ISIS Attacks US: The Day After

[Timmy]

Obamas plan is have US Iraq combat troops deaths at or near zero. . And he's done that . Sorry if that upsets republicans .

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

So now you are for the long-term occupation of Syria and Iraq.

I am simply acquainting you with reality. If you want to "wipe out ISIS", then you have to commit to at least a ten year occupation of Syria. The next two or three Presidents will have to send tens of thousands of Americans to server there.

Are you game?

Nah.

Destroy Tehran. They are the source. Six or seven daisy cutters. Then tell the Islamic world the next peep out of them will result in the total destruction of Mecca and Medina without further ado.

Then stand by it. They understand force.

"You wanna go see God? Let's go see him together."

Yeah. Bomb Mecca, even threaten to bomb Mecca, and alienate every Muslim on the planet.

So?

"Sultan Mehmed and his bodyguards fled the camp [near Târgovişte, Wallachia] in terror, until he was convinced to return. Four days later, the Turkish army approached Târgovişte. The city gate was open, and no living person – citizen or soldier – challenged them. However, as the Ottomans drew closer, they were confronted by a ghoulish sight: a forest of 20,000 Turks and Muslim Bulgarians impaled in every way conceivable surrounding the city. Rising up from the middle of this gruesome field of rotting corpses, to signify his rank, Hamza Pasha was impaled on a stake taller than the others.

"The sultan, upon seeing this horrifying sight, ordered an immediate retreat back across the Danube."

You have to speak to them in language they understand. They don't care about your diplomacy.

 

[Timmy]

This is insane. Liberals are up in arms over the Colorado shooting and wringing their hands, yet thousands of innocents slaughtered by ISIS hasn't got their attention. The Paris attacks came as no surprise after all the Christians, gays and other innocents that were tortured and murdered by ISIS. I guess the OP isn't counting all the victims before the Paris attacks. Those who have been paying attention as ISIS has gained strength have been concerned.

The left wets their pants over a cop shooting a thug in a justified shooting, then turn the other way when radical Muslims behead innocents.

What number of ISIS victims will get the left to stand up and fight? A million? Two million? Or does it depend on what color or religion the victims are?

Right now the left is in a tizzy over the Colorado Springs shooting, yet dismiss 130 dead in Paris?

I guess it all depends on who is doing the killing and who the victims are. I'd like to see the same concern over the slaughtered Christians as I see from you guys over Michael Brown.

No one is buying your bleeding heart republican act . You don't care when Americans die on our own soil cause it might cause gun control .

You really think anyone believes you care about dead Frenchman??

 

[CrusaderFrank]

We have learned what the pain threshold is for the "home of the brave". It is 129 Frenchmen. Using my conversion table that translates to 4 or 5 Americans.

If and when ISIS succeeds in perptrating a terror attack in the United States, they will only need to take out 4 or 5 Americans for the weakminded to collectively lose their shit.


After 9/11, we went nuts. Torture; imprisoning US citizens without habeas corpus; flag pin blacklists; wiretapping US citizens by the millions; three wars (Iraq, Afghanistan, Terror), including the pre-emptive invasion of another country; the creation of a massive new Cabinet level police agency; the militarization of state, county, and local police; and so forth.

The day after ISIS attacks the Vaterland, Trump will say, "You know, not all of Hitler's ideas were wrong", and his followers will cheer and don their armbands.

The day after that, Congress will unveil Patriot Act II: This Time We REALLY Mean Business.™

Meter maids will be shooting double-parkers. The FBI will be doing "drop-ins" to ask why there has been a sudden spike in the amount of milk you put in your cereal. Swastikas will be the new black. Sean Hannity will be denying bamboo shoots under your fingernails is torture.

I think deep down inside, the tards are wishing for an ISIS attack so they can finally remove their masks and let loose their inner Nazi.


But how will we deal with ISIS after that day?

Invasion. Boots on the ground. In force. All that Hollywood fantasy shit to which the tards are masturbating every night.

But what they do not realize is that such an operation will require at least a ten year occupation. After the collapse of ISIS, we will need to occupy Syria to prevent another terrorist organization filling the vacuum. As we learned in Iraq, it takes a very long time, and a lot of troops, to establish stability in a power vacuum.

