Massacre / Gun Control summary

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Wolfstrike, Oct 4, 2017.

  1. Admiral Rockwell Tory
    Offline

    Admiral Rockwell Tory Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    12,700
    Thanks Received:
    1,453
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Sitting down in front of my computer
    Ratings:
    +7,017
    Yet you still couldn't remember that you brought it up? I was making fun of you, jackass!

    Go to bed, HappyJoy! You're drunk!
     
  2. John Shaw
    Offline

    John Shaw VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2017
    Messages:
    1,629
    Thanks Received:
    186
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +971
    The only argument I can think of for needing access to bump stocks or fully automatic weapons is that they need them in case the government turns against the people ... but the 2nd amendment (and state constitutions) was written with shitty muskets in mind. I doubt early Americans could've dreamed that an elderly man could rain absolute hell from 32 stories up, killing dozens of people in a matter of minutes. I highly doubt they imagined a world in which the American military could launch precision nuclear strikes across the globe, capable of annihilating millions in mere seconds. I doubt they would believe that a simple gun, fully-auto or not, would stand a chance against the god-like power our military has become.

    In other words, if the military turns against the people, no number of assault rifles is going to save the people.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Bootney Lee Farnsworth
    Offline

    Bootney Lee Farnsworth Silver Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2017
    Messages:
    2,835
    Thanks Received:
    330
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Ratings:
    +2,447
    I'm right here. I certainly wouldn't run away from someone like you. :lol:

    There is reason to believe that this dude is probably going to fuck up the liberal media narrative. They are not focusing on this guy like they have on other perps. Now, it could be a lack of information, but that has never stopped them in the past. Russia Russia Russia

    So, don't sit there and tell me that I have no reason to be suspicious. You know it.


    SPORT

    Now, get bent, you sanctimonious twat.
     
  4. Admiral Rockwell Tory
    Offline

    Admiral Rockwell Tory Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    12,700
    Thanks Received:
    1,453
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Sitting down in front of my computer
    Ratings:
    +7,017
    Sorry, but you are ignoring history. How did we defeat a vastly superior force in the Revolutionary War?

    How did the Viet Cong run us out of Vietnam with AK-47s?

    Why are we having so much trouble defeating the Taliban who have no real weaponry?

    Why haven't the Russians wiped out all of the Syrian rebels?
     
  5. John Shaw
    Offline

    John Shaw VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2017
    Messages:
    1,629
    Thanks Received:
    186
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +971
    The difference between the rebels and the English was not nearly as large, lol. The American military, if it so chose, could wipe your property off the face of the Earth from miles away, or snipe your entire family to death within 0.5 seconds before you even knew they were there. No gun is going to save you from that.

    Nam didn't win that war. American politicians lost it.

    The Taliban aren't winning jack shit. They are just surviving like cockroaches, which they would achieve way more easily if they just stopped trying to fight like fucking idiots.

    Why haven't we been able to wipe out ISIS, and why haven't the Russians wiped out the Syrian rebels? That's a somewhat better question, but it probably has to do with Russia not wanting to appear as though they don't give a damn about committing war crimes, since the rebels are mostly terrorists hiding behind human shields. Russia is trying to become a world leader and power again, not the world's pariah. They want to look like the reasonable ones. Also, costs, logistics, etc. Not the same as a fight in the military's own back yard. And we're leaning on the Iraqis, because we don't want to become entrenched again in an occupation.

    But if you'll recall, the American military demolished the Iraqi military in ... what, a week?
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2017
  6. HappyJoy
    Offline

    HappyJoy Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2015
    Messages:
    12,381
    Thanks Received:
    1,140
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +5,282
    You missed the point, I've already lapped you twice.
     
  7. Admiral Rockwell Tory
    Offline

    Admiral Rockwell Tory Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    12,700
    Thanks Received:
    1,453
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Sitting down in front of my computer
    Ratings:
    +7,017
    The only lapping you are doing is at your own genitalia. Stop acting like a dog and go to bed!
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. Bootney Lee Farnsworth
    Offline

    Bootney Lee Farnsworth Silver Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2017
    Messages:
    2,835
    Thanks Received:
    330
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Ratings:
    +2,447
    Sounds like we need to arm more civilians with much better and more deadly weapons and equipment. You're making a fine argument for ZERO weapons restrictions.
    :beer:
     
  9. John Shaw
    Offline

    John Shaw VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2017
    Messages:
    1,629
    Thanks Received:
    186
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +971
    Unless civilians are suddenly flying around in apaches raining down hellfire missiles from a mile away, I don't think it's going to matter.
     
  10. Bootney Lee Farnsworth
    Offline

    Bootney Lee Farnsworth Silver Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2017
    Messages:
    2,835
    Thanks Received:
    330
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Ratings:
    +2,447
    Well, maybe we better start thinking about making some collective purchases, just in case.

    All the air superiority in the world will not defeat an insurgency. It takes boots on the ground. If we have the same equipment as an infantryman, we will be just fine.
     

Share This Page