Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.The car did not shoot michael brown.Looks like Holder says you are full of it.
Michael Brown was 148 feet from Wilson as he was shot to death
absolutely false
i am surprised this guy is still floating this lie
pretty disgusting really
He was 148 ft away from the car...Why do you lie when a tape measure proves you wrong?
Wilson said in his testimony that even tho he wasnt a threat anymore he (paraphrase) could be to someone sometime.
What are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.The car did not shoot michael brown.Michael Brown was 148 feet from Wilson as he was shot to death
absolutely false
i am surprised this guy is still floating this lie
pretty disgusting really
He was 148 ft away from the car...Why do you lie when a tape measure proves you wrong?
Wilson said in his testimony that even tho he wasnt a threat anymore he (paraphrase) could be to someone sometime.
You didn't read the DOJ report did you, though they questioned Wilson's pursuing at that time, Wilson thought that due to the fact he felt Brown was involved in robbing the store, and he was so aggressive at going after Wilson's gun, he thought brown was a threat. He did nothing illegal nor did he violate Brown's civil rights.
What are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.The car did not shoot michael brown.Looks like Holder says you are full of it.Simple math proves you wrong. And it is documented. You can even see the flowers still being put on the sidewalk directly across from the spot where Michael Brown was shot down in cold blood, 148 feet away from an officer who was in no way in danger.
Michael Brown was 148 feet from Wilson as he was shot to death
absolutely false
i am surprised this guy is still floating this lie
pretty disgusting really
He was 148 ft away from the car...Why do you lie when a tape measure proves you wrong?
What are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.The car did not shoot michael brown.He was 148 ft away from the car...Why do you lie when a tape measure proves you wrong?
Wilson said in his testimony that even tho he wasnt a threat anymore he (paraphrase) could be to someone sometime.
You didn't read the DOJ report did you, though they questioned Wilson's pursuing at that time, Wilson thought that due to the fact he felt Brown was involved in robbing the store, and he was so aggressive at going after Wilson's gun, he thought brown was a threat. He did nothing illegal nor did he violate Brown's civil rights.
Wilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.
Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?
What are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.The car did not shoot michael brown.
Wilson said in his testimony that even tho he wasnt a threat anymore he (paraphrase) could be to someone sometime.
You didn't read the DOJ report did you, though they questioned Wilson's pursuing at that time, Wilson thought that due to the fact he felt Brown was involved in robbing the store, and he was so aggressive at going after Wilson's gun, he thought brown was a threat. He did nothing illegal nor did he violate Brown's civil rights.
Wilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.
Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?
Cops drive around all day listening to the dispatches that go out over their radios. He heard the call, even though he was on a different call. Happens all the time.
What are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.The car did not shoot michael brown.He was 148 ft away from the car...Why do you lie when a tape measure proves you wrong?
Wilson said in his testimony that even tho he wasnt a threat anymore he (paraphrase) could be to someone sometime.
You didn't read the DOJ report did you, though they questioned Wilson's pursuing at that time, Wilson thought that due to the fact he felt Brown was involved in robbing the store, and he was so aggressive at going after Wilson's gun, he thought brown was a threat. He did nothing illegal nor did he violate Brown's civil rights.
Wilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.
Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?
LOLWhat are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.The car did not shoot michael brown.
Wilson said in his testimony that even tho he wasnt a threat anymore he (paraphrase) could be to someone sometime.
You didn't read the DOJ report did you, though they questioned Wilson's pursuing at that time, Wilson thought that due to the fact he felt Brown was involved in robbing the store, and he was so aggressive at going after Wilson's gun, he thought brown was a threat. He did nothing illegal nor did he violate Brown's civil rights.
Wilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.
Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?
Cops drive around all day listening to the dispatches that go out over their radios. He heard the call, even though he was on a different call. Happens all the time.
LOLWhat are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.
Wilson said in his testimony that even tho he wasnt a threat anymore he (paraphrase) could be to someone sometime.
You didn't read the DOJ report did you, though they questioned Wilson's pursuing at that time, Wilson thought that due to the fact he felt Brown was involved in robbing the store, and he was so aggressive at going after Wilson's gun, he thought brown was a threat. He did nothing illegal nor did he violate Brown's civil rights.
Wilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.
Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?
Cops drive around all day listening to the dispatches that go out over their radios. He heard the call, even though he was on a different call. Happens all the time.
