Is Hillary's e-mail scandal falling apart?

[Oldstyle]

"Small terror attack"? Really, Huggy? Al Queda managed to attack a US consulate and kill our Ambassador. It was a serious terror attack.

Why are you even bringing up George W. Bush? He has NOTHING to do with what took place in Benghazi. This was an Obama Administration screw-up...a complete failure by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to protect our diplomatic staff...and then a full court press by the entire Obama apparatus to shift blame from themselves to some obscure YouTube video that ALSO had nothing to do with what took place in Benghazi.

That's right. A SMALL terrorist attack which the ambassador could have easily avoided had he been safe in the embassy on such an anniversary that had the whole world looking for reprisals.

The Ambassador and his puny contingent of security were obviously clearly in no position to handle an attack yet you morons want to blame Hillary.

You don't want the truth. You people NEVER want the truth. You are hideous hateful liars.

You will never win the Benghazi argument because you made it up out of whole cloth. You will never win the e-mail argument because NOTHING illegal occurred. There is no IS. There is no fire..just smoke you aholes are constantly attempting to blow up Americans asses.

So the fact that Hillary Clinton drew down the number of security personnel in Libya despite repeated requests from Christopher Stevens to maintain the same level absolves Clinton from blame for the subsequent deaths of Stevens and the other three men? You talk about the "truth", Huggy but then you buy the lies that the Clinton State Department hid behind so that she wouldn't be held responsible for those deaths.

It was Hillary Clinton that frantically put out the narratives about YouTube videos causing a demonstration that escalated into a full on attack...it was Hillary Clinton that floated the trial balloon attempting to blame the GOP's cuts to the State Department budget for the woeful security. It was Hillary Clinton that lied to the parents of those slain men. It was Hillary Clinton that hid documents and communications from Congressional investigators and then asked "What difference does it make!" when Congress attempted over and over again to get to the bottom of what happened in Libya.

Chris Stevens was in no position to dictate personnel levels for the state department. Congress set spending levels not in field ambassadors.

That's laughably inaccurate, Huggy! The State Department made a request for a certain number. As with ALL government entities they asked for more than they really need because that's the way the game is played. You ask for a million...they approve you for nine hundred thousand. That's the way it works whether Congress is run by the GOP or the Democrats and I can very easily show you that the State Department's budget request when the Democrats controlled the Congress was NEVER granted in full either!

You see that lower amount as a "cut" when in reality it's almost ALWAYS an increase to an agency's budget...just not as big of an increase as they asked for. If you were to ask an agency head off the record if he or she ever expected to get fully funded for the amount they asked for they'd laugh their heads off and admit that they'd be SHOCKED if they had received what they asked for!

As for Chris Stevens being in a position to "dictate" personnel levels? Obviously he was not in that position because if he WAS then his requests that his security detail not be decreased would have been approved. The person that WAS in a position to "dictate" personnel levels is the Secretary of State...a certain Hillary Rodham Clinton! She's the one who decides where State Department funds get spent. She's the one who decided that they wouldn't be spent in Libya because she was the one who decided that the "optics" of having a heavily armed "bunker" of a consulate didn't match the narrative that the Obama White House was putting out that they had Al Queda "on the run".

So Benghazi and e-mails are your best chance of winning the white house house in 2016.....sad. With the Trump factor, you are screwed. But please don't lose hope.....

Benghazi, the Clinton Foundation and e-mails are why Hillary Clinton isn't fit to be President. All of that has nothing to do with who the GOP eventually decides to nominate. Admit it...you liberals are freaked out right now because Hillary's campaign is imploding and you don't have a viable option to her. What you thought was going to be a cake walk election in 2016 is turning out to be a bit of a nightmare.

 

[Esmeralda]

It illustrates how desperate they are, and their lack of courage to allow the voters to decide during the General Election.

They know that if Hillary comes out of this unscathed, as it looks like she will, there is NO ONE in the GOP clown car that can even get within 10 points of her. They will fan the flames and propagate lies, hoping that something will stick to the wall.

Truly. These are the people who think Donald Trump is a viable presidential candidate. They have no discernable rational thought at all.

Coming from someone who probably voted twice for Barack "I don't have a clue what I'm doing" Obama...that's rather amusing, Esmeralda! Just saying...

What a stupid thing for you to say. Just childish and stupid.

For one thing, for anyone on the entire planet to think there is a comparison between Obama and Trump is crazy. Not even one of the weak and rather pathetic line up of current GOP candidates is anywhere near someone I would compare Trump to. Trump is a nut case. He is not a viable candidate for the the White House. He is not a viable person or individual to lead the free world, to lead the strongest nation on the planet. You people who support him have lost your minds.

For the second thing, I'm not and never was a cheer leader for Obama: I wanted Mrs. Clinton, not Obama. At the same time, he has been viciously and without precedence or with any reason, been accused of being a horrible president, when the facts are that he has been quite adequate, to the point he is rated at 18 by presidential historians (while, BTW, GW Bush is rated nearly last).

So, people like you seem to live in some wierd, perverted la la land that not only ignores reality but makes up a skewed one to fit your perverse wishful image of what reality should be. God help us if someone like Trump actually makes it to the White House: we would be at war literally and figuratively with most of the world within months. He is completely without the skills, intellect, knowledge and understanding to be the US President. The fact people like you in the GOP don't realize that is absolutely shocking and a sad, sad insight into contemporary America.

What's amusing is that you think Barry Obama has the "skills, intellect, knowledge and understanding" to be POTUS but that Donald Trump has none of those things!

What exactly has Obama done in his life besides be fortunate enough to be "Johnny on the spot" when Harvard needed to send a signal that they were not a racist institution and decided that the easiest way to do that would be to name a black man as the first President of the Harvard Law Review?

If you REALLY look at the man's accomplishments before and since then...he's been (to use your own description!) nothing more than "adequate" at every thing he's done in life. He was a mediocre lawyer. He was a run of the mill college instructor. He was an abysmal legislator.

Now compare that to Trump. You may not like the man. I don't particularly like him myself but only a fool would say that he doesn't have skill, intellect, knowledge and understanding! He has all of those in spades.

OMG It is amazing. Only a fool would think Donald Trump is worthy of a position as US president. He is a buffoon. Plain and simple. He's like Palin on steroids. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. You all think Palin is so cool and that she's viable as a presidential candidate. Too funny.

