Loss of sea ice leads to unprecedented Arctic warming

[ding]

Your use of "last glacial cycle" is proof you are completely lost.

How so?

 

[ding]

Why isn't Plymouth Rock underwater?

You accept their fudge as accurate. It is not.

Oceans are not warming which is why there is no breakout of cane activity.

That they lie about south pacific island sinking is because they have no ocean rise... Which all starts with the truth of the satellite and balloon data, which shows

Co2 up

Atmospheric temps NOT

THEORY REJECTED

If the planet hasnt been warming why has the ocean been rising for the past 20,000 years?

And why did the slope change 6,000 years ago?

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Aside from the albedo effects in summer, the loss of sea ice over winter leads to atmospheric heating from the warmer sea water.

December serving up baked Alaska and warming most of Arctic

Much of the Arctic is in a burst of freak December warming. Temperatures in Alaska’s northernmost community hit 40 degrees Monday morning.

apnews.com

So, no downside to a warm planet

 

[ding]

So, no downside to a warm planet

Not really. The downside side is a colder planet.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Not really. The downside side is a colder planet.

That makes no sense

 

[ding]

That makes no sense

We’re less than 2C away from 3,000 ft thick ice sheets covering all of Canada, significant portions of the US NE/Midwest, significant portions of Europe and Asia and displacing 250 million people.

 

[EMH]

How so?

IQ over 5 test...


The whole "interglacial" bullshit depends on retards to believe the entire planet warms and cools all together because of co2.

The truth that NA thawed while greenland froze blows that bullshit up completely, but it takes an IQ over 5 to notice....

 

[EMH]

If the planet hasnt been warming why has the ocean been rising for the past 20,000 years?

And why did the slope change 6,000 years ago?

You have precisely ZERO evidence of ocean rise.

ZERO

 

[ding]

IQ over 5 test...

Textbook dunning effect

 

[ding]

The whole "interglacial" bullshit depends on retards to believe the entire planet warms and cools all together because of co2.

Actually it doesn’t. The previous interglacial was 2C warmer than today with 26 ft higher seas than today and 120 ppm LESS atmospheric CO2 than today.

Thus proving there is no correlation between CO2 And temperature today.

 

[ding]

The truth that NA thawed while greenland froze blows that bullshit up completely, but it takes an IQ over 5 to notice....

Incorrect. It proves that once the planet transitioned from a greenhouse planet to an icehouse planet ~3 million years ago that climate fluctuations and environmental uncertainty increased because the northern hemisphere has a lower temperature threshold for extensive continental glaciation than the southern hemisphere but more room for glaciation to spread than the southern hemisphere.

Do you even oxygen isotope curve?

 

[ding]

You have precisely ZERO evidence of ocean rise.

ZERO

It’s been rising for 20,000 years. There’s so much evidence for it that it’s hard to miss. That you believe the seas rising for 20,000 years with a slope change in the rise occurring 6,000 years supports AGW is baffling. It doesn’t.

 

[EMH]

It’s been rising for 20,000 years. There’s so much evidence for it that it’s hard to miss. That you believe the seas rising for 20,000 years with a slope change in the rise occurring 6,000 years supports AGW is baffling. It doesn’t.

Amazing.

Oceans rising, yet Plymouth Rock is still right by the ocean where Pilgrims found it.

Is Massachusetts rising?

Lol


Lost the fudge parrot is...

 

[ding]

Amazing.

Oceans rising, yet Plymouth Rock is still right by the ocean where Pilgrims found it.

Is Massachusetts rising?

Lol


Lost the fudge parrot is...

It’s public record.

 

[EMH]

It’s public record.

Lol...

There is a difference between FUDGE and data....

 

[ding]

Lol...

There is a difference between FUDGE and data....

That’s why I look at the data. You know… oxygen isotope curve, ice cores, etc.

What have you looked at?

 

[EMH]

That’s why I look at the data. You know… oxygen isotope curve, ice cores, etc.

What have you looked at?

Your "theory" about "glacials" gets rejected because Greenland froze while North America thawed at the same time.

What caused NA to thaw while Greenland froze at the same time??


Start the Jeopardy! Music....

 

[ding]

Your "theory" about "glacials" gets rejected because Greenland froze while North America thawed at the same time.

What caused NA to thaw while Greenland froze at the same time??


Start the Jeopardy! Music....

What data have you studied?

 

[EMH]

What data have you studied?

The satellite and balloon data showing no warming in the atmopshere.

The hurricane data showing no breakout in cane activity.

The ocean temp data showing no warming in the oceans.

The urban heat sink data which documents urban areas are 1 to 10 degrees warmer than surrounding undeveloped land. Urban heat is all of the warming in Surface Ground, and the only data showing warming that is not FUDGED.

 

[ding]

The satellite and balloon data showing no warming in the atmopshere.

The hurricane data showing no breakout in cane activity.

The ocean temp data showing no warming in the oceans.

The urban heat sink data which documents urban areas are 1 to 10 degrees warmer than surrounding undeveloped land. Urban heat is all of the warming in Surface Ground, and the only data showing warming that is not FUDGED.

None of that is paleoclimate data. What paleoclimate data have you studied?