More Americans want states to ignore federal courts

[BluesLegend]

I'm not ignoring Federal law...I'm supporting the dissenting SCOTUS justices who argued those decisions were not based in law OH SNAP!! Eat it libs.

 

[rightwinger]

This goes to Justice Scalia's dissent when he said "each decision...unabashedly not based on law the court moves one step closer to being reminded of it's impotence".

Pound Sand, Your Honor! More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

While dissenting from the recent Supreme Court decision rubber-stamping same-sex “marriage,” Justice Antonin Scalia warned his colleagues that with “each decision ... unabashedly based not on law” the Court moves “one step closer to being reminded of [its] impotence.” And a new poll shows that another such step has in fact been taken, with more Americans supporting the idea that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings. WritesRasmussen Reports, “A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 33% of Likely U.S. Voters now believe that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if their elected officials [dis]agree with them. That’s up nine points from 24% when we first asked this question in February.Just over half (52%) disagree, down from 58% in the earlier survey. Fifteen percent (15%) are undecided.”

This shift is clearly influenced not just by Obergefell v. Hodges (the marriage ruling), but also a late June ObamaCare decision so contrary to the “Affordable Care Act’s” text that Justice Scalia lamented to the Court, “Words no longer have meaning.” Not surprisingly, there was an ideological divide among poll respondents.

Pound Sand Your Honor More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

More conservative hatred of the Constitution on the 4th of July

First note that this gratuitous judicial-review power — where courts’ rulings on law are considered to constrain all three branches of government — is not found in the Constitution. Rather, it was unilaterally declared by the Court itself in the 1803 Marbury v. Madison decision. In other words, Rasmussen’s supposition about the courts’ role does not align with constitutionalism.

But critics would say that this is putting it lightly. Justice Scalia wrote in his Obergefell dissent that the Court has actually become “a threat to American democracy.” And this just reflects what founder Thomas Jefferson warned when he said that if the Court was not reminded of its impotence, if it comes to be viewed as having ultimate-arbiter (judicial review) power, our Constitution will have become “a suicide pact.” As I wrote just last week:

Jefferson explained the problem with judicial review, writing, “For intending to establish three departments, co-ordinate and independent, that they might check and balance one another, it has given, according to this [judicial review] opinion, to one of them alone, the right to prescribe rules for the government of the others, and to that one too, which is unelected by, and independent of the nation.... The constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist, and shape into any form they please.”

Jefferson also pointed out, correctly, that “Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.” …Judicial review is “a very dangerous doctrine indeed,” Jefferson warned in 1820, “and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.”

Jefferson also wrote that nullification — states’ ignoring of federal dictates — is the “rightful remedy” for all central-government usurpation of states’ powers. Of course, this includes plainly unconstitutional rulings by oligarchic federal courts.

Guess Jefferson was just an unamerican SOB eh!?

Marbury vs Madison established judicial review over two hundred years ago.....you are a little late in your opposition to it

But you are free to use the Constitution to reverse it

 

[rightwinger]

I'm not ignoring Federal law...I'm supporting the dissenting SCOTUS justices who argued those decisions were not based in law OH SNAP!! Eat it libs.

That and 89 cents will buy you a pack of gum

 

[Preacher]

...especially one that wants to protect marriage through a constitutional amendment.

Ain't gonna happen...

You want to think that it won't happen...we shall see...

I'm not ignoring Federal law...I'm supporting the dissenting SCOTUS justices who argued those decisions were not based in law OH SNAP!! Eat it libs.

Oh but to the butt fuckers and their supporters we are EVIL racisssss and bigots....for some reason they think words hurt? I have been racissss and bigot and hater most of my life and yet it hasn't made me give a shit anymore...the thought of a cultural marxist leftard is about as high on my give a shit list as dog shit is.

 

[Preacher]

This goes to Justice Scalia's dissent when he said "each decision...unabashedly not based on law the court moves one step closer to being reminded of it's impotence".

Pound Sand, Your Honor! More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

While dissenting from the recent Supreme Court decision rubber-stamping same-sex “marriage,” Justice Antonin Scalia warned his colleagues that with “each decision ... unabashedly based not on law” the Court moves “one step closer to being reminded of [its] impotence.” And a new poll shows that another such step has in fact been taken, with more Americans supporting the idea that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings. WritesRasmussen Reports, “A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 33% of Likely U.S. Voters now believe that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if their elected officials [dis]agree with them. That’s up nine points from 24% when we first asked this question in February.Just over half (52%) disagree, down from 58% in the earlier survey. Fifteen percent (15%) are undecided.”

