It Begins: California Begins Indoctrinating Children Into The LGBT Lifestyle Against Parents Wishes

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

I'd love to hear a gay persons opinion on this

Parents in CA call all the shots...you know that the OP is a conspiracy queen.

It isn't hard for me to believe Californians are sick enough to support this.

Of course...you're an easy mark for the OP.

How am I an easy mark? I'm disputing the claim that parents disapproved....sure, some probably do...but I doubt the majority are against it.

 

[bodecea]

It's so telling how all the usual Christian sharia supporters jumped right in this story.

 

[Windparadox]

`
`
I'm bisexual but I only speak for myself. As a parent, no matter how supposedly "well intended " a law, I generally support parents rights over the states intentions..

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Before they were just suggesting it. Now, California parents have no choice: It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents


The governor was referring to the bill's author, Sen. Mark Leno, a San Francisco Democrat.

California law already requires state schools to teach about the contributions of Native Americans, African-Americans, Mexican-Americans, and Asian-Americans, among other groups.

It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents
By
Warner Todd Huston
-
December 27, 2017
Share
Despite their reputation for being the “Party of choice,” Democrats in California have ruled that parents are not allowed to opt their school-aged children out of the mandatory LGBT indoctrination in the state-sponsored school system.

Naturally, far left-wing California has become the first state in the Union to force kids to use LGBT inclusive textbooks. But at the same time it left no legal way for parents to opt out from the propaganda.

The gay propaganda law supposedly requires a “‘fair, accurate, inclusive, and respectful’ treatment of homosexual, bisexual, transgender, and lesbian Americans despite the historical insignificance,” according to Truth Revolt.

State publisher Mark Jarrett cited several historical figures who *might* have been gay saying that his textbooks will essentially make these historical figures gay icons.

“We’re not trying to make anybody gay; we’re not saying there’s an agenda; we’re not saying that these people are better than other people; what we’re saying is this is another group of Americans and they face certain prejudices,” said state publisher Mark Jarrett, whose history textbooks include special mention of the sexual preferences of historical figures like Jane Adams, Emily Dickinson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, President James Buchanan, though it’s inconclusive if these prominent Americans were gay or not.

“I think we should say, ‘Buchanan, he never married. He had a very good friend who was living with him. He may have been gay,’” Jarrett added. “On the other hand, at that time, being gay was seen as something evil and wrong.”

It should be noted that men sharing expenses with other men and living together was an extremely common thing in our country’s history. Senators did it, Congressmen did it, and so do regular Americans all across the nation.

In Fact, it was extremely common even into the 20th century. It has only been since WWII that Americans developed a sense that living completely on alone with no co-habitating partners, whether platonic or romantic, was considered the thing to do.

As to President Buchanan, gay activists have tried to claim him as their own for decades but there is no direct proof of his sexual proclivities.

Gay activists have also ridiculously tried to make President Abraham Lincoln gay, as well.

The radical gay agenda is infused throughout California’s textbooks, Truth Revolt report:

California approved the textbooks written by Jarrett, a Ph.D, to be used in the 8th grade. Students will read that legendary stagecoach driver Charlie Parkhurst “was a woman who identified as a man,” according to Fox News. They will read that George Washington’s chief of staff Baron Von Steuben “may have been gay,” and that poet Walt Whitman “was drawn to young men… but denied his same sex preferences in public.”

Critics say much of these accounts are speculation, but California rejected any publisher that didn’t mention the homosexual preferences or claims against historical figures in their textbooks. In one textbook, the state forced the publisher to add “lesbian” to describe NASA astronaut Sally Ride.

So, to appease the radical gay lobby, California is now taking what are supposed to be factual school textbooks and filling them with “speculation” on the sexual leanings of historical figures despite the FACT that the facts are not known.

California is now officially indoctrinating, not educating, its children.​

Los Angeles (CNN) -- Democratic California Gov. Jerry Brown said Thursday he had signed a bill that will require public schools in the state to teach students about the contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans.

The bill, believed to be the first of its kind in the nation, will also require teachers to provide instruction on the role of people

This bill revises existing laws that prohibit discrimination in education and ensures that the important contributions of Americans from all backgrounds and walks of life are included in our history books. It represents an important step forward for our state, and I thank Senator Leno for his hard work on this historic legislation."

It's apparent now that gays should either be put in insane asylums, internment campss, or sent to the middle east to ISIS strongholds with tall buildings. This is all in order to protect the children from them. They should be considered a national security threat.

Christian sharia.

Never heard of it but it sounds beautiful!

