Limbaugh Dares Obama: 'Debate Me'

[DiveCon]

actually, to be fair, it would need to be on neutral ground
no way anyone would accept Rush's show as such

 

[DiveCon]

I dare Limbaugh to lose 50 pounds and get off OxyContin.

hes already done one
and why do you care what his weight is

 

[Midnight Marauder]

actually, to be fair, it would need to be on neutral ground
no way anyone would accept Rush's show as such

Which is, exactly what I said. O'Reilly is one thing, not a partisan hack. Limbaugh is a totally one-sided other.

 

[Shogun]

You're comparing Randi Rhodes to Limbaugh?

You missed your last two med doses, clearly. But I suppose if The Obama did some far-left Liberal radio show for a creampuff interview, you'd be okay with that.

I said, The Obama is far too intelligent to get in that arena.

Indeed, YOUR personal validation of Rush Limbaugh is about as universal as a liberal's opinion of Rhodes. Don't let that get in the way of acting like a Rush fanboy though. Obama doing an interview, "creampuff" in your opinion or not, isn't a DEBATE, now is it little guy? Maybe you should go sit at the kiddy table and get your radio hero some digits.


ps, by all means... talk shit. In case you haven't noticed I enjoy stomping mudholes in the asses of people like you. I suggest you pick up your gauntlet and adjust your tone.

I don't validate Limbaugh. Your disdain for him is clouding your vision of the topic. Like it or not, he's the #1 radio commentator in the country. I didn't address whether The Obama should go on his show. I opined why he wouldn't.

If you think you're some kind of internet tuffguy, and that you can actually "stomp" folks, you are as delusional as you are stupid, and I have been wrong in my estimation. It's actually a week's worth of meds you missed.

Clown.

My opinion of Limbaugh has nothing to do with the total joke that is a radio DJ calling out an American President to a debate. And yes, by even giving the slightest validity to the idea you DO validate Rush a some kind of political contender. Like it or not, even #1 radio entertainers are still not anywhere close to being a debate contender with the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.


Oh, you are wrong about a whole lot more than who is missing what medication, fuck knuckle. Hell, I'd rather be CLOWNING your FOOL ass than trying to defend some court jester challenge. Now, like I said, I suggest you change your panties because I thrive on turning out people like you in this forum.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I dare Limbaugh to lose 50 pounds and get off OxyContin.

I can't tell you how it makes one swoon when a liberal speaks so elequently about an opponents weight, or pain threshold. Ahhhhh.

Time for a review:
Since Liberals see their view as a higher calling that that of Conservatives, they mistakenly believe that it is entirely appropriate for then to use, not logic, facts, nor accepted debating techniques, but ad hominem attacks on the physical appearance, personal history, or imaginary mental defects. Notice how the Liberal replaces intellect with emotion. This is, no doubt, based on a medieval concept of recognizing witches and demons. In fact, Liberals attempt to deal with opponents in similar fashion: recall Clarence Thomas’ “High Tech Lynching.”

 

[DiveCon]

actually, to be fair, it would need to be on neutral ground
no way anyone would accept Rush's show as such

Which is, exactly what I said. O'Reilly is one thing, not a partisan hack. Limbaugh is a totally one-sided other.

i propose the site be GWU
thats about as neutral as you will get

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Limbaugh "is somebody"? What, EXACTLY, are his credentials that should temp an American President? Should Bush have gone at it with Randi Rhodes? She's somebody on the radio, yes? If you can't fathom the ridiculous, and let's face it LAUGHABLE, nature of some radio entertainer challenging the President then I guess it's pretty clear why you don't get my farcical challenge to Limbaugh.

Evidently Rush "is somebody".....at least according to top liberals who say he is the defacto leader of the Republican party.

""Top Democrats believe they have struck political gold by depicting Rush Limbaugh as the new face of the Republican Party, "

"The report points to Democratic strategists Stanley Greenberg and James Carville and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel as leading the effort..."

Hey, just because the GOP has gonads the size of a field mouse nutsack when it comes to the republican platform doesn't mean that a radio disk jockey should expect anything but a round of laughter from such blustered bravado. Like I said, if you feel this strongly about Rush's leadership then put your vote where your talking points are.

He'd sure make a better prez than Obama...

The GOP needs to get back to its conservative roots....Rush is one of the very few who actually promotes conservatism and opposes Obama's headlong rush toward fascistic socialism....

We all know who would win the debate.....and it ain't D'Ohbama.

 

[Shogun]

Obama would be crushed like a bug. No way he would ever do that.

....which is why Rush has to hide behind his little cave based radio show to invoke a challenge, eh?




Tell me, if Rush is such the MAN, why doesn't he run for office? Hell, if you feel so strongly then I guess YOU HAVE SOMEONE TO RUN IN '12, yes?

Limbaugh doesn't crave power, and likes his millions in salary. What fool would leave a job which pays millions, to try for a job that pays a low six figures?

suuuuuuuuure, dude... whatever you say..


looks like were having CHICKEN for dinner and, uh, Midnight Marauder lol still has feathers on his cyst filled ass!

