Lev Parnas Says Trump Knew Everything In Ukraine Scandal

[Crixus]

So did Adam Shiff. So did Stormy Daniels as well as many other from Russia to porn land. So far everyone who had the good on trump has either been tossed in the slammer, owing Trump a shit ton of money, or has had to walk off the stage. This dude was wrapped up months ago. If he had the goods, Adam Shiff would have had them. I almost can't wait to see what Trump gets impeached for in 2022. Your team lost. Your team is going to lose again. You will feel better if you accept it and move on.

Funny. Trump* already lost. He is impeached - FOREVER.

No, not really. In the end what will be remembered is Nancy Pelosi being usurped by AOC. 2016 will be noted as the fall of Pelosi. Trump, asshole that he is is less of an asshole then you dorks running around screaming at the sky. It will be amusing in 2021 watching y'all hope and pray, and another 4 years of impeachment and for what? Jabba Naddler and his impeachment counseled will be relegated to obscurity in congress and forgotten. Pelosi will drink her self to death. The plus side for y'all is AOC will fill her shoes, but in the end your people will fail. Trump will get his two terms and all y'all will be able to do is cry about it

Historians will record the facts and truths - not your NaziCon conspiracy theories.

They've already recorded the facts.....

That you don't have a case.

Best of luck.

Only to the blind.


The rest who can see,


See a swamp of government corruption in the entire Whitehouse, lead and headed, by crooked Donald.

And that Brothel of govt corruption taking place at Mara Lago that our tax dollars is paying for, needs shutting down.

Yeah, but one of those who claim to "see" also said they believed that Trump payed hookers to piss on the bed Bammer slept on. Those who claim to "see" are just trumpkins in a different colored MAGA hat. Blind, lol. Blind is better then impetuous brats any day.

 

[Maxdeath]

Parnas has documents to back up his words.

Don't suppose you have ever heard of someone saying things that weren't true to try and keep from going to jail?
Don't suppose you have ever heard of someone forging something?
Ever hear of the saying if it's to good to be true it probably is?
If you answered no to any of those I have a bridge in Arizona that used to be in England that I can sell you for just under ten million.

Don't suppose you heard the part where he said he had documentation to prove what he said.

Shall we look at the whole thing?
Let's start off with the fact that we have a person who, let's be kind and call him shifty at best, claims to have documents that are unverified but contradicts things he has already made statements about. The documents were released by Schiff, we will be kind and say he is unreliable.

Next these earth shattering miracles just happen to show up at this time, being kept instead of being thrown away or hidden. I hate to say it but if any of it were true it would dwarf the parting of the sea by Moses or the raising of Laserus.

Next the guy is hoping to get a book deal, a round of speaking engagements, perhaps better sentence.

Last but certainly not least I have heard so many times from TDS inflicted individuals that "we have him now". From the Steele dossier, to Muller, to Stormy Daniels. Even conspiracy theories from left websites that get maybe four visitors a month. I tend anymore to discount it out of hand because the crazy left usually jumps on the band wagon with both feet before even objectively looking at what they are touting as the new got him now.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The former associate of Rudy Giuliani said in an MSNBC interview that the president was aware of “all my movements.”

Lev Parnas, an associate of Rudy Giuliani at the center of the Ukraine scandal that led to President Donald Trump’s impeachment, said both men were fully aware “of all my movements” and that the president knew “exactly what was going on” as he waged a pressure campaign to dig up dirt on a presidential campaign rival.

“President Trump knew exactly what was going on,” Parnas told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow in an interview set to air Wednesday. “He was aware of all my movements. I wouldn’t do anything without the consent of Rudy Giuliani or the president. I have no intent, I have no reason to speak to any of these officials.”

The explosive comments come the same day the House voted to send two articles of impeachment against the president to the Senate for trial. The House voted largely along party lines to impeach Trump on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress last month. He is just the third American president to be impeached.

The pressure campaign in Ukraine was a central fixture of the House impeachment vote after a parade of current and former Trump administration officials detailed an effort by the White House to pressure Ukraine to announce an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter in exchange for political favors.

More: PARNAS PINS IT ON THE PRESIDENT

Rachel Maddow interviewing Parnas is awesome! If you haven't seen it - you should.

You are so dumb.

You can't dig up what isn't there.

. . . and if it IS there? It is the president's job to clean up corruption.

If it isn't? Sure, impeach Trump. But anyone that is into this? Knows it is there, we saw the film and Hunter Biden admitted it in an interview. On top of that, the Ukrainian PM has denied that any undue influence was placed upon them.



Not a lot else to this story.


Eat up!

You do understand that Parnas was the point man on the ground who was working directly with Ukrainian officials to get the announcement of an investigation into the Bidens. Don't you?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

MSNBC, lol. Yeah parnas is lying.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I'm still waiting for you to answer my question.

I'll repeat it for you.