 

[mudwhistle]

I'd love to hear a gay persons opinion on this

Parents in CA call all the shots...you know that the OP is a conspiracy queen.

It isn't hard for me to believe Californians are sick enough to support this.

I really don't think they had a choice or even care anymore. Many no hablo English.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

It's so telling how all the usual Christian sharia supporters jumped right in this story.

There's no such thing as christian sharia.

 

[Political Junky]

Before they were just suggesting it. Now, California parents have no choice: It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents

It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents
By
Warner Todd Huston
-
December 27, 2017
Share
Despite their reputation for being the “Party of choice,” Democrats in California have ruled that parents are not allowed to opt their school-aged children out of the mandatory LGBT indoctrination in the state-sponsored school system.

Naturally, far left-wing California has become the first state in the Union to force kids to use LGBT inclusive textbooks. But at the same time it left no legal way for parents to opt out from the propaganda.

The gay propaganda law supposedly requires a “‘fair, accurate, inclusive, and respectful’ treatment of homosexual, bisexual, transgender, and lesbian Americans despite the historical insignificance,” according to Truth Revolt.

State publisher Mark Jarrett cited several historical figures who *might* have been gay saying that his textbooks will essentially make these historical figures gay icons.

“We’re not trying to make anybody gay; we’re not saying there’s an agenda; we’re not saying that these people are better than other people; what we’re saying is this is another group of Americans and they face certain prejudices,” said state publisher Mark Jarrett, whose history textbooks include special mention of the sexual preferences of historical figures like Jane Adams, Emily Dickinson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, President James Buchanan, though it’s inconclusive if these prominent Americans were gay or not.

“I think we should say, ‘Buchanan, he never married. He had a very good friend who was living with him. He may have been gay,’” Jarrett added. “On the other hand, at that time, being gay was seen as something evil and wrong.”

It should be noted that men sharing expenses with other men and living together was an extremely common thing in our country’s history. Senators did it, Congressmen did it, and so do regular Americans all across the nation.

In Fact, it was extremely common even into the 20th century. It has only been since WWII that Americans developed a sense that living completely on alone with no co-habitating partners, whether platonic or romantic, was considered the thing to do.

As to President Buchanan, gay activists have tried to claim him as their own for decades but there is no direct proof of his sexual proclivities.

Gay activists have also ridiculously tried to make President Abraham Lincoln gay, as well.

The radical gay agenda is infused throughout California’s textbooks, Truth Revolt report:

California approved the textbooks written by Jarrett, a Ph.D, to be used in the 8th grade. Students will read that legendary stagecoach driver Charlie Parkhurst “was a woman who identified as a man,” according to Fox News. They will read that George Washington’s chief of staff Baron Von Steuben “may have been gay,” and that poet Walt Whitman “was drawn to young men… but denied his same sex preferences in public.”

Critics say much of these accounts are speculation, but California rejected any publisher that didn’t mention the homosexual preferences or claims against historical figures in their textbooks. In one textbook, the state forced the publisher to add “lesbian” to describe NASA astronaut Sally Ride.

So, to appease the radical gay lobby, California is now taking what are supposed to be factual school textbooks and filling them with “speculation” on the sexual leanings of historical figures despite the FACT that the facts are not known.

California is now officially indoctrinating, not educating, its children.​

You're a very sick person.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Before they were just suggesting it. Now, California parents have no choice: It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents

It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents
By
Warner Todd Huston
-
December 27, 2017
Share
Despite their reputation for being the “Party of choice,” Democrats in California have ruled that parents are not allowed to opt their school-aged children out of the mandatory LGBT indoctrination in the state-sponsored school system.

Naturally, far left-wing California has become the first state in the Union to force kids to use LGBT inclusive textbooks. But at the same time it left no legal way for parents to opt out from the propaganda.

The gay propaganda law supposedly requires a “‘fair, accurate, inclusive, and respectful’ treatment of homosexual, bisexual, transgender, and lesbian Americans despite the historical insignificance,” according to Truth Revolt.

State publisher Mark Jarrett cited several historical figures who *might* have been gay saying that his textbooks will essentially make these historical figures gay icons.

“We’re not trying to make anybody gay; we’re not saying there’s an agenda; we’re not saying that these people are better than other people; what we’re saying is this is another group of Americans and they face certain prejudices,” said state publisher Mark Jarrett, whose history textbooks include special mention of the sexual preferences of historical figures like Jane Adams, Emily Dickinson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, President James Buchanan, though it’s inconclusive if these prominent Americans were gay or not.

“I think we should say, ‘Buchanan, he never married. He had a very good friend who was living with him. He may have been gay,’” Jarrett added. “On the other hand, at that time, being gay was seen as something evil and wrong.”