 

[JimH52]

That's right. A SMALL terrorist attack which the ambassador could have easily avoided had he been safe in the embassy on such an anniversary that had the whole world looking for reprisals.

The Ambassador and his puny contingent of security were obviously clearly in no position to handle an attack yet you morons want to blame Hillary.

You don't want the truth. You people NEVER want the truth. You are hideous hateful liars.

You will never win the Benghazi argument because you made it up out of whole cloth. You will never win the e-mail argument because NOTHING illegal occurred. There is no IS. There is no fire..just smoke you aholes are constantly attempting to blow up Americans asses.

So the fact that Hillary Clinton drew down the number of security personnel in Libya despite repeated requests from Christopher Stevens to maintain the same level absolves Clinton from blame for the subsequent deaths of Stevens and the other three men? You talk about the "truth", Huggy but then you buy the lies that the Clinton State Department hid behind so that she wouldn't be held responsible for those deaths.

It was Hillary Clinton that frantically put out the narratives about YouTube videos causing a demonstration that escalated into a full on attack...it was Hillary Clinton that floated the trial balloon attempting to blame the GOP's cuts to the State Department budget for the woeful security. It was Hillary Clinton that lied to the parents of those slain men. It was Hillary Clinton that hid documents and communications from Congressional investigators and then asked "What difference does it make!" when Congress attempted over and over again to get to the bottom of what happened in Libya.

Chris Stevens was in no position to dictate personnel levels for the state department. Congress set spending levels not in field ambassadors.

That's laughably inaccurate, Huggy! The State Department made a request for a certain number. As with ALL government entities they asked for more than they really need because that's the way the game is played. You ask for a million...they approve you for nine hundred thousand. That's the way it works whether Congress is run by the GOP or the Democrats and I can very easily show you that the State Department's budget request when the Democrats controlled the Congress was NEVER granted in full either!

You see that lower amount as a "cut" when in reality it's almost ALWAYS an increase to an agency's budget...just not as big of an increase as they asked for. If you were to ask an agency head off the record if he or she ever expected to get fully funded for the amount they asked for they'd laugh their heads off and admit that they'd be SHOCKED if they had received what they asked for!

As for Chris Stevens being in a position to "dictate" personnel levels? Obviously he was not in that position because if he WAS then his requests that his security detail not be decreased would have been approved. The person that WAS in a position to "dictate" personnel levels is the Secretary of State...a certain Hillary Rodham Clinton! She's the one who decides where State Department funds get spent. She's the one who decided that they wouldn't be spent in Libya because she was the one who decided that the "optics" of having a heavily armed "bunker" of a consulate didn't match the narrative that the Obama White House was putting out that they had Al Queda "on the run".

So Benghazi and e-mails are your best chance of winning the white house house in 2016.....sad. With the Trump factor, you are screwed. But please don't lose hope.....

Benghazi, the Clinton Foundation and e-mails are why Hillary Clinton isn't fit to be President. All of that has nothing to do with who the GOP eventually decides to nominate. Admit it...you liberals are freaked out right now because Hillary's campaign is imploding and you don't have a viable option to her. What you thought was going to be a cake walk election in 2016 is turning out to be a bit of a nightmare.

Doesn't matter who the Dems run. Donald has poisoned the GOP well. Even if he doesn't get the nomination, they will lose. I am sure it is hard to admit or think about.

 

[Slyhunter]

They know that if Hillary comes out of this unscathed, as it looks like she will, there is NO ONE in the GOP clown car that can even get within 10 points of her. They will fan the flames and propagate lies, hoping that something will stick to the wall.

Truly. These are the people who think Donald Trump is a viable presidential candidate. They have no discernable rational thought at all.

Coming from someone who probably voted twice for Barack "I don't have a clue what I'm doing" Obama...that's rather amusing, Esmeralda! Just saying...

What a stupid thing for you to say. Just childish and stupid.

For one thing, for anyone on the entire planet to think there is a comparison between Obama and Trump is crazy. Not even one of the weak and rather pathetic line up of current GOP candidates is anywhere near someone I would compare Trump to. Trump is a nut case. He is not a viable candidate for the the White House. He is not a viable person or individual to lead the free world, to lead the strongest nation on the planet. You people who support him have lost your minds.

For the second thing, I'm not and never was a cheer leader for Obama: I wanted Mrs. Clinton, not Obama. At the same time, he has been viciously and without precedence or with any reason, been accused of being a horrible president, when the facts are that he has been quite adequate, to the point he is rated at 18 by presidential historians (while, BTW, GW Bush is rated nearly last).

So, people like you seem to live in some wierd, perverted la la land that not only ignores reality but makes up a skewed one to fit your perverse wishful image of what reality should be. God help us if someone like Trump actually makes it to the White House: we would be at war literally and figuratively with most of the world within months. He is completely without the skills, intellect, knowledge and understanding to be the US President. The fact people like you in the GOP don't realize that is absolutely shocking and a sad, sad insight into contemporary America.

What's amusing is that you think Barry Obama has the "skills, intellect, knowledge and understanding" to be POTUS but that Donald Trump has none of those things!

What exactly has Obama done in his life besides be fortunate enough to be "Johnny on the spot" when Harvard needed to send a signal that they were not a racist institution and decided that the easiest way to do that would be to name a black man as the first President of the Harvard Law Review?

If you REALLY look at the man's accomplishments before and since then...he's been (to use your own description!) nothing more than "adequate" at every thing he's done in life. He was a mediocre lawyer. He was a run of the mill college instructor. He was an abysmal legislator.

Now compare that to Trump. You may not like the man. I don't particularly like him myself but only a fool would say that he doesn't have skill, intellect, knowledge and understanding! He has all of those in spades.

OMG It is amazing. Only a fool would think Donald Trump is worthy of a position as US president. He is a buffoon. Plain and simple. He's like Palin on steroids. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. You all think Palin is so cool and that she's viable as a presidential candidate. Too funny.

Have you seen the democratic candidats?
A socialist
A murderer
And a buffoon.
I mean damn

 

[Esmeralda]

Truly. These are the people who think Donald Trump is a viable presidential candidate. They have no discernable rational thought at all.

Coming from someone who probably voted twice for Barack "I don't have a clue what I'm doing" Obama...that's rather amusing, Esmeralda! Just saying...

What a stupid thing for you to say. Just childish and stupid.

