RDD_1210
Forms his own opinions
- May 13, 2010
- 18,981
- 1,817
- 265
Actually, the "rhetoric" is far from old, because it's still very much true. I understand that allowing people to buy insurance only when they become sick is bad business, and that's why you have open enrollment periods to stop such behavior. That's no excuse for insurance companies to actively seek out reasons to deny coverage to already existing customers based upon ridiculous pre-existing conditions.Promote being the key word RDD...Not "do for" but "promote"
Yeah and when their rights are being raped by insurance companies, that's when action was needed. So they are in fact, upholding the constitution.
Actually, you need to understand the truth about insurance...
and dont jump donw my throat until you offer me the respect of reading what I am saying...
It is the greed of the people...the consumer...not the insurance companies....as is the reason for the "pre-existing" caluse...
People tended to not buy insurance until they needed it. Insurance was not worth the money for the 100 every 6 months visit for strep throat...but when something major came up? THEN they would buy insurance....and that is a losing prospect for an insurance company.
So get of the evil insurance company rhetoric...it is getting old.
So what is the fix?
We already have it in place.
Free healthcare for anyone who needs it at the ER.
Sorry it is not "luxurious" and "comfortable"......
But it is there.
You're smarter then this. So this "free" healthcare that anyone can get an ER....someone has to foot that bill. So who picks up that cost?