It should be noted that men sharing expenses with other men and living together was an extremely common thing in our country’s history. Senators did it, Congressmen did it, and so do regular Americans all across the nation.

In Fact, it was extremely common even into the 20th century. It has only been since WWII that Americans developed a sense that living completely on alone with no co-habitating partners, whether platonic or romantic, was considered the thing to do.

As to President Buchanan, gay activists have tried to claim him as their own for decades but there is no direct proof of his sexual proclivities.

Gay activists have also ridiculously tried to make President Abraham Lincoln gay, as well.

The radical gay agenda is infused throughout California’s textbooks, Truth Revolt report:

California approved the textbooks written by Jarrett, a Ph.D, to be used in the 8th grade. Students will read that legendary stagecoach driver Charlie Parkhurst “was a woman who identified as a man,” according to Fox News. They will read that George Washington’s chief of staff Baron Von Steuben “may have been gay,” and that poet Walt Whitman “was drawn to young men… but denied his same sex preferences in public.”

Critics say much of these accounts are speculation, but California rejected any publisher that didn’t mention the homosexual preferences or claims against historical figures in their textbooks. In one textbook, the state forced the publisher to add “lesbian” to describe NASA astronaut Sally Ride.

So, to appease the radical gay lobby, California is now taking what are supposed to be factual school textbooks and filling them with “speculation” on the sexual leanings of historical figures despite the FACT that the facts are not known.

California is now officially indoctrinating, not educating, its children.​

You're a very sick person.

You're projecting.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

`
`
I'm bisexual but I only speak for myself. As a parent, no matter how supposedly "well intended " a law, I generally support parents rights over the states intentions..

You mean the parents right to have their children taught a white washed version of history and to grow up to believe that LGBT people are just freaks with no value to society like the bigots on this board?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I'd love to hear a gay persons opinion on this

Parents in CA call all the shots...you know that the OP is a conspiracy queen.

It isn't hard for me to believe Californians are sick enough to support this.

I really don't think they had a choice or even care anymore. Many no hablo English.

Or maybe they are smart enough to know that this policy is not a threat in any way. That the bigots are hyping it up and spreading hysteria

 

[Leo123]

You mean the parents right to have their children taught a white washed version of history and to grow up to believe that LGBT people are just freaks with no value to society like the bigots on this board?

LGBT is not 'history' it is sexual education. Nice try though.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

I'd love to hear a gay persons opinion on this

Parents in CA call all the shots...you know that the OP is a conspiracy queen.

It isn't hard for me to believe Californians are sick enough to support this.

I really don't think they had a choice or even care anymore. Many no hablo English.

Or maybe they are smart enough to know that this policy is not a threat in any way. That the bigots are hyping it up and spreading hysteria

There's no reason for it. Let parents teach their kids what they want about the topic.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

You mean the parents right to have their children taught a white washed version of history and to grow up to believe that LGBT people are just freaks with no value to society like the bigots on this board?

LGBT is not 'history' it is sexual education. Nice try though.

Wrong sparky!!Do you even understand what exactly is being taught??

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Shocking stuff. Why oh why are schools trying to teach kids about cultures and lifestyles that they may not be aware of ?

This isn't teaching kids about cultures and lifestyles. This is brainwashing kids into immoral and evil sexual perversions, and grooming them for further abuse by perverts. In a sane society, anyone who willingly had any part in this would be prosecuted as a sex offender,and kept in prison and away from children for the rest of their wretched lives.

It is, of course, no surprise at all to see you defending this sexual abuse of children.

If we dont teach our kids they will grow up as twisted and ignorant as yourself.

Teach them what? How to be a perverted homo?

It's obvious enough why sick perverts such as Tommy Tainant want children to be groomed and indoctrinated into accepting sexual perversion and abuse.

On a properly run board this comment would be deleted.
Get some help you sick fuck.

 

[Windparadox]

You mean the parents right to have their children taught a white washed version of history and to grow up to believe that LGBT people are just freaks with no value to society like the bigots on this board?

`
I'm a civil libertarian. It applies to all, even those I vehemently disagree with. To that extent, I will not now, nor ever, allow the state to usurp the natural law of parental rights, which would include the parental right of their child's education. Force of law the worst possible way to attempt to change human behavior.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Parents will have to work extra hard to counter the propaganda. The school is preparing students for adult sex with a same sex partner. Possibly the teachers themselves.