For one thing, for anyone on the entire planet to think there is a comparison between Obama and Trump is crazy. Not even one of the weak and rather pathetic line up of current GOP candidates is anywhere near someone I would compare Trump to. Trump is a nut case. He is not a viable candidate for the the White House. He is not a viable person or individual to lead the free world, to lead the strongest nation on the planet. You people who support him have lost your minds.

For the second thing, I'm not and never was a cheer leader for Obama: I wanted Mrs. Clinton, not Obama. At the same time, he has been viciously and without precedence or with any reason, been accused of being a horrible president, when the facts are that he has been quite adequate, to the point he is rated at 18 by presidential historians (while, BTW, GW Bush is rated nearly last).

So, people like you seem to live in some wierd, perverted la la land that not only ignores reality but makes up a skewed one to fit your perverse wishful image of what reality should be. God help us if someone like Trump actually makes it to the White House: we would be at war literally and figuratively with most of the world within months. He is completely without the skills, intellect, knowledge and understanding to be the US President. The fact people like you in the GOP don't realize that is absolutely shocking and a sad, sad insight into contemporary America.

What's amusing is that you think Barry Obama has the "skills, intellect, knowledge and understanding" to be POTUS but that Donald Trump has none of those things!

What exactly has Obama done in his life besides be fortunate enough to be "Johnny on the spot" when Harvard needed to send a signal that they were not a racist institution and decided that the easiest way to do that would be to name a black man as the first President of the Harvard Law Review?

If you REALLY look at the man's accomplishments before and since then...he's been (to use your own description!) nothing more than "adequate" at every thing he's done in life. He was a mediocre lawyer. He was a run of the mill college instructor. He was an abysmal legislator.

Now compare that to Trump. You may not like the man. I don't particularly like him myself but only a fool would say that he doesn't have skill, intellect, knowledge and understanding! He has all of those in spades.

OMG It is amazing. Only a fool would think Donald Trump is worthy of a position as US president. He is a buffoon. Plain and simple. He's like Palin on steroids. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. You all think Palin is so cool and that she's viable as a presidential candidate. Too funny.

Have you seen the democratic candidats?
A socialist
A murderer
And a buffoon.
I mean damn

LMAO

 

[JimH52]

Truly. These are the people who think Donald Trump is a viable presidential candidate. They have no discernable rational thought at all.

Coming from someone who probably voted twice for Barack "I don't have a clue what I'm doing" Obama...that's rather amusing, Esmeralda! Just saying...

What a stupid thing for you to say. Just childish and stupid.

For one thing, for anyone on the entire planet to think there is a comparison between Obama and Trump is crazy. Not even one of the weak and rather pathetic line up of current GOP candidates is anywhere near someone I would compare Trump to. Trump is a nut case. He is not a viable candidate for the the White House. He is not a viable person or individual to lead the free world, to lead the strongest nation on the planet. You people who support him have lost your minds.

For the second thing, I'm not and never was a cheer leader for Obama: I wanted Mrs. Clinton, not Obama. At the same time, he has been viciously and without precedence or with any reason, been accused of being a horrible president, when the facts are that he has been quite adequate, to the point he is rated at 18 by presidential historians (while, BTW, GW Bush is rated nearly last).

So, people like you seem to live in some wierd, perverted la la land that not only ignores reality but makes up a skewed one to fit your perverse wishful image of what reality should be. God help us if someone like Trump actually makes it to the White House: we would be at war literally and figuratively with most of the world within months. He is completely without the skills, intellect, knowledge and understanding to be the US President. The fact people like you in the GOP don't realize that is absolutely shocking and a sad, sad insight into contemporary America.

What's amusing is that you think Barry Obama has the "skills, intellect, knowledge and understanding" to be POTUS but that Donald Trump has none of those things!

What exactly has Obama done in his life besides be fortunate enough to be "Johnny on the spot" when Harvard needed to send a signal that they were not a racist institution and decided that the easiest way to do that would be to name a black man as the first President of the Harvard Law Review?

If you REALLY look at the man's accomplishments before and since then...he's been (to use your own description!) nothing more than "adequate" at every thing he's done in life. He was a mediocre lawyer. He was a run of the mill college instructor. He was an abysmal legislator.

Now compare that to Trump. You may not like the man. I don't particularly like him myself but only a fool would say that he doesn't have skill, intellect, knowledge and understanding! He has all of those in spades.

OMG It is amazing. Only a fool would think Donald Trump is worthy of a position as US president. He is a buffoon. Plain and simple. He's like Palin on steroids. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. You all think Palin is so cool and that she's viable as a presidential candidate. Too funny.

Have you seen the democratic candidats?
A socialist
A murderer
And a buffoon.
I mean damn

I repeat.....with Trump breathing, the GOP cannot win in 2016. It does not matter who is the Dem. pick......just a fact. He is in the process of screwing the your party over. Nothing that you can do about it. Sit back and watch.

 

[westwall]

"Small terror attack"? Really, Huggy? Al Queda managed to attack a US consulate and kill our Ambassador. It was a serious terror attack.

Why are you even bringing up George W. Bush? He has NOTHING to do with what took place in Benghazi. This was an Obama Administration screw-up...a complete failure by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to protect our diplomatic staff...and then a full court press by the entire Obama apparatus to shift blame from themselves to some obscure YouTube video that ALSO had nothing to do with what took place in Benghazi.

That's right. A SMALL terrorist attack which the ambassador could have easily avoided had he been safe in the embassy on such an anniversary that had the whole world looking for reprisals.

The Ambassador and his puny contingent of security were obviously clearly in no position to handle an attack yet you morons want to blame Hillary.

You don't want the truth. You people NEVER want the truth. You are hideous hateful liars.

You will never win the Benghazi argument because you made it up out of whole cloth. You will never win the e-mail argument because NOTHING illegal occurred. There is no IS. There is no fire..just smoke you aholes are constantly attempting to blow up Americans asses.

So the fact that Hillary Clinton drew down the number of security personnel in Libya despite repeated requests from Christopher Stevens to maintain the same level absolves Clinton from blame for the subsequent deaths of Stevens and the other three men? You talk about the "truth", Huggy but then you buy the lies that the Clinton State Department hid behind so that she wouldn't be held responsible for those deaths.

