Misrepresenting Libertarianism

Absurd questions like who builds, maintains, and pays for the roads and whether the systematic oppression of an entire race is acceptable?

Why don't you just come out and admit what you really think? Why do you libertardians only admit what you really think on accident?
 
Absurd questions like who builds, maintains, and pays for the roads and whether the systematic oppression of an entire race is acceptable?

Why don't you just come out and admit what you really think? Why do you libertardians only admit what you really think on accident?

You tell him, Nikolai.
 
Absurd questions like who builds, maintains, and pays for the roads and whether the systematic oppression of an entire race is acceptable?

Why don't you just come out and admit what you really think? Why do you libertardians only admit what you really think on accident?
I don't entertain poorly veiled sock puppet communists anymore, either.

Maybe you'll be more at home HERE.
 
Absurd questions like who builds, maintains, and pays for the roads
I believe Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution spells out the requirements about the government's role in building/keeping roads.

the systematic oppression of an entire race is acceptable?
Now we're going into non-sequiturs.

Why don't you just come out and admit what you really think? Why do you libertardians only admit what you really think on accident?
Because what you think libertarians "really" think is not what they "really" think.
 
Wowzers!...The Fabians at Salon smear libertarians?!?!??

Stop the presses! :rolleyes:

how many media do you have to attack in order to make the libertarian message palatable?
Like you'd give a critique of Fabian socialism from Town Hall any credence?

Go fish. :rolleyes:

keep attacki8ng the messengers and maybe some day a majority of idjits will follow your lead.


---


http://www.usmessageboard.com/education-and-history/118296-the-manifoil-libertarian-principle-challenge-is-voting-a-civil-right.html
 
Absurd questions like who builds, maintains, and pays for the roads and whether the systematic oppression of an entire race is acceptable?

Why don't you just come out and admit what you really think? Why do you libertardians only admit what you really think on accident?
Don't be silly, JB...he doesn't think. Others do that for him.
 
Fascinating rebuttal. You clearly pwned the duder on this one.

His C&P is a non sequitur.

Not to mention that Rand Paul, and most libertarians, are probably supportive of a state's right to enact Jim Crow laws.

Most libertarians actually support the federal governments authority to enforce the constitution, which specifically prohibits states from making Jim Crow laws. If the federal government had done its job there would have been no Jim Crow laws, and no one would be able to now claim that most libertarians supported them. I used to wonder why both parties are unable to man up and admit when they are wrong, now I know it is becasue they simply are never wrong.

Well, you know how that old saying goes..."The more things change, the more they stay the same." People never like to be proven wrong. It's that simple.

I have very few things cluttering my desk, but this is something I have framed and I often stare at it wondering if something just said or written applies to me. Found it ages ago in some newspaper.

I Might Be Wrong

Age, attitude, sex or creed,
put me on top, the rest below.

But I might be wrong.

Apologize? Why?
All the blame is surely theirs,
and so is the shame.
Let others ask for my pardon!

All the same,
I might be wrong.

I must not change the way I am.
Let it stay the way it's always been.

And yet, I might be wrong.

Author unknown
 
Peck said:
How many Liberals does it take to screw in a light bulb? None. The Government will take care of it.


:lol:

Good one! :clap2:
How many liberoidal socialist nitwits does it take to change a light bulb?

None!...That's the IBEW's job and we'll break your knee caps if you try to change it!

you're afraid of Union 'thugs'?

I thought you were a tough guy.

:eek:


---

http://www.usmessageboard.com/education-and-history/118296-the-manifoil-libertarian-principle-challenge-is-voting-a-civil-right.html
 
Absurd questions like who builds, maintains, and pays for the roads and whether the systematic oppression of an entire race is acceptable?

Why don't you just come out and admit what you really think? Why do you libertardians only admit what you really think on accident?
I don't entertain poorly veiled sock puppet communists anymore, either.

Maybe you'll be more at home HERE.

Didn't you just violate one of the most sacred rules of USMB by posting the link to another forum? Does this mean we all can now?
 
:lol:

Good one! :clap2:
How many liberoidal socialist nitwits does it take to change a light bulb?

None!...That's the IBEW's job and we'll break your knee caps if you try to change it!

you're afraid of Union 'thugs'?

I thought you were a tough guy.

:eek:


---

http://www.usmessageboard.com/education-and-history/118296-the-manifoil-libertarian-principle-challenge-is-voting-a-civil-right.html
union thugs tend to carry clubs.
 
How many liberoidal socialist nitwits does it take to change a light bulb?

None!...That's the IBEW's job and we'll break your knee caps if you try to change it!

you're afraid of Union 'thugs'?

I thought you were a tough guy.

:eek:


---

http://www.usmessageboard.com/education-and-history/118296-the-manifoil-libertarian-principle-challenge-is-voting-a-civil-right.html
union thugs tend to carry clubs.

Yeah. I thought Libertarian Pussies carried guns?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/current-events/118398-crazy-anti-census-woman-shot-dead-after-pointing-shotgun-at-police.html
 
Great comment from the link in the OP:

When criminals have the tacit approval of the police (aka, the state) it would have been very difficult for the free market to sort it out. The reason is that the state was deliberately looking the other way instead of enforcing the laws. This is not a free market problem. This a problem of evil people running the show.
The classical liberal view of why men form governments is to protect the unalienable rights of the citizens. In the case of Jim Crow laws the state was actively denying the rights of the citizenry. To blame libertarians for this is not just a misrepresentation, it is an outright lie. The NY Times should be ashamed to have run such a dishonest article.

The writers at the NYTs screwed up again. That, however, won't stop the rabid wackos from supporting their lies.

Yep...

:)

peace...
 
Great comment from the link in the OP:

When criminals have the tacit approval of the police (aka, the state) it would have been very difficult for the free market to sort it out. The reason is that the state was deliberately looking the other way instead of enforcing the laws. This is not a free market problem. This a problem of evil people running the show.
The classical liberal view of why men form governments is to protect the unalienable rights of the citizens. In the case of Jim Crow laws the state was actively denying the rights of the citizenry. To blame libertarians for this is not just a misrepresentation, it is an outright lie. The NY Times should be ashamed to have run such a dishonest article.

The writers at the NYTs screwed up again. That, however, won't stop the rabid wackos from supporting their lies.

Yep...

:)

peace...

HEY! Libertarians...with these two on your side you sure will win converts. :lol::lol::lol:
 
His C&P is a non sequitur.

Not to mention that Rand Paul, and most libertarians, are probably supportive of a state's right to enact Jim Crow laws.
"Probably"??

Care to back that up with anything other than your clearly bigoted surmise?

Do you support state's having the right to segregate? If yes in some cases, list the cases.

Can you show me anyone who claims the state has a right to segregate?
 

Forum List

Back
Top