he would rip you apartI'll debate Limbaugh.
Shouldn't be too hard.
Only if I had a pale of KFC!
So after he ripped ya apart he'd eat your lunch too? You are a glutton for punishment.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
he would rip you apartI'll debate Limbaugh.
Shouldn't be too hard.
Only if I had a pale of KFC!
Do you really think busy, rich people like Limbaugh post on message boards?Why would Obama care to go on Rush's show to debate him? Hell, I CHALLENGE RUSH LIMBAUGH TO DEBATE ON US MESSAGEBOARD. IF HE DOESN'T, then he is a giant pussy.
That fat NAZI gasbag would look like such a fool in any kind of real debate.
He'd discover that actually debating honestly is nothing like pontificating a load of partisan nonsense when one controls the microphone.
Not that Obama will bother, of course.
Nor should he.
Now, run along fat man and beat up on the Republican leadership who are frightened of you.
Obama's got a country to run.
Don't you think he has wayyyyyy bigger fish to fry than to even bring the dude's name up? We didn't see Bush using the bully pulpit to call out any of his media/pundit critics.seriously people, don't you think he's got a WAAAYYYY bigger fish to fry than to debate some over-zealous ideologue?
....which is why Rush has to hide behind his little cave based radio show to invoke a challenge, eh?
Tell me, if Rush is such the MAN, why doesn't he run for office? Hell, if you feel so strongly then I guess YOU HAVE SOMEONE TO RUN IN '12, yes?
I have someone to run in 2012, but he wouldn't be a Republican.
Face facts: Barack Obama is a mental midget compared to Rush Limbaugh. I am not supporting Rush or do I even listen to his show. In fact, liberals know far more about Rush Limbaugh than I'll ever know. However, Obama is just not that smart. He relies on his teleprompter to introduce people. He doesn't know how basic things work like the stock market. It would be a no-win situation for Obama.
rush is a bozo, he is divisive.... divisivemess is a tool of Evil...divide and conquer is the tool of satan....
continue to stay away from him, you'll feel cleaner and will have less need to waste drinking water to shower imo....
no president would ever debate any broadcast host....no need, they're president....sheesh, when does common sense come in to play....?
it's a JOKE that any of you even thought this could even be in contention???
i'm SHOCKED actually that anyone would even think that this would be appropriate for a president, any president, while we are paying him to lead our country, or ever for any reason???? you all are pretty funny just talking about it....
quite immaturely too! but amusing none the less...
care
O'Reilly is a self aggrandizing buffoon... He is partially responsible for the Marxist Muslim presently sitting in the Executive and driving the US Economy over the edge.
O'Reilly is a journalist who has traveled the world covering wars, politics, disasters, you name it and through it all has managed to remain non partisan and not an ideologue. He's tough but fair. He's as tough on the right as he is on the left. We need more people like him in the media.
They only conceal it so long as they're insecure. Once they're secure in their power, they lose that fear of being honest. This bunch is already doing so.Socialism never looks good in the light... which is why Socialists go to such lengths to conceal their intentions.
He does agree. To understand O'Reilly, you have to do a little research. But you have him totally misjudged, which most people do.O'Reilly is a self aggrandizing buffoon... He is partially responsible for the Marxist Muslim presently sitting in the Executive and driving the US Economy over the edge.
O'Reilly is a journalist who has traveled the world covering wars, politics, disasters, you name it and through it all has managed to remain non partisan and not an ideologue. He's tough but fair. He's as tough on the right as he is on the left. We need more people like him in the media.
They only conceal it so long as they're insecure. Once they're secure in their power, they lose that fear of being honest. This bunch is already doing so.Socialism never looks good in the light... which is why Socialists go to such lengths to conceal their intentions.
Not an ideologue? ROLMNAO... Why don't you explain to my what you think an ideologue is... and were I you, I'd consult a dictionary; As I said O'Reilly is a self aggrandizing buffoon... He is interested in what promotes Bill O'Reilly... and that he sets aside the adovocacy of immutable, bed-rock principle in order to appear 'non-partisan' is all I need to know, to know that O'Reilly is part of the problem.
O'Reilly could have shut down the Hussein campaign... had I interviewed him, Lord Hussein would be forever known as a 'Former Presidential Candidate Hussein;' and that would be a result of his failure to respond to simple questions which would have exposed his Marxist intentions...
To you, that's 'partisan', to me that's being an American. Socialism is the antithesis of American... Socialism is cultural decadence... Socialism is cultural death... it's wrong, it's foolish and it's never acceptable in any 'ism'...
Never forget friend: THERE ARE NO LEFTIST AMERICANS... PERIOD!
O'Reilly disagrees... which once again, conclusively proves that he is part of the problem.
That fat NAZI gasbag would look like such a fool in any kind of real debate.
He'd discover that actually debating honestly is nothing like pontificating a load of partisan nonsense when one controls the microphone.
Not that Obama will bother, of course.
Nor should he.
Now, run along fat man and beat up on the Republican leadership who are frightened of you.
Obama's got a country to run.
It's the job of an interviewer to shut down a Presidential campaign? I get this feeling you didn't see the O'Reilly/Obama interview.
I honestly can't believe that anyone seriously thinks that Limbaugh would win that one. No way no how!
And to whether Obama should debate him or not... seriously people, don't you think he's got a WAAAYYYY bigger fish to fry than to debate some over-zealous ideologue? Sure, when the wars are over, the crisis is no longer, and public education's worth a shit, why shouldn't he...
