London has fallen

[DOTR]

More to the point...welcome to your future...brought to you by your friendly oligarchs. The liberal elites.

 

[frigidweirdo]

View attachment 131044

More to the point...welcome to your future...brought to you by your friendly oligarchs. The liberal elites.

So, 7 people died in London the other day and 4-5 died a few weeks back. That's what, 12 people in a city of 8 million who died.

Phili has a population of 1.5 million, and a murder rate of 17.9 per 100,000 people per year, which is about 268 murders a year. That's nearly one a day. That's about the same rate as London with terror attacks in a very short period of time.

And the right says that that is acceptable.

 

[theHawk]

View attachment 131044

More to the point...welcome to your future...brought to you by your friendly oligarchs. The liberal elites.

So, 7 people died in London the other day and 4-5 died a few weeks back. That's what, 12 people in a city of 8 million who died.

Phili has a population of 1.5 million, and a murder rate of 17.9 per 100,000 people per year, which is about 268 murders a year. That's nearly one a day. That's about the same rate as London with terror attacks in a very short period of time.

And the right says that that is acceptable.

Gawd you're pathetic. You're now dismissing terror attacks because we have hoods full of thugs that kill each other. When have we ever said it was acceptable? It's the left wing media that ignores that violence as much as possible.

 

[DOTR]

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

View attachment 131044

More to the point...welcome to your future...brought to you by your friendly oligarchs. The liberal elites.

So, 7 people died in London the other day and 4-5 died a few weeks back. That's what, 12 people in a city of 8 million who died.

Phili has a population of 1.5 million, and a murder rate of 17.9 per 100,000 people per year, which is about 268 murders a year. That's nearly one a day. That's about the same rate as London with terror attacks in a very short period of time.

And the right says that that is acceptable.

You're not taking into consideration the mass hysteria these events cause. They affect exponentially more people than just the victim count.

 

[IsaacNewton]

It's easy to see the part of the population that is 'terrorized' by terrorists. Conservatives are the core audience of terrorists.

During WW2 London was bombed daily for six months destroying thousands of buildings and killing tens of thousands of Londoners. Did they whine about 'London has fallen'? No, Churchill went there and walked through the bombed streets to keep the people's spirits up.

Conservatives in the US are such uber-snowflakes they twitch if a fly lands on the table. It may be radicalized! And they accuse anyone that doesn't share their abject fear as being 'with' the terrorists. It is arm flailing paranoia on a large scale. Governments are doing everything they can cons. Where is Trump and his lying bullshit statement on the campaign trail 'I will defeat Isis so fast, I'll have the generals draw up a plan and defeat Isis in 30 days'. Well?

A right wing whacko went terrorist in Oregon a week ago and stabbed two people to death. Tell us oh cons of the travelling piss, how do you stop such things. You can't even stop the homegrown neocon whacks in the US that kill their own countrymen. What we need are for the 'moderate conservatives' to come forward and denounce this radical conservatives part of their movement as evil. They are always silent.

Terrorists can't win a fight by definition so they strive to strike abject fear into a large group of people with relatively small attacks. It works like magic on conservatives. Everyone else gets out the next day and tells the losers of the world no one is going to scare them.

 

[MikeK]

View attachment 131044

More to the point...welcome to your future...brought to you by your friendly oligarchs. The liberal elites.

So, 7 people died in London the other day and 4-5 died a few weeks back. That's what, 12 people in a city of 8 million who died.

Phili has a population of 1.5 million, and a murder rate of 17.9 per 100,000 people per year, which is about 268 murders a year. That's nearly one a day. That's about the same rate as London with terror attacks in a very short period of time.

And the right says that that is acceptable.

 

[frigidweirdo]

View attachment 131044

More to the point...welcome to your future...brought to you by your friendly oligarchs. The liberal elites.

So, 7 people died in London the other day and 4-5 died a few weeks back. That's what, 12 people in a city of 8 million who died.

Phili has a population of 1.5 million, and a murder rate of 17.9 per 100,000 people per year, which is about 268 murders a year. That's nearly one a day. That's about the same rate as London with terror attacks in a very short period of time.

And the right says that that is acceptable.

Gawd you're pathetic. You're now dismissing terror attacks because we have hoods full of thugs that kill each other. When have we ever said it was acceptable? It's the left wing media that ignores that violence as much as possible.