It was Hillary Clinton that frantically put out the narratives about YouTube videos causing a demonstration that escalated into a full on attack...it was Hillary Clinton that floated the trial balloon attempting to blame the GOP's cuts to the State Department budget for the woeful security. It was Hillary Clinton that lied to the parents of those slain men. It was Hillary Clinton that hid documents and communications from Congressional investigators and then asked "What difference does it make!" when Congress attempted over and over again to get to the bottom of what happened in Libya.

Chris Stevens was in no position to dictate personnel levels for the state department. Congress set spending levels not in field ambassadors.

That's laughably inaccurate, Huggy! The State Department made a request for a certain number. As with ALL government entities they asked for more than they really need because that's the way the game is played. You ask for a million...they approve you for nine hundred thousand. That's the way it works whether Congress is run by the GOP or the Democrats and I can very easily show you that the State Department's budget request when the Democrats controlled the Congress was NEVER granted in full either!

You see that lower amount as a "cut" when in reality it's almost ALWAYS an increase to an agency's budget...just not as big of an increase as they asked for. If you were to ask an agency head off the record if he or she ever expected to get fully funded for the amount they asked for they'd laugh their heads off and admit that they'd be SHOCKED if they had received what they asked for!

As for Chris Stevens being in a position to "dictate" personnel levels? Obviously he was not in that position because if he WAS then his requests that his security detail not be decreased would have been approved. The person that WAS in a position to "dictate" personnel levels is the Secretary of State...a certain Hillary Rodham Clinton! She's the one who decides where State Department funds get spent. She's the one who decided that they wouldn't be spent in Libya because she was the one who decided that the "optics" of having a heavily armed "bunker" of a consulate didn't match the narrative that the Obama White House was putting out that they had Al Queda "on the run".

So Benghazi and e-mails are your best chance of winning the white house house in 2016.....sad. With the Trump factor, you are screwed. But please don't lose hope.....

What's funny is the claim her emails weren't classified, but whenever a Benghazi email is finally released through an FOIA request it is heavily redacted! That means it is classified! You idiots are so in the tank for this old hag that you are blind to actual evidence of her lying through her teeth!

You are all laughable!

 

[westwall]

Coming from someone who probably voted twice for Barack "I don't have a clue what I'm doing" Obama...that's rather amusing, Esmeralda! Just saying...

What a stupid thing for you to say. Just childish and stupid.

For one thing, for anyone on the entire planet to think there is a comparison between Obama and Trump is crazy. Not even one of the weak and rather pathetic line up of current GOP candidates is anywhere near someone I would compare Trump to. Trump is a nut case. He is not a viable candidate for the the White House. He is not a viable person or individual to lead the free world, to lead the strongest nation on the planet. You people who support him have lost your minds.

For the second thing, I'm not and never was a cheer leader for Obama: I wanted Mrs. Clinton, not Obama. At the same time, he has been viciously and without precedence or with any reason, been accused of being a horrible president, when the facts are that he has been quite adequate, to the point he is rated at 18 by presidential historians (while, BTW, GW Bush is rated nearly last).

So, people like you seem to live in some wierd, perverted la la land that not only ignores reality but makes up a skewed one to fit your perverse wishful image of what reality should be. God help us if someone like Trump actually makes it to the White House: we would be at war literally and figuratively with most of the world within months. He is completely without the skills, intellect, knowledge and understanding to be the US President. The fact people like you in the GOP don't realize that is absolutely shocking and a sad, sad insight into contemporary America.

What's amusing is that you think Barry Obama has the "skills, intellect, knowledge and understanding" to be POTUS but that Donald Trump has none of those things!

What exactly has Obama done in his life besides be fortunate enough to be "Johnny on the spot" when Harvard needed to send a signal that they were not a racist institution and decided that the easiest way to do that would be to name a black man as the first President of the Harvard Law Review?

If you REALLY look at the man's accomplishments before and since then...he's been (to use your own description!) nothing more than "adequate" at every thing he's done in life. He was a mediocre lawyer. He was a run of the mill college instructor. He was an abysmal legislator.

Now compare that to Trump. You may not like the man. I don't particularly like him myself but only a fool would say that he doesn't have skill, intellect, knowledge and understanding! He has all of those in spades.

OMG It is amazing. Only a fool would think Donald Trump is worthy of a position as US president. He is a buffoon. Plain and simple. He's like Palin on steroids. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. You all think Palin is so cool and that she's viable as a presidential candidate. Too funny.

Have you seen the democratic candidats?
A socialist
A murderer
And a buffoon.
I mean damn

I repeat.....with Trump breathing, the GOP cannot win in 2016. It does not matter who is the Dem. pick......just a fact. He is in the process of screwing the your party over. Nothing that you can do about it. Sit back and watch.

You keep spewing this as if you believe it so I will assume you do. Here's some free education, if Trump is the nominee he'll win...and that scares the crap out of me as a Democrat.

 

[Esmeralda]

What a stupid thing for you to say. Just childish and stupid.

For one thing, for anyone on the entire planet to think there is a comparison between Obama and Trump is crazy. Not even one of the weak and rather pathetic line up of current GOP candidates is anywhere near someone I would compare Trump to. Trump is a nut case. He is not a viable candidate for the the White House. He is not a viable person or individual to lead the free world, to lead the strongest nation on the planet. You people who support him have lost your minds.

For the second thing, I'm not and never was a cheer leader for Obama: I wanted Mrs. Clinton, not Obama. At the same time, he has been viciously and without precedence or with any reason, been accused of being a horrible president, when the facts are that he has been quite adequate, to the point he is rated at 18 by presidential historians (while, BTW, GW Bush is rated nearly last).

So, people like you seem to live in some wierd, perverted la la land that not only ignores reality but makes up a skewed one to fit your perverse wishful image of what reality should be. God help us if someone like Trump actually makes it to the White House: we would be at war literally and figuratively with most of the world within months. He is completely without the skills, intellect, knowledge and understanding to be the US President. The fact people like you in the GOP don't realize that is absolutely shocking and a sad, sad insight into contemporary America.

What's amusing is that you think Barry Obama has the "skills, intellect, knowledge and understanding" to be POTUS but that Donald Trump has none of those things!

What exactly has Obama done in his life besides be fortunate enough to be "Johnny on the spot" when Harvard needed to send a signal that they were not a racist institution and decided that the easiest way to do that would be to name a black man as the first President of the Harvard Law Review?

If you REALLY look at the man's accomplishments before and since then...he's been (to use your own description!) nothing more than "adequate" at every thing he's done in life. He was a mediocre lawyer. He was a run of the mill college instructor. He was an abysmal legislator.