This shift is clearly influenced not just by Obergefell v. Hodges (the marriage ruling), but also a late June ObamaCare decision so contrary to the “Affordable Care Act’s” text that Justice Scalia lamented to the Court, “Words no longer have meaning.” Not surprisingly, there was an ideological divide among poll respondents.

Pound Sand Your Honor More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

More conservative hatred of the Constitution on the 4th of July

First note that this gratuitous judicial-review power — where courts’ rulings on law are considered to constrain all three branches of government — is not found in the Constitution. Rather, it was unilaterally declared by the Court itself in the 1803 Marbury v. Madison decision. In other words, Rasmussen’s supposition about the courts’ role does not align with constitutionalism.

But critics would say that this is putting it lightly. Justice Scalia wrote in his Obergefell dissent that the Court has actually become “a threat to American democracy.” And this just reflects what founder Thomas Jefferson warned when he said that if the Court was not reminded of its impotence, if it comes to be viewed as having ultimate-arbiter (judicial review) power, our Constitution will have become “a suicide pact.” As I wrote just last week:

Jefferson explained the problem with judicial review, writing, “For intending to establish three departments, co-ordinate and independent, that they might check and balance one another, it has given, according to this [judicial review] opinion, to one of them alone, the right to prescribe rules for the government of the others, and to that one too, which is unelected by, and independent of the nation.... The constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist, and shape into any form they please.”

Jefferson also pointed out, correctly, that “Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.” …Judicial review is “a very dangerous doctrine indeed,” Jefferson warned in 1820, “and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.”

Jefferson also wrote that nullification — states’ ignoring of federal dictates — is the “rightful remedy” for all central-government usurpation of states’ powers. Of course, this includes plainly unconstitutional rulings by oligarchic federal courts.

Guess Jefferson was just an unamerican SOB eh!?

Marbury vs Madison established judicial review over two hundred years ago.....you are a little late in your opposition to it

But you are free to use the Constitution to reverse it

That's from the article...not me.Jefferson must be an un american sob eh? He was for and called for nullification.

 

[sealybobo]

This goes to Justice Scalia's dissent when he said "each decision...unabashedly not based on law the court moves one step closer to being reminded of it's impotence".

Pound Sand, Your Honor! More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

While dissenting from the recent Supreme Court decision rubber-stamping same-sex “marriage,” Justice Antonin Scalia warned his colleagues that with “each decision ... unabashedly based not on law” the Court moves “one step closer to being reminded of [its] impotence.” And a new poll shows that another such step has in fact been taken, with more Americans supporting the idea that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings. WritesRasmussen Reports, “A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 33% of Likely U.S. Voters now believe that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if their elected officials [dis]agree with them. That’s up nine points from 24% when we first asked this question in February.Just over half (52%) disagree, down from 58% in the earlier survey. Fifteen percent (15%) are undecided.”

This shift is clearly influenced not just by Obergefell v. Hodges (the marriage ruling), but also a late June ObamaCare decision so contrary to the “Affordable Care Act’s” text that Justice Scalia lamented to the Court, “Words no longer have meaning.” Not surprisingly, there was an ideological divide among poll respondents.

Pound Sand Your Honor More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

Correction. More Republicans want states to ignore the federal government. Don't you find it odd that over the last few years Republicans have become more and more anarchist? Anti American?

Republicans are Americans. Rethink and try again

Ok let's say a million Republicans for Americans wanted to secede from the union when Bill Clinton was president and now because a black man is President 2,000,000 want to secede. So your poll showing that more Republicans want to secede isn't telling me anything I don't already know. That means this polll is misleading. Its not telling you what you think it is. No you try again

 

[rightwinger]

We saw the same reaction from conservatives after Brown vs Board of Education

You mean the democratic party members....and of course SANE NORMAL people would be pissed when their children are forced into schools with ******* who have no interest in learning...as time has shown it was a waste of time and big big mistake. Test scores have gone down,gangs,crime,drugs have gone up and all non white schools for the most part of full of criminals.

