ISIS Attacks US: The Day After

We have learned what the pain threshold is for the "home of the brave". It is 129 Frenchmen. Using my conversion table that translates to 4 or 5 Americans.

If and when ISIS succeeds in perptrating a terror attack in the United States, they will only need to take out 4 or 5 Americans for the weakminded to collectively lose their shit.


After 9/11, we went nuts. Torture; imprisoning US citizens without habeas corpus; flag pin blacklists; wiretapping US citizens by the millions; three wars (Iraq, Afghanistan, Terror), including the pre-emptive invasion of another country; the creation of a massive new Cabinet level police agency; the militarization of state, county, and local police; and so forth.

The day after ISIS attacks the Vaterland, Trump will say, "You know, not all of Hitler's ideas were wrong", and his followers will cheer and don their armbands.

The day after that, Congress will unveil Patriot Act II: This Time We REALLY Mean Business.™

Meter maids will be shooting double-parkers. The FBI will be doing "drop-ins" to ask why there has been a sudden spike in the amount of milk you put in your cereal. Swastikas will be the new black. Sean Hannity will be denying bamboo shoots under your fingernails is torture.

I think deep down inside, the tards are wishing for an ISIS attack so they can finally remove their masks and let loose their inner Nazi.


But how will we deal with ISIS after that day?

Invasion. Boots on the ground. In force. All that Hollywood fantasy shit to which the tards are masturbating every night.

But what they do not realize is that such an operation will require at least a ten year occupation. After the collapse of ISIS, we will need to occupy Syria to prevent another terrorist organization filling the vacuum. As we learned in Iraq, it takes a very long time, and a lot of troops, to establish stability in a power vacuum.

"Let the Arab nations provide most of the ground troops", the fools say. How soon they have forgotten that ISIS went through the Iraqi defense forces like a hot knife through butter.

No, my friends, there is no Arab nation which has the capability to stabilize the region. We are it. It will have to be us.

But America will tire of the occupation just like we did in Iraq.


You won't find any of the chickenhawks who are going around saying we need to "wipe out ISIS" talking about the realities on the ground. They have a Hollywood movie in their heads. A big thrilling picture that climaxes in two hours and then everyone goes home.


So here's the thing:

If an attack by ISIS in the United States is as near a certainty as a lot of people are saying, then we should not wait for that day before going after ISIS in force. We should be doing it now.

But you see, all the tough talkers don't have the real guts it takes. They don't have the courage to roger up on committing the next two or three Presidents to a Syrian occupation.

Sadly, it will take an actual attack on the US before we get the momentum to go after ISIS in force. But even then, the chickenhawks will never commit to the real long term effort it will require, and so they will be right back to square one in less than ten years, shitting their pants over ISIS's bastard child.

The only real advantage to attacking ISIS now is that it will pre-empt our domestic Nazis who are waiting for an excuse to burn down mosques and pummel the first Muslims they see.




Now, there is an alternative outcome...

If ISIS perpetrates a massive terror attack on the Soviet Union Russia first, then Putin will do the job, and he will not only go after ISIS, he will slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocents to the loud cheers of the Putin-fellaters here at home. You know who you are.

After reading that long winded and delusional rant, who's the wingnut here?

:lol:
As usual, you rubes have nothing substantive to say.

Go back and read your rant.. you actually declare that people are hoping for an ISIS attack... then you go on and on about suspending Habeus Corpus and torturing U.S. citizens.

I think my response was quite fitting.
 
We have learned what the pain threshold is for the "home of the brave". It is 129 Frenchmen. Using my conversion table that translates to 4 or 5 Americans.

If and when ISIS succeeds in perptrating a terror attack in the United States, they will only need to take out 4 or 5 Americans for the weakminded to collectively lose their shit.


After 9/11, we went nuts. Torture; imprisoning US citizens without habeas corpus; flag pin blacklists; wiretapping US citizens by the millions; three wars (Iraq, Afghanistan, Terror), including the pre-emptive invasion of another country; the creation of a massive new Cabinet level police agency; the militarization of state, county, and local police; and so forth.

The day after ISIS attacks the Vaterland, Trump will say, "You know, not all of Hitler's ideas were wrong", and his followers will cheer and don their armbands.

The day after that, Congress will unveil Patriot Act II: This Time We REALLY Mean Business.™

Meter maids will be shooting double-parkers. The FBI will be doing "drop-ins" to ask why there has been a sudden spike in the amount of milk you put in your cereal. Swastikas will be the new black. Sean Hannity will be denying bamboo shoots under your fingernails is torture.

I think deep down inside, the tards are wishing for an ISIS attack so they can finally remove their masks and let loose their inner Nazi.


But how will we deal with ISIS after that day?

