More Evidence of Judge Chutkan's Over-The-Top Bias

[excalibur]

Every time you look you find more bias from judge Chutkan.

Evidence is overwhelming that she is over-the-top biased.

 

[The Duke]

Every time you look you find more bias from judge Chutkan.

Evidence is overwhelming that she is over-the-top biased.

Should recuse or be removed.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Should recuse or be removed.

Not gonna happen.

 

[Crepitus]

 

[Lord Long Rod]

Federal judges used to be top notch jurists. Not so any more.

 

[Thunk]

Remember the judge in the general mike flynn case?

The FBI drops all charges but the judge wouldn't dismiss the case.

President Trump gives Flynn a full pardon and the judge still would not let the case go.

A higher court ordered that judge to drop it...and he still wouldn't. So he opens the court to the public (amicus briefs) to see if anybody or their brother has anything against mike flynn.

Now THAT'S some democrat filth for ya!

 

[Rogue AI]

Chief Justice Roberts needs to get the judiciary in order. His legacy is turning into one giant embarrassment mired in misconduct, political bias, and outright incompetence.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Bias to the law, maybe.

 

[excalibur]

 

[excalibur]

 

[excalibur]

 

[pknopp]

I called everyone in Jeffrey Epstein's little black book.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Every time you look you find more bias from judge Chutkan.

Evidence is overwhelming that she is over-the-top biased.

So you are mad she won't move it to Trump Humper country.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

 

[Marener]

Remember the judge in the general mike flynn case?

Very well.

The FBI drops all charges but the judge wouldn't dismiss the case.

It was the DoJ that dropped charges after Billy Barr inserted his political cronies into the process. It was a bizarre decision by the DoJ who had already secured a guilty plea. The question remained whether the DoJ was acting properly when they did so.

President Trump gives Flynn a full pardon and the judge still would not let the case go.

That's not true at all.

Citing Trump’s Pardon, Judge Dismisses Case Against Michael Flynn (Published 2020)

A federal judge portrayed the Justice Department’s prior attempt to drop the case as unlikely to have met legal standards as legitimate.

www.nytimes.com

A higher court ordered that judge to drop it...and he still wouldn't. So he opens the court to the public (amicus briefs) to see if anybody or their brother has anything against mike flynn.

That's because the judge would have had the option to appeal the case en banc and getting amicus briefs to see if that was a good idea or not. That's the system we have.

Now THAT'S some democrat filth for ya!

The filth is the political cronyism that protects the president's buddies from the effects of violating the law.

 

[Thunk]

It was a bizarre decision by the DoJ who had already secured a guilty plea. The question remained whether the DoJ was acting properly when they did so.

Not much of a question when Flynns lawyers were acting on behalf of the crooked DOJ to obtain that plea. Which was discovered after he fired them.

 

[Thunk]

That's because the judge would have had the option to appeal

Why would an "impartial" judge ever wish to appeal a case?

 

[Marener]

Not much of a question when Flynns lawyers were acting on behalf of the crooked DOJ to obtain that plea. Which was discovered after he fired them.

Nope. Flynn's lawyers were working on behalf of Flynn. They had secured a deal that would keep Flynn out of jail entirely.

That's a good deal.

 

[Marener]

Why would an "impartial" judge ever wish to appeal a case?

Why wouldn't they?

 

[Lastamender]

71 Percent of Americans Say Trump Can't Get an Impartial Jury: Survey

A majority of Americans, more than seven in 10, don't think President Donald Trump can get an impartial jury in his ongoing legal battles according to a new survey about Americans' trust in the broader...

www.theepochtimes.com