No, we are talking asshole conservatives.
The same asshole conservatives who oppose gay marriage

 

[SassyIrishLass]

This goes to Justice Scalia's dissent when he said "each decision...unabashedly not based on law the court moves one step closer to being reminded of it's impotence".

Pound Sand, Your Honor! More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

While dissenting from the recent Supreme Court decision rubber-stamping same-sex “marriage,” Justice Antonin Scalia warned his colleagues that with “each decision ... unabashedly based not on law” the Court moves “one step closer to being reminded of [its] impotence.” And a new poll shows that another such step has in fact been taken, with more Americans supporting the idea that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings. WritesRasmussen Reports, “A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 33% of Likely U.S. Voters now believe that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if their elected officials [dis]agree with them. That’s up nine points from 24% when we first asked this question in February.Just over half (52%) disagree, down from 58% in the earlier survey. Fifteen percent (15%) are undecided.”

This shift is clearly influenced not just by Obergefell v. Hodges (the marriage ruling), but also a late June ObamaCare decision so contrary to the “Affordable Care Act’s” text that Justice Scalia lamented to the Court, “Words no longer have meaning.” Not surprisingly, there was an ideological divide among poll respondents.

Pound Sand Your Honor More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

Correction. More Republicans want states to ignore the federal government. Don't you find it odd that over the last few years Republicans have become more and more anarchist? Anti American?

Republicans are Americans. Rethink and try again

Ok let's say a million Republicans for Americans wanted to secede from the union when Bill Clinton was president and now because a black man is President 2,000,000 want to secede. So your poll showing that more Republicans want to secede isn't telling me anything I don't already know. That means this polll is misleading. Its not telling you what you think it is. No you try again

How in the hell did you arrive at it's because a black man is POTUS? How? Falling back to that BS is ignorance

 

[rightwinger]

This goes to Justice Scalia's dissent when he said "each decision...unabashedly not based on law the court moves one step closer to being reminded of it's impotence".

Pound Sand, Your Honor! More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

While dissenting from the recent Supreme Court decision rubber-stamping same-sex “marriage,” Justice Antonin Scalia warned his colleagues that with “each decision ... unabashedly based not on law” the Court moves “one step closer to being reminded of [its] impotence.” And a new poll shows that another such step has in fact been taken, with more Americans supporting the idea that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings. WritesRasmussen Reports, “A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 33% of Likely U.S. Voters now believe that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if their elected officials [dis]agree with them. That’s up nine points from 24% when we first asked this question in February.Just over half (52%) disagree, down from 58% in the earlier survey. Fifteen percent (15%) are undecided.”

This shift is clearly influenced not just by Obergefell v. Hodges (the marriage ruling), but also a late June ObamaCare decision so contrary to the “Affordable Care Act’s” text that Justice Scalia lamented to the Court, “Words no longer have meaning.” Not surprisingly, there was an ideological divide among poll respondents.

Pound Sand Your Honor More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

More conservative hatred of the Constitution on the 4th of July

First note that this gratuitous judicial-review power — where courts’ rulings on law are considered to constrain all three branches of government — is not found in the Constitution. Rather, it was unilaterally declared by the Court itself in the 1803 Marbury v. Madison decision. In other words, Rasmussen’s supposition about the courts’ role does not align with constitutionalism.

But critics would say that this is putting it lightly. Justice Scalia wrote in his Obergefell dissent that the Court has actually become “a threat to American democracy.” And this just reflects what founder Thomas Jefferson warned when he said that if the Court was not reminded of its impotence, if it comes to be viewed as having ultimate-arbiter (judicial review) power, our Constitution will have become “a suicide pact.” As I wrote just last week:

Jefferson explained the problem with judicial review, writing, “For intending to establish three departments, co-ordinate and independent, that they might check and balance one another, it has given, according to this [judicial review] opinion, to one of them alone, the right to prescribe rules for the government of the others, and to that one too, which is unelected by, and independent of the nation.... The constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist, and shape into any form they please.”

Jefferson also pointed out, correctly, that “Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.” …Judicial review is “a very dangerous doctrine indeed,” Jefferson warned in 1820, “and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.”

Jefferson also wrote that nullification — states’ ignoring of federal dictates — is the “rightful remedy” for all central-government usurpation of states’ powers. Of course, this includes plainly unconstitutional rulings by oligarchic federal courts.

Guess Jefferson was just an unamerican SOB eh!?

