Loss of sea ice leads to unprecedented Arctic warming

Aside from the albedo effects in summer, the loss of sea ice over winter leads to atmospheric heating from the warmer sea water.
Excellent. This means the vast lands of the North will become more habitable.
 
Always with the fraud it is deliberate misinterpretation...

Islands in south pacific sinking... Nothing else is sinking... Must be ocean rise not tectonic plate approaching PROF...

For arctic sea ice, been there done that. In 2005 and 2007 there was shocking arctic sea ice loss... Just ovef Gakkel Ridge... That then grew back... There was also an 87F reading from the arctic ocean as climate "scientists" chased a tectonic spike in pursuit of warming FROM....


DUH.....


 
Aside from the albedo effects in summer, the loss of sea ice over winter leads to atmospheric heating from the warmer sea water.


How to find "warmer sea water" in arctic.

Monitor seismic events.

When instruments detect seismic event at gakkel ridge, jet out on taxpayer funded yacht and measure ocean temp RIGHT OVER UNDERSEA MAGMA RELEASE


blame co2

Go on CNN and scream DOOM!!!
 
There is going to be such a rush as people try to get new homes after theirs goes under the sea.


To cause sea level rise on Earth requires a net ongoing ice melt.

That is not happening.

That is why the FRAUD lies about pacific islands approaching PROF, because

THERE IS NO OCEAN RISE

Because

THERE IS NO NET ICE MELT

Because earth is NOT WARMING....
 
Aside from the albedo effects in summer, the loss of sea ice over winter leads to atmospheric heating from the warmer sea water.

Good. That means Obama's $15 million beachfront mansion will float away, and we'll never hear another word out of his nasty pie hole.
 
Aside from the albedo effects in summer, the loss of sea ice over winter leads to atmospheric heating from the warmer sea water.
Typical interglacial climate.

You do realize previous interglacials were 2C warmer than today with 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2, right?
 
To cause sea level rise on Earth requires a net ongoing ice melt.

That is not happening.

That is why the FRAUD lies about pacific islands approaching PROF, because

THERE IS NO OCEAN RISE

Because

THERE IS NO NET ICE MELT

Because earth is NOT WARMING....
The seas have been rising for ~20,000 years. A significant slope change occurred about 6,000 years ago. Prior to 6,000 years ago sea level rise was a combination of ice melt plus thermal expansion of water. Since that time sea level rise is most due to thermal expansion of water.

So you are correct.
 
My favorite part of their wacky catastrophe predictions is that within 8 years sea level rise will increase from ~3 mm/yr to ~10 mm/yr.

That’s never going to happen.
 
1670336495079.png













































































































































































































1670336552618.png
 
Aside from the albedo effects in summer, the loss of sea ice over winter leads to atmospheric heating from the warmer sea water.
Thus proving why the planet’s climate is driven by the northern hemisphere and that climate fluctuations and environmental uncertainty are hallmarks of our bipolar glaciated planet.
 
The seas have been rising for ~20,000 years. A significant slope change occurred about 6,000 years ago. Prior to 6,000 years ago sea level rise was a combination of ice melt plus thermal expansion of water. Since that time sea level rise is most due to thermal expansion of water.

So you are correct.

Why isn't Plymouth Rock underwater?

You accept their fudge as accurate. It is not.

Oceans are not warming which is why there is no breakout of cane activity.

That they lie about south pacific island sinking is because they have no ocean rise... Which all starts with the truth of the satellite and balloon data, which shows

Co2 up

Atmospheric temps NOT

THEORY REJECTED
 
Why isn't Plymouth Rock underwater?

You accept their fudge as accurate. It is not.

Oceans are not warming which is why there is no breakout of cane activity.

That they lie about south pacific island sinking is because they have no ocean rise... Which all starts with the truth of the satellite and balloon data, which shows

Co2 up

Atmospheric temps NOT

THEORY REJECTED
I don’t accept their “fudge” but the seas have been rising since the last glacial cycle ended because of ice melt and thermal expansion of water. The point I am making is that the thermal expansion of water hasn’t changed in 6,000 years.
 
I don’t accept their “fudge” but the seas have been rising since the last glacial cycle ended because of ice melt and thermal expansion of water. The point I am making is that the thermal expansion of water hasn’t changed in 6,000 years.


Your use of "last glacial cycle" is proof you are completely lost.

Earth ice

90% on Antarctica
7% on Greenland
0.3% on Ellesmere Island (Canada)

The overwhelming majority of Earth ice is on land near an earth pole. And land moves.



Two subjects for you to check.

1. North American ice age

1 million years ago NA had ice age glaciers down to Indiana, and indiana still had glacier ice 10k years ago. That ice melted. Tectonic direction of NA = SW.

2. Search for ancient Greenland green

Digging through the deepest Greenland ice and scooping up ancient pine cones dated 400-800k years ago. 1 million years ago, Greenland was completely green save mountains. Tectonic direction NW but pushed also SW by arctic ocean growth.


During the past million years, greenland FROZE while North America THAWED all at the same time on the same planet with the same atmosphere with the same amount of co2 in the atmosphere.

Ice ages are continent specific. Ice ages begin when land gets within 600 miles of an Earth pole, where the summer sun is insufficient to melt the snow, which then starts to stack.

Antarctica has 70 million year old dinosaur fossils, because 70 million years ago AA was not on South Pole...
 

Forum List

Back
Top