Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"If what has been reported in the papers is accurate -.
Based on a source who says what is being reported is NOT what he said / saw and aside from the fact that the National Security Advisor has declared what s being reported is false....
.
You are not paying attention to the law! The SOS is not authorized to de classify documents. As a matter of fact it's her job to classify all incoming documents to her office.The president is authorized by office as able to de classify information. Hillary was not!I saw a huff headline a bit ago that said it was done to Hillary. Bet they probably failed to mention what she actually did do. Here it is. And their justification for making like hell for Trump.
This Is How Republicans Treated Hillary Clinton When She Was Accused Of Mishandling Sensitive Information | HuffPost
You are not paying attention to what Trump and the Republicans said- they didn't claim Hillary wasn't authorized- they claimed she was 'reckless'
View attachment 126929
View attachment 126930
If what has been reported in the papers is accurate- what Trump did was completely legal and reckless- and careless- and potentially harmed our Intelligence gathering capability.
All this leaking of information for the purpose of embarrassing Trump and his administration has got to stop. Those who release information without authority to do so are betraying a trust with their unethical behavior if not outright breaking the law if anything that is classified or sensitive is made public. Certainly there are things we should be told, but also things we shouldn't. And it is not for anyone to make that decision and take that action who is not authorized to make that call.
. The New York Times and other outlets revealed Tuesday that the source of the intelligence about the laptop explosives was Israel—and it was considered so sensitive that the Trump administration was instructed not to share it even with close allies like Canada and England, much less Russia
.
“We need to have immediate classified briefings on what occurred at this meeting so that Congress can at least know as much as Russian leaders,” Rep. Barbara Comstock (R-VA) said Tuesday.
Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-WI), a former military intelligence officer, also demanded “a thorough account of the President’s meeting with Russian officials,” including “a transcript of the meeting.”
task0778 post: 17267877All this leaking of information for the purpose of embarrassing Trump and his administration has got to stop. Those who release information without authority to do so are betraying a trust with their unethical behavior if not outright breaking the law if anything that is classified or sensitive is made public. Certainly there are things we should be told, but also things we shouldn't. And it is not for anyone to make that decision and take that action who is not authorized to make that call.
You need to tell Trump loyalists to stop leaking. It's the only way to stop the Buffoon. He was efn bragging about how cool it was to have this Intel. Israel did not want Canada or England to know, let alone Russia.
Coulter's about done with the pony humping clown. When will the rest of the deplorables give the lying idiot up?
Read this and weep for our great country:
. The New York Times and other outlets revealed Tuesday that the source of the intelligence about the laptop explosives was Israel—and it was considered so sensitive that the Trump administration was instructed not to share it even with close allies like Canada and England, much less Russia
It's Republicans condemning Trump.
.
“We need to have immediate classified briefings on what occurred at this meeting so that Congress can at least know as much as Russian leaders,” Rep. Barbara Comstock (R-VA) said Tuesday.
Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-WI), a former military intelligence officer, also demanded “a thorough account of the President’s meeting with Russian officials,” including “a transcript of the meeting.”
Congressional GOP: Trump Told The Russians More Than He Told Us
The leaks are from patriots who support Trump but can't take his clown act seriously anymore. They want to beat some sense into the buffoon.
Lots of luck with that.
What I find strange is that most Trump voters voted for Trump as the least evil.
You really think the leaks are coming from Trump loyalists? Amazing. I'd bet my last dollar these leaks are coming from lib/dem Obama loyalists instead.
You really think the leaks are coming from Trump loyalists? Amazing. I'd bet my last dollar these leaks are coming from lib/dem Obama loyalists instead.
Take it up with your right wing Trump loyalist pundit who knows and is defending the leaker.
"Conservative pundit Erick Erickson is vouching for the reliability of a least one source who revealed to Washington Post reporters that President Donald Trump disclosed “highly classified information” while meeting with Russian officials last week.
Erickson knows one of the sources and supports their decision to go to the media, he wrote Tuesday in a blog post for his website, The Resurgent."
Erick Erickson: Trump's Russia Leak Is 'Far Worse' Than Reported | HuffPost
Read it. And denounce Erickson.
You are defending a buffoon. You will have to stop at some point.
his guy is about as conservative as Olberman is. Really dude? Some clown from the HuffPo writes some shit and you accept it as gospel? Amazing.
You really think the leaks are coming from Trump loyalists? Amazing. I'd bet my last dollar these leaks are coming from lib/dem Obama loyalists instead.
I still tend to believe eye witnesses who go public over anonymous sources who don't.So HE'S lying, but "anonymous sources" are not?"National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster on Tuesday adamantly defended President Trump’s conversations with Russian officials as “wholly appropriate,”
What a shock.
The National Security Advisor supports the President.
I bet Michael Flynn will too.
I didn't say that McMaster was lying- I am saying he was being a supportive adminstration official who carefully parsed his words.
Remember just in the last week we have had repeated examples of White House officials defending something Trump has done- only to have Trump contradict them the next day.
Poor Pence has repeatedly had that happen.
I still tend to believe eye witnesses who go public over anonymous sources who don't.
Trump is not the eyewitness I'm talking about.hadit, post: 17272317I still tend to believe eye witnesses who go public over anonymous sources who don't.
Your Buffoon makes it impossible to do that. If you don't see the wrong that your buffoon did then you are for your tribe over nation. We've had it with the buffoonish kleptocrat's people. You are blind.
You have to lo9ve the wiki praising morons when they talked about Democrats & now think leakers are bad under El Dumbster.All this leaking of information for the purpose of embarrassing Trump and his administration has got to stop. Those who release information without authority to do so are betraying a trust with their unethical behavior if not outright breaking the law if anything that is classified or sensitive is made public. Certainly there are things we should be told, but also things we shouldn't. And it is not for anyone to make that decision and take that action who is not authorized to make that call.
And the anonymous sources who refuse to go public don't support him. Shocking, isn't it? If they want to be taken seriously, they should go public and let their veracity be judged.Yes, the NSA that Trump just named, defends him. Shocking.
You fucking losers had a freaking fit about Hillary's e-mails even after no properly marked classified mails were found. Then defend the dumbasss who blurts out top secret stuff to the Russians.
You are pissed, I know it,. You know it. So really, when are you asshats going to admit what a disaster you elected President.