Don't wanna be a pessimist here... but I don't think that's gonna happen anytime soon...
The Obama cannot do that. Even though his interview with Bill O'Reilly went well, Bill was a friendly interviewer in that he isn't a partisan hack and stayed away from populist nonsense. Bill was firm, but The Obama came across very well in that arena.
Up against Rush, in that much more informal and partisan setting, there is no way The Obama can come out smelling good. He's far too intelligent to even try it.
Limbaugh knows that.
Hannity has had a standing invitation for The Obama to come on either his TV or radio shows, for months.
I honestly can't believe that anyone seriously thinks that Limbaugh would win that one. No way no how!
And to whether Obama should debate him or not... seriously people, don't you think he's got a WAAAYYYY bigger fish to fry than to debate some over-zealous ideologue? Sure, when the wars are over, the crisis is no longer, and public education's worth a shit, why shouldn't he...
Don't wanna be a pessimist here... but I don't think that's gonna happen anytime soon...
You know, given the state of our nation you would think that the Obama Whitehouse would be consumed morning to night with finding ways to help Americans... AND... you would be wrong. The article clearly stated that the efforts to demonize a radio talk show host are originating from the Whitehouse. Bless their ignorant little hearts..the dems haven't figured out that the presidential campaign ended back in November.
this is because Obama is a lightweight and is just a puppetI honestly can't believe that anyone seriously thinks that Limbaugh would win that one. No way no how!
And to whether Obama should debate him or not... seriously people, don't you think he's got a WAAAYYYY bigger fish to fry than to debate some over-zealous ideologue? Sure, when the wars are over, the crisis is no longer, and public education's worth a shit, why shouldn't he...
Don't wanna be a pessimist here... but I don't think that's gonna happen anytime soon...
You know, given the state of our nation you would think that the Obama Whitehouse would be consumed morning to night with finding ways to help Americans... AND... you would be wrong. The article clearly stated that the efforts to demonize a radio talk show host are originating from the Whitehouse. Bless their ignorant little hearts..the dems haven't figured out that the presidential campaign ended back in November.
It's only designed to smoke screen the masse's into looking at a conservative talk show host, to keep the masse's eyes off of what the White House is actually doing. Rush can stir up a lot of hate, especially with left wing way out wacco's. The hate from this group aka (moveon.org) was evident when Bush was in office. The Obama Whitehouse is just trying to stir up the anger movement again coming from this group.
I don't ever remember the Bush Whitehouse going after Al Franken or even mentioning his name. President Bush never said to Democrats--"Don't listen to Al Franken or Keith Obermann."
LOL! I think this backfires on them. Anyone with half a brain knows that an a.m. talk show host is not running for political office, & would eventually realise that's something is really weird about the DNC actually spending money in an off-election year to bring up what Limbaugh has to say. Millions of Americans are fairly upset over all this spending & bail-out after bail-out. They may just get curious enough to listen to what the opposite side of being liberal & tune into Rush Limbaugh.
I'll bet Rush Limbaughs audiance has increased over this.
Do you really think busy, rich people like Limbaugh post on message boards?Why would Obama care to go on Rush's show to debate him? Hell, I CHALLENGE RUSH LIMBAUGH TO DEBATE ON US MESSAGEBOARD. IF HE DOESN'T, then he is a giant pussy.
Do you think American Presidents debate silly radio jockeys?
Do you really think busy, rich people like Limbaugh post on message boards?
Do you think American Presidents debate silly radio jockeys?
No, Obama's people labeled him the "voice of the GOP".
So if Rush is the voice of the GOP and the Dems want both sides heard on the radio, here's a chance to kill two birds with one stone.......
I didn't say he would, or should. But he would be alot closer to doing that with Limbaugh, than Limbaugh would ever do with you. Because Limbaugh, like him or not, IS somebody.Indeed, it looks like you took the suggestion seriously enough to contemplate his chances of "smelling good". So, again, if Rush won't take my challenge seriously why would you imagine that Obama would take a challenge from a radio entertainer seriously?
You're not.
Limbaugh "is somebody"? What, EXACTLY, are his credentials that should temp an American President? Should Bush have gone at it with Randi Rhodes? She's somebody on the radio, yes? If you can't fathom the ridiculous, and let's face it LAUGHABLE, nature of some radio entertainer challenging the President then I guess it's pretty clear why you don't get my farcical challenge to Limbaugh.
Do you really think busy, rich people like Limbaugh post on message boards?Why would Obama care to go on Rush's show to debate him? Hell, I CHALLENGE RUSH LIMBAUGH TO DEBATE ON US MESSAGEBOARD. IF HE DOESN'T, then he is a giant pussy.
Do you think American Presidents debate silly radio jockeys?
Do you think American Presidents debate silly radio jockeys?
No, Obama's people labeled him the "voice of the GOP".
So if Rush is the voice of the GOP and the Dems want both sides heard on the radio, here's a chance to kill two birds with one stone.......
Exactly - if Rush represents tens of millions of registered Republicans, then should not Mr. Obama take an hour to debate with him on the current economic mess and potential solutions?
I have said it many times prior - take away his teleprompter, and Obama's IQ plummets. He is no Kennedy - lacking both wit and the ability to grasp concepts quickly while communicating responses quickly. Off-script and he struggles greatly - perhaps even more so than Bush...
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6HVeaDDMdc]YouTube - Stupid Obama[/ame]