Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The exit happened on Obama's watch.............Not Bush's watch.........
Of course it did, Bush agreed at the end of his dismal death filled and wealth drained term to pull all troops out by the end of 2011.
Bush could not negotiate a long term deal and permanent bases in Iraq like he wanted. So he was forced to surrender to Maliki, Sadr, and Tehran's terms.
So Bush failed to find the WMD justification for starting a war where the was no war, and then he failed to achieve the trumped up justification to create a pro-America democracy that would allow US troops and Air Force assets to remain on Iraq soil indefinitely and welcomed. We US troops were not welcomed in Iraq until a terrorist scum spread terror in Sunni inhabited Iraq.
That scum has not taken over Iraq and never will.
Bush's other of many failures was the military failure to stop the alleged flow of Iranian made weapons into Iraq. You posted the lie that most Anericans were killed by Iranian weapons and then you posted that maybe it was 500 mostly during the surge under Bush's watch. Why don't you hold Bush responsible for what happened on his watch and that was not dictated by any president that came before him?
You sure are good at closing your eyes to all of Bush's Iraq failures but your eyes are wide open trying to blame Obama for Bush's surrender agreement in December 2008.
And that is the Sofa excuse..............going cold turkey not negotiating with Iraq to at least leave an intelligence presence there.................
The exit happened on Obama's watch.............Not Bush's watch.........
But alas. Mr. Giggles the gnat is part of the party of excuses..................
How's Libya fairing these days.................Real great there now isn't it...........
. If Obama had not supplied weapons to the Syrian rebels and destablised Iibya with from the rear bombing campaign ISIS would not have formed, our Ambassador would still be alive, and Iraq wouldn't need our troops to stay. But he did and the situation changed because of HIM not Bush and HE did not do and damn thing to even try and prevent it. This is all on Obama.
If Obama had not supplied weapons to the Syrian rebels....,
.
May 30, 2012 - 12:55 AM EDT
Obama will not arm Syrian rebels; Romney sees a 'lack of leadership'
BY AMIE PARNES AND JEREMY HERB170 Shares
President Obama and Mitt Romney on Tuesday offered clashing views over whether to arm insurgents in Syria after a weekend massacre left more than 100 people dead and drew international condemnation.
Romney called for the United States and partner nations to “arm the opposition so they can defend themselves” against the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad, but White House press secretary Jay Carney warned that would lead to more “chaos and carnage” and was “not the right course.”
The deep divide highlighted the realpolitik approach in Syria favored by an Obama administration focused on convincing Syrian ally Russia to pressure Assad and concerned about where weapons intended for insurgents might end up.
It also offered an opening of sorts for Romney — who clinched the Republican nomination on Tuesday night — to hammer Obama on foreign policy, which has been one of the president’s biggest strengths during his time in office.
As violence in Syria has escalated, Romney has ramped up his attacks on Obama’s handling of the events.
“President Obama’s lack of leadership has resulted in a policy of paralysis that has watched Assad slaughter 10,000 individuals,” Romney said in a statement Tuesday on Syria, his second in three days.
Observers say the conflict in Syria provides “fertile ground” for Romney and other Republicans.
Freewill 12233134If Obama had not supplied weapons to the Syrian rebels....,
Did you vote for Romney or Obama? Did you bother listening to all the bullcrap that Romney said. He never missed a chance to dance on dead bodies to criticize the sitting president.
.
May 30, 2012 - 12:55 AM EDT
Obama will not arm Syrian rebels; Romney sees a 'lack of leadership'
BY AMIE PARNES AND JEREMY HERB170 Shares
President Obama and Mitt Romney on Tuesday offered clashing views over whether to arm insurgents in Syria after a weekend massacre left more than 100 people dead and drew international condemnation.
Romney called for the United States and partner nations to “arm the opposition so they can defend themselves” against the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad, but White House press secretary Jay Carney warned that would lead to more “chaos and carnage” and was “not the right course.”