Now compare that to Trump. You may not like the man. I don't particularly like him myself but only a fool would say that he doesn't have skill, intellect, knowledge and understanding! He has all of those in spades.

OMG It is amazing. Only a fool would think Donald Trump is worthy of a position as US president. He is a buffoon. Plain and simple. He's like Palin on steroids. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. You all think Palin is so cool and that she's viable as a presidential candidate. Too funny.

Have you seen the democratic candidats?
A socialist
A murderer
And a buffoon.
I mean damn

I repeat.....with Trump breathing, the GOP cannot win in 2016. It does not matter who is the Dem. pick......just a fact. He is in the process of screwing the your party over. Nothing that you can do about it. Sit back and watch.

You keep spewing this as if you believe it so I will assume you do. Here's some free education, if Trump is the nominee he'll win...and that scares the crap out of me as a Democrat.

OMG I didn't think you were that stupid.

 

[JimH52]

What a stupid thing for you to say. Just childish and stupid.

For one thing, for anyone on the entire planet to think there is a comparison between Obama and Trump is crazy. Not even one of the weak and rather pathetic line up of current GOP candidates is anywhere near someone I would compare Trump to. Trump is a nut case. He is not a viable candidate for the the White House. He is not a viable person or individual to lead the free world, to lead the strongest nation on the planet. You people who support him have lost your minds.

For the second thing, I'm not and never was a cheer leader for Obama: I wanted Mrs. Clinton, not Obama. At the same time, he has been viciously and without precedence or with any reason, been accused of being a horrible president, when the facts are that he has been quite adequate, to the point he is rated at 18 by presidential historians (while, BTW, GW Bush is rated nearly last).

So, people like you seem to live in some wierd, perverted la la land that not only ignores reality but makes up a skewed one to fit your perverse wishful image of what reality should be. God help us if someone like Trump actually makes it to the White House: we would be at war literally and figuratively with most of the world within months. He is completely without the skills, intellect, knowledge and understanding to be the US President. The fact people like you in the GOP don't realize that is absolutely shocking and a sad, sad insight into contemporary America.

What's amusing is that you think Barry Obama has the "skills, intellect, knowledge and understanding" to be POTUS but that Donald Trump has none of those things!

What exactly has Obama done in his life besides be fortunate enough to be "Johnny on the spot" when Harvard needed to send a signal that they were not a racist institution and decided that the easiest way to do that would be to name a black man as the first President of the Harvard Law Review?

If you REALLY look at the man's accomplishments before and since then...he's been (to use your own description!) nothing more than "adequate" at every thing he's done in life. He was a mediocre lawyer. He was a run of the mill college instructor. He was an abysmal legislator.

Now compare that to Trump. You may not like the man. I don't particularly like him myself but only a fool would say that he doesn't have skill, intellect, knowledge and understanding! He has all of those in spades.

OMG It is amazing. Only a fool would think Donald Trump is worthy of a position as US president. He is a buffoon. Plain and simple. He's like Palin on steroids. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. You all think Palin is so cool and that she's viable as a presidential candidate. Too funny.

Have you seen the democratic candidats?
A socialist
A murderer
And a buffoon.
I mean damn

I repeat.....with Trump breathing, the GOP cannot win in 2016. It does not matter who is the Dem. pick......just a fact. He is in the process of screwing the your party over. Nothing that you can do about it. Sit back and watch.

You keep spewing this as if you believe it so I will assume you do. Here's some free education, if Trump is the nominee he'll win...and that scares the crap out of me as a Democrat.

Have you been on Mars? He has lost the Hispanic vote, he can't win the black vote and most true conservatives hate him. HE WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT!

 

[thanatos144]

What has Trump to do with Hilary Clinton and her criminal behavior? She should be in prison .

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

 

[browsing deer]

What's amusing is that you think Barry Obama has the "skills, intellect, knowledge and understanding" to be POTUS but that Donald Trump has none of those things!

What exactly has Obama done in his life besides be fortunate enough to be "Johnny on the spot" when Harvard needed to send a signal that they were not a racist institution and decided that the easiest way to do that would be to name a black man as the first President of the Harvard Law Review?

If you REALLY look at the man's accomplishments before and since then...he's been (to use your own description!) nothing more than "adequate" at every thing he's done in life. He was a mediocre lawyer. He was a run of the mill college instructor. He was an abysmal legislator.

Now compare that to Trump. You may not like the man. I don't particularly like him myself but only a fool would say that he doesn't have skill, intellect, knowledge and understanding! He has all of those in spades.

OMG It is amazing. Only a fool would think Donald Trump is worthy of a position as US president. He is a buffoon. Plain and simple. He's like Palin on steroids. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. You all think Palin is so cool and that she's viable as a presidential candidate. Too funny.

Have you seen the democratic candidats?
A socialist
A murderer
And a buffoon.
I mean damn

I repeat.....with Trump breathing, the GOP cannot win in 2016. It does not matter who is the Dem. pick......just a fact. He is in the process of screwing the your party over. Nothing that you can do about it. Sit back and watch.

You keep spewing this as if you believe it so I will assume you do. Here's some free education, if Trump is the nominee he'll win...and that scares the crap out of me as a Democrat.

Have you been on Mars? He has lost the Hispanic vote, he can't win the black vote and most true conservatives hate him. HE WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT!

He won't be the nominee either. He is making the true conservatives hate him even more each day, and as he gets more air time, the trumpbots will see him for what he truly is. By december he will be Donald Who?

 

[HUGGY]

That's right. A SMALL terrorist attack which the ambassador could have easily avoided had he been safe in the embassy on such an anniversary that had the whole world looking for reprisals.

The Ambassador and his puny contingent of security were obviously clearly in no position to handle an attack yet you morons want to blame Hillary.

You don't want the truth. You people NEVER want the truth. You are hideous hateful liars.

You will never win the Benghazi argument because you made it up out of whole cloth. You will never win the e-mail argument because NOTHING illegal occurred. There is no IS. There is no fire..just smoke you aholes are constantly attempting to blow up Americans asses.

So the fact that Hillary Clinton drew down the number of security personnel in Libya despite repeated requests from Christopher Stevens to maintain the same level absolves Clinton from blame for the subsequent deaths of Stevens and the other three men? You talk about the "truth", Huggy but then you buy the lies that the Clinton State Department hid behind so that she wouldn't be held responsible for those deaths.

