'Joe The Plumber' Claims Gun Control Caused The Holocaust

So, Ohio may be sending Joe the Plumber to Congress. Holy shit...

(CNN) – Samuel Wurzelbacher, better known as "Joe the Plumber," won Tuesday's Republican primary in Ohio's 9th Congressional District, according to unofficial vote results from the Ohio Secretary of State.

With 100% of precincts reporting, Wurzelbacher bested opponent Steven Kraus to become the GOP nominee and will face Democratic Rep. Marcy Kaptur, the longest serving woman in the House of Representatives, in the fall.

‘Joe the Plumber’ wins GOP primary in Ohio
 
How does disarming citizens enable them to protect themselves from rulers like Hitler? England forbidding the Scots from owning firearms with which they could gain their independence and prevent oppression by the crown was a major factor in the Founders including the 2nd Amendment into the Bill of Rights.
 
Jews caused the Holohoax. It was in the script and had to happen.
Besides, why do you think Jews have been persecuted since their invention ? They have three eyes ?
Antisemitism is a disease. You catch it from Jews.
 
The Great Depression caused Hitler's rise to power. Economic troubles and people looking for someone to blame. Such is the way with Fascism. Nationalism in the guise of patriotism, excluding large parts of society as "not one of us", dismantling civil liberties in the guise of security, politics in bed with the wealthy and powerful.....sound familiar?
 
Well Hell. I thought Joe the Plumber was an idiot in the eye of the left??

Wonder why shitting bull now decides what he says is board worthy??

Slow day in libville??
 
The betrayal of the terms of the ceasefire leading to the treaty of Versaille caused WWII and the rise of Hitler.

The AUSTERITY imposed on Germany so pissed off the Germans that they lost their collective minds and put Hitler into power.

Time to read your history, kiddies.
 
So, Ohio may be sending Joe the Plumber to Congress. Holy shit...

(CNN) – Samuel Wurzelbacher, better known as "Joe the Plumber," won Tuesday's Republican primary in Ohio's 9th Congressional District, according to unofficial vote results from the Ohio Secretary of State.

With 100% of precincts reporting, Wurzelbacher bested opponent Steven Kraus to become the GOP nominee and will face Democratic Rep. Marcy Kaptur, the longest serving woman in the House of Representatives, in the fall.

‘Joe the Plumber’ wins GOP primary in Ohio

Stranger things have happened but Marcy is probably kicking his butt all over NW Ohio. I'd love to see a debate.
 
How does disarming citizens enable them to protect themselves from rulers like Hitler? England forbidding the Scots from owning firearms with which they could gain their independence and prevent oppression by the crown was a major factor in the Founders including the 2nd Amendment into the Bill of Rights.

First, you work on a whole lot of common misconceptions.

The first is that gun control was common in Germany under Hitler, which it wasn't. Gun ownership was promoted and even seen as a German virtue. The guy who actually confiscated most of the guns in Germany was that radical liberal, Dwight D. Eisenhower after the war.

The second one is that if you ar-tards ever did take up arms against your government, that you'd win. Um. Nope. The government has bigger guns, better guns, and people who are trained with them a lot better. If there ever comes a time when it's you against the government, the government will win, and your neighbors will be cheering them when they do because you were frightening their children.

Gun_TotingBibleThumperMO.jpg
Nothing frightening about this guy at all.
 
Last edited:
Actually that's not what he said.
I realized it is impossible for some people to read critically. But if you don't you end up sounding like, well, Lakhota for one.
What he actually said was that gun control was part of the genocide both in the Holocaust and Nazi Germany, as gun control preceded both events.
That is a true statement. Every dictator seeks to disarm the population. The latest is Chavez, who outlawed private ownership of firearms in Venezuala just this month. But that is a long line of such behavior.
Gun control in this country started as a racist measure to control blacks.
 
Actually that's not what he said.
I realized it is impossible for some people to read critically. But if you don't you end up sounding like, well, Lakhota for one.
What he actually said was that gun control was part of the genocide both in the Holocaust and Nazi Germany, as gun control preceded both events.
That is a true statement. Every dictator seeks to disarm the population. The latest is Chavez, who outlawed private ownership of firearms in Venezuala just this month. But that is a long line of such behavior.
Gun control in this country started as a racist measure to control blacks.

All Progressive leaders like Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot and Fidel favor rigid gun control laws
 
The Great Depression caused Hitler's rise to power. Economic troubles and people looking for someone to blame. Such is the way with Fascism. Nationalism in the guise of patriotism, excluding large parts of society as "not one of us", dismantling civil liberties in the guise of security, politics in bed with the wealthy and powerful.....sound familiar?

This is history, 'Joe' supporters prefer FANTASY.
 
