- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #481
Skull, the law can be written to hold a person criminally liable if his stolen gun is used in a crime, and already civil liability can be filed against someone for negligence in such cases. Also the false comparison of equivalency of guns and other tools falls apart every single time.
Hadit is wrong when he says gun collectors and target shooters do not kill others with their guns. Look at the Las Vegas shooter.
2aguy, bless you. Of course the legislature can require guns to be insured, which is not in violation of the Constitution. Only the mentally unbalanced think so, or those who are paid to blog for the NRA.
Ghook93 apparently just woke up and was not thinking clearly.
9thIDdoc clearly does not understand that the 2dA cannot prevent the LEO and military from taking over the country if they so want to.
Humorme does not understand what ‘confiscation’ means. Show me in the supposedly proposed bill that all semi-automatic weapons will be confiscated.
Hadit is wrong when he says gun collectors and target shooters do not kill others with their guns. Look at the Las Vegas shooter.
2aguy, bless you. Of course the legislature can require guns to be insured, which is not in violation of the Constitution. Only the mentally unbalanced think so, or those who are paid to blog for the NRA.
Ghook93 apparently just woke up and was not thinking clearly.
9thIDdoc clearly does not understand that the 2dA cannot prevent the LEO and military from taking over the country if they so want to.
Humorme does not understand what ‘confiscation’ means. Show me in the supposedly proposed bill that all semi-automatic weapons will be confiscated.