The deep divide highlighted the realpolitik approach in Syria favored by an Obama administration focused on convincing Syrian ally Russia to pressure Assad and concerned about where weapons intended for insurgents might end up.
It also offered an opening of sorts for Romney — who clinched the Republican nomination on Tuesday night — to hammer Obama on foreign policy, which has been one of the president’s biggest strengths during his time in office.
As violence in Syria has escalated, Romney has ramped up his attacks on Obama’s handling of the events.
“President Obama’s lack of leadership has resulted in a policy of paralysis that has watched Assad slaughter 10,000 individuals,” Romney said in a statement Tuesday on Syria, his second in three days.
Observers say the conflict in Syria provides “fertile ground” for Romney and other Republicans.
Obama will not arm Syrian rebels; Romney sees a 'lack of leadership'
My god if you can't remember what happened three years ago - you ought to do a little research before making a fool of yourself as you just did.
From the link:
"Romney called for the United States and partner nations to “arm the opposition so they can defend themselves” against the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad, but White House press secretary Jay Carney warned that would lead to more “chaos and carnage” and was “not the right course.”"
Now you have to declare that it was because Obama did not arm the opposition in Syria that created ISIS.
Are you gonna make the switch? Or admit you don't have a clue about what happened in Syria. You never did and you never will because the truth is not your friend.
. If Obama had not supplied weapons to the Syrian rebels and destablised Iibya with from the rear bombing campaign ISIS would not have formed, our Ambassador would still be alive, and Iraq wouldn't need our troops to stay. But he did and the situation changed because of HIM not Bush and HE did not do and damn thing to even try and prevent it. This is all on Obama.
If there were no "dumb" invasion of Iraq in March 2003 as Obama advised, it would still be Sunnis in power in Iraq. Iraqi tribal Sunnis that never believed in this AQ or ISIS Jihad crap would be in control of Baghdad. And the whole world would have found through UN peaceful inspection that there was no WMD in Iraq. Which means Bush never had to start a 'democracy' project in Iraq, getting 4484 Americans killed in that project that failed to produce a viable democracy and Shiite majority army that would fight to protect Bush's barrel of a gun democracy.
Please provide a list of weapons that Obama provided to ISIS.
You have obviously forgot who was president when the troops moved out.
Moron, hen we moved out of Italy after WWII did THAT mean we lost the war?
. If Obama had not supplied weapons to the Syrian rebels and destablised Iibya with from the rear bombing campaign ISIS would not have formed, our Ambassador would still be alive, and Iraq wouldn't need our troops to stay. But he did and the situation changed because of HIM not Bush and HE did not do and damn thing to even try and prevent it. This is all on Obama.
If there were no "dumb" invasion of Iraq in March 2003 as Obama advised, it would still be Sunnis in power in Iraq. Iraqi tribal Sunnis that never believed in this AQ or ISIS Jihad crap would be in control of Baghdad. And the whole world would have found through UN peaceful inspection that there was no WMD in Iraq. Which means Bush never had to start a 'democracy' project in Iraq, getting 4484 Americans killed in that project that failed to produce a viable democracy and Shiite majority army that would fight to protect Bush's barrel of a gun democracy.
Please provide a list of weapons that Obama provided to ISIS.
Let's review. The PM has said they will still fund terrorism, that they will build up their military, and now we know that they at least think they have more flexibility with their ballistic missile program. Quite the deal. What in the hell does Iran need ballistic missiles? If the liberal left tells me I don't need an AK47 then why not tell Iran they don't really need ballistic missiles. Unless of course Israel really doesn't matter.
Iran Vows to Violate UN Restrictions on Ballistic Missiles
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani vowed that the Islamic Republic would violate outstanding United Nations restrictions governing the country’s ballistic missile program and that the behavior would not violate the recent nuclear accord, according to a translation of the leader’s remarks performed by the CIA’s Open Source Center.
EVERYONE in the ME was happy to see the Butcher of Baghdad gone, the left wing in America, not so much.