It was Hillary Clinton that frantically put out the narratives about YouTube videos causing a demonstration that escalated into a full on attack...it was Hillary Clinton that floated the trial balloon attempting to blame the GOP's cuts to the State Department budget for the woeful security. It was Hillary Clinton that lied to the parents of those slain men. It was Hillary Clinton that hid documents and communications from Congressional investigators and then asked "What difference does it make!" when Congress attempted over and over again to get to the bottom of what happened in Libya.

Chris Stevens was in no position to dictate personnel levels for the state department. Congress set spending levels not in field ambassadors.

That's laughably inaccurate, Huggy! The State Department made a request for a certain number. As with ALL government entities they asked for more than they really need because that's the way the game is played. You ask for a million...they approve you for nine hundred thousand. That's the way it works whether Congress is run by the GOP or the Democrats and I can very easily show you that the State Department's budget request when the Democrats controlled the Congress was NEVER granted in full either!

You see that lower amount as a "cut" when in reality it's almost ALWAYS an increase to an agency's budget...just not as big of an increase as they asked for. If you were to ask an agency head off the record if he or she ever expected to get fully funded for the amount they asked for they'd laugh their heads off and admit that they'd be SHOCKED if they had received what they asked for!

As for Chris Stevens being in a position to "dictate" personnel levels? Obviously he was not in that position because if he WAS then his requests that his security detail not be decreased would have been approved. The person that WAS in a position to "dictate" personnel levels is the Secretary of State...a certain Hillary Rodham Clinton! She's the one who decides where State Department funds get spent. She's the one who decided that they wouldn't be spent in Libya because she was the one who decided that the "optics" of having a heavily armed "bunker" of a consulate didn't match the narrative that the Obama White House was putting out that they had Al Queda "on the run".

So Benghazi and e-mails are your best chance of winning the white house house in 2016.....sad. With the Trump factor, you are screwed. But please don't lose hope.....

Benghazi, the Clinton Foundation and e-mails are why Hillary Clinton isn't fit to be President. All of that has nothing to do with who the GOP eventually decides to nominate. Admit it...you liberals are freaked out right now because Hillary's campaign is imploding and you don't have a viable option to her. What you thought was going to be a cake walk election in 2016 is turning out to be a bit of a nightmare.

You are a fool. I am not a liberal. I just hate liars. The GOP is thick with butt hurt liars that will say anything, make up anything and do anything they believe will give them some perceived advantage.

You and your pathetic pack of dishonest scum keep calling me a liberal. That just goes to show how out of touch and willing to repeat a lie you really are.

You are either just stupid or dishonest. You are stupid if you cannot grasp how many true republicans despise what people like you have done to a once proud political party.

I am not a "liberal". I am just realistic. Hillary will run away with this election. The reason Hillary will make fools out of people like you is because America sees right through you lying scum bags. It has nothing to do with being "liberal". What it has to do with is America is disgusted with your dishonesty.

The religious right stole the republican party. You do not represent the true values of the GOP any more than a car thief has earned the right to drive his stolen automobile.

You can call me a "liberal" until you are blue in the face but that and all your bullshit is made no more true by the rote repetition.

You scum bags hide behind the bible and nothing could be more hypocritical. You are not Christ like. If anything you are more like Judas. You are thieves of the GOP and like Judas you are owned out right by the Koch brothers and the Waltons and the Pharms and the HMO's, the modern Romans. Like Judas you have taken the few coins and sold your integrity and sold out your country.

 

[Slyhunter]

OMG It is amazing. Only a fool would think Donald Trump is worthy of a position as US president. He is a buffoon. Plain and simple. He's like Palin on steroids. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. You all think Palin is so cool and that she's viable as a presidential candidate. Too funny.

Have you seen the democratic candidats?
A socialist
A murderer
And a buffoon.
I mean damn

I repeat.....with Trump breathing, the GOP cannot win in 2016. It does not matter who is the Dem. pick......just a fact. He is in the process of screwing the your party over. Nothing that you can do about it. Sit back and watch.

You keep spewing this as if you believe it so I will assume you do. Here's some free education, if Trump is the nominee he'll win...and that scares the crap out of me as a Democrat.

Have you been on Mars? He has lost the Hispanic vote, he can't win the black vote and most true conservatives hate him. HE WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT!

He won't be the nominee either. He is making the true conservatives hate him even more each day, and as he gets more air time, the trumpbots will see him for what he truly is. By december he will be Donald Who?

Youre scared

 

[thanatos144]

So the fact that Hillary Clinton drew down the number of security personnel in Libya despite repeated requests from Christopher Stevens to maintain the same level absolves Clinton from blame for the subsequent deaths of Stevens and the other three men? You talk about the "truth", Huggy but then you buy the lies that the Clinton State Department hid behind so that she wouldn't be held responsible for those deaths.

It was Hillary Clinton that frantically put out the narratives about YouTube videos causing a demonstration that escalated into a full on attack...it was Hillary Clinton that floated the trial balloon attempting to blame the GOP's cuts to the State Department budget for the woeful security. It was Hillary Clinton that lied to the parents of those slain men. It was Hillary Clinton that hid documents and communications from Congressional investigators and then asked "What difference does it make!" when Congress attempted over and over again to get to the bottom of what happened in Libya.

Chris Stevens was in no position to dictate personnel levels for the state department. Congress set spending levels not in field ambassadors.

That's laughably inaccurate, Huggy! The State Department made a request for a certain number. As with ALL government entities they asked for more than they really need because that's the way the game is played. You ask for a million...they approve you for nine hundred thousand. That's the way it works whether Congress is run by the GOP or the Democrats and I can very easily show you that the State Department's budget request when the Democrats controlled the Congress was NEVER granted in full either!

You see that lower amount as a "cut" when in reality it's almost ALWAYS an increase to an agency's budget...just not as big of an increase as they asked for. If you were to ask an agency head off the record if he or she ever expected to get fully funded for the amount they asked for they'd laugh their heads off and admit that they'd be SHOCKED if they had received what they asked for!

As for Chris Stevens being in a position to "dictate" personnel levels? Obviously he was not in that position because if he WAS then his requests that his security detail not be decreased would have been approved. The person that WAS in a position to "dictate" personnel levels is the Secretary of State...a certain Hillary Rodham Clinton! She's the one who decides where State Department funds get spent. She's the one who decided that they wouldn't be spent in Libya because she was the one who decided that the "optics" of having a heavily armed "bunker" of a consulate didn't match the narrative that the Obama White House was putting out that they had Al Queda "on the run".

