Judicial Watch demands Ginsberg recuse herself from voter ID case.

ShootSpeeders

Gold Member
May 13, 2012
20,232
2,363
280
She hates trump so obviously yes, she should. Prior court said voter ID discriminates against blacks which is absurd. Both whites and blacks are required to produce a photo.


Judicial Watch: Should Ginsburg Sit Out NC Voter ID Case?

july 29 2016 Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton Friday questioned whether Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg should recuse herself from any future action regarding the North Carolina voter ID case that a federal appeals court struck down because it was discriminatory.

"Given her comments attacking Donald Trump, there's a real question about whether Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg should recuse herself from the North Carolina voter ID case," Fitton said.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Va., ruled that the law discriminated against African Americans.

Under the law, voters would have been required to show photo identification when casting their ballots in the November election.

Other restrictions were also blocked by the court, including those that scaled back early voting, that prevented residents from registering and voting on the same day, and that eliminated voters' ability to cast ballots outside their assigned precincts.
 
This voter ID shit cracks me up. South Africa (who Ginsberg once referred to having a better Constitution than the USA) requires voter ID.

Jimmy Carter's center that monitors third world elections demands voter ID. Only in America are blacks so stupid they can't get voter ID according to liberals. Shows you what D's really think of American blacks.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
Federal judges take the view that "disparate impact" is all you need to repeal a law. So lets apply that to welfare and affirmative action.
 

Forum List

Back
Top