Marbury vs Madison established judicial review over two hundred years ago.....you are a little late in your opposition to it

But you are free to use the Constitution to reverse it

That's from the article...not me.Jefferson must be an un american sob eh? He was for and called for nullification.

Jefferson lost, just like conservatives today will lose

 

[sealybobo]

This goes to Justice Scalia's dissent when he said "each decision...unabashedly not based on law the court moves one step closer to being reminded of it's impotence".

Pound Sand, Your Honor! More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

While dissenting from the recent Supreme Court decision rubber-stamping same-sex “marriage,” Justice Antonin Scalia warned his colleagues that with “each decision ... unabashedly based not on law” the Court moves “one step closer to being reminded of [its] impotence.” And a new poll shows that another such step has in fact been taken, with more Americans supporting the idea that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings. WritesRasmussen Reports, “A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 33% of Likely U.S. Voters now believe that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if their elected officials [dis]agree with them. That’s up nine points from 24% when we first asked this question in February.Just over half (52%) disagree, down from 58% in the earlier survey. Fifteen percent (15%) are undecided.”

This shift is clearly influenced not just by Obergefell v. Hodges (the marriage ruling), but also a late June ObamaCare decision so contrary to the “Affordable Care Act’s” text that Justice Scalia lamented to the Court, “Words no longer have meaning.” Not surprisingly, there was an ideological divide among poll respondents.

Pound Sand Your Honor More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

Correction. More Republicans want states to ignore the federal government. Don't you find it odd that over the last few years Republicans have become more and more anarchist? Anti American?

Republicans are Americans. Rethink and try again

This is a liberal nation. If you aren't a liberal then you are an American in name only.

Ever hear the theory that we need Republicans and they need us? If it weren't for Republicans the Russians would have invaded by now. And if it wasn't for us liberals we wouldn't have the big middle class that we had over the last 50 years. Not to mention the rest of the world would hate us

 

[BluesLegend]

I'm not ignoring Federal law...I'm supporting the dissenting SCOTUS justices who argued those decisions were not based in law OH SNAP!! Eat it libs.

That and 89 cents will buy you a pack of gum

 

[SwimExpert]

Yeppers, Eisenhower was a liberal

Yes, he was. This is the same man who invented the American welfare system.

and Wallace a conservative

Yes, he was. He was a Dixiecrat populist of Ala-fucking-bama. Truth....you should try it sometime.

 

[sealybobo]

This goes to Justice Scalia's dissent when he said "each decision...unabashedly not based on law the court moves one step closer to being reminded of it's impotence".

Pound Sand, Your Honor! More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

While dissenting from the recent Supreme Court decision rubber-stamping same-sex “marriage,” Justice Antonin Scalia warned his colleagues that with “each decision ... unabashedly based not on law” the Court moves “one step closer to being reminded of [its] impotence.” And a new poll shows that another such step has in fact been taken, with more Americans supporting the idea that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings. WritesRasmussen Reports, “A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 33% of Likely U.S. Voters now believe that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if their elected officials [dis]agree with them. That’s up nine points from 24% when we first asked this question in February.Just over half (52%) disagree, down from 58% in the earlier survey. Fifteen percent (15%) are undecided.”

This shift is clearly influenced not just by Obergefell v. Hodges (the marriage ruling), but also a late June ObamaCare decision so contrary to the “Affordable Care Act’s” text that Justice Scalia lamented to the Court, “Words no longer have meaning.” Not surprisingly, there was an ideological divide among poll respondents.

Pound Sand Your Honor More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

Correction. More Republicans want states to ignore the federal government. Don't you find it odd that over the last few years Republicans have become more and more anarchist? Anti American?

Republicans are Americans. Rethink and try again

Ok let's say a million Republicans for Americans wanted to secede from the union when Bill Clinton was president and now because a black man is President 2,000,000 want to secede. So your poll showing that more Republicans want to secede isn't telling me anything I don't already know. That means this polll is misleading. Its not telling you what you think it is. No you try again

How in the hell did you arrive at it's because a black man is POTUS? How? Falling back to that BS is ignorance

I guess you are right. It isn't like you disrespected Bill Clinton any less than you do Obama. You're just using different talking points when attacking each of them. We sense a hint of racism in your attacks on Obama. Perfect example is your spokesman in South Carolina who walked into a church and told black people that they were raping white women and taking over the country. That is absolutely the GOP's talking point. Could have come straight from Rush Limbaugh or Donald trumps mouth

 

[SassyIrishLass]

This goes to Justice Scalia's dissent when he said "each decision...unabashedly not based on law the court moves one step closer to being reminded of it's impotence".