 

[Chris]

I dare Limbaugh to lose 50 pounds and get off OxyContin.

I can't tell you how it makes one swoon when a liberal speaks so elequently about an opponents weight, or pain threshold. Ahhhhh.

Time for a review:
Since Liberals see their view as a higher calling that that of Conservatives, they mistakenly believe that it is entirely appropriate for then to use, not logic, facts, nor accepted debating techniques, but ad hominem attacks on the physical appearance, personal history, or imaginary mental defects. Notice how the Liberal replaces intellect with emotion. This is, no doubt, based on a medieval concept of recognizing witches and demons. In fact, Liberals attempt to deal with opponents in similar fashion: recall Clarence Thomas’ “High Tech Lynching.”

I need a Vicodin.....RUSHHH!!!!!

 

[Shogun]

actually, to be fair, it would need to be on neutral ground
no way anyone would accept Rush's show as such

of course not. But hey, this is WND fodder for fanboys who who really gives a fuck about the laughable details of such a goofnut challenge?

 

[Midnight Marauder]

Indeed, YOUR personal validation of Rush Limbaugh is about as universal as a liberal's opinion of Rhodes. Don't let that get in the way of acting like a Rush fanboy though. Obama doing an interview, "creampuff" in your opinion or not, isn't a DEBATE, now is it little guy? Maybe you should go sit at the kiddy table and get your radio hero some digits.


ps, by all means... talk shit. In case you haven't noticed I enjoy stomping mudholes in the asses of people like you. I suggest you pick up your gauntlet and adjust your tone.

I don't validate Limbaugh. Your disdain for him is clouding your vision of the topic. Like it or not, he's the #1 radio commentator in the country. I didn't address whether The Obama should go on his show. I opined why he wouldn't.

If you think you're some kind of internet tuffguy, and that you can actually "stomp" folks, you are as delusional as you are stupid, and I have been wrong in my estimation. It's actually a week's worth of meds you missed.

Clown.

My opinion of Limbaugh has nothing to do with the total joke that is a radio DJ calling out an American President to a debate. And yes, by even giving the slightest validity to the idea you DO validate Rush a some kind of political contender. Like it or not, even #1 radio entertainers are still not anywhere close to being a debate contender with the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.


Oh, you are wrong about a whole lot more than who is missing what medication, fuck knuckle. Hell, I'd rather be CLOWNING your FOOL ass than trying to defend some court jester challenge. Now, like I said, I suggest you change your panties because I thrive on turning out people like you in this forum.

I didn't give any validity to the idea. And you're the only one so far with soiled diapers. Why don't you go back and read what I actually said, perchance to stop making yourself look like a total idiot. And change those shit filled, rotten diapers. You're stinking up a classy place.

 

[xsited1]

Obama would be crushed like a bug. No way he would ever do that.

....which is why Rush has to hide behind his little cave based radio show to invoke a challenge, eh?




Tell me, if Rush is such the MAN, why doesn't he run for office? Hell, if you feel so strongly then I guess YOU HAVE SOMEONE TO RUN IN '12, yes?

I have someone to run in 2012, but he wouldn't be a Republican.

Face facts: Barack Obama is a mental midget compared to Rush Limbaugh. I am not supporting Rush or do I even listen to his show. In fact, liberals know far more about Rush Limbaugh than I'll ever know. However, Obama is just not that smart. He relies on his teleprompter to introduce people. He doesn't know how basic things work like the stock market. It would be a no-win situation for Obama.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

I dare Limbaugh to lose 50 pounds and get off OxyContin.

I can't tell you how it makes one swoon when a liberal speaks so elequently about an opponents weight, or pain threshold. Ahhhhh.

Time for a review:
Since Liberals see their view as a higher calling that that of Conservatives, they mistakenly believe that it is entirely appropriate for then to use, not logic, facts, nor accepted debating techniques, but ad hominem attacks on the physical appearance, personal history, or imaginary mental defects. Notice how the Liberal replaces intellect with emotion. This is, no doubt, based on a medieval concept of recognizing witches and demons. In fact, Liberals attempt to deal with opponents in similar fashion: recall Clarence Thomas’ “High Tech Lynching.”

I need a Vicodin.....RUSHHH!!!!!

You lose your hearing and we'll see how YOU handle it.

 

[DiveCon]

I dare Limbaugh to lose 50 pounds and get off OxyContin.

I can't tell you how it makes one swoon when a liberal speaks so elequently about an opponents weight, or pain threshold. Ahhhhh.

Time for a review:
Since Liberals see their view as a higher calling that that of Conservatives, they mistakenly believe that it is entirely appropriate for then to use, not logic, facts, nor accepted debating techniques, but ad hominem attacks on the physical appearance, personal history, or imaginary mental defects. Notice how the Liberal replaces intellect with emotion. This is, no doubt, based on a medieval concept of recognizing witches and demons. In fact, Liberals attempt to deal with opponents in similar fashion: recall Clarence Thomas’ “High Tech Lynching.”

