Mark Halprin Calls Obama A Dick On Air

NBC = Nazi Broadcasting Company. The only person to tell the truth on that Network and they fire em. Crazy stuff.
 
Last edited:
The apologeticsporn, a perversion of reality, flows from the far right con right as usual.

These guys are a perversion of all what is good with America, and the nice thing, they grow older, they can't recruit, they will fail in taking over the GOP or they will destroy it, and thus, they will fail.

Oh, boo hoo.

Can somebody translate this into American English for me? Even the Queen's English, or any other form of English spoken by more than one person.
We can probably get mascale to translate...If you think that'll help. :lol:

It won't help me.
 
If being a D*ck will actually get Congress out of their political shells, then so be it. It is about time Obama got tough. I blame Joe Scarborough. He told the guy he had his back, and then he said he was joking. Personally, I like Mark Halperin.

Yeah, right.....Obama is a workin fool.:cuckoo:

I need something to fertilize my garden so could you shovel some of that shit my way please?
 
After watching it again the other day I realized that the biggest joke here is that Scarborough was just joking about the 7 second delay, and Halperin thought he was serious.
 
I don't get a vacation this year.
Where's Obama this weekend. Just curious. I figure those with their nostrils up his anus will know his location.
 
NBC = Nazi Broadcasting Company. The only person to tell the truth on that Network and they fire em. Crazy stuff.

Playing the "Natzi card" is egregarious...



e·gre·gious
   [ih-gree-juhs, -jee-uhs] Show IPA

adjective
1.
extraordinary in some bad way; glaring; flagrant: an egregious mistake; an egregious liar.

-----------

gre·gar·i·ous
   [gri-gair-ee-uhs] Show IPA

adjective
1.
fond of the company of others; sociable.

-----

egre.gar.i.ous

adjective
1.
A glaring mistake being sociable in the company of others.

see 'message board'


chuckle...you invented a new word.
 
No they didn't. They never did. That's sheer ignorance.

:confused:

I do not even know what to say. The Democrats had 60 votes in the Senate, and it takes 60 votes to end a filibuster. Talk about ignorance.

If people won't vote with you, you don't have the votes. The letter after your name is irrelevant.

I told someone in another thread, you would come with this ridiculous bushwah....thx...:lol::lol:


Tool Cat says.....
 

Attachments

  • $tool cat copy.jpg
    $tool cat copy.jpg
    95.8 KB · Views: 66
No they didn't. They never did. That's sheer ignorance.

:confused:

I do not even know what to say. The Democrats had 60 votes in the Senate, and it takes 60 votes to end a filibuster. Talk about ignorance.

If people won't vote with you, you don't have the votes. The letter after your name is irrelevant.

Which Democrat did not vote with the party when it counted? Did you run them out of office?
 
:confused:

I do not even know what to say. The Democrats had 60 votes in the Senate, and it takes 60 votes to end a filibuster. Talk about ignorance.

If people won't vote with you, you don't have the votes. The letter after your name is irrelevant.

I told someone in another thread, you would come with this ridiculous bushwah....thx...:lol::lol:


Tool Cat says.....

It's a fact. Contrary to the conventional (lack of) wisdom and of course contrary to the media's penchant for hyping it,

there is no such thing as a filibuster proof majority by party affiliation, because, now listen carefully,

Senators have no obligation to vote with their party. Get it?

Oh, and btw, the stimulus passed in 2009 when the Democrats did not have a filibuster proof majority. Why then did the Republican party ALLOW the stimulus to pass? Eh, genius?
 
If people won't vote with you, you don't have the votes. The letter after your name is irrelevant.

I told someone in another thread, you would come with this ridiculous bushwah....thx...:lol::lol:


Tool Cat says.....

It's a fact. Contrary to the conventional (lack of) wisdom and of course contrary to the media's penchant for hyping it,

there is no such thing as a filibuster proof majority by party affiliation, because, now listen carefully,

Senators have no obligation to vote with their party. Get it?

Oh, and btw, the stimulus passed in 2009 when the Democrats did not have a filibuster proof majority. Why then did the Republican party ALLOW the stimulus to pass? Eh, genius?

In the House no Repugs voted yes, while 11 Dems voted no.

In the Senate the vote was 61 - 36


The Senate got three NE RINOs to vote with them. Collins, Snowe, and Specter.

Same people that helped the Dems pass all of their crapola.
 
If people won't vote with you, you don't have the votes. The letter after your name is irrelevant.

I told someone in another thread, you would come with this ridiculous bushwah....thx...:lol::lol:


Tool Cat says.....

It's a fact. Contrary to the conventional (lack of) wisdom and of course contrary to the media's penchant for hyping it,

there is no such thing as a filibuster proof majority by party affiliation, because, now listen carefully,

Senators have no obligation to vote with their party. Get it?

Oh, and btw, the stimulus passed in 2009 when the Democrats did not have a filibuster proof majority. Why then did the Republican party ALLOW the stimulus to pass? Eh, genius?

What a genius.

stimulus did not pass in 2009, TARP did. And that almost did not pass, but Bush believed in it, and got out and twisted a few arms. That is called leadership, something I understand even when I think it was wrong.
 
NBC = Nazi Broadcasting Company. The only person to tell the truth on that Network and they fire em. Crazy stuff.

Playing the "Natzi card" is egregarious...



e·gre·gious
   [ih-gree-juhs, -jee-uhs] Show IPA

adjective
1.
extraordinary in some bad way; glaring; flagrant: an egregious mistake; an egregious liar.

-----------

gre·gar·i·ous
   [gri-gair-ee-uhs] Show IPA

adjective
1.
fond of the company of others; sociable.

-----

egre.gar.i.ous

adjective
1.
A glaring mistake being sociable in the company of others.

see 'message board'


chuckle...you invented a new word.
I don't believe you will find it in the next edition of the OED.

Which is a pity, because I like it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top