"Let the Arab nations provide most of the ground troops", the fools say. How soon they have forgotten that ISIS went through the Iraqi defense forces like a hot knife through butter.

No, my friends, there is no Arab nation which has the capability to stabilize the region. We are it. It will have to be us.

But America will tire of the occupation just like we did in Iraq.


You won't find any of the chickenhawks who are going around saying we need to "wipe out ISIS" talking about the realities on the ground. They have a Hollywood movie in their heads. A big thrilling picture that climaxes in two hours and then everyone goes home.


So here's the thing:

If an attack by ISIS in the United States is as near a certainty as a lot of people are saying, then we should not wait for that day before going after ISIS in force. We should be doing it now.

But you see, all the tough talkers don't have the real guts it takes. They don't have the courage to roger up on committing the next two or three Presidents to a Syrian occupation.

Sadly, it will take an actual attack on the US before we get the momentum to go after ISIS in force. But even then, the chickenhawks will never commit to the real long term effort it will require, and so they will be right back to square one in less than ten years, shitting their pants over ISIS's bastard child.

The only real advantage to attacking ISIS now is that it will pre-empt our domestic Nazis who are waiting for an excuse to burn down mosques and pummel the first Muslims they see.




Now, there is an alternative outcome...

If ISIS perpetrates a massive terror attack on the Soviet Union Russia first, then Putin will do the job, and he will not only go after ISIS, he will slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocents to the loud cheers of the Putin-fellaters here at home. You know who you are.

ISIS attacks...because Global Warming

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Make up you mind leftist.

I'm a natural born conservative. I was a conservative a long time before it was cool. I know you tards have been led to believe you are conservatives, but you aren't.

As for "make up you [sic] mind", that's pretty hilarious considering the GOP has never put a plan on the table to deal with ISIS and has been satisfied to just carp about what Obama was doing. They have hidden their collective heads in their asses for well over a year and refused to approve an AUMF against ISIS.

Any coward can say, "Whatever Obama is doing, we are against that." It takes balls to say what should be done, and I have been asking your fellow pants shitters for a very long time what should be done. They have invariably run to their hidey holes.

Now that France has suffered an attack, the chickenhawks have started talking tough about exterminating refugees and Muslims in general. But none of them has still put forth an actual viable plan.

The best part is that the socialist surrender monkeys of France are the people who suffered the attack, and yet they are still going to take in Syrian refugees while you pants shitters cower in fear of them.

So much for the "home of the brave".

The French are a fabulous people. Their problem is their government, even as ours is our problem.

 

[davecmarino]

G5000- First, you are full of shit when you say you are a conservative. You are a liberal bullshit artist. You want to put the blame on Republicans and post about how none of this is Obama's fault. First the man sabotaged a new status of forces agreement in Iraq by completely refusing to negotiate with them. Iraq had a problem with the action of some of our civilian security forces and would not have risked taking any action against a member of the US Armed Forces. Negotiations would have just been a political loss for Obama so he decided to let the old Status of Forces agreement expire because it gave him a way to blame the previous administration no matter what. He got to claim his political victory. Next there wouldn't be an ISIS if Obama hadn't funded the Muslim brotherhood and other known terrorists organizations to topple Syria's democratically elected government. You blaming Republicans and calling conservatives names because we want common sense positive vetting of any Refugees just shows how much of a kook-aid drinking stupid liberal you are. Next you ramp up you rhetoric with saying we are just against Obama and we don't have a plan but I remember a few of the candidates discussing ISIS and what the would do. From take out the oil fields by air to putting more troops on the ground. You keep calling Republicans out but we all know you are just a liberal who doesn't have a clue.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[tinydancer]

So now you are for the long-term occupation of Syria and Iraq.

I am simply acquainting you with reality. If you want to "wipe out ISIS", then you have to commit to at least a ten year occupation of Syria. The next two or three Presidents will have to send tens of thousands of Americans to server there.

Are you game?

Nah.

Destroy Tehran. They are the source. Six or seven daisy cutters. Then tell the Islamic world the next peep out of them will result in the total destruction of Mecca and Medina without further ado.

Then stand by it. They understand force.

"You wanna go see God? Let's go see him together."

Tehran isn't the source of ISIS. ISIS is Sunni. You're looking at all the Arab Spring bullshit with ISIS. Saudi Arabia/Qatar/Turkey now Kuwait joining in.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

So now you are for the long-term occupation of Syria and Iraq.

