Judge who upheld Trump subpoena donated to DemonRATS on committee seeking the records

[The Purge]

The New York federal judge who ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees has donated in the past to a slew of big-name Democrats -- including two who currently sit on those committees, according to federal election filings.

After an hour of oral arguments, Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have "a legitimate legislative purpose," and that Trump was unlikely to prevail in a lawsuit to quash the requests. Judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Federal election records show that, when he was a partner at the law firm Day Pitney LLP and before he was appointed to the bench in 2011, Ramos sent $350 to Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes from 2007 to 2008, as well as $500 to elect New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez in 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

... to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Of course there is no appearance here, he is overtly bias!!!!

 

[Intolerant]

Another 0bama appointed piece of shit.

 

[Erinwltr]

" before he was appointed to the bench in 2011"
The reasoning behind his ruling was very straight forward and simple. And right.

 

[Camp]

Perhaps they can appeal the decision.

 

[Care4all]

The New York federal judge who ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees has donated in the past to a slew of big-name Democrats -- including two who currently sit on those committees, according to federal election filings.

After an hour of oral arguments, Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have "a legitimate legislative purpose," and that Trump was unlikely to prevail in a lawsuit to quash the requests. Judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Federal election records show that, when he was a partner at the law firm Day Pitney LLP and before he was appointed to the bench in 2011, Ramos sent $350 to Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes from 2007 to 2008, as well as $500 to elect New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez in 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

... to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Of course there is no appearance here, he is overtly bias!!!!

Lest you forget, Trump donated to them and to Hillary Clinton, as well.

Political preference and who you donated to is not a legitimate ethical reason to recuse oneself, according to the ethics rules.

 

[The Purge]

The New York federal judge who ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees has donated in the past to a slew of big-name Democrats -- including two who currently sit on those committees, according to federal election filings.

After an hour of oral arguments, Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have "a legitimate legislative purpose," and that Trump was unlikely to prevail in a lawsuit to quash the requests. Judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Federal election records show that, when he was a partner at the law firm Day Pitney LLP and before he was appointed to the bench in 2011, Ramos sent $350 to Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes from 2007 to 2008, as well as $500 to elect New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez in 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

... to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Of course there is no appearance here, he is overtly bias!!!!

Lest you forget, Trump donated to them and Hillary Clinton, as well.

Political preference and who you donated to is not a legitimate ethical reason to recuse oneself, according to the ethics rules.

Of course. it is...especially when 2 people on the committee asking for these documents are ones that rec. donations. And Trumps donations had no difference as he did not gain anything from those donations.

 

[Crepitus]

The New York federal judge who ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees has donated in the past to a slew of big-name Democrats -- including two who currently sit on those committees, according to federal election filings.

After an hour of oral arguments, Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have "a legitimate legislative purpose," and that Trump was unlikely to prevail in a lawsuit to quash the requests. Judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Federal election records show that, when he was a partner at the law firm Day Pitney LLP and before he was appointed to the bench in 2011, Ramos sent $350 to Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes from 2007 to 2008, as well as $500 to elect New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez in 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

... to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Of course there is no appearance here, he is overtly bias!!!!

And Bart O'kavenaugh sucked tRump off repeatedly to get his position.

What's your point?

 

[The Purge]

The New York federal judge who ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees has donated in the past to a slew of big-name Democrats -- including two who currently sit on those committees, according to federal election filings.

After an hour of oral arguments, Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have "a legitimate legislative purpose," and that Trump was unlikely to prevail in a lawsuit to quash the requests. Judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Federal election records show that, when he was a partner at the law firm Day Pitney LLP and before he was appointed to the bench in 2011, Ramos sent $350 to Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes from 2007 to 2008, as well as $500 to elect New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez in 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

... to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Of course there is no appearance here, he is overtly bias!!!!

And Bart O'kavenaugh sucked tRump off repeatedly to get his position.

What's your point?

My point is you are a troll!

 

[Erinwltr]

The New York federal judge who ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees has donated in the past to a slew of big-name Democrats -- including two who currently sit on those committees, according to federal election filings.

After an hour of oral arguments, Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have "a legitimate legislative purpose," and that Trump was unlikely to prevail in a lawsuit to quash the requests. Judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Federal election records show that, when he was a partner at the law firm Day Pitney LLP and before he was appointed to the bench in 2011, Ramos sent $350 to Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes from 2007 to 2008, as well as $500 to elect New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez in 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

... to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Of course there is no appearance here, he is overtly bias!!!!