Invasion. Boots on the ground. In force. All that Hollywood fantasy shit to which the tards are masturbating every night.

But what they do not realize is that such an operation will require at least a ten year occupation. After the collapse of ISIS, we will need to occupy Syria to prevent another terrorist organization filling the vacuum. As we learned in Iraq, it takes a very long time, and a lot of troops, to establish stability in a power vacuum.

"Let the Arab nations provide most of the ground troops", the fools say. How soon they have forgotten that ISIS went through the Iraqi defense forces like a hot knife through butter.

No, my friends, there is no Arab nation which has the capability to stabilize the region. We are it. It will have to be us.

But America will tire of the occupation just like we did in Iraq.


You won't find any of the chickenhawks who are going around saying we need to "wipe out ISIS" talking about the realities on the ground. They have a Hollywood movie in their heads. A big thrilling picture that climaxes in two hours and then everyone goes home.


So here's the thing:

If an attack by ISIS in the United States is as near a certainty as a lot of people are saying, then we should not wait for that day before going after ISIS in force. We should be doing it now.

But you see, all the tough talkers don't have the real guts it takes. They don't have the courage to roger up on committing the next two or three Presidents to a Syrian occupation.

Sadly, it will take an actual attack on the US before we get the momentum to go after ISIS in force. But even then, the chickenhawks will never commit to the real long term effort it will require, and so they will be right back to square one in less than ten years, shitting their pants over ISIS's bastard child.

The only real advantage to attacking ISIS now is that it will pre-empt our domestic Nazis who are waiting for an excuse to burn down mosques and pummel the first Muslims they see.




Now, there is an alternative outcome...

If ISIS perpetrates a massive terror attack on the Soviet Union Russia first, then Putin will do the job, and he will not only go after ISIS, he will slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocents to the loud cheers of the Putin-fellaters here at home. You know who you are.

After reading that long winded and delusional rant, who's the wingnut here?

:lol:
As usual, you rubes have nothing substantive to say.

Go back and read your rant.. you actually declare that people are hoping for an ISIS attack... then you go on and on about suspending Habeus Corpus and torturing U.S. citizens.

I think my response was quite fitting.
I do believe there are some bigots who can't wait for an attack so they can openly unleash their inner Nazi.

As for suspending habeas corpus for American citizens and torture, that did happen. I have often suspected many of you rubes were in a coma during that period and didn't wake up until January 20, 2009 when the baton was passed.
 
We have learned what the pain threshold is for the "home of the brave". It is 129 Frenchmen. Using my conversion table that translates to 4 or 5 Americans.

If and when ISIS succeeds in perptrating a terror attack in the United States, they will only need to take out 4 or 5 Americans for the weakminded to collectively lose their shit.


After 9/11, we went nuts. Torture; imprisoning US citizens without habeas corpus; flag pin blacklists; wiretapping US citizens by the millions; three wars (Iraq, Afghanistan, Terror), including the pre-emptive invasion of another country; the creation of a massive new Cabinet level police agency; the militarization of state, county, and local police; and so forth.

The day after ISIS attacks the Vaterland, Trump will say, "You know, not all of Hitler's ideas were wrong", and his followers will cheer and don their armbands.

The day after that, Congress will unveil Patriot Act II: This Time We REALLY Mean Business.™

Meter maids will be shooting double-parkers. The FBI will be doing "drop-ins" to ask why there has been a sudden spike in the amount of milk you put in your cereal. Swastikas will be the new black. Sean Hannity will be denying bamboo shoots under your fingernails is torture.

I think deep down inside, the tards are wishing for an ISIS attack so they can finally remove their masks and let loose their inner Nazi.


But how will we deal with ISIS after that day?

Invasion. Boots on the ground. In force. All that Hollywood fantasy shit to which the tards are masturbating every night.

But what they do not realize is that such an operation will require at least a ten year occupation. After the collapse of ISIS, we will need to occupy Syria to prevent another terrorist organization filling the vacuum. As we learned in Iraq, it takes a very long time, and a lot of troops, to establish stability in a power vacuum.

"Let the Arab nations provide most of the ground troops", the fools say. How soon they have forgotten that ISIS went through the Iraqi defense forces like a hot knife through butter.

No, my friends, there is no Arab nation which has the capability to stabilize the region. We are it. It will have to be us.

But America will tire of the occupation just like we did in Iraq.


You won't find any of the chickenhawks who are going around saying we need to "wipe out ISIS" talking about the realities on the ground. They have a Hollywood movie in their heads. A big thrilling picture that climaxes in two hours and then everyone goes home.


So here's the thing:

If an attack by ISIS in the United States is as near a certainty as a lot of people are saying, then we should not wait for that day before going after ISIS in force. We should be doing it now.