Do you believe that because lev said jabba the hutt barr was part of the team that makes it a legal investigation?

thats the same question I asked,,,

So what conclusion did you come to, is it legal?

I'm still waiting for you to answer my question.

I'll repeat it for you.

Do you believe that because lev said jabba the hutt barr was part of the team that makes it a legal investigation?

thats the same question I asked,,,

So what conclusion did you come to, is it legal?

if I knew that I wouldnt have asked the question,,,

I already stated no. Now you know.

so the AG isnt allowed to look into corruption???

He's not "looking into corruption" , dope.

The allegation Parnas made was that Barr knew about and was part of the "team" that was trying to get an announcement from Zelensky.

 

[progressive hunter]

thats the same question I asked,,,

So what conclusion did you come to, is it legal?

thats the same question I asked,,,

So what conclusion did you come to, is it legal?

if I knew that I wouldnt have asked the question,,,

I already stated no. Now you know.

so the AG isnt allowed to look into corruption???

He's not "looking into corruption" , dope.

The allegation Parnas made was that Barr knew about and was part of the "team" that was trying to get an announcement from Zelensky.

thats the same thing,,,all is one and one is all,,,

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The former associate of Rudy Giuliani said in an MSNBC interview that the president was aware of “all my movements.”

Lev Parnas, an associate of Rudy Giuliani at the center of the Ukraine scandal that led to President Donald Trump’s impeachment, said both men were fully aware “of all my movements” and that the president knew “exactly what was going on” as he waged a pressure campaign to dig up dirt on a presidential campaign rival.

“President Trump knew exactly what was going on,” Parnas told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow in an interview set to air Wednesday. “He was aware of all my movements. I wouldn’t do anything without the consent of Rudy Giuliani or the president. I have no intent, I have no reason to speak to any of these officials.”

The explosive comments come the same day the House voted to send two articles of impeachment against the president to the Senate for trial. The House voted largely along party lines to impeach Trump on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress last month. He is just the third American president to be impeached.

The pressure campaign in Ukraine was a central fixture of the House impeachment vote after a parade of current and former Trump administration officials detailed an effort by the White House to pressure Ukraine to announce an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter in exchange for political favors.

More: PARNAS PINS IT ON THE PRESIDENT

Rachel Maddow interviewing Parnas is awesome! If you haven't seen it - you should.

Part 2 tomorrow night.

The problem with all of this is Trump wasn't digging up dirt.....he was trying to find out who committed crimes.
That's what he's supposed to do.
You idiots seem to think that once a Democrat announces they are running for president THEY ARE HEREBY ABOVE THE LAW.

What crimes?

That's not what Parnas says he was doing.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So the Democrats are relying on the testimony of another convict / criminal, huh?!

That worked so well for them last time when they had Cohen testify for them on his way to prison...

Yes... a criminal.
A criminal who the president's personal lawyer hired to do work on behalf of the president.

This defense of smearing Parnas doesn't help Trump. It just raises more questions as to why the president would work with such a man.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So what conclusion did you come to, is it legal?

So what conclusion did you come to, is it legal?

if I knew that I wouldnt have asked the question,,,

I already stated no. Now you know.

so the AG isnt allowed to look into corruption???

He's not "looking into corruption" , dope.

The allegation Parnas made was that Barr knew about and was part of the "team" that was trying to get an announcement from Zelensky.

thats the same thing,,,all is one and one is all,,,

No, it's not. Not at all.

 

[progressive hunter]

if I knew that I wouldnt have asked the question,,,

I already stated no. Now you know.

so the AG isnt allowed to look into corruption???

He's not "looking into corruption" , dope.

The allegation Parnas made was that Barr knew about and was part of the "team" that was trying to get an announcement from Zelensky.

thats the same thing,,,all is one and one is all,,,

No, it's not. Not at all.

so you say,,,

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I already stated no. Now you know.

so the AG isnt allowed to look into corruption???

He's not "looking into corruption" , dope.

The allegation Parnas made was that Barr knew about and was part of the "team" that was trying to get an announcement from Zelensky.

thats the same thing,,,all is one and one is all,,,

No, it's not. Not at all.

so you say,,,

So Parnas said, dope.

 

[progressive hunter]

so the AG isnt allowed to look into corruption???

He's not "looking into corruption" , dope.

The allegation Parnas made was that Barr knew about and was part of the "team" that was trying to get an announcement from Zelensky.

thats the same thing,,,all is one and one is all,,,

No, it's not. Not at all.

so you say,,,

So Parnas said, dope.

how would he know??
hes just a paid dupe with limited information,,,

 

[Osiris-ODS]

So the Democrats are relying on the testimony of another convict / criminal, huh?!

That worked so well for them last time when they had Cohen testify for them on his way to prison...

