Limbaugh Dares Obama: 'Debate Me'

Why would Obama care to go on Rush's show to debate him? Hell, I CHALLENGE RUSH LIMBAUGH TO DEBATE ON US MESSAGEBOARD. IF HE DOESN'T, then he is a giant pussy.
Do you really think busy, rich people like Limbaugh post on message boards?

Ole Rash Limburger is a genius showman in the mold of P.T. Barnum, who was credited with the observation that there’s a sucker born every minute. In other words, he’s a charlatan who spoon feeds the right wing what they want to hear and sells Sleep Number Beds, Blue Emu, Oreck Vacuums and other stuff while they’re in rapture.

If he thought that he could sell enough product by posting here he'd do it in a New York second, or have it done by a surrogate on the sly!
 
Last edited:
That fat NAZI gasbag would look like such a fool in any kind of real debate.

He'd discover that actually debating honestly is nothing like pontificating a load of partisan nonsense when one controls the microphone.

Not that Obama will bother, of course.

Nor should he.

Now, run along fat man and beat up on the Republican leadership who are frightened of you.

Obama's got a country to run.

Yeah...run the country into the ground. If Oblah blah is so busy,why did he send his thugs to do his petty bidding then? If Odumbo is so thin skinned that he can't handle Rush's commentary without blowing a gasket..it's going to be a long 4 years for the dipshit.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Vel
seriously people, don't you think he's got a WAAAYYYY bigger fish to fry than to debate some over-zealous ideologue?
Don't you think he has wayyyyyy bigger fish to fry than to even bring the dude's name up? We didn't see Bush using the bully pulpit to call out any of his media/pundit critics.


Oblah blah has been doing this dating back to the elections. He had to have his lackeys trash Joe the plumber (a private citizen) because his huge ego couldn't stand the heat of any opposition. We will see a lot more whiny,cry baby bullshit from this immature dipshit the left elected in the next 4 years.
 
....which is why Rush has to hide behind his little cave based radio show to invoke a challenge, eh?

:lol:


Tell me, if Rush is such the MAN, why doesn't he run for office? Hell, if you feel so strongly then I guess YOU HAVE SOMEONE TO RUN IN '12, yes?

:eusa_angel:

I have someone to run in 2012, but he wouldn't be a Republican.

Face facts: Barack Obama is a mental midget compared to Rush Limbaugh. I am not supporting Rush or do I even listen to his show. In fact, liberals know far more about Rush Limbaugh than I'll ever know. However, Obama is just not that smart. He relies on his teleprompter to introduce people. He doesn't know how basic things work like the stock market. It would be a no-win situation for Obama.

rush is a bozo, he is divisive.... divisivemess is a tool of Evil...divide and conquer is the tool of satan....

continue to stay away from him, you'll feel cleaner and will have less need to waste drinking water to shower imo....


no president would ever debate any broadcast host....no need, they're president....sheesh, when does common sense come in to play....?

it's a JOKE that any of you even thought this could even be in contention???

i'm SHOCKED actually that anyone would even think that this would be appropriate for a president, any president, while we are paying him to lead our country, or ever for any reason???? :lol: you all are pretty funny just talking about it....

quite immaturely too! but amusing none the less...

care

If divide and conquer is the tool of satan,then Oblah blah must be the devil...he started this big bru ha ha with Rush.:cuckoo:
 
O'Reilly is a self aggrandizing buffoon... He is partially responsible for the Marxist Muslim presently sitting in the Executive and driving the US Economy over the edge.

O'Reilly is a journalist who has traveled the world covering wars, politics, disasters, you name it and through it all has managed to remain non partisan and not an ideologue. He's tough but fair. He's as tough on the right as he is on the left. We need more people like him in the media.
Socialism never looks good in the light... which is why Socialists go to such lengths to conceal their intentions.
They only conceal it so long as they're insecure. Once they're secure in their power, they lose that fear of being honest. This bunch is already doing so.