But you see, all the tough talkers don't have the real guts it takes. They don't have the courage to roger up on committing the next two or three Presidents to a Syrian occupation.

Sadly, it will take an actual attack on the US before we get the momentum to go after ISIS in force. But even then, the chickenhawks will never commit to the real long term effort it will require, and so they will be right back to square one in less than ten years, shitting their pants over ISIS's bastard child.

The only real advantage to attacking ISIS now is that it will pre-empt our domestic Nazis who are waiting for an excuse to burn down mosques and pummel the first Muslims they see.




Now, there is an alternative outcome...

If ISIS perpetrates a massive terror attack on the Soviet Union Russia first, then Putin will do the job, and he will not only go after ISIS, he will slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocents to the loud cheers of the Putin-fellaters here at home. You know who you are.
Smoking dope again?
 
We have learned what the pain threshold is for the "home of the brave". It is 129 Frenchmen. Using my conversion table that translates to 4 or 5 Americans.

If and when ISIS succeeds in perptrating a terror attack in the United States, they will only need to take out 4 or 5 Americans for the weakminded to collectively lose their shit.


After 9/11, we went nuts. Torture; imprisoning US citizens without habeas corpus; flag pin blacklists; wiretapping US citizens by the millions; three wars (Iraq, Afghanistan, Terror), including the pre-emptive invasion of another country; the creation of a massive new Cabinet level police agency; the militarization of state, county, and local police; and so forth.

The day after ISIS attacks the Vaterland, Trump will say, "You know, not all of Hitler's ideas were wrong", and his followers will cheer and don their armbands.

The day after that, Congress will unveil Patriot Act II: This Time We REALLY Mean Business.™

Meter maids will be shooting double-parkers. The FBI will be doing "drop-ins" to ask why there has been a sudden spike in the amount of milk you put in your cereal. Swastikas will be the new black. Sean Hannity will be denying bamboo shoots under your fingernails is torture.

I think deep down inside, the tards are wishing for an ISIS attack so they can finally remove their masks and let loose their inner Nazi.


But how will we deal with ISIS after that day?

Invasion. Boots on the ground. In force. All that Hollywood fantasy shit to which the tards are masturbating every night.

But what they do not realize is that such an operation will require at least a ten year occupation. After the collapse of ISIS, we will need to occupy Syria to prevent another terrorist organization filling the vacuum. As we learned in Iraq, it takes a very long time, and a lot of troops, to establish stability in a power vacuum.

"Let the Arab nations provide most of the ground troops", the fools say. How soon they have forgotten that ISIS went through the Iraqi defense forces like a hot knife through butter.

No, my friends, there is no Arab nation which has the capability to stabilize the region. We are it. It will have to be us.

But America will tire of the occupation just like we did in Iraq.


You won't find any of the chickenhawks who are going around saying we need to "wipe out ISIS" talking about the realities on the ground. They have a Hollywood movie in their heads. A big thrilling picture that climaxes in two hours and then everyone goes home.


So here's the thing:

If an attack by ISIS in the United States is as near a certainty as a lot of people are saying, then we should not wait for that day before going after ISIS in force. We should be doing it now.

But you see, all the tough talkers don't have the real guts it takes. They don't have the courage to roger up on committing the next two or three Presidents to a Syrian occupation.

Sadly, it will take an actual attack on the US before we get the momentum to go after ISIS in force. But even then, the chickenhawks will never commit to the real long term effort it will require, and so they will be right back to square one in less than ten years, shitting their pants over ISIS's bastard child.

The only real advantage to attacking ISIS now is that it will pre-empt our domestic Nazis who are waiting for an excuse to burn down mosques and pummel the first Muslims they see.




Now, there is an alternative outcome...

If ISIS perpetrates a massive terror attack on the Soviet Union Russia first, then Putin will do the job, and he will not only go after ISIS, he will slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocents to the loud cheers of the Putin-fellaters here at home. You know who you are.
Smoking dope again?
Another non-substantive rube.
 
Anyone who believes that the Democrats are willing to do anything about ISIS is completely delusional. The only thing they will do is allow it to grow by assisting in the transportation of hidden terror cells. Why do you think most the Arab neighbors don't want to take these people in? I'll tell you why. It is because they know that most will be nothing but trouble. These are the same people who used to chant screw the USA and helped the terrorist fight against the Allied nations in Iraq. They supported the terrorist again in overthrowing their own government and didn't consider ISIS a threat until it turned on them. No, the USA will have a non-Rino Republican as president because the majority is sick of the status quo. Rand or Cruz will lead this country back to common sense. That is the future even if the Dems still want to be ruled by the biggest do nothing liars that can be found in this country.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Forum List

Back
Top