A fact is something that is proved with verifiable evidence. We have no evidence that Wilson knew about the shop lifting/robbery. None. The police department said for days after the event that Wilson knew nothing about it. Then they change their story. The evidence is not believable.LOLWilson said in his testimony that even tho he wasnt a threat anymore he (paraphrase) could be to someone sometime.
You didn't read the DOJ report did you, though they questioned Wilson's pursuing at that time, Wilson thought that due to the fact he felt Brown was involved in robbing the store, and he was so aggressive at going after Wilson's gun, he thought brown was a threat. He did nothing illegal nor did he violate Brown's civil rights.
Wilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.
Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?
Cops drive around all day listening to the dispatches that go out over their radios. He heard the call, even though he was on a different call. Happens all the time.
You don't like the facts do you? Because you are good at ignoring them.
What are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.The car did not shoot michael brown.Looks like Holder says you are full of it.
Michael Brown was 148 feet from Wilson as he was shot to death
absolutely false
i am surprised this guy is still floating this lie
pretty disgusting really
He was 148 ft away from the car...Why do you lie when a tape measure proves you wrong?
Read the DOJ report, Wilson was chasing down Brown because after Brown tried to take Wilson's gun, and the gun discharged into Browns hands, Wilson felt Brown was a threat. Brown turned around and then charged Wilson, the evidence of the shell casing being behind Brown prove he was charging.
It's all in the DOJ report. It also found that many witnesses accounts were not credible.
What are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.The car did not shoot michael brown.
Wilson said in his testimony that even tho he wasnt a threat anymore he (paraphrase) could be to someone sometime.
You didn't read the DOJ report did you, though they questioned Wilson's pursuing at that time, Wilson thought that due to the fact he felt Brown was involved in robbing the store, and he was so aggressive at going after Wilson's gun, he thought brown was a threat. He did nothing illegal nor did he violate Brown's civil rights.
Wilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.
Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?
Again, I am going with the DOJ report. He said a bulletin came over the air reporting a robbery and the Cigarillos were taken, that is a reason Wilson pulled up to them, them. He saw the Cigarillos in Brown's hand and suspicioned he was one of the robbers. He started to get out of his car and Brown leaned into the door to prevent Wilson from getting out.
What are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.The car did not shoot michael brown.Michael Brown was 148 feet from Wilson as he was shot to death
absolutely false
i am surprised this guy is still floating this lie
pretty disgusting really
He was 148 ft away from the car...Why do you lie when a tape measure proves you wrong?
Read the DOJ report, Wilson was chasing down Brown because after Brown tried to take Wilson's gun, and the gun discharged into Browns hands, Wilson felt Brown was a threat. Brown turned around and then charged Wilson, the evidence of the shell casing being behind Brown prove he was charging.
It's all in the DOJ report. It also found that many witnesses accounts were not credible.
So the shell casings were behind the direction Brown was running from ? didnt quite see that. but this clip is also from th ereport.
9. Brown’s Toxicology A toxicologist with the St. Louis University (SLU) Toxicology Laboratory and the Chief of the Division of Forensic Toxicology at AFMES each conducted blood and urine screens on samples collected from Brown’s body. Brown tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids, the hallucinogenic substances associated with marijuana use. The SLU Toxicology Laboratory found 12 nanograms per milliliter of Delta-9-THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, where AFMES found 11 nanograms per milliliter of Delta-9-THC in Brown’s blood. According to both laboratories, these levels of Delta-9-THC are consistent with Brown having ingested THC within a few hours before his death. This concentration of THC would have rendered Brown impaired at the time of his death. As a general matter, this level of impairment can alter one’s perception of time and space, but the extent to which this was true in Brown’s case cannot be determined. THC affects individuals differently depending on unknown variables such as whether Brown was a chronic user and the concentration of the THC ingested.
A fact is something that is proved with verifiable evidence. We have no evidence that Wilson knew about the shop lifting/robbery. None. The police department said for days after the event that Wilson knew nothing about it. Then they change their story. The evidence is not believable.LOLYou didn't read the DOJ report did you, though they questioned Wilson's pursuing at that time, Wilson thought that due to the fact he felt Brown was involved in robbing the store, and he was so aggressive at going after Wilson's gun, he thought brown was a threat. He did nothing illegal nor did he violate Brown's civil rights.
Wilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.
Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?
Cops drive around all day listening to the dispatches that go out over their radios. He heard the call, even though he was on a different call. Happens all the time.
You don't like the facts do you? Because you are good at ignoring them.
You like to think a fact is something that agrees with what you want to think. Those aren't facts, they are your perception of reality: not facts.
