Michael Brown was 148 feet from Wilson as he was shot to death

[Papageorgio]

I don't care what the Chief said, I don't find him to be believable. Wilson's story with all the evidence and forensics in, stood up. I have no reason not to believe him. All the stories out there, a few witnesses were telling the truth, the majority lied, the forensics and ballistics stood up for Wilson's story. If he was going to lie at the beginning. I would think reason would tell you he lied else where to cover the first time lie, that didn't occur, his story was consistent with the evidence, otherwise the DOJ would have been all over it, they had an agenda.

So basically we're just dismissing any information we dont like and embrassing the ones we do

No, the Chief was obviously mistaken, if that is what he said. There is a lot of confusion around at the time, people misspeak, see the WH for their mistakes.

The DOJ believe the evidence that was presented that said Wilson knew about the robbery because the timeline fits the story. The radio bulletin, again went off BEFORE Wilson met up with Brown. So, you still have nothing.

Yeah, obviously...Of course the robbery fits the timeline silly...Do you think that they wouldnt have their story together after 2 months? LOL....I mean come on...this is silly

You are right, you are being silly. The time a radio bulletin goes out,,it is time stamped, the officer calls in, it is time stamped. No need to get the story straight, an investigation checks out the timelines and you are being pissed because you are dead wrong and the DOJ that wanted so badly to hang Wilson could not do it because he went by the book. Keep crying, bitching and moaning, the side you desperately want to win was shown in error. Even this thread is based on a falsehood. However, you will believe whatever you need to believe regardless of the truth that is in front you.

If the times are stamped then why didnt the Chief know about this stamping record? If they didnt need to get the story straight then how did the story change after 2 months. What? He found out about time stamping 2 months later?

I mean, what is the best reason you can think of of how the Chief told two different stories? Both true? Both lies?

He was mistaken, look at the White House on Benghazi, they had so many stories, no one knew what to think. There is confusion and things that are inaccurate are said. Liberals after defending liberals should know this.

He probably never check the time stamps immediately after it occurred. You might want to contact the DOJ and ask them how they came to their conclusions. Now quit being silly, you are now moving into looking stupid. Again, believe what you want the facts are not agreeing with you.

 

[Yarddog]

I know you are an intelligent person, but your acting like a fucking Idiot. Is it just for fun? Here, I pasted you the link to the DOJ report, read the cover page. Its the one with the Great Big Letters on it. It sort of summarizes the whole reason for the report. If this doesnt solve the question for you, ask your mother, but dont ask me again

http://www.justice.gov/sites/defaul...4/doj_report_on_shooting_of_michael_brown.pdf

 

[Papageorgio]

The car did not shoot michael brown.

What are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.

Wilson said in his testimony that even tho he wasnt a threat anymore he (paraphrase) could be to someone sometime.

You didn't read the DOJ report did you, though they questioned Wilson's pursuing at that time, Wilson thought that due to the fact he felt Brown was involved in robbing the store, and he was so aggressive at going after Wilson's gun, he thought brown was a threat. He did nothing illegal nor did he violate Brown's civil rights.

Wilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.

Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?

I heard First storys that said Brown was shot in the back as well. Are we still going to go by that? sometimes, first reports are out of context or incomplete.

I heard that also, so I guess the police had two months to move the bullet entries to the front.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Wilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.

Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?

I heard First storys that said Brown was shot in the back as well. Are we still going to go by that? sometimes, first reports are out of context or incomplete.

But he wasnt tho...Forensics proved that. Forensics didnt prove Wilson heard something on the radio. The Chief would know about the movements of his officers wouldnt he?

Every cop drives with his dispatch radio ON! to not have it on would be an anomaly. I dont need to have forensic evidence only common sense as simple as 2 + 2 = 4

No facts needed...seems to be a pattern.

Cops drive with their dispatch radios on, its a FACT. you dont need forensic evidence to prove that. Silly is the word for what your saying .
Ask a cop the next time you see one. As a matter of fact Im going to bring up that conversation the next time I do.

Why would I ask a cop anything?...You're speaking for all cops on what they all do all the time right now. No gray areas allowed. Cops never ever ever miss a call...thanks

 

[Papageorgio]

I know you are an intelligent person, but your acting like a fucking Idiot. Is it just for fun? Here, I pasted you the link to the DOJ report, read the cover page. Its the one with the Great Big Letters on it. It sort of summarizes the whole reason for the report. If this doesnt solve the question for you, ask your mother, but dont ask me again

http://www.justice.gov/sites/defaul...4/doj_report_on_shooting_of_michael_brown.pdf

He has too much pride to admit he is so wrong.