I need a Vicodin.....RUSHHH!!!!!

more proof you are a moron

 

[Midnight Marauder]

Obama would be crushed like a bug. No way he would ever do that.

....which is why Rush has to hide behind his little cave based radio show to invoke a challenge, eh?




Tell me, if Rush is such the MAN, why doesn't he run for office? Hell, if you feel so strongly then I guess YOU HAVE SOMEONE TO RUN IN '12, yes?

I have someone to run in 2012, but he wouldn't be a Republican.

Face facts: Barack Obama is a mental midget compared to Rush Limbaugh. I am not supporting Rush or do I even listen to his show. In fact, liberals know far more about Rush Limbaugh than I'll ever know. However, Obama is just not that smart. He relies on his teleprompter to introduce people. He doesn't know how basic things work like the stock market. It would be a no-win situation for Obama.

Obama's intelligent. Don't ever underestimate that. He's intelligent enough to know what card table to not sit at.

 

[Shogun]

Evidently Rush "is somebody".....at least according to top liberals who say he is the defacto leader of the Republican party.

""Top Democrats believe they have struck political gold by depicting Rush Limbaugh as the new face of the Republican Party, "

"The report points to Democratic strategists Stanley Greenberg and James Carville and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel as leading the effort..."

Hey, just because the GOP has gonads the size of a field mouse nutsack when it comes to the republican platform doesn't mean that a radio disk jockey should expect anything but a round of laughter from such blustered bravado. Like I said, if you feel this strongly about Rush's leadership then put your vote where your talking points are.

He'd sure make a better prez than Obama...

The GOP needs to get back to its conservative roots....Rush is one of the very few who actually promotes conservatism and opposes Obama's headlong rush toward fascistic socialism....

We all know who would win the debate.....and it ain't D'Ohbama.

Opinions and assholes, buddy.

and no, what we all know is why the big conservative bear needs to hide in his little bear cave while you rushbots make excuses for your failed elections. Like I said, if you feel so strongly then put your vote where your talking points are...

I have no doubt that a debate on a neutral setting would eviscerate what pathetic semblance of leadership you are grasping at.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

True, he knows how to stack the cards...

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Hey, just because the GOP has gonads the size of a field mouse nutsack when it comes to the republican platform doesn't mean that a radio disk jockey should expect anything but a round of laughter from such blustered bravado. Like I said, if you feel this strongly about Rush's leadership then put your vote where your talking points are.

He'd sure make a better prez than Obama...

The GOP needs to get back to its conservative roots....Rush is one of the very few who actually promotes conservatism and opposes Obama's headlong rush toward fascistic socialism....

We all know who would win the debate.....and it ain't D'Ohbama.

Opinions and assholes, buddy.

and no, what we all know is why the big conservative bear needs to hide in his little bear cave while you rushbots make excuses for your failed elections. Like I said, if you feel so strongly then put your vote where your talking points are...

I have no doubt that a debate on a neutral setting would eviscerate what pathetic semblance of leadership you are grasping at.

LOL...like your loser debates?

 

[xsited1]

....which is why Rush has to hide behind his little cave based radio show to invoke a challenge, eh?




Tell me, if Rush is such the MAN, why doesn't he run for office? Hell, if you feel so strongly then I guess YOU HAVE SOMEONE TO RUN IN '12, yes?

I have someone to run in 2012, but he wouldn't be a Republican.

Face facts: Barack Obama is a mental midget compared to Rush Limbaugh. I am not supporting Rush or do I even listen to his show. In fact, liberals know far more about Rush Limbaugh than I'll ever know. However, Obama is just not that smart. He relies on his teleprompter to introduce people. He doesn't know how basic things work like the stock market. It would be a no-win situation for Obama.

Obama's intelligent. Don't ever underestimate that. He's intelligent enough to know what card table to not sit at.

Obama is intelligent enough to know which thugs to hire. Alone, he's a mental midget.

 

[Midnight Marauder]

Opinions and assholes, buddy.

and no, what we all know is why the big conservative bear needs to hide in his little bear cave while you rushbots make excuses for your failed elections. Like I said, if you feel so strongly then put your vote where your talking points are...

I have no doubt that a debate on a neutral setting would eviscerate what pathetic semblance of leadership you are grasping at.

Your biggest problem so far is, assuming facts not in evidence. I am not a Limbaugh fan, don't listen to his show, and don't even agree with most of his views which reach me.

Your type of assumption asshattery is among the worst kind, makes generally intelligent people look really stupid. Like you do right now.

Are you the idea police? Limbaugh challenges Obama to a debate, in Limbaugh's arena, and I point out it's nothing but posturing blatherskite because Limbaugh knows The Obama is far too intelligent to fall for such a scam, and that's somehow being a fan of Limbaugh and endorsing the idea?

Are you seeing how stupid you've made yourself look yet?