Don't forget George Nader, who was granted immunity by the Mueller team for his federal campaign finance charges for funneling 3.5 mil of foreign money to the Hillary campaign, and was represented by Obama's White House counsel. He had already been convinced of child sexual abuse and child pornography in the 90s and 2000s, and just got convicted again.

The fact that he had such strong ties with leaders in the Arab world (the reason he was used as a liason by people in Washington) says so much about the Arab world. After all, under Sharia law the legal marriage age for women is NINE years old. Yes NINE. A quarter of all marriages in Iran are child marriages (child being the female).

See An 8-Year-Old Bride - a truly eye opening account.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

He's not "looking into corruption" , dope.

The allegation Parnas made was that Barr knew about and was part of the "team" that was trying to get an announcement from Zelensky.

thats the same thing,,,all is one and one is all,,,

No, it's not. Not at all.

so you say,,,

So Parnas said, dope.

how would he know??
hes just a paid dupe with limited information,,,

Limited?
He's just the point man on the ground in Ukraine who was pressuring the Zelensky admin to make the announcement.
He said he sat in meetings with Barr where this was discussed.

Decidedly not limited.

 

[progressive hunter]

thats the same thing,,,all is one and one is all,,,

No, it's not. Not at all.

so you say,,,

So Parnas said, dope.

how would he know??
hes just a paid dupe with limited information,,,

Limited?
He's just the point man on the ground in Ukraine who was pressuring the Zelensky admin to make the announcement.
He said he sat in meetings with Barr where this was discussed.

Decidedly not limited.

limited to that aspect,,,
but it seems if barr was involved there he was involved in the rest of it,,,

 

[Hutch Starskey]

No, it's not. Not at all.

so you say,,,

So Parnas said, dope.

how would he know??
hes just a paid dupe with limited information,,,

Limited?
He's just the point man on the ground in Ukraine who was pressuring the Zelensky admin to make the announcement.
He said he sat in meetings with Barr where this was discussed.

Decidedly not limited.

limited to that aspect,,,
but it seems if barr was involved there he was involved in the rest of it,,,

There is no "rest of it".

Barr has already said in a nationally televised interview that he never contacted the Ukrainian govt to investigate and that Trump never asked him to.

Justice Department: Trump never asked Barr to talk to Ukraine

 

[progressive hunter]

so you say,,,

So Parnas said, dope.

how would he know??
hes just a paid dupe with limited information,,,

Limited?
He's just the point man on the ground in Ukraine who was pressuring the Zelensky admin to make the announcement.
He said he sat in meetings with Barr where this was discussed.

Decidedly not limited.

limited to that aspect,,,
but it seems if barr was involved there he was involved in the rest of it,,,

There is no "rest of it".

Barr has already said in a nationally televised interview that he never contacted the Ukrainian govt to investigate and that Trump never asked him to.

Justice Department: Trump never asked Barr to talk to Ukraine

who said he contacted anyone???
but as parnas said he was involved,,,that was a big complaint of the TDSers that he wasnt involved,,,

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So Parnas said, dope.

how would he know??
hes just a paid dupe with limited information,,,

Limited?
He's just the point man on the ground in Ukraine who was pressuring the Zelensky admin to make the announcement.
He said he sat in meetings with Barr where this was discussed.

Decidedly not limited.

limited to that aspect,,,
but it seems if barr was involved there he was involved in the rest of it,,,

There is no "rest of it".

Barr has already said in a nationally televised interview that he never contacted the Ukrainian govt to investigate and that Trump never asked him to.

Justice Department: Trump never asked Barr to talk to Ukraine

who said he contacted anyone???
but as parnas said he was involved,,,that was a big complaint of the TDSers that he wasnt involved,,,

Well then what is "the rest of it" that you said Barr was involved with in Ukraine?

Yes, dope. The complaint was if there was corruption, then why didn't Trump ask Barr to investigate?

Answer: Because it was never about corruption but rather an announcement of an investigation in order to diminish Biden.

 

[progressive hunter]

how would he know??
hes just a paid dupe with limited information,,,

Limited?
He's just the point man on the ground in Ukraine who was pressuring the Zelensky admin to make the announcement.
He said he sat in meetings with Barr where this was discussed.

Decidedly not limited.

limited to that aspect,,,
but it seems if barr was involved there he was involved in the rest of it,,,

There is no "rest of it".

Barr has already said in a nationally televised interview that he never contacted the Ukrainian govt to investigate and that Trump never asked him to.

Justice Department: Trump never asked Barr to talk to Ukraine

who said he contacted anyone???
but as parnas said he was involved,,,that was a big complaint of the TDSers that he wasnt involved,,,

Well then what is "the rest of it" that you said Barr was involved with in Ukraine?

REALLY!!!!
you dont know???

sorry at this point if you dont know you should educate yourself cause I'm tired of educating others

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

This is like a bad Netflix series. 100% partisan and boring and we know the outcome.