More Illegal activity by States in regards families

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by RetiredGySgt, Jan 14, 2009.

  1. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,590
    Thanks Received:
    5,908
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,017
    Just watched a news clip that stated the children that had those Nazi names were removed from their home. The report STATED that NO charges had been made of child abuse. And that the State would not say why the children were removed.
     
  2. brownlou
    Offline

    brownlou Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    64
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +10
    The Division of Youth and Family Services didn't comment publicly as to why the children were removed.
     
  3. doeton
    Offline

    doeton Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,213
    Thanks Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +65
    be nice if there was a link here...
     
  4. catzmeow
    Offline

    catzmeow BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    24,064
    Thanks Received:
    2,922
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Gunshine State
    Ratings:
    +2,974
    They usually don't, to protect the privacy of the children, unless abuse is substantiated. Sometimes, they have no choice, however.
     
  5. Ravi
    Offline

    Ravi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    81,432
    Thanks Received:
    12,698
    Trophy Points:
    2,205
    Location:
    Hating Hatters
    Ratings:
    +29,887
    On the surface this seems stupid. Though the one story I saw about it the cops claimed it had nothing to do with the kids' names.
     
  6. xsited1
    Offline

    xsited1 Agent P

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,750
    Thanks Received:
    5,300
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    Little Rock, AR
    Ratings:
    +5,307
    FOXNews.com - Young 'Adolf Hitler' and Two Sisters Removed From Home - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News

    A 3-year-old boy named Adolf Hitler and his two Nazi-named younger sisters were removed from their New Jersey home last week and placed in state custody, police said.

    Adolf Hitler Campbell and his sisters, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell, were taken from their Holland Township, N.J., home on Friday by the state's Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS), Sgt. John Harris of the Holland Township Police Department told FOXNews.com.
     
  7. Againsheila
    Offline

    Againsheila Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    17,126
    Thanks Received:
    2,554
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Federal Way WA
    Ratings:
    +2,700
    "I’ve dealt with the family for years and as far as the children are concerned, I have never had any reports of any abuse with the children," Harris said. "As far as I know, he’s always been very good with the children."


    Forensic psychologist N.G. Berrill said naming a boy Hitler could be considered child abuse.

    FOXNews.com - Young 'Adolf Hitler' and Two Sisters Removed From Home - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News
    <<<

    And there you have it, they removed 3 kids from their family because some forensic psychologist doesn't like the name they gave their son.

    They never should have complained about the birthday cake, no one would know, and their family would still be together. We really do live in a sick world.
     
  8. catzmeow
    Offline

    catzmeow BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    24,064
    Thanks Received:
    2,922
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Gunshine State
    Ratings:
    +2,974
    No offense, but you're jumping the gun here. IN fact, the DCFS spokesperson DID NOT COMMENT on why the kids were removed from the home, nor does it state that there were no allegations of abuse. This guy will get his day in court, in front of a judge, and given that child protective agencies these days have a family preservation mandate, it is unlikely that the children will be kept in protective custody unless there is a good reason.
     
  9. brownlou
    Offline

    brownlou Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    64
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +10
    If it had been a black family who living off government funds who named their kids Idi Amin and Momar Kadifi, no one would give a crap about it.
    It's reverse discrimination is all.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. catzmeow
    Offline

    catzmeow BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    24,064
    Thanks Received:
    2,922
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Gunshine State
    Ratings:
    +2,974
    Dude...you're talking out your brownlouass.
     

Share This Page