VA and NC GOP Ponder Loyalty Oath for Candidates in the primaries. SC has already decided to do so.

Statistikhengst

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2013
45,564
11,756
2,070
deep within the statistical brain!!
The GOP can make Trump take a loyalty pledge. But they can’t make him honor it.


It's kind of complex.

The Republican Party in Virginia and North Carolina is considering adding an extra qualification for those wishing to appear on their state's primary ballots: A commitment to support the eventual Republican nominee. Which may prompt the casual observer to ask, "Can they do that?"

The answer is yes. Adding external, seemingly tangential stipulations to primary ballots is both perfectly within the rights of state parties -- and something with a long history. Richard Winger, editor of the three-decade-old journal Ballot Access News, spoke with The Post by phone to walk through how it works.

"Ever since 1972, the Supreme Court has upheld the ability of political parties to control their own nomination process," Winger explained. That independence leverages the First Amendment's freedom of association clause. "Parties are private organizations," Winger said. "They have the right not to be merged with the government. They are associations of people that come together and work together for common political goals, and so essentially they're private." And therefore can control their own membership -- and candidates...

...In 2008, the Texas Democratic Party introduced another new rule: Candidates had to pledge to support the eventual nominee. Former Ohio representative Dennis Kucinich declined to do so, and sued. "He lost in every round," Winger says. "He lost in U.S. District Court, he lost in the Fifth Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court wouldn't hear it." That case establishes pretty clearly that Virginia and North Carolina can apply the limit they're considering.

Ultimately, though, the loyalty oath depends on the good word of the candidate. If a candidate -- call him Ronald Bump -- were to pledge to support the Republican nominee but then decided to run as an independent, there's nothing that could be done to prevent him from doing so. The repercussions would be solely in the judgment of the voters. Which, for our hypothetical Bump candidate, might not be a significantly limiting factor.

In other words, the tiger still has no teeth.

FYI

Update:

SC has already gone there, today:

S.C. joins state parties seeking to complicate Trump's run
 
Where have I heard of this stuff before??

Oh yeah,,
hqdefault.jpg
 
Try as they might, Mr Comb Over will do what he wants. If Donald does not win the GOP nomination, it is nearly certain he will run third party....and there is NOTHING the GOP can do about it, cause he is "very rich".
 
Trump definitely is under their skin… Bad move by the GOP… Loyalty oath…WTF??? I wonder who is pulling the strings… Bilderberg Group?
 
"The state party announced on Tuesday that for presidential candidates to qualify for the South Carolina primary, they must pledge to support the Republican presidential nominee — and not run as a third-party candidate — in the general election."

This is completely unnecessary.

Once Silly Season ends and the primaries start, as serious, mainstream, rank and file republicans participate in actual elections, Trump will be gone – likely after the South Carolina primary.

Indeed, this stunt could very well backfire, were Trump would run as an independent to get back at republicans who didn't allow him to run in a given primary.
 
"The state party announced on Tuesday that for presidential candidates to qualify for the South Carolina primary, they must pledge to support the Republican presidential nominee — and not run as a third-party candidate — in the general election."

This is completely unnecessary.

Once Silly Season ends and the primaries start, as serious, mainstream, rank and file republicans participate in actual elections, Trump will be gone – likely after the South Carolina primary.

Indeed, this stunt could very well backfire, were Trump would run as an independent to get back at republicans who didn't allow him to run in a given primary.

Trump has always said he will support the GOP nominee if treated fairly by the party. These initiatives will be giving him good reason to believe he won't be given a level playing field.

This is better than a Sitcom!
 
"The state party announced on Tuesday that for presidential candidates to qualify for the South Carolina primary, they must pledge to support the Republican presidential nominee — and not run as a third-party candidate — in the general election."

This is completely unnecessary.

Once Silly Season ends and the primaries start, as serious, mainstream, rank and file republicans participate in actual elections, Trump will be gone – likely after the South Carolina primary.

Indeed, this stunt could very well backfire, were Trump would run as an independent to get back at republicans who didn't allow him to run in a given primary.
They are terrified, aren't they?
 
"The state party announced on Tuesday that for presidential candidates to qualify for the South Carolina primary, they must pledge to support the Republican presidential nominee — and not run as a third-party candidate — in the general election."

This is completely unnecessary.

Once Silly Season ends and the primaries start, as serious, mainstream, rank and file republicans participate in actual elections, Trump will be gone – likely after the South Carolina primary.

Indeed, this stunt could very well backfire, were Trump would run as an independent to get back at republicans who didn't allow him to run in a given primary.

Trump has always said he will support the GOP nominee if treated fairly by the party. These initiatives will be giving him good reason to believe he won't be given a level playing field.

This is better than a Sitcom!
It is a sitcom.
 
It won't take that much resources to build it. Israel built a wall like that between Israel and the West bank and it didn't cause a blip in its GDP. the wall is greater in Israel's border ib a population than the mexican wall would be in a population of 325 million. To man it is a different story.
 
Again… being caught up beating on each other and nobody cares who is really behind these initiatives. Apparently the system works to divert attention from the puppet masters… Congratulations!
 

Forum List

Back
Top