 

[ClosedCaption]

I know you are an intelligent person, but your acting like a fucking Idiot. Is it just for fun? Here, I pasted you the link to the DOJ report, read the cover page. Its the one with the Great Big Letters on it. It sort of summarizes the whole reason for the report. If this doesnt solve the question for you, ask your mother, but dont ask me again

http://www.justice.gov/sites/defaul...4/doj_report_on_shooting_of_michael_brown.pdf

I didnt ask for a link...I've seen it. I'm asking what you believe the report was about because you seem to have mixed up a few things

 

[Yarddog]

I know you are an intelligent person, but your acting like a fucking Idiot. Is it just for fun? Here, I pasted you the link to the DOJ report, read the cover page. Its the one with the Great Big Letters on it. It sort of summarizes the whole reason for the report. If this doesnt solve the question for you, ask your mother, but dont ask me again

http://www.justice.gov/sites/defaul...4/doj_report_on_shooting_of_michael_brown.pdf

He has too much pride to admit he is so wrong.

I cant understand it

 

[ClosedCaption]

What are you saying then, that Wilson got out of the car, chased Brown down and killed him? Why would he need to shoot him at all if the kid was running away and was no danger to him? It wasn't like he was chasing a murderer. He was chasing a jaywalker.

Wilson said in his testimony that even tho he wasnt a threat anymore he (paraphrase) could be to someone sometime.

You didn't read the DOJ report did you, though they questioned Wilson's pursuing at that time, Wilson thought that due to the fact he felt Brown was involved in robbing the store, and he was so aggressive at going after Wilson's gun, he thought brown was a threat. He did nothing illegal nor did he violate Brown's civil rights.

Wilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.

Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?

I heard First storys that said Brown was shot in the back as well. Are we still going to go by that? sometimes, first reports are out of context or incomplete.

I heard that also, so I guess the police had two months to move the bullet entries to the front.

You seem to put a lot of weight behind what people say....well everyone but the Chief. What does what someone said has to do with anything?

 

[Papageorgio]

Wilson said in his testimony that even tho he wasnt a threat anymore he (paraphrase) could be to someone sometime.

You didn't read the DOJ report did you, though they questioned Wilson's pursuing at that time, Wilson thought that due to the fact he felt Brown was involved in robbing the store, and he was so aggressive at going after Wilson's gun, he thought brown was a threat. He did nothing illegal nor did he violate Brown's civil rights.

Wilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.

Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?

I heard First storys that said Brown was shot in the back as well. Are we still going to go by that? sometimes, first reports are out of context or incomplete.

I heard that also, so I guess the police had two months to move the bullet entries to the front.

You seem to put a lot of weight behind what people say....well everyone but the Chief. What does what someone said has to do with anything?

I put a lot of weight behind ballistics, evidence and forensics. You are the one putting the weight of an entire case on what a police chief said hours after a stressful and confusing event. Everything else doesn't seem to matter to you.

 

[bucs90]

He was a criminal. Not that I believe your distances at all but he could have been 148 MILES away and he would still have deserved to die.

Maybe he deserved to be arrested and should have gotten a fair trial and a judgement. That's what the law says.

Do you not believe in the rule of law.

Wilson tried that. Then Gentle Giant became violent and tried to take his gun.

I do believe in Rule of Law.

And SCOTUS rulings Graham vs Connor, Terry vs Ohio and Tennessee vs Garner all support Wilsons innocence.

So...DO YOU believe in rule of law?

 

[ClosedCaption]

You didn't read the DOJ report did you, though they questioned Wilson's pursuing at that time, Wilson thought that due to the fact he felt Brown was involved in robbing the store, and he was so aggressive at going after Wilson's gun, he thought brown was a threat. He did nothing illegal nor did he violate Brown's civil rights.

Wilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.

Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?

I heard First storys that said Brown was shot in the back as well. Are we still going to go by that? sometimes, first reports are out of context or incomplete.

I heard that also, so I guess the police had two months to move the bullet entries to the front.

You seem to put a lot of weight behind what people say....well everyone but the Chief. What does what someone said has to do with anything?

I put a lot of weight behind ballistics, evidence and forensics. You are the one putting the weight of an entire case on what a police chief said hours after a stressful and confusing event. Everything else doesn't seem to matter to you.

So again, you're bringing up things that dont matter to muddy the waters. Got it

 

[Papageorgio]

Wilson didnt know anything about robbing the store unless we are ignoring the Police chief who a day after the incident held a presser.

Are we going with the first story from the Capt or the revised story?

I heard First storys that said Brown was shot in the back as well. Are we still going to go by that? sometimes, first reports are out of context or incomplete.

I heard that also, so I guess the police had two months to move the bullet entries to the front.

You seem to put a lot of weight behind what people say....well everyone but the Chief. What does what someone said has to do with anything?

I put a lot of weight behind ballistics, evidence and forensics. You are the one putting the weight of an entire case on what a police chief said hours after a stressful and confusing event. Everything else doesn't seem to matter to you.

So again, you're bringing up things that dont matter to muddy the waters. Got it

What is mudding the water. You asked a question, I gave you an answer, just because you don't like my answer and just because you are wrong, doesn't mean I am mudding anything.