I am simply acquainting you with reality. If you want to "wipe out ISIS", then you have to commit to at least a ten year occupation of Syria. The next two or three Presidents will have to send tens of thousands of Americans to server there.

Are you game?

Nah.

Destroy Tehran. They are the source. Six or seven daisy cutters. Then tell the Islamic world the next peep out of them will result in the total destruction of Mecca and Medina without further ado.

Then stand by it. They understand force.

"You wanna go see God? Let's go see him together."

Tehran isn't the source of ISIS. ISIS is Sunni. You're looking at all the Arab Spring bullshit with ISIS. Saudi Arabia/Qatar/Turkey now Kuwait joining in.

Not the point. A high tide lifts all boats. The creation of the Islamic state of Iran in 1979 gave rise to the Islamic Revolution, which fueled all the others.

Definitely Carter's greatest folly, and now Obama aspires to top that.

 

[tinydancer]

So now you are for the long-term occupation of Syria and Iraq.

I am simply acquainting you with reality. If you want to "wipe out ISIS", then you have to commit to at least a ten year occupation of Syria. The next two or three Presidents will have to send tens of thousands of Americans to server there.

Are you game?

Nah.

Destroy Tehran. They are the source. Six or seven daisy cutters. Then tell the Islamic world the next peep out of them will result in the total destruction of Mecca and Medina without further ado.

Then stand by it. They understand force.

"You wanna go see God? Let's go see him together."

Tehran isn't the source of ISIS. ISIS is Sunni. You're looking at all the Arab Spring bullshit with ISIS. Saudi Arabia/Qatar/Turkey now Kuwait joining in.

Not the point. A high tide lifts all boats. The creation of the Islamic state of Iran in 1979 gave rise to the Islamic Revolution, which fueled all the others.

Definitely Carter's greatest folly, and now Obama aspires to top that.

Operation Cyclone.

Carter owns all this bullshit.

 

[Wildman]

Now, there is an alternative outcome...

do you lay awake at night dreaming up this or did you have Mommie C&P it for you from some other liberfag??

 

[Wildman]

if manhattan gets hit, u think new york will vote for Hillary?

i believe they would vote for her if she were to become the next "Typhoid Mary" !!

 

[Wildman]

If you want to "wipe out ISIS", then you have to commit to at least a ten year occupation of Syria.

you are so full of shit, a livestock feed lot would appear to be a dog stain on a carpet.

 

[g5000]

It was 130 French lives lost. Not 129.

Okay, that rounds up to 5 Americans.

Why are you blaming the GOP for not having a plan on the table for dealing with ISIS.

Like I said, anyone can be a critic. So cough up a better idea.

Here is a novel idea. Let Syria come up with their own game plan and let's leave it alone. Isn't it time we let these nations work out their own problems?

So do I understand you correctly in that you believe we should totally withdraw from the Middle East?

I'm not being a critic. I am merely telling you ISIS is his baby ( no pun intended). Not ours. As for totally withdrawing from the Middle East? Yes!

This would mean allowing Iran to go nuclear, and a nuclear arms race in the Middle East, and probably the annihilation of Israel.

 

[g5000]

This is insane. Liberals are up in arms over the Colorado shooting and wringing their hands, yet thousands of innocents slaughtered by ISIS hasn't got their attention. The Paris attacks came as no surprise after all the Christians, gays and other innocents that were tortured and murdered by ISIS. I guess the OP isn't counting all the victims before the Paris attacks. Those who have been paying attention as ISIS has gained strength have been concerned.

Utter bullshit. You pants shitters are the ones who want to turn away the victims of ISIS. You want to send them back to be slaughtered by the tens of thousands.

And the Right has REFUSED to approve an AUMF for over a year. Obama has been asking for one for a long time, and the Right can't come out of its hidey hole to approve one.

You are seriously, seriously deluded.

 

[g5000]

If you want to "wipe out ISIS", then you have to commit to at least a ten year occupation of Syria.

you are so full of shit, a livestock feed lot would appear to be a dog stain on a carpet.

A ten year minimum occupation is a fact. Unless you want ANOTHER jihadist terror organization to spring up. Sorry to destroy your Hollywood fantasy.