Not an ideologue? ROLMNAO... Why don't you explain to my what you think an ideologue is... and were I you, I'd consult a dictionary; As I said O'Reilly is a self aggrandizing buffoon... He is interested in what promotes Bill O'Reilly... and that he sets aside the adovocacy of immutable, bed-rock principle in order to appear 'non-partisan' is all I need to know, to know that O'Reilly is part of the problem.

O'Reilly could have shut down the Hussein campaign... had I interviewed him, Lord Hussein would be forever known as a 'Former Presidential Candidate Hussein;' and that would be a result of his failure to respond to simple questions which would have exposed his Marxist intentions...

To you, that's 'partisan', to me that's being an American. Socialism is the antithesis of American... Socialism is cultural decadence... Socialism is cultural death... it's wrong, it's foolish and it's never acceptable in any 'ism'...

Never forget friend: THERE ARE NO LEFTIST AMERICANS... PERIOD!

O'Reilly disagrees... which once again, conclusively proves that he is part of the problem.
 
Last edited:
O'Reilly is a self aggrandizing buffoon... He is partially responsible for the Marxist Muslim presently sitting in the Executive and driving the US Economy over the edge.

O'Reilly is a journalist who has traveled the world covering wars, politics, disasters, you name it and through it all has managed to remain non partisan and not an ideologue. He's tough but fair. He's as tough on the right as he is on the left. We need more people like him in the media.
Socialism never looks good in the light... which is why Socialists go to such lengths to conceal their intentions.
They only conceal it so long as they're insecure. Once they're secure in their power, they lose that fear of being honest. This bunch is already doing so.

Not an ideologue? ROLMNAO... Why don't you explain to my what you think an ideologue is... and were I you, I'd consult a dictionary; As I said O'Reilly is a self aggrandizing buffoon... He is interested in what promotes Bill O'Reilly... and that he sets aside the adovocacy of immutable, bed-rock principle in order to appear 'non-partisan' is all I need to know, to know that O'Reilly is part of the problem.

O'Reilly could have shut down the Hussein campaign... had I interviewed him, Lord Hussein would be forever known as a 'Former Presidential Candidate Hussein;' and that would be a result of his failure to respond to simple questions which would have exposed his Marxist intentions...

To you, that's 'partisan', to me that's being an American. Socialism is the antithesis of American... Socialism is cultural decadence... Socialism is cultural death... it's wrong, it's foolish and it's never acceptable in any 'ism'...

Never forget friend: THERE ARE NO LEFTIST AMERICANS... PERIOD!

O'Reilly disagrees... which once again, conclusively proves that he is part of the problem.
He does agree. To understand O'Reilly, you have to do a little research. But you have him totally misjudged, which most people do.

It's the job of an interviewer to shut down a Presidential campaign? I get this feeling you didn't see the O'Reilly/Obama interview.
 
That fat NAZI gasbag would look like such a fool in any kind of real debate.

Now don't be so hard on Toro... she does the best she can, God bless'er.

And I think it's just bad form to denigrate her weight... people come in all sizes and shapes and that someone is 'heavy' doesn't make them a bad person...

He'd discover that actually debating honestly is nothing like pontificating a load of partisan nonsense when one controls the microphone.

So you've pontificated loads of partisan nonsense while controlling a microphone? I gotta say that it's nice that you finally experienced this little epiphany... as it's been obvious to the rest of us that you're painfully ill-equipped for debate.

Not that Obama will bother, of course.

Well "bother" is a poor choice of a word, as The Lord of you Idiots has no potential upside by taking Limbaugh up on his challenge... We've all seen the Coke-head Marxist grand puhbah when he's working without a teleprompter net... HE's a mess...

Limbaugh on the otherhand spends 15 hours a week free-thinking before 22 MILLION PEOPLE... He instinctively knows what he believes... and he isn't afraid of who knows it.

Nor should he.

