Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Thats not proof humans arent a factor in Global Warming
Thats not proof humans arent a factor in Global Warming
Thats not proof humans arent a factor in Global Warming
I'm trying but you keep forgetting to link to this information that I'm missing. Lets play a game...I provide evidence with a link, then you provide a rebuttal linking your information. Cool?
Aight...http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/pd/climate/factsheets/howhuman.pdf
Maybe you dont like that one so I'll throw in a bonus:
How are humans responsible for global warming? | Environmental Defense Fund
Your turn
But see, you have no proof that humans are. And see the burden is yours to prove it. Not me. I have enough historical data that tells me that AGW is BS. 1940 to 1970 and the last 17 years.
By no proof you mean the proof I just linked to? Twice?
Your turn...You got proof or nah?
So Global Warming science isnt real because Carbon Credits and stuff?
Forget the carbon credits I'm talking about the science and the earth and you're talking about money. I said I dont want to pay for other countries either but thats not a reason to calll Global Warming a scam
Never once did I state my standing on the issue. You just assumed that.
I know and I also notice you are doing everything in your power to avoid giving your opinion on it. I'm sure its because you dont have the time right?
Space bar just broke? Dog ate it?
no offense my friend but that is not an answer, well a good answer.
it is really not anymore complicated then that
the well connected use the ideological stooges
to their advantage it is repeated over and over
not just in global warming but in many areas
OK, let me put it this way, what do you feel is their ideology is motivating them? In other words do you think it is just about control? If you do then where are they trying to control the US? What good would it be to just tear down the fabric of America just for control?
Do you feel their ideology is their desire to move to a Euro-socialist type government? Even though there is none better in Europe? Why would they wish to do so?
it is really not anymore complicated then that
the well connected use the ideological stooges
to their advantage it is repeated over and over
not just in global warming but in many areas
OK, let me put it this way, what do you feel is their ideology is motivating them? In other words do you think it is just about control? If you do then where are they trying to control the US? What good would it be to just tear down the fabric of America just for control?
Do you feel their ideology is their desire to move to a Euro-socialist type government? Even though there is none better in Europe? Why would they wish to do so?
liberals believe that they know how we should live better than we do ourselves. They hate self determination because they cannot control it. If they can remotely control your thermostat in your home, dictate what car you drive and how many miles you are allowed, then they can achieve their goal of socialist collectivist domination.
Remember, liberals have a defective gene. Their agenda is not rational. Their thought processes are not rational.
You are trying to apply rational logical thought to a liberal agenda----that is impossible.
Total horseshit. We should be looking into all alternative forms of energy. No one, even the oil companies, has ever said otherwise.
But until we find something that will power our millions of cars, trucks, buses, trains, and planes, we need oil. This country has plenty of untapped oil, its foolish not to use it.
Who is suggesting we abandon all oil usage today?
not abandon, but curtail usage by driving up the prices. Obama has said that several times "your power bills will skyrocket". Do you think that skyrocketing energy prices would be good for our economy?
What is the utopian sea level?
What is the ideal global temperature?
How are more glacier more valuable to man then less?
What do you make out of no real warming since 1998?
A sea level that floods our ports is definately not utopian.
Granted. How much higher would they have to be for this to happen?
A global temperature driving climatic changes that negatively affect the agriculture that a world with 7 billion people on it is definately not utopian.
Granted, and what temperature would that occur? Warmer or colder?
As for you question concerning the glaciers, that is truly stupid.
What do you mean stupid? The more the glacier recedes the more land for man to use. I am not sure what is stupid about that. Obviously if the shrinking glaciers are brought up as a downside of GW/CC/CD then it is important to someone.
