Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Only Congress can write words on formerly blank pieces of paper and have them enacted as laws in our Republic; any Thing else, is simply activism, Judicial or otherwise.Dictionaries v. THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.Every dictionary definition supports my contention and specifically not Yours.
I will go with the Court on this one. So will EVERYBODY else.
I can't lose; every dictionary supports my contention and not Yours.You cite to no sources on the intent of the framers. We do.The People and The Militia are plural, not Individual, every time we have to quibble meaning.
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776
Was he referring to an individual or the communist collective?
"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824
Does that sound like your communist "People" plurality that really means nobody?
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun."
- Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778
Are you going to argue that "Everyone" means the collective communist nobody "People" like before?
So, nobody takes you seriously, dan, because you will not rebut ONE BIT of the above. You will repeat your unsourced bullshit.
We source. You don't.
You lose.
too bad it isn't about Socialism.
Very simple, the right of the people shall not be infringed. The 2nd Amendment allows me to purchase a gun if I so choose.
That doesn't prevent states from regulating it.
Who said differently? The right of the people shall not be infringed. The 2nd Amendment allows me to purchase a gun if I so choose.
Buy all you want. States can still regulate them.
Interesting the left isn't concerned about states rights when Arizona wanted to enforce their immigration laws, nor are they for states rights concerning marriage, abortion and lax gun control. I believe the states have those rights including gun control, marriage, abortion, immigration and so on.
Funny. Tell it to the federal government. Give Trump a call...
Judges don't make dictionary definitions. DC v Heller could be overturned on simple legal error. All I need is, Standing.I can't lose; every dictionary supports my contention and not Yours.You cite to no sources on the intent of the framers. We do.The People and The Militia are plural, not Individual, every time we have to quibble meaning.
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776
Was he referring to an individual or the communist collective?
"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824
Does that sound like your communist "People" plurality that really means nobody?
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun."
- Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778
Are you going to argue that "Everyone" means the collective communist nobody "People" like before?
So, nobody takes you seriously, dan, because you will not rebut ONE BIT of the above. You will repeat your unsourced bullshit.
We source. You don't.
You lose.
too bad it isn't about Socialism.
I’m glad courts uphold your definitions. At least we have smart judges.
Judges don't make dictionary definitions. DC v Heller could be overturned on simple legal error. All I need is, Standing.I can't lose; every dictionary supports my contention and not Yours.You cite to no sources on the intent of the framers. We do.The People and The Militia are plural, not Individual, every time we have to quibble meaning.
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776
Was he referring to an individual or the communist collective?
"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824
Does that sound like your communist "People" plurality that really means nobody?
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun."
- Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778
Are you going to argue that "Everyone" means the collective communist nobody "People" like before?
So, nobody takes you seriously, dan, because you will not rebut ONE BIT of the above. You will repeat your unsourced bullshit.
We source. You don't.
You lose.
too bad it isn't about Socialism.
I’m glad courts uphold your definitions. At least we have smart judges.
I only don't have Standing; i already know I have the supreme argument. The right wing can Only have an Inferior argument.Judges don't make dictionary definitions. DC v Heller could be overturned on simple legal error. All I need is, Standing.I can't lose; every dictionary supports my contention and not Yours.You cite to no sources on the intent of the framers. We do.The People and The Militia are plural, not Individual, every time we have to quibble meaning.
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776
Was he referring to an individual or the communist collective?
"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824
Does that sound like your communist "People" plurality that really means nobody?
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun."
- Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778
Are you going to argue that "Everyone" means the collective communist nobody "People" like before?
So, nobody takes you seriously, dan, because you will not rebut ONE BIT of the above. You will repeat your unsourced bullshit.
We source. You don't.
You lose.
too bad it isn't about Socialism.
I’m glad courts uphold your definitions. At least we have smart judges.
Which you don't have, so you still have nothing, nor will you get any, just like to other causes you pretend to fight for but have yet to do anything. Did you get federal minimum wage to $15 yet? Did you get the government to pay you for not working yet? You are just all wind and nothing else.
I only don't have Standing; i already know I have the supreme argument. The right wing can Only have an Inferior argument.Judges don't make dictionary definitions. DC v Heller could be overturned on simple legal error. All I need is, Standing.I can't lose; every dictionary supports my contention and not Yours.You cite to no sources on the intent of the framers. We do.
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776
Was he referring to an individual or the communist collective?