How does disarming citizens enable them to protect themselves from rulers like Hitler? England forbidding the Scots from owning firearms with which they could gain their independence and prevent oppression by the crown was a major factor in the Founders including the 2nd Amendment into the Bill of Rights.

First, you work on a whole lot of common misconceptions.

The first is that gun control was common in Germany under Hitler, which it wasn't. Gun ownership was promoted and even seen as a German virtue. The guy who actually confiscated most of the guns in Germany was that radical liberal, Dwight D. Eisenhower after the war.

The second one is that if you ar-tards ever did take up arms against your government, that you'd win. Um. Nope. The government has bigger guns, better guns, and people who are trained with them a lot better. If there ever comes a time when it's you against the government, the government will win, and your neighbors will be cheering them when they do because you were frightening their children.

Gun_TotingBibleThumperMO.jpg
Nothing frightening about this guy at all.

So what your saying is that people should be allow to have bigger better guns? I agree.
 
The Great Depression caused Hitler's rise to power. Economic troubles and people looking for someone to blame. Such is the way with Fascism. Nationalism in the guise of patriotism, excluding large parts of society as "not one of us", dismantling civil liberties in the guise of security, politics in bed with the wealthy and powerful.....sound familiar?

Sure does

“I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money” -- Progressive Barry Obama

occupy-wall-street.jpg
 
How does disarming citizens enable them to protect themselves from rulers like Hitler? England forbidding the Scots from owning firearms with which they could gain their independence and prevent oppression by the crown was a major factor in the Founders including the 2nd Amendment into the Bill of Rights.

First, you work on a whole lot of common misconceptions.

The first is that gun control was common in Germany under Hitler, which it wasn't. Gun ownership was promoted and even seen as a German virtue. The guy who actually confiscated most of the guns in Germany was that radical liberal, Dwight D. Eisenhower after the war.

The second one is that if you ar-tards ever did take up arms against your government, that you'd win. Um. Nope. The government has bigger guns, better guns, and people who are trained with them a lot better. If there ever comes a time when it's you against the government, the government will win, and your neighbors will be cheering them when they do because you were frightening their children.

Gun_TotingBibleThumperMO.jpg
Nothing frightening about this guy at all.

Again, logical arguments in a fantasy thread. 'Joe' doesn't know anything but what he is trained to learn. He IS a good doggie.
 



Lakota.........you officially win the USMESSAGEBOARD award for.....................


"Stupidest fuck in the POLITICS forum!!"



Its dopes like you that make things like this priceless gems....................


13960_189855479432_503149432_2664011_7029878_n-5.jpg
 
Last edited:
How does disarming citizens enable them to protect themselves from rulers like Hitler? England forbidding the Scots from owning firearms with which they could gain their independence and prevent oppression by the crown was a major factor in the Founders including the 2nd Amendment into the Bill of Rights.

First, you work on a whole lot of common misconceptions.

The first is that gun control was common in Germany under Hitler, which it wasn't. Gun ownership was promoted and even seen as a German virtue. The guy who actually confiscated most of the guns in Germany was that radical liberal, Dwight D. Eisenhower after the war.

The second one is that if you ar-tards ever did take up arms against your government, that you'd win. Um. Nope. The government has bigger guns, better guns, and people who are trained with them a lot better. If there ever comes a time when it's you against the government, the government will win, and your neighbors will be cheering them when they do because you were frightening their children.

So what your saying is that people should be allow to have bigger better guns? I agree.

No, I'm saying you'll never have good enough guns. Sorry. Just simple reality. Even if you got an entire city to rally to your cause, the government has nukes.
 
First, you work on a whole lot of common misconceptions.

The first is that gun control was common in Germany under Hitler, which it wasn't. Gun ownership was promoted and even seen as a German virtue. The guy who actually confiscated most of the guns in Germany was that radical liberal, Dwight D. Eisenhower after the war.

The second one is that if you ar-tards ever did take up arms against your government, that you'd win. Um. Nope. The government has bigger guns, better guns, and people who are trained with them a lot better. If there ever comes a time when it's you against the government, the government will win, and your neighbors will be cheering them when they do because you were frightening their children.

So what your saying is that people should be allow to have bigger better guns? I agree.

No, I'm saying you'll never have good enough guns. Sorry. Just simple reality. Even if you got an entire city to rally to your cause, the government has nukes.

The Russians had nukes. Didn't make a bit of difference to the Afghans.
 
No, I'm saying you'll never have good enough guns. Sorry. Just simple reality. Even if you got an entire city to rally to your cause, the government has nukes.

The Russians had nukes. Didn't make a bit of difference to the Afghans.

Big difference. Giving up Afghanistan did not have anything to do with whether they would lose power or not.

In fact, Afghanistan still had Communists in charge when Russia decided that was a bad idea.

It wasn't Afghans who ended Communism, it was Russians.
 

Forum List

Back
Top