What are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.The car did not shoot michael brown.He was 148 ft away from the car...Why do you lie when a tape measure proves you wrong?
Read the DOJ report, Wilson was chasing down Brown because after Brown tried to take Wilson's gun, and the gun discharged into Browns hands, Wilson felt Brown was a threat. Brown turned around and then charged Wilson, the evidence of the shell casing being behind Brown prove he was charging.
It's all in the DOJ report. It also found that many witnesses accounts were not credible.
So the shell casings were behind the direction Brown was running from ? didnt quite see that. but this clip is also from th ereport.
9. Brown’s Toxicology A toxicologist with the St. Louis University (SLU) Toxicology Laboratory and the Chief of the Division of Forensic Toxicology at AFMES each conducted blood and urine screens on samples collected from Brown’s body. Brown tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids, the hallucinogenic substances associated with marijuana use. The SLU Toxicology Laboratory found 12 nanograms per milliliter of Delta-9-THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, where AFMES found 11 nanograms per milliliter of Delta-9-THC in Brown’s blood. According to both laboratories, these levels of Delta-9-THC are consistent with Brown having ingested THC within a few hours before his death. This concentration of THC would have rendered Brown impaired at the time of his death. As a general matter, this level of impairment can alter one’s perception of time and space, but the extent to which this was true in Brown’s case cannot be determined. THC affects individuals differently depending on unknown variables such as whether Brown was a chronic user and the concentration of the THC ingested.
This isnt about weed dude...be serious
A fact is something that is proved with verifiable evidence. We have no evidence that Wilson knew about the shop lifting/robbery. None. The police department said for days after the event that Wilson knew nothing about it. Then they change their story. The evidence is not believable.LOLWilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.
Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?
Cops drive around all day listening to the dispatches that go out over their radios. He heard the call, even though he was on a different call. Happens all the time.
You don't like the facts do you? Because you are good at ignoring them.
You like to think a fact is something that agrees with what you want to think. Those aren't facts, they are your perception of reality: not facts.
Yes we do, the bulletin came out before the incident occurred, he was in the vicinity. You might want to read the DOJ report, they were trying hard to get Wilson on anything and couldn't.
What are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.
Wilson said in his testimony that even tho he wasnt a threat anymore he (paraphrase) could be to someone sometime.
You didn't read the DOJ report did you, though they questioned Wilson's pursuing at that time, Wilson thought that due to the fact he felt Brown was involved in robbing the store, and he was so aggressive at going after Wilson's gun, he thought brown was a threat. He did nothing illegal nor did he violate Brown's civil rights.
Wilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.
Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?
Again, I am going with the DOJ report. He said a bulletin came over the air reporting a robbery and the Cigarillos were taken, that is a reason Wilson pulled up to them, them. He saw the Cigarillos in Brown's hand and suspicioned he was one of the robbers. He started to get out of his car and Brown leaned into the door to prevent Wilson from getting out.
I know what you're going on but why you are ignoring the Chiefs own words?
What are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.The car did not shoot michael brown.
Read the DOJ report, Wilson was chasing down Brown because after Brown tried to take Wilson's gun, and the gun discharged into Browns hands, Wilson felt Brown was a threat. Brown turned around and then charged Wilson, the evidence of the shell casing being behind Brown prove he was charging.
It's all in the DOJ report. It also found that many witnesses accounts were not credible.
So the shell casings were behind the direction Brown was running from ? didnt quite see that. but this clip is also from th ereport.
9. Brown’s Toxicology A toxicologist with the St. Louis University (SLU) Toxicology Laboratory and the Chief of the Division of Forensic Toxicology at AFMES each conducted blood and urine screens on samples collected from Brown’s body. Brown tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids, the hallucinogenic substances associated with marijuana use. The SLU Toxicology Laboratory found 12 nanograms per milliliter of Delta-9-THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, where AFMES found 11 nanograms per milliliter of Delta-9-THC in Brown’s blood. According to both laboratories, these levels of Delta-9-THC are consistent with Brown having ingested THC within a few hours before his death. This concentration of THC would have rendered Brown impaired at the time of his death. As a general matter, this level of impairment can alter one’s perception of time and space, but the extent to which this was true in Brown’s case cannot be determined. THC affects individuals differently depending on unknown variables such as whether Brown was a chronic user and the concentration of the THC ingested.
This isnt about weed dude...be serious
Why did they bother to put the toxology report in ? of course it has something to do with factoring in Behavior in the situation.
Or are you guys just lying? explain why a cop would be driving with his dispatch radio turned off. Please explain that to me.