"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824
Does that sound like your communist "People" plurality that really means nobody?
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun."
- Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778
Are you going to argue that "Everyone" means the collective communist nobody "People" like before?
So, nobody takes you seriously, dan, because you will not rebut ONE BIT of the above. You will repeat your unsourced bullshit.
We source. You don't.
You lose.
too bad it isn't about Socialism.
I’m glad courts uphold your definitions. At least we have smart judges.
Which you don't have, so you still have nothing, nor will you get any, just like to other causes you pretend to fight for but have yet to do anything. Did you get federal minimum wage to $15 yet? Did you get the government to pay you for not working yet? You are just all wind and nothing else.
so what; natural rights are recognized and secured in State Constitutions.I only don't have Standing; i already know I have the supreme argument. The right wing can Only have an Inferior argument.Judges don't make dictionary definitions. DC v Heller could be overturned on simple legal error. All I need is, Standing.I can't lose; every dictionary supports my contention and not Yours.
too bad it isn't about Socialism.
I’m glad courts uphold your definitions. At least we have smart judges.
Which you don't have, so you still have nothing, nor will you get any, just like to other causes you pretend to fight for but have yet to do anything. Did you get federal minimum wage to $15 yet? Did you get the government to pay you for not working yet? You are just all wind and nothing else.
You have no argument, you have no standing otherwise you would prove otherwise and you haven't. Face it you are all talk and nothing else. I can own a gun if I choose, you can claim otherwise, I don't mind.
so what; natural rights are recognized and secured in State Constitutions.I only don't have Standing; i already know I have the supreme argument. The right wing can Only have an Inferior argument.Judges don't make dictionary definitions. DC v Heller could be overturned on simple legal error. All I need is, Standing.I’m glad courts uphold your definitions. At least we have smart judges.
Which you don't have, so you still have nothing, nor will you get any, just like to other causes you pretend to fight for but have yet to do anything. Did you get federal minimum wage to $15 yet? Did you get the government to pay you for not working yet? You are just all wind and nothing else.
You have no argument, you have no standing otherwise you would prove otherwise and you haven't. Face it you are all talk and nothing else. I can own a gun if I choose, you can claim otherwise, I don't mind.
it shouldn't be about banning guns, but about ensuring the security of our free States, even if it means, mustering the California State Militia (a militia you can rely on, regardless of what our federales are doing).
Only the unorganized militia whines about gun control.so what; natural rights are recognized and secured in State Constitutions.I only don't have Standing; i already know I have the supreme argument. The right wing can Only have an Inferior argument.Judges don't make dictionary definitions. DC v Heller could be overturned on simple legal error. All I need is, Standing.
Which you don't have, so you still have nothing, nor will you get any, just like to other causes you pretend to fight for but have yet to do anything. Did you get federal minimum wage to $15 yet? Did you get the government to pay you for not working yet? You are just all wind and nothing else.
You have no argument, you have no standing otherwise you would prove otherwise and you haven't. Face it you are all talk and nothing else. I can own a gun if I choose, you can claim otherwise, I don't mind.
it shouldn't be about banning guns, but about ensuring the security of our free States, even if it means, mustering the California State Militia (a militia you can rely on, regardless of what our federales are doing).
Still nothing, why do you post nothing over and over again?
Really? You think Peolle in the “organized militia” are not also people who valuse the inalienable right?Only the unorganized militia whines about gun control.
Only the unorganized militia whines about gun control.so what; natural rights are recognized and secured in State Constitutions.I only don't have Standing; i already know I have the supreme argument. The right wing can Only have an Inferior argument.Which you don't have, so you still have nothing, nor will you get any, just like to other causes you pretend to fight for but have yet to do anything. Did you get federal minimum wage to $15 yet? Did you get the government to pay you for not working yet? You are just all wind and nothing else.
You have no argument, you have no standing otherwise you would prove otherwise and you haven't. Face it you are all talk and nothing else. I can own a gun if I choose, you can claim otherwise, I don't mind.
it shouldn't be about banning guns, but about ensuring the security of our free States, even if it means, mustering the California State Militia (a militia you can rely on, regardless of what our federales are doing).
Still nothing, why do you post nothing over and over again?
NEWTON, Mass. ― A thirtysomething man sought to buy a rifle here last September, and if he had been living in almost any other part of the country, he could have done so easily.