Pound Sand, Your Honor! More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

While dissenting from the recent Supreme Court decision rubber-stamping same-sex “marriage,” Justice Antonin Scalia warned his colleagues that with “each decision ... unabashedly based not on law” the Court moves “one step closer to being reminded of [its] impotence.” And a new poll shows that another such step has in fact been taken, with more Americans supporting the idea that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings. WritesRasmussen Reports, “A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 33% of Likely U.S. Voters now believe that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if their elected officials [dis]agree with them. That’s up nine points from 24% when we first asked this question in February.Just over half (52%) disagree, down from 58% in the earlier survey. Fifteen percent (15%) are undecided.”

This shift is clearly influenced not just by Obergefell v. Hodges (the marriage ruling), but also a late June ObamaCare decision so contrary to the “Affordable Care Act’s” text that Justice Scalia lamented to the Court, “Words no longer have meaning.” Not surprisingly, there was an ideological divide among poll respondents.

Pound Sand Your Honor More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

Correction. More Republicans want states to ignore the federal government. Don't you find it odd that over the last few years Republicans have become more and more anarchist? Anti American?

Republicans are Americans. Rethink and try again

Ok let's say a million Republicans for Americans wanted to secede from the union when Bill Clinton was president and now because a black man is President 2,000,000 want to secede. So your poll showing that more Republicans want to secede isn't telling me anything I don't already know. That means this polll is misleading. Its not telling you what you think it is. No you try again

How in the hell did you arrive at it's because a black man is POTUS? How? Falling back to that BS is ignorance

I guess you are right. It isn't like you disrespected Bill Clinton any less than you do Obama. You're just using different talking points when attacking each of them. We sense a hint of racism in your attacks on Obama. Perfect example is your spokesman in South Carolina who walked into a church and told black people that they were raping white women and taking over the country. That is absolutely the GOP's talking point. Could have come straight from Rush Limbaugh or Donald trumps mouth

No, asshole YOU are injecting racism into it.

 

[Preacher]

We saw the same reaction from conservatives after Brown vs Board of Education

You mean the democratic party members....and of course SANE NORMAL people would be pissed when their children are forced into schools with ******* who have no interest in learning...as time has shown it was a waste of time and big big mistake. Test scores have gone down,gangs,crime,drugs have gone up and all non white schools for the most part of full of criminals.

No, we are talking asshole conservatives.
The same asshole conservatives who oppose gay marriage

Democrats were the ones that didn't want apes and humans in school together...same party you vote for. I am not a conservative although I am against faggot "marriage" and integration which has done nothing positive.

This goes to Justice Scalia's dissent when he said "each decision...unabashedly not based on law the court moves one step closer to being reminded of it's impotence".

Pound Sand, Your Honor! More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

While dissenting from the recent Supreme Court decision rubber-stamping same-sex “marriage,” Justice Antonin Scalia warned his colleagues that with “each decision ... unabashedly based not on law” the Court moves “one step closer to being reminded of [its] impotence.” And a new poll shows that another such step has in fact been taken, with more Americans supporting the idea that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings. WritesRasmussen Reports, “A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 33% of Likely U.S. Voters now believe that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if their elected officials [dis]agree with them. That’s up nine points from 24% when we first asked this question in February.Just over half (52%) disagree, down from 58% in the earlier survey. Fifteen percent (15%) are undecided.”

This shift is clearly influenced not just by Obergefell v. Hodges (the marriage ruling), but also a late June ObamaCare decision so contrary to the “Affordable Care Act’s” text that Justice Scalia lamented to the Court, “Words no longer have meaning.” Not surprisingly, there was an ideological divide among poll respondents.

Pound Sand Your Honor More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

More conservative hatred of the Constitution on the 4th of July

First note that this gratuitous judicial-review power — where courts’ rulings on law are considered to constrain all three branches of government — is not found in the Constitution. Rather, it was unilaterally declared by the Court itself in the 1803 Marbury v. Madison decision. In other words, Rasmussen’s supposition about the courts’ role does not align with constitutionalism.

