Michele Bachmann: Obama Health Care Reform 'The Crown Jewel Of Socialism'

Where is the part of the Constitution that authorized the Space Program?

That's funny, because yesterday in the story about the Republicans budget cuts it was mentioned that there would probably be strong resistance to NASA cuts FROM Republican representatives of states with a big space program presence.

Mis representation NYCarbineer.

The author of the "story" said he would "expect there to be resistance"...but had absolutely nothing as proof to back it up.....he offered his opinion.

Do you suppose I thus used the word 'probably' for a reason?
 
That's funny, because yesterday in the story about the Republicans budget cuts it was mentioned that there would probably be strong resistance to NASA cuts FROM Republican representatives of states with a big space program presence.

Mis representation NYCarbineer.

The author of the "story" said he would "expect there to be resistance"...but had absolutely nothing as proof to back it up.....he offered his opinion.

Do you suppose I thus used the word 'probably' for a reason?

Yes....to imply thast there were facts supporting it....otherwise you would have...or should have...siad that someone has the following OPINION.

Lets be real...look at the contexct of why you even cited that article.

You were trying to confirm a position by presenting one persons personal opinion without mentioning it was simply a persons opinion.
 
Could you please point to the specific wording in the Constitution that says the Federal Government is responsible for 'helping Americans'. Thanks.

Read the Preamble. The sum total of the intent of the Constitution is to help Americans.

"promote the General Welfare". Key word: Promote. Not provide - you will notice that the founders wrote 'provide for' when referring to defending the nation.

And... the Preamble is not the Articles that gives the Federal Government the responsibility. It is the 'why' of the Constitution..... the 'how' is the Articles.

There's a lot of things that aren't in the constitution. The CIA and FBI aren't mentioned-do you think those shouldn't be in place? How about the USPS? The interstate highway system?

And why is healthcare constitutional? Well nowhere in the constitution does it bar congress from passing it. However the bill followed the process as listed in Article 1. It was signed into law according to Article 2. In fact the only way it could be deemed unconstitutional is if the Supreme Court decides on it-which they haven't (and most likely will not).

So the question isn't whether it's constitutional or not-the real question is how is it NOT constitutional? Show me where the constitution limits the government's ability to implement this bill.
 
Mis representation NYCarbineer.

The author of the "story" said he would "expect there to be resistance"...but had absolutely nothing as proof to back it up.....he offered his opinion.

Do you suppose I thus used the word 'probably' for a reason?

Yes....to imply thast there were facts supporting it....otherwise you would have...or should have...siad that someone has the following OPINION.

Lets be real...look at the contexct of why you even cited that article.

You were trying to confirm a position by presenting one persons personal opinion without mentioning it was simply a persons opinion.

For once Wilowtree is right about something, you are really can be an idiot. First of all there IS evidence of what I said:

For example:
Save NASA Rally - Houston Republican | Examiner.com

and if that's not enough, read through the rest of links:

cuts NASA republican congressman - Yahoo! Search Results

I suggest you apologize to me in full dress contrition or you're getting neg repped for lying about what I said.
 
Do you suppose I thus used the word 'probably' for a reason?

Yes....to imply thast there were facts supporting it....otherwise you would have...or should have...siad that someone has the following OPINION.

Lets be real...look at the contexct of why you even cited that article.

You were trying to confirm a position by presenting one persons personal opinion without mentioning it was simply a persons opinion.

For once Wilowtree is right about something, you are really can be an idiot. First of all there IS evidence of what I said:

For example:
Save NASA Rally - Houston Republican | Examiner.com

and if that's not enough, read through the rest of links:

cuts NASA republican congressman - Yahoo! Search Results

I suggest you apologize to me in full dress contrition or you're getting neg repped for lying about what I said.

The neg rep measn squat to me.....threaten me with it if you wish, but that will never make me do something I dont feel is warranted.

But if I was in the wrong, that means something to me.

So I apologize.
 
Yes....to imply thast there were facts supporting it....otherwise you would have...or should have...siad that someone has the following OPINION.

Lets be real...look at the contexct of why you even cited that article.

You were trying to confirm a position by presenting one persons personal opinion without mentioning it was simply a persons opinion.

For once Wilowtree is right about something, you are really can be an idiot. First of all there IS evidence of what I said:

For example:
Save NASA Rally - Houston Republican | Examiner.com

and if that's not enough, read through the rest of links:

cuts NASA republican congressman - Yahoo! Search Results

I suggest you apologize to me in full dress contrition or you're getting neg repped for lying about what I said.