ROFL... Easy, don't spot... Hussein isn't going to risk it... He knows what will happen and knowing THAT is all he needs to know.

Now, run along fat man and beat up on the Republican leadership who are frightened of you.

Obama's got a country to run.

LOL... Is there anyone on this site that really believes that this idiot is anything other than a radical leftist?

Anyone?
.
.
.
.
.
.

Anyone at all?
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: Vel
It's the job of an interviewer to shut down a Presidential campaign? I get this feeling you didn't see the O'Reilly/Obama interview.

Well I read his books The No Spin Zone and Culture Warrior; and I am a semi-regular veiwer of The Factor... and I saw the interview... so you're all over it.

The JOB of an interviewer is to expose the interviewEE to questions which provide insight into who they are... IT'S THE JOB OF AN AMERICAN WHO IS INTERVIEWING A MARXIST MUSLIM, WHO IS CLOAKING HIMSELF BEHIND THE FACADE OF A CENTRIST CHRISTIAN, IN ORDER TO PROMOTE HIMSELF AS A CANDIDATE FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE US TO EXPOSE THAT MARXIST FUCK FOR WHAT HE IS...

Hells bells man... O'Reilly didn't have the sack to ask Hussein if, as a Christian, if HE BELIEVES THAT Muslims are going to Hell...
 
I honestly can't believe that anyone seriously thinks that Limbaugh would win that one. No way no how! :eek:

And to whether Obama should debate him or not... seriously people, don't you think he's got a WAAAYYYY bigger fish to fry than to debate some over-zealous ideologue? Sure, when the wars are over, the crisis is no longer, and public education's worth a shit, why shouldn't he...

Don't wanna be a pessimist here... but I don't think that's gonna happen anytime soon... :doubt:


You know, given the state of our nation you would think that the Obama Whitehouse would be consumed morning to night with finding ways to help Americans... AND... you would be wrong. The article clearly stated that the efforts to demonize a radio talk show host are originating from the Whitehouse. Bless their ignorant little hearts..the dems haven't figured out that the presidential campaign ended back in November.
 
The Obama cannot do that. Even though his interview with Bill O'Reilly went well, Bill was a friendly interviewer in that he isn't a partisan hack and stayed away from populist nonsense. Bill was firm, but The Obama came across very well in that arena.

Up against Rush, in that much more informal and partisan setting, there is no way The Obama can come out smelling good. He's far too intelligent to even try it.

Limbaugh knows that.

Hannity has had a standing invitation for The Obama to come on either his TV or radio shows, for months.

"He's far too intelligent to debate Rush Limbaugh"> Does that really make any sense to you? It appears to me that he's probably a little intimidated by someone or anyone who would actually criticise his current policies, therefore putting him on the spot to defend his policies. Obama won't debate anyone regarding his policies, even going to the point of pre-selecting reporters at news conferences--so he knows exactly what they're going to be asking. An example-of that was during the news conference regarding the stimulus bill.
 
Last edited:
I honestly can't believe that anyone seriously thinks that Limbaugh would win that one. No way no how! :eek:

And to whether Obama should debate him or not... seriously people, don't you think he's got a WAAAYYYY bigger fish to fry than to debate some over-zealous ideologue? Sure, when the wars are over, the crisis is no longer, and public education's worth a shit, why shouldn't he...

Don't wanna be a pessimist here... but I don't think that's gonna happen anytime soon... :doubt:


You know, given the state of our nation you would think that the Obama Whitehouse would be consumed morning to night with finding ways to help Americans... AND... you would be wrong. The article clearly stated that the efforts to demonize a radio talk show host are originating from the Whitehouse. Bless their ignorant little hearts..the dems haven't figured out that the presidential campaign ended back in November.

It's only designed to smoke screen the masse's into looking at a conservative talk show host, to keep the masse's eyes off of what the White House is actually doing. Rush can stir up a lot of hate, especially with left wing way out wacco's. The hate from this group aka (moveon.org) was evident when Bush was in office. The Obama Whitehouse is just trying to stir up the anger movement again coming from this group.