 

[ClosedCaption]

I heard First storys that said Brown was shot in the back as well. Are we still going to go by that? sometimes, first reports are out of context or incomplete.

I heard that also, so I guess the police had two months to move the bullet entries to the front.

You seem to put a lot of weight behind what people say....well everyone but the Chief. What does what someone said has to do with anything?

I put a lot of weight behind ballistics, evidence and forensics. You are the one putting the weight of an entire case on what a police chief said hours after a stressful and confusing event. Everything else doesn't seem to matter to you.

So again, you're bringing up things that dont matter to muddy the waters. Got it

What is mudding the water. You asked a question, I gave you an answer, just because you don't like my answer and just because you are wrong, doesn't mean I am mudding anything.

Well that true except you didnt answer the question. You just started telling me a list of things you put weight behind

 

[Papageorgio]

I heard that also, so I guess the police had two months to move the bullet entries to the front.

You seem to put a lot of weight behind what people say....well everyone but the Chief. What does what someone said has to do with anything?

I put a lot of weight behind ballistics, evidence and forensics. You are the one putting the weight of an entire case on what a police chief said hours after a stressful and confusing event. Everything else doesn't seem to matter to you.

So again, you're bringing up things that dont matter to muddy the waters. Got it

What is mudding the water. You asked a question, I gave you an answer, just because you don't like my answer and just because you are wrong, doesn't mean I am mudding anything.

Well that true except you didnt answer the question. You just started telling me a list of things you put weight behind

Then please, clarify your question for me.

 

[Kondor3]

Screw the distance... what signifies is that there is insufficient evidence to prosecute Wilson... and that witnesses favoring Brown were discredited. Case closed.

 

[MaryL]

Truth, I am good with that. Why is it a bunch of so called eye witnesses said Brown had his hands in the air and was surrendering when he wasn't ? No eyebrows get raised. Why was Brown even attacking officer Wilson? Why was Brown such a dickhead arrogant punk? Questions, questions. We all want answers. All this smoke and mirrors is getting old. We all want the truth.

 

[September]

He was a criminal. Not that I believe your distances at all but he could have been 148 MILES away and he would still have deserved to die.

"The Jedi don't believe in killing their prisoners. Nobody deserves to die, no matter what their crimes."- Bastila
​

 

[thereisnospoon]

It's really simple to measure the distance, and quite accurately:




Those who measured started at the fire-hydrant that was near the police car from which officer Wilson fired the deadly shots:

Distance from the driver's side door (when officer Wilson claims he fired the shots) to the fire hydrant: 17 feet.

Distance from the fire hydrant to the spot where Michael Brown was standing when he was shot: 131 feet.

131 +17 = 148.

Now, there is an angle involved between the cop car and the hydrant, which means that actual distance of 17 feet, calculated as a straight line, will be somewhat less, maybe one third less. So, the true distance may be 140 to 141 feet. The angle represented by the yellow line looks to be about 35 degrees to the plain, if you consider the straight path of the sidewalk next to the hydrant to be the plain.

The police report says 35 feet. And a police officer said TWICE in a press conference that the distance was 35 feet:



(1:13 and 6:01)

35 feet and 148 are nowhere close to each other in terms of distance. 148 feet = 49 yards, or just about one-half of a football field.

The film clearly documents the start and end points, and they can be confirmed by police photos and photos shot by witnesses on that day.

35 feet could be an argument for immediate danger for a police officer. But 148 feet? No way.

Why did the Ferguson police lie about this detail?

And if the Ferguson police have lied about this, then we must ask what else they have lied about?

You know, sometimes it's all about simple math. The Ferguson police can lie for a while, but they cannot change geography and they cannot undo so many photos and videos.



Discuss.

Does a suspected perpetrator who is 148 feet away from an officer represent a danger to that officer's life?

None of which was in the DOJ report, nor the eyewitness testimony offered in the Grand Jury trial..
More lies. More shit stirring by anarchists, left wing media and those who want to keep the flames burning.

 

[MaryL]

Truth is inescapable. Facts are hard to find. Let me ask this yet AGAIN: Why did Michael Brown confront Officer Darren Wilson? When all he had to do was comply with the officer's order to move over to the sidewalk? And this isn't about anything else, Wilson didn't shoot Brown on a whim. Regardless of the physics involved.

 

[Papageorgio]

Truth is inescapable. Facts are hard to find. Let me ask this yet AGAIN: Why did Michael Brown confront Officer Darren Wilson? When all he had to do was comply with the officer's order to move over to the sidewalk? And this isn't about anything else, Wilson didn't shoot brown on a whim. Regardless of the physics involved.

Because after hearing the bulletin on his radio and seeing the Cigarillos in Brown's hand, Wilson knew he needed to talk to the two gentleman, that is when Brown held Wilson's door shut, he knew he was caught for the robbery.