Loss of sea ice leads to unprecedented Arctic warming

[EMH]

None of that is paleoclimate data. What paleoclimate data have you studied?

What a worthless weasel...


Answer my question first.

Jeopardy music still playing....

 

[ding]

What a worthless weasel...


Answer my question first.

Jeopardy music still playing....

We are discussing the paleoclimate. You know… sea level rising over 20,000 years.

What paleoclimate data have you studied that says the sea level hasn’t been rising for 20,000 years?

 

[EMH]

We are discussing the paleoclimate. You know… sea level rising over 20,000 years.

What paleoclimate data have you studied that says the sea level hasn’t been rising for 20,000 years?

You have been asked above how co2 thawed NA and froze Greenland at the same time.

You will not answer that question.

Not hard to figure out why....

 

[ding]

You have been asked above how co2 thawed NA and froze Greenland at the same time.

You will not answer that question.

Not hard to figure out why....

The sea level rising for the past 20,000 years is in the public record. You deny that. You have presented no evidence whatsoever to back up your ridiculous claim.

 

[ding]

You have been asked above how co2 thawed NA and froze Greenland at the same time.

CO2 doesn’t drive climate changes so it’s not possible for CO2 to thaw or freeze anything.

The earths climate is driven by bipolar glaciation which was driven by plate tectonics thermally isolating the polar regions from warmer ocean waters. The resulting cooling allowed orbital forcing cycles to trigger glaciation at both poles.

 

[Captain Caveman]

CO2 doesn’t drive climate changes so it’s not possible for CO2 to thaw or freeze anything.

The earths climate is driven by bipolar glaciation which was driven by plate tectonics thermally isolating the polar regions from warmer ocean waters. The resulting cooling allowed orbital forcing cycles to trigger glaciation at both poles.

The Japanese earthquake shifted the earth's axis by about a foot. That earthquake will still continue effect the climate.

Japan 2011 earthquake continues to cause climate changes

But the climate fools just blame co2

 

[Mashmont]

Less sea ice, more loss of heat to outer space.
That cools the planet.

The Japanese earthquake shifted the earth's axis by about a foot. That earthquake will still continue effect the climate.

Japan 2011 earthquake continues to cause climate changes

But the climate fools just blame co2

Paid climate fools.

Follow the (Climate Change) Money

The first iron rule of American politics is: Follow the money. This explains, oh, about 80 percent of what goes on in Washington. Shortly after the latest Chicken Little climate change report was published last month, I noted on CNN that one reason so many hundreds of scientists are persuaded...

www.heritage.org

"One reason so many hundreds of scientists are persuaded that the sky is falling is that they are paid handsomely to do so."

 

[Captain Caveman]

Paid climate fools.

Follow the (Climate Change) Money

The first iron rule of American politics is: Follow the money. This explains, oh, about 80 percent of what goes on in Washington. Shortly after the latest Chicken Little climate change report was published last month, I noted on CNN that one reason so many hundreds of scientists are persuaded...

www.heritage.org

"One reason so many hundreds of scientists are persuaded that the sky is falling is that they are paid handsomely to do so."

Any scientist that supports full on man made climate change gets funded, those that report differently, ie. present facts, get cancelled and erased.

Yes, man contributes to climate change, but so do hundreds of other factors. Co2 is just one element, but apparently, paying more tax makes the climate gooder.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Paid climate fools.

Follow the (Climate Change) Money

The first iron rule of American politics is: Follow the money. This explains, oh, about 80 percent of what goes on in Washington. Shortly after the latest Chicken Little climate change report was published last month, I noted on CNN that one reason so many hundreds of scientists are persuaded...

www.heritage.org

"One reason so many hundreds of scientists are persuaded that the sky is falling is that they are paid handsomely to do so."

Paid? Where's my check?

 

[Mashmont]

Paid? Where's my check?

Most aren't fake 'scientists'. Those gullible people are at the bottom of the food chain carrying their water for free.

 

[EMH]

Most aren't fake 'scientists'. Those gullible people are at the bottom of the food chain carrying their water for free.

There are the fudgebaking liars

And their willing accomplices in media and government

And then there are unimaginable morons who parrot...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Most aren't fake 'scientists'. Those gullible people are at the bottom of the food chain carrying their water for free.