Lest you forget, Trump donated to them and Hillary Clinton, as well.

Political preference and who you donated to is not a legitimate ethical reason to recuse oneself, according to the ethics rules.

Of course. it is...especially when 2 people on the committee asking for these documents are ones that rec. donations. And Trumps donations had no difference as he did not gain anything from those donations.

Okay you want it both ways. Good for you, Boogie.

 

[Care4all]

The New York federal judge who ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees has donated in the past to a slew of big-name Democrats -- including two who currently sit on those committees, according to federal election filings.

After an hour of oral arguments, Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have "a legitimate legislative purpose," and that Trump was unlikely to prevail in a lawsuit to quash the requests. Judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Federal election records show that, when he was a partner at the law firm Day Pitney LLP and before he was appointed to the bench in 2011, Ramos sent $350 to Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes from 2007 to 2008, as well as $500 to elect New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez in 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

... to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Of course there is no appearance here, he is overtly bias!!!!

Lest you forget, Trump donated to them and Hillary Clinton, as well.

Political preference and who you donated to is not a legitimate ethical reason to recuse oneself, according to the ethics rules.

Of course. it is...especially when 2 people on the committee asking for these documents are ones that rec. donations. And Trumps donations had no difference as he did not gain anything from those donations.

NOT EVEN CLOSE!

So what if they received a donation from them nearly 10 years ago? How would the judge's decision to donate to a Congressman from their state years ago, have anything to do with their decision now, to uphold the constitution?

 

[Crepitus]

The New York federal judge who ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees has donated in the past to a slew of big-name Democrats -- including two who currently sit on those committees, according to federal election filings.

After an hour of oral arguments, Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have "a legitimate legislative purpose," and that Trump was unlikely to prevail in a lawsuit to quash the requests. Judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Federal election records show that, when he was a partner at the law firm Day Pitney LLP and before he was appointed to the bench in 2011, Ramos sent $350 to Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes from 2007 to 2008, as well as $500 to elect New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez in 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

... to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Of course there is no appearance here, he is overtly bias!!!!

And Bart O'kavenaugh sucked tRump off repeatedly to get his position.

What's your point?

My point is you are a troll!

You mean you don't have a point.

Well, other than the one on top of your head.

 

[Erinwltr]

The New York federal judge who ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees has donated in the past to a slew of big-name Democrats -- including two who currently sit on those committees, according to federal election filings.

After an hour of oral arguments, Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have "a legitimate legislative purpose," and that Trump was unlikely to prevail in a lawsuit to quash the requests. Judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Federal election records show that, when he was a partner at the law firm Day Pitney LLP and before he was appointed to the bench in 2011, Ramos sent $350 to Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes from 2007 to 2008, as well as $500 to elect New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez in 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

... to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Of course there is no appearance here, he is overtly bias!!!!

Lest you forget, Trump donated to them and Hillary Clinton, as well.

Political preference and who you donated to is not a legitimate ethical reason to recuse oneself, according to the ethics rules.

Of course. it is...especially when 2 people on the committee asking for these documents are ones that rec. donations. And Trumps donations had no difference as he did not gain anything from those donations.

NOT EVEN CLOSE!

So what if they received a donation from them nearly 10 years ago? How would the judge's decision to donate to a Congressman from their state years ago, have anything to do with their decision now, to uphold the constitution?

This is the point where Purge will call you a libtardo, commie, whatever. Just watch.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

" before he was appointed to the bench in 2011"
The reasoning behind his ruling was very straight forward and simple. And right.

There is no legitimate legislative interest here. None! It's simply digging through the mud for something with which
dems can attack Trump. Wake the fuck up, Bozo.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

duplicate

 

[The Purge]

The New York federal judge who ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees has donated in the past to a slew of big-name Democrats -- including two who currently sit on those committees, according to federal election filings.

After an hour of oral arguments, Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have "a legitimate legislative purpose," and that Trump was unlikely to prevail in a lawsuit to quash the requests. Judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Federal election records show that, when he was a partner at the law firm Day Pitney LLP and before he was appointed to the bench in 2011, Ramos sent $350 to Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes from 2007 to 2008, as well as $500 to elect New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez in 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

... to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Of course there is no appearance here, he is overtly bias!!!!

Lest you forget, Trump donated to them and Hillary Clinton, as well.

Political preference and who you donated to is not a legitimate ethical reason to recuse oneself, according to the ethics rules.

Of course. it is...especially when 2 people on the committee asking for these documents are ones that rec. donations. And Trumps donations had no difference as he did not gain anything from those donations.

