/studyguide/elementary/GloJar-7.pdf

The Creative Science Centre - by Dr Jonathan P. Hare

 

[RetiredGySgt]

None of them prove the point and you know it. Why is it science can not create an experiment that conclusively proves the point and one that can be repeated.

 

[Freewill]

Why do you think that the physics of GHGs is any differant for those made by man, and those created by geological events? Are you truly so stupid that you think that nature differentiates on the basis of manmade and nature created?

CO2 follows rising temperatures not the other way round. We keep asking you to provide evidence via an experiment that what you claim happens.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeYfl45X1wo]CO2 experiment - YouTube[/ame]

How do we know more CO2 is causing warming?

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

http://www.pcc.edu/about/events/sustainability-training/documents/co2-aquariums-greenhouse.pdf

http://www.starhop.com/library/pdf/studyguide/elementary/GloJar-7.pdf

The Creative Science Centre - by Dr Jonathan P. Hare

Sorry, didn't listen to the whole video, but did the scientist realize that heat and visible light are two different things?

 

[Freewill]

The question I have never heard an answer to, what temperature, other then colder, should be the Earth's Temperature?

 

[Old Rocks]

For the last 10,000 years, the earth's temperature has been in a very small range. A rapid departure from that range in either direction, with 7 billion humans depending on agriculture, will spell disaster.

Eco-Economy Indicators - Grain Harvest | EPI

The world produced 2,241 million tons of grain in 2012, down 75 million tons or 3 percent from the 2011 record harvest. The drop was largely because of droughts that devastated several major crops—namely corn in the United States (the world’s largest crop) and wheat in Russia, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, and Australia. Each of these countries also is an important exporter. Global grain consumption fell significantly for the first time since 1995, as high prices dampened use for ethanol production and livestock feed. Still, overall consumption did exceed production. With drought persisting in key producing regions, there is concern that farmers in 2013 will again be unable to produce the surpluses necessary to rebuild lowered global grain reserves.

 

[Old Rocks]

NASA - More Extreme Weather Events Forecast
Among the key findings of the National Climate Assessment:
LINKS:

› National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee (NCADAC) Draft Report

› United States Global Change Research Program

› Extreme Weather Map

› VIMS calls for flexible, multi-step approach to deal with flood risk
(Includes link to VIMS "Recurrent Flooding Study for Tidewater Virginia" report)

› SE Va. Sea-Level-Rise Scenarios (VIMS)

The U.S. average temperature has increased by about 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit since 1895, with more than 80 percent of the increase occurring since 1980.
Extreme weather and climate events have risen in recent decades, with "new and stronger evidence" that many of these increases are related to human activities.
Climate change impacts already are evident and expected to become "increasingly challenging" across the U.S. through this century and beyond.
Climate change threatens human physical and mental health in many ways due to rising extreme weather events, wildfires, degrading air quality, disease transmitted by insects, food and water.
Wielicki noted that coastal areas are particularly vulnerable because of rising sea levels. Yet, the coastal population is increasing by 1,000,000 people per year. Many of these areas have key infrastructure such as ports, military bases, power plants and tourism.

 

[Old Rocks]

USGS Release: USGS Details Effects of Climate Change on Water Availability in 14 Local Basins Nationwide (5/16/2012 6:00:00 AM)

Climate change projections indicate a steady increase in temperature progressing through the 21st century, generally resulting in snowpack reductions, changes to the timing of snowmelt, altered streamflows, and reductions in soil moisture, all of which could affect water management, agriculture, recreation, hazard mitigation, and ecosystems across the nation. Despite some widespread similarities in climate change trends, climate change will affect specific water basins in the U.S. differently, based on the particular hydrologic and geologic conditions in that area.

New USGS modeling studies project changes in water availability due to climate change at the local level. So far, the USGS has applied these models to fourteen basins, including:

 

[Old Rocks]

You guys post ignorant flap yap. How about some real science to back up your opinion?

 

[LoneLaugher]

You guys post ignorant flap yap. How about some real science to back up your opinion?

The argument denying man's impact on the climate is rooted in identity politics.

 

[LeftofLeft]

​

The Earth will decide what temperature she wants, when she wants, and how she wants. This has been the case for 4 billion years. Why do some think something man-made in the last 50 years can change that?

Why do you think that the physics of GHGs is any differant for those made by man, and those created by geological events? Are you truly so stupid that you think that nature differentiates on the basis of manmade and nature created?

Speaking of stupidity, how about the so called thought leaders who were not finding scientific correlation in their data to support their hypothesis so they skewed/manipulated the data to support their cause to keep people like you perpetuating a hypothesis as absolute scientific fact?