His record was free of arrests, involuntary psychiatric commitments or anything else that might automatically disqualify him from owning firearms under federal law. He could have walked into a gun store, filled out a form and walked out with a weapon in less than an hour.
But he couldn’t do that in Massachusetts because the state requires would-be buyers to get a permit first. That means going through a much longer process and undergoing a lot more scrutiny.
Each applicant must complete a four-hour gun safety course, get character references from two people, and show up at the local police department for fingerprinting and a one-on-one interview with a specially designated officer. Police must also do some work on their own, searching department records for information that wouldn’t show up on the official background check.
More: This Is The Nation’s Toughest Gun Law
I salute Massachusetts for passing commonsense gun laws! Thankfully, we have states like Massachusetts that are moving forward on gun control. Hopefully more will follow their lead.
NEWTON, Mass. ― A thirtysomething man sought to buy a rifle here last September, and if he had been living in almost any other part of the country, he could have done so easily.
His record was free of arrests, involuntary psychiatric commitments or anything else that might automatically disqualify him from owning firearms under federal law. He could have walked into a gun store, filled out a form and walked out with a weapon in less than an hour.
But he couldn’t do that in Massachusetts because the state requires would-be buyers to get a permit first. That means going through a much longer process and undergoing a lot more scrutiny.
Each applicant must complete a four-hour gun safety course, get character references from two people, and show up at the local police department for fingerprinting and a one-on-one interview with a specially designated officer. Police must also do some work on their own, searching department records for information that wouldn’t show up on the official background check.
More: This Is The Nation’s Toughest Gun Law
I salute Massachusetts for passing commonsense gun laws! Thankfully, we have states like Massachusetts that are moving forward on gun control. Hopefully more will follow their lead.
You have absolutely no idea how gun control works do you. You fucking liberal snowflake
The point is, we have a Second Amendment and should have, No Security problems.Really? You think Peolle in the “organized militia” are not also people who valuse the inalienable right?Only the unorganized militia whines about gun control.
And, the “organized militia” (national guard) is not really a militia, despite Congresses’s bullshit 1903 law. That is a standing army.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
I never said you couldn't. I only claim, well regulated militia may not be Infringed, regardless of all of the other ones.Only the unorganized militia whines about gun control.so what; natural rights are recognized and secured in State Constitutions.I only don't have Standing; i already know I have the supreme argument. The right wing can Only have an Inferior argument.
You have no argument, you have no standing otherwise you would prove otherwise and you haven't. Face it you are all talk and nothing else. I can own a gun if I choose, you can claim otherwise, I don't mind.
it shouldn't be about banning guns, but about ensuring the security of our free States, even if it means, mustering the California State Militia (a militia you can rely on, regardless of what our federales are doing).
Still nothing, why do you post nothing over and over again?
Nothing to whine about, I can own a gun and you can't do crap about it.
I never said you couldn't. I only claim, well regulated militia may not be Infringed, regardless of all of the other ones.Only the unorganized militia whines about gun control.so what; natural rights are recognized and secured in State Constitutions.You have no argument, you have no standing otherwise you would prove otherwise and you haven't. Face it you are all talk and nothing else. I can own a gun if I choose, you can claim otherwise, I don't mind.
it shouldn't be about banning guns, but about ensuring the security of our free States, even if it means, mustering the California State Militia (a militia you can rely on, regardless of what our federales are doing).
Still nothing, why do you post nothing over and over again?
Nothing to whine about, I can own a gun and you can't do crap about it.
I am merely, "parroting" our Second Amendment.I never said you couldn't. I only claim, well regulated militia may not be Infringed, regardless of all of the other ones.Only the unorganized militia whines about gun control.so what; natural rights are recognized and secured in State Constitutions.
it shouldn't be about banning guns, but about ensuring the security of our free States, even if it means, mustering the California State Militia (a militia you can rely on, regardless of what our federales are doing).
Still nothing, why do you post nothing over and over again?
Nothing to whine about, I can own a gun and you can't do crap about it.
Doesn’t matter what you say.
I am merely, "parroting" our Second Amendment.I never said you couldn't. I only claim, well regulated militia may not be Infringed, regardless of all of the other ones.Only the unorganized militia whines about gun control.Still nothing, why do you post nothing over and over again?
Nothing to whine about, I can own a gun and you can't do crap about it.
Doesn’t matter what you say.