You dumb shits blame Obama for ISIS because we took our troops out of Iraq. So...duh...if we took our troops out after wiping out ISIS, what would happen?

Another terror organization would spring right back up.

 

[g5000]

G5000- First, you are full of shit when you say you are a conservative. You are a liberal bullshit artist. You want to put the blame on Republicans and post about how none of this is Obama's fault.

Wrong. I put the blame on both houses. The Right and the Left.

Obama for inaction, the Right for cowardice.

First the man sabotaged a new status of forces agreement in Iraq by completely refusing to negotiate with them. Iraq had a problem with the action of some of our civilian security forces and would not have risked taking any action against a member of the US Armed Forces. Negotiations would have just been a political loss for Obama so he decided to let the old Status of Forces agreement expire because it gave him a way to blame the previous administration no matter what. He got to claim his political victory.

Iraq wanted us out. This is a fact. So we left. It's as simple as that.

Next there wouldn't be an ISIS if Obama hadn't funded the Muslim brotherhood and other known terrorists organizations to topple Syria's democratically elected government.

There wouldn't be an ISIS if we had not invaded Iraq.

 

[g5000]

Now, there is an alternative outcome...

do you lay awake at night dreaming up this or did you have Mommie C&P it for you from some other liberfag??

It is you who lives in a dream world. You have been so dumbed down and so brainwashed you are incapable of recognizing reality when it smacks you in the face.


ISIS is just as likely to commit a terror attack against Russia as the United States. They have already taken out a Russian airliner. ISIS hates Russia as much as they hate us, because Russia has allied itself with Iran and the Syrian government.


Therefore, if Mother Russia is attacked before the United States, then it's a whole new ball game.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

We have learned what the pain threshold is for the "home of the brave". It is 129 Frenchmen. Using my conversion table that translates to 4 or 5 Americans.

If and when ISIS succeeds in perptrating a terror attack in the United States, they will only need to take out 4 or 5 Americans for the weakminded to collectively lose their shit.


After 9/11, we went nuts. Torture; imprisoning US citizens without habeas corpus; flag pin blacklists; wiretapping US citizens by the millions; three wars (Iraq, Afghanistan, Terror), including the pre-emptive invasion of another country; the creation of a massive new Cabinet level police agency; the militarization of state, county, and local police; and so forth.

The day after ISIS attacks the Vaterland, Trump will say, "You know, not all of Hitler's ideas were wrong", and his followers will cheer and don their armbands.

The day after that, Congress will unveil Patriot Act II: This Time We REALLY Mean Business.™

Meter maids will be shooting double-parkers. The FBI will be doing "drop-ins" to ask why there has been a sudden spike in the amount of milk you put in your cereal. Swastikas will be the new black. Sean Hannity will be denying bamboo shoots under your fingernails is torture.

I think deep down inside, the tards are wishing for an ISIS attack so they can finally remove their masks and let loose their inner Nazi.


But how will we deal with ISIS after that day?

Invasion. Boots on the ground. In force. All that Hollywood fantasy shit to which the tards are masturbating every night.

But what they do not realize is that such an operation will require at least a ten year occupation. After the collapse of ISIS, we will need to occupy Syria to prevent another terrorist organization filling the vacuum. As we learned in Iraq, it takes a very long time, and a lot of troops, to establish stability in a power vacuum.

"Let the Arab nations provide most of the ground troops", the fools say. How soon they have forgotten that ISIS went through the Iraqi defense forces like a hot knife through butter.

No, my friends, there is no Arab nation which has the capability to stabilize the region. We are it. It will have to be us.

But America will tire of the occupation just like we did in Iraq.


You won't find any of the chickenhawks who are going around saying we need to "wipe out ISIS" talking about the realities on the ground. They have a Hollywood movie in their heads. A big thrilling picture that climaxes in two hours and then everyone goes home.


So here's the thing:

If an attack by ISIS in the United States is as near a certainty as a lot of people are saying, then we should not wait for that day before going after ISIS in force. We should be doing it now.

But you see, all the tough talkers don't have the real guts it takes. They don't have the courage to roger up on committing the next two or three Presidents to a Syrian occupation.