But critics would say that this is putting it lightly. Justice Scalia wrote in his Obergefell dissent that the Court has actually become “a threat to American democracy.” And this just reflects what founder Thomas Jefferson warned when he said that if the Court was not reminded of its impotence, if it comes to be viewed as having ultimate-arbiter (judicial review) power, our Constitution will have become “a suicide pact.” As I wrote just last week:

Jefferson explained the problem with judicial review, writing, “For intending to establish three departments, co-ordinate and independent, that they might check and balance one another, it has given, according to this [judicial review] opinion, to one of them alone, the right to prescribe rules for the government of the others, and to that one too, which is unelected by, and independent of the nation.... The constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist, and shape into any form they please.”

Jefferson also pointed out, correctly, that “Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.” …Judicial review is “a very dangerous doctrine indeed,” Jefferson warned in 1820, “and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.”

Jefferson also wrote that nullification — states’ ignoring of federal dictates — is the “rightful remedy” for all central-government usurpation of states’ powers. Of course, this includes plainly unconstitutional rulings by oligarchic federal courts.

Guess Jefferson was just an unamerican SOB eh!?

Marbury vs Madison established judicial review over two hundred years ago.....you are a little late in your opposition to it

But you are free to use the Constitution to reverse it

That's from the article...not me.Jefferson must be an un american sob eh? He was for and called for nullification.

Jefferson lost, just like conservatives today will lose

So you are FOR the constitution when its bent and broken to fit YOUR view of how the world is but you hate it when its not...gotcha...and no just because the PC are trying to force America into the shitter doesn't mean us normal folks are losing or giving up push to hard and we all know what can and will happen...

 

[sealybobo]

Does anybody doubt that if there were no liberals in America America would be just another different version of Russian assholes bullying the rest of the world

 

[Preacher]

This goes to Justice Scalia's dissent when he said "each decision...unabashedly not based on law the court moves one step closer to being reminded of it's impotence".

Pound Sand, Your Honor! More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

While dissenting from the recent Supreme Court decision rubber-stamping same-sex “marriage,” Justice Antonin Scalia warned his colleagues that with “each decision ... unabashedly based not on law” the Court moves “one step closer to being reminded of [its] impotence.” And a new poll shows that another such step has in fact been taken, with more Americans supporting the idea that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings. WritesRasmussen Reports, “A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 33% of Likely U.S. Voters now believe that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if their elected officials [dis]agree with them. That’s up nine points from 24% when we first asked this question in February.Just over half (52%) disagree, down from 58% in the earlier survey. Fifteen percent (15%) are undecided.”

This shift is clearly influenced not just by Obergefell v. Hodges (the marriage ruling), but also a late June ObamaCare decision so contrary to the “Affordable Care Act’s” text that Justice Scalia lamented to the Court, “Words no longer have meaning.” Not surprisingly, there was an ideological divide among poll respondents.

Pound Sand Your Honor More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

Correction. More Republicans want states to ignore the federal government. Don't you find it odd that over the last few years Republicans have become more and more anarchist? Anti American?

Republicans are Americans. Rethink and try again

Ok let's say a million Republicans for Americans wanted to secede from the union when Bill Clinton was president and now because a black man is President 2,000,000 want to secede. So your poll showing that more Republicans want to secede isn't telling me anything I don't already know. That means this polll is misleading. Its not telling you what you think it is. No you try again

How in the hell did you arrive at it's because a black man is POTUS? How? Falling back to that BS is ignorance

I guess you are right. It isn't like you disrespected Bill Clinton any less than you do Obama. You're just using different talking points when attacking each of them. We sense a hint of racism in your attacks on Obama. Perfect example is your spokesman in South Carolina who walked into a church and told black people that they were raping white women and taking over the country. That is absolutely the GOP's talking point. Could have come straight from Rush Limbaugh or Donald trumps mouth

Truth hurts would you like some FBI statistics to back up those facts?

 

[sealybobo]

Correction. More Republicans want states to ignore the federal government. Don't you find it odd that over the last few years Republicans have become more and more anarchist? Anti American?