So Benghazi and e-mails are your best chance of winning the white house house in 2016.....sad. With the Trump factor, you are screwed. But please don't lose hope.....

Benghazi, the Clinton Foundation and e-mails are why Hillary Clinton isn't fit to be President. All of that has nothing to do with who the GOP eventually decides to nominate. Admit it...you liberals are freaked out right now because Hillary's campaign is imploding and you don't have a viable option to her. What you thought was going to be a cake walk election in 2016 is turning out to be a bit of a nightmare.

You are a fool. I am not a liberal. I just hate liars. The GOP is thick with butt hurt liars that will say anything, make up anything and do anything they believe will give them some perceived advantage.

You and your pathetic pack of dishonest scum keep calling me a liberal. That just goes to show how out of touch and willing to repeat a lie you really are.

You are either just stupid or dishonest. You are stupid if you cannot grasp how many true republicans despise what people like you have done to a once proud political party.

I am not a "liberal". I am just realistic. Hillary will run away with this election. The reason Hillary will make fools out of people like you is because America sees right through you lying scum bags. It has nothing to do with being "liberal". What it has to do with is America is disgusted with your dishonesty.

The religious right stole the republican party. You do not represent the true values of the GOP any more than a car thief has earned the right to drive his stolen automobile.

You can call me a "liberal" until you are blue in the face but that and all your bullshit is made no more true by the rote repetition.

You scum bags hide behind the bible and nothing could be more hypocritical. You are not Christ like. If anything you are more like Judas. You are thieves of the GOP and like Judas you are owned out right by the Koch brothers and the Waltons and the Pharms and the HMO's, the modern Romans. Like Judas you have taken the few coins and sold your integrity and sold out your country.

You are extremely progressive and a liar to boot

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

 

[Esmeralda]

OMG It is amazing. Only a fool would think Donald Trump is worthy of a position as US president. He is a buffoon. Plain and simple. He's like Palin on steroids. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. You all think Palin is so cool and that she's viable as a presidential candidate. Too funny.

Have you seen the democratic candidats?
A socialist
A murderer
And a buffoon.
I mean damn

I repeat.....with Trump breathing, the GOP cannot win in 2016. It does not matter who is the Dem. pick......just a fact. He is in the process of screwing the your party over. Nothing that you can do about it. Sit back and watch.

You keep spewing this as if you believe it so I will assume you do. Here's some free education, if Trump is the nominee he'll win...and that scares the crap out of me as a Democrat.

Have you been on Mars? He has lost the Hispanic vote, he can't win the black vote and most true conservatives hate him. HE WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT!

He won't be the nominee either. He is making the true conservatives hate him even more each day, and as he gets more air time, the trumpbots will see him for what he truly is. By december he will be Donald Who?

He will never get the GOP nomination, but if he continues garnering the support he's getting from the extreme RW, he will go out on his own, cut the party in two, and guarantee that the Democratic candidate will win the election. It's all good.

 

[rdean]

Clinton Email Scandal Falls Apart As State Dept. Says There Was No Policy Against Private Email

Is this the beginning of the end of the GOP's scandal.

I've been saying this since day one. Every SOT and even the president had private servers or emails. Obama closed that gap two years after Mrs. Clinton left office. One wonders if she lets this drag out just to make the GOP look more foolish than usual.

 

[HUGGY]

Chris Stevens was in no position to dictate personnel levels for the state department. Congress set spending levels not in field ambassadors.

That's laughably inaccurate, Huggy! The State Department made a request for a certain number. As with ALL government entities they asked for more than they really need because that's the way the game is played. You ask for a million...they approve you for nine hundred thousand. That's the way it works whether Congress is run by the GOP or the Democrats and I can very easily show you that the State Department's budget request when the Democrats controlled the Congress was NEVER granted in full either!

You see that lower amount as a "cut" when in reality it's almost ALWAYS an increase to an agency's budget...just not as big of an increase as they asked for. If you were to ask an agency head off the record if he or she ever expected to get fully funded for the amount they asked for they'd laugh their heads off and admit that they'd be SHOCKED if they had received what they asked for!

As for Chris Stevens being in a position to "dictate" personnel levels? Obviously he was not in that position because if he WAS then his requests that his security detail not be decreased would have been approved. The person that WAS in a position to "dictate" personnel levels is the Secretary of State...a certain Hillary Rodham Clinton! She's the one who decides where State Department funds get spent. She's the one who decided that they wouldn't be spent in Libya because she was the one who decided that the "optics" of having a heavily armed "bunker" of a consulate didn't match the narrative that the Obama White House was putting out that they had Al Queda "on the run".

So Benghazi and e-mails are your best chance of winning the white house house in 2016.....sad. With the Trump factor, you are screwed. But please don't lose hope.....

Benghazi, the Clinton Foundation and e-mails are why Hillary Clinton isn't fit to be President. All of that has nothing to do with who the GOP eventually decides to nominate. Admit it...you liberals are freaked out right now because Hillary's campaign is imploding and you don't have a viable option to her. What you thought was going to be a cake walk election in 2016 is turning out to be a bit of a nightmare.

You are a fool. I am not a liberal. I just hate liars. The GOP is thick with butt hurt liars that will say anything, make up anything and do anything they believe will give them some perceived advantage.

You and your pathetic pack of dishonest scum keep calling me a liberal. That just goes to show how out of touch and willing to repeat a lie you really are.

You are either just stupid or dishonest. You are stupid if you cannot grasp how many true republicans despise what people like you have done to a once proud political party.

I am not a "liberal". I am just realistic. Hillary will run away with this election. The reason Hillary will make fools out of people like you is because America sees right through you lying scum bags. It has nothing to do with being "liberal". What it has to do with is America is disgusted with your dishonesty.

The religious right stole the republican party. You do not represent the true values of the GOP any more than a car thief has earned the right to drive his stolen automobile.

You can call me a "liberal" until you are blue in the face but that and all your bullshit is made no more true by the rote repetition.

You scum bags hide behind the bible and nothing could be more hypocritical. You are not Christ like. If anything you are more like Judas. You are thieves of the GOP and like Judas you are owned out right by the Koch brothers and the Waltons and the Pharms and the HMO's, the modern Romans. Like Judas you have taken the few coins and sold your integrity and sold out your country.