I don't ever remember the Bush Whitehouse going after Al Franken or even mentioning his name. President Bush never said to Democrats--"Don't listen to Al Franken or Keith Obermann."

LOL! I think this backfires on them. Anyone with half a brain knows that an a.m. talk show host is not running for political office, & would eventually realise that's something is really weird about the DNC actually spending money in an off-election year to bring up what Limbaugh has to say. Millions of Americans are fairly upset over all this spending & bail-out after bail-out. They may just get curious enough to listen to what the opposite side of being liberal & tune into Rush Limbaugh.

I'll bet Rush Limbaughs audiance has increased over this.
 
I honestly can't believe that anyone seriously thinks that Limbaugh would win that one. No way no how! :eek:

And to whether Obama should debate him or not... seriously people, don't you think he's got a WAAAYYYY bigger fish to fry than to debate some over-zealous ideologue? Sure, when the wars are over, the crisis is no longer, and public education's worth a shit, why shouldn't he...

Don't wanna be a pessimist here... but I don't think that's gonna happen anytime soon... :doubt:


You know, given the state of our nation you would think that the Obama Whitehouse would be consumed morning to night with finding ways to help Americans... AND... you would be wrong. The article clearly stated that the efforts to demonize a radio talk show host are originating from the Whitehouse. Bless their ignorant little hearts..the dems haven't figured out that the presidential campaign ended back in November.

It's only designed to smoke screen the masse's into looking at a conservative talk show host, to keep the masse's eyes off of what the White House is actually doing. Rush can stir up a lot of hate, especially with left wing way out wacco's. The hate from this group aka (moveon.org) was evident when Bush was in office. The Obama Whitehouse is just trying to stir up the anger movement again coming from this group.

I don't ever remember the Bush Whitehouse going after Al Franken or even mentioning his name. President Bush never said to Democrats--"Don't listen to Al Franken or Keith Obermann."

LOL! I think this backfires on them. Anyone with half a brain knows that an a.m. talk show host is not running for political office, & would eventually realise that's something is really weird about the DNC actually spending money in an off-election year to bring up what Limbaugh has to say. Millions of Americans are fairly upset over all this spending & bail-out after bail-out. They may just get curious enough to listen to what the opposite side of being liberal & tune into Rush Limbaugh.

I'll bet Rush Limbaughs audiance has increased over this.
this is because Obama is a lightweight and is just a puppet
Moveon.org is running this show
and George Soros money is funding it
 
Why would Obama care to go on Rush's show to debate him? Hell, I CHALLENGE RUSH LIMBAUGH TO DEBATE ON US MESSAGEBOARD. IF HE DOESN'T, then he is a giant pussy.
Do you really think busy, rich people like Limbaugh post on message boards?

Do you think American Presidents debate silly radio jockeys?

No, Obama's people labeled him the "voice of the GOP".

So if Rush is the voice of the GOP and the Dems want both sides heard on the radio, here's a chance to kill two birds with one stone.......
 
Do you really think busy, rich people like Limbaugh post on message boards?

Do you think American Presidents debate silly radio jockeys?

No, Obama's people labeled him the "voice of the GOP".

So if Rush is the voice of the GOP and the Dems want both sides heard on the radio, here's a chance to kill two birds with one stone.......

Exactly - if Rush represents tens of millions of registered Republicans, then should not Mr. Obama take an hour to debate with him on the current economic mess and potential solutions?

I have said it many times prior - take away his teleprompter, and Obama's IQ plummets. He is no Kennedy - lacking both wit and the ability to grasp concepts quickly while communicating responses quickly. Off-script and he struggles greatly - perhaps even more so than Bush...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6HVeaDDMdc]YouTube - Stupid Obama[/ame]
 
Indeed, it looks like you took the suggestion seriously enough to contemplate his chances of "smelling good". So, again, if Rush won't take my challenge seriously why would you imagine that Obama would take a challenge from a radio entertainer seriously?
I didn't say he would, or should. But he would be alot closer to doing that with Limbaugh, than Limbaugh would ever do with you. Because Limbaugh, like him or not, IS somebody.