NOT EVEN CLOSE!

So what if they received a donation from them nearly 10 years ago? How would the judge's decision to donate to a Congressman from their state years ago, have anything to do with their decision now, to uphold the constitution?

Write the articles maker...I am sure he'll take the time and a thousand words to explain it to you...

 

[The Purge]

The New York federal judge who ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees has donated in the past to a slew of big-name Democrats -- including two who currently sit on those committees, according to federal election filings.

After an hour of oral arguments, Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have "a legitimate legislative purpose," and that Trump was unlikely to prevail in a lawsuit to quash the requests. Judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Federal election records show that, when he was a partner at the law firm Day Pitney LLP and before he was appointed to the bench in 2011, Ramos sent $350 to Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes from 2007 to 2008, as well as $500 to elect New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez in 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

... to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Of course there is no appearance here, he is overtly bias!!!!

And Bart O'kavenaugh sucked tRump off repeatedly to get his position.

What's your point?

My point is you are a troll!

You mean you don't have a point.

Well, other than the one on top of your head.

No wonder I rarely answer you....DON'T FEED THE..

 

[The Purge]

The New York federal judge who ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees has donated in the past to a slew of big-name Democrats -- including two who currently sit on those committees, according to federal election filings.

After an hour of oral arguments, Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have "a legitimate legislative purpose," and that Trump was unlikely to prevail in a lawsuit to quash the requests. Judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Federal election records show that, when he was a partner at the law firm Day Pitney LLP and before he was appointed to the bench in 2011, Ramos sent $350 to Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes from 2007 to 2008, as well as $500 to elect New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez in 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

... to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Of course there is no appearance here, he is overtly bias!!!!

Lest you forget, Trump donated to them and Hillary Clinton, as well.

Political preference and who you donated to is not a legitimate ethical reason to recuse oneself, according to the ethics rules.

Of course. it is...especially when 2 people on the committee asking for these documents are ones that rec. donations. And Trumps donations had no difference as he did not gain anything from those donations.

NOT EVEN CLOSE!

So what if they received a donation from them nearly 10 years ago? How would the judge's decision to donate to a Congressman from their state years ago, have anything to do with their decision now, to uphold the constitution?

This is the point where Purge will call you a libtardo, commie, whatever. Just watch.

Describing yourself.... good to know you acknowledge it!

 

[Crepitus]

The New York federal judge who ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees has donated in the past to a slew of big-name Democrats -- including two who currently sit on those committees, according to federal election filings.

After an hour of oral arguments, Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have "a legitimate legislative purpose," and that Trump was unlikely to prevail in a lawsuit to quash the requests. Judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Federal election records show that, when he was a partner at the law firm Day Pitney LLP and before he was appointed to the bench in 2011, Ramos sent $350 to Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes from 2007 to 2008, as well as $500 to elect New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez in 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

... to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Of course there is no appearance here, he is overtly bias!!!!

And Bart O'kavenaugh sucked tRump off repeatedly to get his position.

What's your point?

My point is you are a troll!

You mean you don't have a point.

Well, other than the one on top of your head.

No wonder I rarely answer you....DON'T FEED THE..

Don't feed the trolling?

Lol

 

[The Purge]

The New York federal judge who ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees has donated in the past to a slew of big-name Democrats -- including two who currently sit on those committees, according to federal election filings.

After an hour of oral arguments, Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have "a legitimate legislative purpose," and that Trump was unlikely to prevail in a lawsuit to quash the requests. Judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Federal election records show that, when he was a partner at the law firm Day Pitney LLP and before he was appointed to the bench in 2011, Ramos sent $350 to Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes from 2007 to 2008, as well as $500 to elect New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez in 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

... to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.

Of course there is no appearance here, he is overtly bias!!!!

And Bart O'kavenaugh sucked tRump off repeatedly to get his position.

What's your point?

My point is you are a troll!

You mean you don't have a point.

Well, other than the one on top of your head.

No wonder I rarely answer you....DON'T FEED THE..

Don't feed the trolling?

Lol

There ya go....ROTFLMFAO!

 

[Crepitus]

And Bart O'kavenaugh sucked tRump off repeatedly to get his position.

What's your point?

My point is you are a troll!

You mean you don't have a point.

Well, other than the one on top of your head.

No wonder I rarely answer you....DON'T FEED THE..

Don't feed the trolling?

Lol

There ya go....ROTFLMFAO!

Yep, there I go.

Have a nice day Zippy.