Sadly, it will take an actual attack on the US before we get the momentum to go after ISIS in force. But even then, the chickenhawks will never commit to the real long term effort it will require, and so they will be right back to square one in less than ten years, shitting their pants over ISIS's bastard child.

The only real advantage to attacking ISIS now is that it will pre-empt our domestic Nazis who are waiting for an excuse to burn down mosques and pummel the first Muslims they see.




Now, there is an alternative outcome...

If ISIS perpetrates a massive terror attack on the Soviet Union Russia first, then Putin will do the job, and he will not only go after ISIS, he will slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocents to the loud cheers of the Putin-fellaters here at home. You know who you are.

After reading that long winded and delusional rant, who's the wingnut here?

 

[g5000]

if manhattan gets hit, u think new york will vote for Hillary?

There is a Democratic "anyone but the Republican" demographic who will vote for Hillary no matter what, or they will stay home. Just as there is a Republican "anyone but Hillary" demographic that would vote for Adolf Hitler or stay home before voting Democratic.

Clinton has laid out her plans for ISIS. I bet less than one percent of the rubes reading this have any idea what it is.

 

[g5000]

We have learned what the pain threshold is for the "home of the brave". It is 129 Frenchmen. Using my conversion table that translates to 4 or 5 Americans.

If and when ISIS succeeds in perptrating a terror attack in the United States, they will only need to take out 4 or 5 Americans for the weakminded to collectively lose their shit.


After 9/11, we went nuts. Torture; imprisoning US citizens without habeas corpus; flag pin blacklists; wiretapping US citizens by the millions; three wars (Iraq, Afghanistan, Terror), including the pre-emptive invasion of another country; the creation of a massive new Cabinet level police agency; the militarization of state, county, and local police; and so forth.

The day after ISIS attacks the Vaterland, Trump will say, "You know, not all of Hitler's ideas were wrong", and his followers will cheer and don their armbands.

The day after that, Congress will unveil Patriot Act II: This Time We REALLY Mean Business.™

Meter maids will be shooting double-parkers. The FBI will be doing "drop-ins" to ask why there has been a sudden spike in the amount of milk you put in your cereal. Swastikas will be the new black. Sean Hannity will be denying bamboo shoots under your fingernails is torture.

I think deep down inside, the tards are wishing for an ISIS attack so they can finally remove their masks and let loose their inner Nazi.


But how will we deal with ISIS after that day?

Invasion. Boots on the ground. In force. All that Hollywood fantasy shit to which the tards are masturbating every night.

But what they do not realize is that such an operation will require at least a ten year occupation. After the collapse of ISIS, we will need to occupy Syria to prevent another terrorist organization filling the vacuum. As we learned in Iraq, it takes a very long time, and a lot of troops, to establish stability in a power vacuum.

"Let the Arab nations provide most of the ground troops", the fools say. How soon they have forgotten that ISIS went through the Iraqi defense forces like a hot knife through butter.

No, my friends, there is no Arab nation which has the capability to stabilize the region. We are it. It will have to be us.

But America will tire of the occupation just like we did in Iraq.


You won't find any of the chickenhawks who are going around saying we need to "wipe out ISIS" talking about the realities on the ground. They have a Hollywood movie in their heads. A big thrilling picture that climaxes in two hours and then everyone goes home.


So here's the thing:

If an attack by ISIS in the United States is as near a certainty as a lot of people are saying, then we should not wait for that day before going after ISIS in force. We should be doing it now.

But you see, all the tough talkers don't have the real guts it takes. They don't have the courage to roger up on committing the next two or three Presidents to a Syrian occupation.

Sadly, it will take an actual attack on the US before we get the momentum to go after ISIS in force. But even then, the chickenhawks will never commit to the real long term effort it will require, and so they will be right back to square one in less than ten years, shitting their pants over ISIS's bastard child.

The only real advantage to attacking ISIS now is that it will pre-empt our domestic Nazis who are waiting for an excuse to burn down mosques and pummel the first Muslims they see.




Now, there is an alternative outcome...

If ISIS perpetrates a massive terror attack on the Soviet Union Russia first, then Putin will do the job, and he will not only go after ISIS, he will slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocents to the loud cheers of the Putin-fellaters here at home. You know who you are.

After reading that long winded and delusional rant, who's the wingnut here?

As usual, you rubes have nothing substantive to say.