You're not.


Limbaugh "is somebody"? What, EXACTLY, are his credentials that should temp an American President? Should Bush have gone at it with Randi Rhodes? She's somebody on the radio, yes? If you can't fathom the ridiculous, and let's face it LAUGHABLE, nature of some radio entertainer challenging the President then I guess it's pretty clear why you don't get my farcical challenge to Limbaugh.

:thup:


:lol:

Limbaugh is an American social Icon comparable to Elvis and the Beatles. He is the GodFather of modern talk radio, has the largest radio audience of any radio personality in the world, and is one of the most wide recognizable media celebrities in the world. He has over 30,000,000 regular listeners world-wide. No one else is even close. He is THE voice of American conservatism. Many credit his influence as being the deciding factor in Bush beating both Gore and Keary and for the Republicans taking over Congress in 1994.
 
Why would Obama care to go on Rush's show to debate him? Hell, I CHALLENGE RUSH LIMBAUGH TO DEBATE ON US MESSAGEBOARD. IF HE DOESN'T, then he is a giant pussy.
Do you really think busy, rich people like Limbaugh post on message boards?

Do you think American Presidents debate silly radio jockeys?

Well it's good to know that the in-house advocates of adult-child sex are Obama Supporters, can't say that I'm shocked...

But President Hussein is the one that said that Limbaugh is the leader of the opposition... so if Limbaugh is a 'silly radio jock' then I'd love to hear how it is that the 'President of the US' who you hold in such high esteem, has spent a month crying about Rush Limbaugh...

But let's not get bogged down in yet another of you patented fatal tactical flaws...

President Hussein is a Marxist; and as such it is not possible for her to be an American... as THERE ARE NO LEFTIST AMERICANS!

She's The President of the United States; which recently has been proven to be substantially less a deal than it was, even as early a mid-Jaunary of this year... It turns out that even a lowly Muslim-Marxist can be elected to that office, even when the US is at war with Muslim Marxists. So like everything else leftists touch, "The Office of the Presidency" is just not that big a deal anymore...

I mean DAMN! This jackass is making public STATEMENTS which DENIGRATE PRIVATE CITIZENS... He can't even win a debate with a political celebrity... THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES DOESN'T EVEN HAVE THE BALLS TO DEBATE A MAN WHO HE HAS DECLARED TO BE THE LEADER OF THE US POLITICAL OPPOSITION!

Now if HUSSEIN CAN'T WORK UP THE BALLS TO DEBATE RUSH LIMBAUGH... WHAT ARE THE ODDS THAT HE'S GONNA GET MUCH OUT OF VLADIMIR PUTIN?
 
Last edited:
Do you think American Presidents debate silly radio jockeys?

No, Obama's people labeled him the "voice of the GOP".

So if Rush is the voice of the GOP and the Dems want both sides heard on the radio, here's a chance to kill two birds with one stone.......

Exactly - if Rush represents tens of millions of registered Republicans, then should not Mr. Obama take an hour to debate with him on the current economic mess and potential solutions?

I have said it many times prior - take away his teleprompter, and Obama's IQ plummets. He is no Kennedy - lacking both wit and the ability to grasp concepts quickly while communicating responses quickly. Off-script and he struggles greatly - perhaps even more so than Bush...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6HVeaDDMdc]YouTube - Stupid Obama[/ame]

I would rather see him debate Newt Gingrich, a much more cerebral and knowledgeable expert on conservative issues than Rush. Without his crutches, both would annihilate Obama in any debate on the issues.
 
Well if we're wishin'... I'd love to see Hussein locked in a room with Mark Levin...

Levin would chew him to pieces...
 

Forum List

Back
Top