You're right.

Not everyone can be like Nobel Prize winner Michael Mann.

 

[Crick]

Any scientist that supports full on man made climate change gets funded, those that report differently, ie. present facts, get cancelled and erased.

Yes, man contributes to climate change, but so do hundreds of other factors. Co2 is just one element, but apparently, paying more tax makes the climate gooder.

No one is doing studies to examine that point because its settled science. It'd be like someone looking to be funded in order to study whether or not bacteria and viruses cause disease.

 

[ding]

No one is doing studies to examine that point because its settled science.

No such thing as settled science. Especially when your only science is a computer model.

 

[Captain Caveman]

No such thing as settled science. Especially when your only science is a computer model.

Even E=mc2 is settled science, until a century or two later something cancels and supercedes it

 

[ding]

Even E=mc2 is settled science, until a century or two later something cancels and supercedes it

Or discover that quantum mechanics is really deterministic.

 

[ReinyDays]

Even E=mc2 is settled science, until a century or two later something cancels and supercedes it

What could supercede this? ... you know this is a definition ... right? ... we define a second as being equal to 10^16 meters ... the same as 2.54 centimeters is one inch ... how do we supercede 25.4 mm = 1 inch? ... how do we supercede 1 second = 10^16 meters? ...

It a conversion formula, not a physics theory ... all four dimensions use the same measure ... time and distance measure the same thing, just like furlongs and fortnights measure the same thing ...

Or Quantum Physics is right, and this isn't ... no one knows ... some parts of physics is settled ... others are still up in the air ...

 

[Captain Caveman]

What could supercede this? ... you know this is a definition ... right? ... we define a second as being equal to 10^16 meters ... the same as 2.54 centimeters is one inch ... how do we supercede 25.4 mm = 1 inch? ... how do we supercede 1 second = 10^16 meters? ...

It a conversion formula, not a physics theory ... all four dimensions use the same measure ... time and distance measure the same thing, just like furlongs and fortnights measure the same thing ...

Or Quantum Physics is right, and this isn't ... no one knows ... some parts of physics is settled ... others are still up in the air ...

You ask, "What could supercede this". As we have to wait a several decades to a century or two.......

ist means, "A person who has learnt the current theories". So a physicist has learnt the current theories on physics. Some theories are tweaked/updated within a short period of time, others like E=mc2 take decades and centuries.

 

[Mashmont]

Aside from the albedo effects in summer, the loss of sea ice over winter leads to atmospheric heating from the warmer sea water.

December serving up baked Alaska and warming most of Arctic

Much of the Arctic is in a burst of freak December warming. Temperatures in Alaska’s northernmost community hit 40 degrees Monday morning.

apnews.com

Ah, manmade climate change: The Gospel of the atheist left. Talk about sky fairies.

 

[Crick]

Ah, manmade climate change: The Gospel of the atheist left. Talk about sky fairies.

Okay, let's talk about sky fairies.

Do you reject the published absorption spectrum of carbon dioxide or do you think it to be the work of sky fairies?

Do you reject the spectrum of radiation that the earth and sea give off when warmed by the sun? or is this more work of the sky fairies?

Do you reject the Keeling curve showing steadily increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere or is that more work of the sky fairies?

Do you reject the global temperature data collected since the Industrial Revolution showing a consistent warming or is that more work of the sky fairies?

Do you reject the multiple proxy studies showing that the Earth had been steadily cooling for thousands of years prior to the Industrial Revolution or is that more work of the sky fairies?

Do you reject the multiple studies showing no correlation whatsoever with the Earth's increasing temperature or is that more work of the sky fairies?

Do you reject the multiple studies comparing the spectrum of incoming solar radiation, outgoing IR and IR backscatter from the atmosphere providing direct evidence of the Greenhouse Effect or is that more work of the sky fairies?

Do you reject the absence of political or religious influence in the conduct of mainstream, peer reviewed climate science or do you believe in sky fairies?

You would seem to be the one who wants to believe things without evidence or even despite evidence. Attempting to use that basis to criticize those who demand such things from science only marks you as an ignorant, bigoted fool.

See www.ipcc.ch if you have any interest in actually knowing what the fuck you're talking about.