Yeah, you go gurl, you start a post with an insult....

 

[theHawk]

Muslim population in the U.K.:

1950: 100,000
1970: 667,000
2000: 1,500,000
2010: 2,476,000
2017: 2,700,000

 

[Tank]

So, 7 people died in London the other day and 4-5 died a few weeks back. That's what, 12 people in a city of 8 million who died.
.

One is too many, you coward,

I don't care how many mud people kill each other, it's time for White people to wake up

 

[frigidweirdo]

View attachment 131044

More to the point...welcome to your future...brought to you by your friendly oligarchs. The liberal elites.

So, 7 people died in London the other day and 4-5 died a few weeks back. That's what, 12 people in a city of 8 million who died.

Phili has a population of 1.5 million, and a murder rate of 17.9 per 100,000 people per year, which is about 268 murders a year. That's nearly one a day. That's about the same rate as London with terror attacks in a very short period of time.

And the right says that that is acceptable.

You're not taking into consideration the mass hysteria these events cause. They affect exponentially more people than just the victim count.

And murders in cities like Philadelphia don't impact the people? Rubbish.

When I was in Southern Africa you simply did not go out at night. Why? Because crime is so high it impacts the people.

So, if I compare murders in Phili and murders in London, it's a just comparison.

 

[ScienceRocks]

It was attacked twice under MAY's government. The bitch should be punished for this.

 

[DOTR]

What the hell. We can always start another hashtag. That helps.

 

[skye]

It was attacked twice under MAY's government. The bitch should be punished for this.

rather you should be punished for posting so much rubbish!

 

[Eloy]

Yiannopoulos doesn't sound like a terribly English name to me.

 

[jasonnfree]

To think this would have happened to America if clinton had won the election. She would have fast tracked muslims here till we were in the same boat as England. Thank God for Trump and lets hope the brits can somehow get armed like Americans are.

 

[skye]

Yiannopoulos doesn't sound like a terribly English name to me.

racist!

 

[theHawk]

It's easy to see the part of the population that is 'terrorized' by terrorists. Conservatives are the core audience of terrorists.

During WW2 London was bombed daily for six months destroying thousands of buildings and killing tens of thousands of Londoners. Did they whine about 'London has fallen'? No, Churchill went there and walked through the bombed streets to keep the people's spirits up.

Conservatives in the US are such uber-snowflakes they twitch if a fly lands on the table. It may be radicalized! And they accuse anyone that doesn't share their abject fear as being 'with' the terrorists. It is arm flailing paranoia on a large scale. Governments are doing everything they can cons. Where is Trump and his lying bullshit statement on the campaign trail 'I will defeat Isis so fast, I'll have the generals draw up a plan and defeat Isis in 30 days'. Well?

A right wing whacko went terrorist in Oregon a week ago and stabbed two people to death. Tell us oh cons of the travelling piss, how do you stop such things. You can't even stop the homegrown neocon whacks in the US that kill their own countrymen. What we need are for the 'moderate conservatives' to come forward and denounce this radical conservatives part of their movement as evil. They are always silent.

Terrorists can't win a fight by definition so they strive to strike abject fear into a large group of people with relatively small attacks. It works like magic on conservatives. Everyone else gets out the next day and tells the losers of the world no one is going to scare them.

Terrorists are trying to kill us first and foremost. The only fear they care about is making people too afraid to do anything and continue to appease them. You're doing exactly what they want, appeasing and defending them. You spend all your energy complaining about conservatives, while they continue to plot to kill more infidels. Terrorists can win and will win if they are allowed to continue their attacks and push their political agenda forward, especially when they have help pushing their agenda from progressives.

 

[Nia88]

To think this would have happened to America if clinton had won the election. She would have fast tracked muslims here till we were in the same boat as England. Thank God for Trump and lets hope the brits can somehow get armed like Americans are.

These attackers in England have been by citizens. Stopping immigration of Muslims would have had zero effect.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Gawd you're pathetic. You're now dismissing terror attacks because we have hoods full of thugs that kill each other. When have we ever said it was acceptable? It's the left wing media that ignores that violence as much as possible.

It's the left wrong that is responsible for creating the conditions that foster that violence as well.

It's ironic indeed, that frigidweirdo tries to dismiss some violence for which his side is culpable, by calling out even greater violence, for which his side is equally culpable.

LIbEralism truly is a mental, ethical, and moral disease.