Misrepresenting Libertarianism

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Oddball, May 24, 2010.

  1. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,390
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,396
    Looks like we've had a whoooole lotta that there "misrepresentin" thing going on around these here parts, too.

    Misrepresenting Libertarianism | Questions and Observations
     
  2. Ravi
    Offline

    Ravi Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    62,995
    Thanks Received:
    8,678
    Trophy Points:
    477
    Location:
    Hating Hatters
    Ratings:
    +9,477
    :rolleyes:

    They forgot to include the word Federal.

    boo hoo
     
  3. manifold
    Offline

    manifold Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    38,903
    Thanks Received:
    5,081
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    in your dreams
    Ratings:
    +5,084
    Fascinating rebuttal. You clearly pwned the duder on this one.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. Ravi
    Offline

    Ravi Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    62,995
    Thanks Received:
    8,678
    Trophy Points:
    477
    Location:
    Hating Hatters
    Ratings:
    +9,477
    His C&P is a non sequitur.

    Not to mention that Rand Paul, and most libertarians, are probably supportive of a state's right to enact Jim Crow laws.
     
  5. JBeukema
    Offline

    JBeukema BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    25,613
    Thanks Received:
    1,702
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,702
    .
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,323
    Thanks Received:
    5,010
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,211
    Most libertarians actually support the federal governments authority to enforce the constitution, which specifically prohibits states from making Jim Crow laws. If the federal government had done its job there would have been no Jim Crow laws, and no one would be able to now claim that most libertarians supported them. I used to wonder why both parties are unable to man up and admit when they are wrong, now I know it is becasue they simply are never wrong.
     
  7. Ravi
    Offline

    Ravi Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    62,995
    Thanks Received:
    8,678
    Trophy Points:
    477
    Location:
    Hating Hatters
    Ratings:
    +9,477
    Does that mean Rand Paul is actually not a libertarian? If so, how could he object to the CRA if it did away with Jim Crow laws?:eusa_eh:
     
  8. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,323
    Thanks Received:
    5,010
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,211
    I am pretty sure that if you check you will see that Paul won the Republican primary in Kentucky, not the Libertarian one. Take any issues you have up with him and his positions with the Republicans, not me.
     
  9. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,390
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,396
    "Probably"??

    Care to back that up with anything other than your clearly bigoted surmise?
     
  10. NYcarbineer
    Offline

    NYcarbineer Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    49,795
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,795
    Do you support state's having the right to segregate? If yes in some cases, list the cases.
     

Share This Page