 

[2aguy]

Before they were just suggesting it. Now, California parents have no choice: It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents

It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents
By
Warner Todd Huston
-
December 27, 2017
Share
Despite their reputation for being the “Party of choice,” Democrats in California have ruled that parents are not allowed to opt their school-aged children out of the mandatory LGBT indoctrination in the state-sponsored school system.

Naturally, far left-wing California has become the first state in the Union to force kids to use LGBT inclusive textbooks. But at the same time it left no legal way for parents to opt out from the propaganda.

The gay propaganda law supposedly requires a “‘fair, accurate, inclusive, and respectful’ treatment of homosexual, bisexual, transgender, and lesbian Americans despite the historical insignificance,” according to Truth Revolt.

State publisher Mark Jarrett cited several historical figures who *might* have been gay saying that his textbooks will essentially make these historical figures gay icons.

“We’re not trying to make anybody gay; we’re not saying there’s an agenda; we’re not saying that these people are better than other people; what we’re saying is this is another group of Americans and they face certain prejudices,” said state publisher Mark Jarrett, whose history textbooks include special mention of the sexual preferences of historical figures like Jane Adams, Emily Dickinson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, President James Buchanan, though it’s inconclusive if these prominent Americans were gay or not.

“I think we should say, ‘Buchanan, he never married. He had a very good friend who was living with him. He may have been gay,’” Jarrett added. “On the other hand, at that time, being gay was seen as something evil and wrong.”

It should be noted that men sharing expenses with other men and living together was an extremely common thing in our country’s history. Senators did it, Congressmen did it, and so do regular Americans all across the nation.

In Fact, it was extremely common even into the 20th century. It has only been since WWII that Americans developed a sense that living completely on alone with no co-habitating partners, whether platonic or romantic, was considered the thing to do.

As to President Buchanan, gay activists have tried to claim him as their own for decades but there is no direct proof of his sexual proclivities.

Gay activists have also ridiculously tried to make President Abraham Lincoln gay, as well.

The radical gay agenda is infused throughout California’s textbooks, Truth Revolt report:

California approved the textbooks written by Jarrett, a Ph.D, to be used in the 8th grade. Students will read that legendary stagecoach driver Charlie Parkhurst “was a woman who identified as a man,” according to Fox News. They will read that George Washington’s chief of staff Baron Von Steuben “may have been gay,” and that poet Walt Whitman “was drawn to young men… but denied his same sex preferences in public.”

Critics say much of these accounts are speculation, but California rejected any publisher that didn’t mention the homosexual preferences or claims against historical figures in their textbooks. In one textbook, the state forced the publisher to add “lesbian” to describe NASA astronaut Sally Ride.

So, to appease the radical gay lobby, California is now taking what are supposed to be factual school textbooks and filling them with “speculation” on the sexual leanings of historical figures despite the FACT that the facts are not known.

California is now officially indoctrinating, not educating, its children.​

But....but......they told us all they wanted was to be able to marry the people they loved...that they didn't want to indoctrinate anyone, and that anyone who thought they did was just being one of those crazy conservative, religious nut jobs.......

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

You mean the parents right to have their children taught a white washed version of history and to grow up to believe that LGBT people are just freaks with no value to society like the bigots on this board?

`
I'm a civil libertarian. It applies to all, even those I vehemently disagree with. To that extent, I will not now, nor ever, allow the state to usurp the natural law of parental rights, which would include the parental right of their child's education. Force of law the worst possible way to attempt to change human behavior.

A Libertarian! That explains a lot. Maybe the parents should just determine the entire curriculum and do away with the school boards? Oh, and what about the rights of parents who do want their kids to learn about LGBT history??

The problem with that though is that you will have any many different ideas as to what should be taught as there are parents. Maybe we van have one child per class. Do you see the folly you position

I'm waiting or just one person to provide an honest and rational answer to the question of what harm is done by this being taught.

 

[Windparadox]

A Libertarian! That explains a lot. Maybe the parents should just determine the entire curriculum and do away with the school boards? Oh, and what about the rights of parents who do want their kids to learn about LGBT history??The problem with that though is that you will have any many different ideas as to what should be taught as there are parents. Maybe we van have one child per class. Do you see the folly you positionI'm waiting or just one person to provide an honest and rational answer to the question of what harm is done by this being taught.

`
`
I see no folly in my position. It's just that your opinion differs from mine. You have no ethical or moral high ground to judge from, nor do I. I'm simply stating I will not allow the state to usurp parental rights.You disagree. So be it.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Parents will have to work extra hard to counter the propaganda. The school is preparing students for adult sex with a same sex partner. Possibly the teachers themselves.

I honestly don't know if you're stupid enough to believe that, or just a vicious liar.