Republicans are Americans. Rethink and try again

Ok let's say a million Republicans for Americans wanted to secede from the union when Bill Clinton was president and now because a black man is President 2,000,000 want to secede. So your poll showing that more Republicans want to secede isn't telling me anything I don't already know. That means this polll is misleading. Its not telling you what you think it is. No you try again

How in the hell did you arrive at it's because a black man is POTUS? How? Falling back to that BS is ignorance

I guess you are right. It isn't like you disrespected Bill Clinton any less than you do Obama. You're just using different talking points when attacking each of them. We sense a hint of racism in your attacks on Obama. Perfect example is your spokesman in South Carolina who walked into a church and told black people that they were raping white women and taking over the country. That is absolutely the GOP's talking point. Could have come straight from Rush Limbaugh or Donald trumps mouth

No, asshole YOU are injecting racism into it.

There is / racism and then there's subtle racism. You know what you're doing or what your side is doing. And maybe you don't see yourself as racist but we do

 

[sealybobo]

We saw the same reaction from conservatives after Brown vs Board of Education

You mean the democratic party members....and of course SANE NORMAL people would be pissed when their children are forced into schools with ******* who have no interest in learning...as time has shown it was a waste of time and big big mistake. Test scores have gone down,gangs,crime,drugs have gone up and all non white schools for the most part of full of criminals.

No, we are talking asshole conservatives.
The same asshole conservatives who oppose gay marriage

Democrats were the ones that didn't want apes and humans in school together...same party you vote for. I am not a conservative although I am against faggot "marriage" and integration which has done nothing positive.

More conservative hatred of the Constitution on the 4th of July

First note that this gratuitous judicial-review power — where courts’ rulings on law are considered to constrain all three branches of government — is not found in the Constitution. Rather, it was unilaterally declared by the Court itself in the 1803 Marbury v. Madison decision. In other words, Rasmussen’s supposition about the courts’ role does not align with constitutionalism.

But critics would say that this is putting it lightly. Justice Scalia wrote in his Obergefell dissent that the Court has actually become “a threat to American democracy.” And this just reflects what founder Thomas Jefferson warned when he said that if the Court was not reminded of its impotence, if it comes to be viewed as having ultimate-arbiter (judicial review) power, our Constitution will have become “a suicide pact.” As I wrote just last week:

Jefferson explained the problem with judicial review, writing, “For intending to establish three departments, co-ordinate and independent, that they might check and balance one another, it has given, according to this [judicial review] opinion, to one of them alone, the right to prescribe rules for the government of the others, and to that one too, which is unelected by, and independent of the nation.... The constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist, and shape into any form they please.”

Jefferson also pointed out, correctly, that “Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.” …Judicial review is “a very dangerous doctrine indeed,” Jefferson warned in 1820, “and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.”

Jefferson also wrote that nullification — states’ ignoring of federal dictates — is the “rightful remedy” for all central-government usurpation of states’ powers. Of course, this includes plainly unconstitutional rulings by oligarchic federal courts.

Guess Jefferson was just an unamerican SOB eh!?

Marbury vs Madison established judicial review over two hundred years ago.....you are a little late in your opposition to it

But you are free to use the Constitution to reverse it

That's from the article...not me.Jefferson must be an un american sob eh? He was for and called for nullification.

Jefferson lost, just like conservatives today will lose

So you are FOR the constitution when its bent and broken to fit YOUR view of how the world is but you hate it when its not...gotcha...and no just because the PC are trying to force America into the shitter doesn't mean us normal folks are losing or giving up push to hard and we all know what can and will happen...

What do you mean normal? Can you define that?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Republicans are Americans. Rethink and try again

Ok let's say a million Republicans for Americans wanted to secede from the union when Bill Clinton was president and now because a black man is President 2,000,000 want to secede. So your poll showing that more Republicans want to secede isn't telling me anything I don't already know. That means this polll is misleading. Its not telling you what you think it is. No you try again

How in the hell did you arrive at it's because a black man is POTUS? How? Falling back to that BS is ignorance

I guess you are right. It isn't like you disrespected Bill Clinton any less than you do Obama. You're just using different talking points when attacking each of them. We sense a hint of racism in your attacks on Obama. Perfect example is your spokesman in South Carolina who walked into a church and told black people that they were raping white women and taking over the country. That is absolutely the GOP's talking point. Could have come straight from Rush Limbaugh or Donald trumps mouth

No, asshole YOU are injecting racism into it.

There is / racism and then there's subtle racism. You know what you're doing or what your side is doing. And maybe you don't see yourself as racist but we do

You're the one bringing race into it, are you this dense? You all wore out the race card long ago and you've almost spent the bigot card