You are extremely progressive and a liar to boot

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

Liar. You don't have a clue what you are talking about. Hating the actions of one party does not make that individual the opposite. I just hate liars. The GOP has been taken over by liars. It and my politics are just that simple.

As far as my personal heroes in politics they are Eisenhower and Goldwater. If THAT makes me a liberal then go ahead and call me an Eisenhower/Goldwater liberal...

You people are ridiculous.

 

[thanatos144]

That's laughably inaccurate, Huggy! The State Department made a request for a certain number. As with ALL government entities they asked for more than they really need because that's the way the game is played. You ask for a million...they approve you for nine hundred thousand. That's the way it works whether Congress is run by the GOP or the Democrats and I can very easily show you that the State Department's budget request when the Democrats controlled the Congress was NEVER granted in full either!

You see that lower amount as a "cut" when in reality it's almost ALWAYS an increase to an agency's budget...just not as big of an increase as they asked for. If you were to ask an agency head off the record if he or she ever expected to get fully funded for the amount they asked for they'd laugh their heads off and admit that they'd be SHOCKED if they had received what they asked for!

As for Chris Stevens being in a position to "dictate" personnel levels? Obviously he was not in that position because if he WAS then his requests that his security detail not be decreased would have been approved. The person that WAS in a position to "dictate" personnel levels is the Secretary of State...a certain Hillary Rodham Clinton! She's the one who decides where State Department funds get spent. She's the one who decided that they wouldn't be spent in Libya because she was the one who decided that the "optics" of having a heavily armed "bunker" of a consulate didn't match the narrative that the Obama White House was putting out that they had Al Queda "on the run".

So Benghazi and e-mails are your best chance of winning the white house house in 2016.....sad. With the Trump factor, you are screwed. But please don't lose hope.....

Benghazi, the Clinton Foundation and e-mails are why Hillary Clinton isn't fit to be President. All of that has nothing to do with who the GOP eventually decides to nominate. Admit it...you liberals are freaked out right now because Hillary's campaign is imploding and you don't have a viable option to her. What you thought was going to be a cake walk election in 2016 is turning out to be a bit of a nightmare.

You are a fool. I am not a liberal. I just hate liars. The GOP is thick with butt hurt liars that will say anything, make up anything and do anything they believe will give them some perceived advantage.

You and your pathetic pack of dishonest scum keep calling me a liberal. That just goes to show how out of touch and willing to repeat a lie you really are.

You are either just stupid or dishonest. You are stupid if you cannot grasp how many true republicans despise what people like you have done to a once proud political party.

I am not a "liberal". I am just realistic. Hillary will run away with this election. The reason Hillary will make fools out of people like you is because America sees right through you lying scum bags. It has nothing to do with being "liberal". What it has to do with is America is disgusted with your dishonesty.

The religious right stole the republican party. You do not represent the true values of the GOP any more than a car thief has earned the right to drive his stolen automobile.

You can call me a "liberal" until you are blue in the face but that and all your bullshit is made no more true by the rote repetition.

You scum bags hide behind the bible and nothing could be more hypocritical. You are not Christ like. If anything you are more like Judas. You are thieves of the GOP and like Judas you are owned out right by the Koch brothers and the Waltons and the Pharms and the HMO's, the modern Romans. Like Judas you have taken the few coins and sold your integrity and sold out your country.

You are extremely progressive and a liar to boot

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

Liar. You don't have a clue what you are talking about. Hating the actions of one party does not make that individual the opposite. I just hate liars. The GOP has been taken over by liars. It and my politics are just that simple.

As far as my personal heroes in politics they are Eisenhower and Goldwater. If THAT makes me a liberal then go ahead and call me an Eisenhower/Goldwater liberal... [emoji38]

You people are ridiculous.

Nothing to do with you hating the GOP . Has to do with what you post.

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

 

[HUGGY]

So Benghazi and e-mails are your best chance of winning the white house house in 2016.....sad. With the Trump factor, you are screwed. But please don't lose hope.....

Benghazi, the Clinton Foundation and e-mails are why Hillary Clinton isn't fit to be President. All of that has nothing to do with who the GOP eventually decides to nominate. Admit it...you liberals are freaked out right now because Hillary's campaign is imploding and you don't have a viable option to her. What you thought was going to be a cake walk election in 2016 is turning out to be a bit of a nightmare.

You are a fool. I am not a liberal. I just hate liars. The GOP is thick with butt hurt liars that will say anything, make up anything and do anything they believe will give them some perceived advantage.

You and your pathetic pack of dishonest scum keep calling me a liberal. That just goes to show how out of touch and willing to repeat a lie you really are.

You are either just stupid or dishonest. You are stupid if you cannot grasp how many true republicans despise what people like you have done to a once proud political party.

I am not a "liberal". I am just realistic. Hillary will run away with this election. The reason Hillary will make fools out of people like you is because America sees right through you lying scum bags. It has nothing to do with being "liberal". What it has to do with is America is disgusted with your dishonesty.

The religious right stole the republican party. You do not represent the true values of the GOP any more than a car thief has earned the right to drive his stolen automobile.

You can call me a "liberal" until you are blue in the face but that and all your bullshit is made no more true by the rote repetition.

You scum bags hide behind the bible and nothing could be more hypocritical. You are not Christ like. If anything you are more like Judas. You are thieves of the GOP and like Judas you are owned out right by the Koch brothers and the Waltons and the Pharms and the HMO's, the modern Romans. Like Judas you have taken the few coins and sold your integrity and sold out your country.

You are extremely progressive and a liar to boot

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

Liar. You don't have a clue what you are talking about. Hating the actions of one party does not make that individual the opposite. I just hate liars. The GOP has been taken over by liars. It and my politics are just that simple.

As far as my personal heroes in politics they are Eisenhower and Goldwater. If THAT makes me a liberal then go ahead and call me an Eisenhower/Goldwater liberal... [emoji38]

You people are ridiculous.

Nothing to do with you hating the GOP . Has to do with what you post.

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

Of course it does. The fact of the matter is that Hillary's e-mails is not a real scandal nor was Benghazi. The new GOP just makes things up they think will play well in the press and beats these dead horses relentlessly.

Many Americans hate what the GOP has become under the leadership of the Christian phony's.

I have every right to point out the traitorous actions and words of my former party.