The neg rep measn squat to me.....threaten me with it if you wish, but that will never make me do something I dont feel is warranted.

But if I was in the wrong, that means something to me.

So I apologize.

Common sense should have told you that representatives in NASA strong areas were going to opposed NASA cuts, left, right or center.

If you were O L D you would know that this is exactly the kind of thing that happened when Ronald Reagan came into power in 1981 and had grandiose plans for making huge cuts in government spending...

...BOTH parties put the screws to that.
 
For once Wilowtree is right about something, you are really can be an idiot. First of all there IS evidence of what I said:

For example:
Save NASA Rally - Houston Republican | Examiner.com

and if that's not enough, read through the rest of links:

cuts NASA republican congressman - Yahoo! Search Results

I suggest you apologize to me in full dress contrition or you're getting neg repped for lying about what I said.

The neg rep measn squat to me.....threaten me with it if you wish, but that will never make me do something I dont feel is warranted.

But if I was in the wrong, that means something to me.

So I apologize.

Common sense should have told you that representatives in NASA strong areas were going to opposed NASA cuts, left, right or center.

If you were O L D you would know that this is exactly the kind of thing that happened when Ronald Reagan came into power in 1981 and had grandiose plans for making huge cuts in government spending...

...BOTH parties put the screws to that.

lol...thanks for saying that 52 is not old.

And if you look at yesterday's thread in queswtion....I am the one who said NIMBY is not a new concept.

Of course they will complain.
 
None of the GOPtards in Congress and in the House know what socialism is, neither do their brainwashed acolytes know what socialism is, thats why the thread has gone off topic. Bachmann is always saying something extremely retarded, she's more well known and liked by her acolytes and admirers for that than for actually accomplishing anything since she's been in office.
 
Last edited:
None of the GOPtards in Congress and in the House know what socialism. neither do their brainwashed acolytes know what socialism is, thats why the thread has gone off topic. Bachmann is always saying something extremely retarded, she more well known and liked by her acolytes and admirers for that than for actually accomplishing anything since she's been in office.
Classic.

Are you wearing your helmet?
 
None of the GOPtards in Congress and in the House know what socialism. neither do their brainwashed acolytes know what socialism is, thats why the thread has gone off topic. Bachmann is always saying something extremely retarded, she more well known and liked by her acolytes and admirers for that than for actually accomplishing anything since she's been in office.

lol.
Your value to this board is ever decreasing in my eyes.
But please...its free to all of us...so do as you please...
 
None of the GOPtards in Congress and in the House know what socialism. neither do their brainwashed acolytes know what socialism is, thats why the thread has gone off topic. Bachmann is always saying something extremely retarded, she more well known and liked by her acolytes and admirers for that than for actually accomplishing anything since she's been in office.

lol.
Your value to this board is ever decreasing in my eyes.
But please...its free to all of us...so do as you please...


Whats that I see in your post again, another dumb post and weak effort to defend Bachmann and her retarded extremism and use of words and terms she knows nothing about about? Now lets back this up again for clarity and give you another opportunity to correct yourself, Bachmann called this health care law a "Crown Jewel of Socialism," what exactly is "socialist" about a country ensuring that its own don't have to be ripped off by health insurance and also that people have access to health care?


Basically what I'm asking jackass, is whether Bachmann's words are true or are they the typical babbling extremist rhetoric from a retarded congresswoman who labelled the Obama administration a "gangster government" without pointing what the hell is so gangster about it? Either she's on point with her words or she purposely likes to blurt out extremist rightwing BS for pure entertainment and smearing.
 
You know, if Michelle Bachmann were about 3 points hotter and could lose that MinneSOta accent,

a man could justify putting up with her idiocy.

I'm so damn sick and tired of the GOPtards and rightwingers tap dancing and trying to play with people's intelligence in this forum by trying to rationalize such stupidity on the right, they want to criticize and whine about Huffington Post links but then turn right the hell around and defend extremist rhetoric by Bachmann and claim any criticism of it is the left trying to "silence" her from telling the truth.
 
The idiocy of calling this the Crown Jewel of Socialism is easily seen merely by comparing our healthcare system, AFTER Obamacare,

with, for example, the healthcare of Canada, or the UK, or pretty much all of Europe.
 

Forum List

Back
Top