Intravenous Vit C kills cancer so FDA quietly bans it.

ShootSpeeders

Gold Member
May 13, 2012
20,232
2,363
280
Vitamin C is very non-toxic and very very cheap so you would expect Big Pharma to fight it. I've read for years that IV vitamin C is a cancer killer.

FDA quietly bans powerful life-saving intravenous Vitamin C – InvestmentWatch

feb 1 2017 It would be naive to think that the FDA endeavors to protect the public’s health as its primary focus. Indeed, that would be a conflict of interest, as it serves its master, the pharmaceutical industry. Has the Food and Drug Administration engineered a shortage of intravenous vitamin C as part of an overall attack on natural and non-toxic approaches to healing that compete with prescription drugs? An analysis by Natural Blaze would suggest that the answer is yes.

Natural Blaze claims that a critical shortage of IV bags in general followed an FDA ban on the mass production of intravenous vitamin C. The FDA limited the availability of IV-C and the pharmaceutical industry halted production of injectable vitamins and minerals, after a 60 minute story about the miraculous recovery of a swine flu patient on life support.

Could the shortage of IV-C be part of an effort to limit alternative cancer therapies?

DrWhitaker.com states, “… vitamin C is a potent antioxidant that has the power to boost immune function, increase resistance to infection, and protect against a wide range of diseases. But there’s an entirely different and largely unknown role of vitamin C, and that is its ability—when administered in very high doses by intravenous (IV) infusions—to kill cancer cells. … Best of all—and unlike virtually all conventional chemotherapy drugs that destroy cancer cells—it is selectively toxic. No matter how high the concentration, vitamin C does not harm healthy cells.”

Dr. Whitaker continues:

“The only way to get blood levels of vitamin C to the concentrations required to kill cancer cells is to administer it intravenously. … For example, 10 g of IV vitamin C raises blood levels 25 times higher than the same dose taken orally, and this increases up to 70-fold as doses get larger.”
 
Vitamin C is very non-toxic and very very cheap so you would expect Big Pharma to fight it. I've read for years that IV vitamin C is a cancer killer.

FDA quietly bans powerful life-saving intravenous Vitamin C – InvestmentWatch

feb 1 2017 It would be naive to think that the FDA endeavors to protect the public’s health as its primary focus. Indeed, that would be a conflict of interest, as it serves its master, the pharmaceutical industry. Has the Food and Drug Administration engineered a shortage of intravenous vitamin C as part of an overall attack on natural and non-toxic approaches to healing that compete with prescription drugs? An analysis by Natural Blaze would suggest that the answer is yes.

Natural Blaze claims that a critical shortage of IV bags in general followed an FDA ban on the mass production of intravenous vitamin C. The FDA limited the availability of IV-C and the pharmaceutical industry halted production of injectable vitamins and minerals, after a 60 minute story about the miraculous recovery of a swine flu patient on life support.

Could the shortage of IV-C be part of an effort to limit alternative cancer therapies?

DrWhitaker.com states, “… vitamin C is a potent antioxidant that has the power to boost immune function, increase resistance to infection, and protect against a wide range of diseases. But there’s an entirely different and largely unknown role of vitamin C, and that is its ability—when administered in very high doses by intravenous (IV) infusions—to kill cancer cells. … Best of all—and unlike virtually all conventional chemotherapy drugs that destroy cancer cells—it is selectively toxic. No matter how high the concentration, vitamin C does not harm healthy cells.”

Dr. Whitaker continues:

“The only way to get blood levels of vitamin C to the concentrations required to kill cancer cells is to administer it intravenously. … For example, 10 g of IV vitamin C raises blood levels 25 times higher than the same dose taken orally, and this increases up to 70-fold as doses get larger.”

Thanks ShootSpeeders
Now THIS is a very helpful post, and gives me a chance to thank you especially.

One friend of mine said a relative of his had to go to Mexico to get some treatment
he thought was based on apricot pits, so maybe it was concentrated Vitamin C.

Another friend with biomedical research on using "Smart Sugars" to boost healing
and recovery of cells from damage and diseases also focuses on "high concentrations"
of the specific sugars that can reverse the pattern of dysfunction causing cells to malfunction or die.

This Vitamin C approach could explain how these alternative methods work
for helping cancer patients improve their recovery rates and process.

Thank you!
And I hope further research on this BEATS any pharmaceutical company
that will be compelled to develop NATURAL remedies if the market grows in that direction.
Similar to how the organic, NonGMO movement causes shifts in the market to meet consumer demand.

An educated consumer base means more power to the people and the planet to shape policies in direction better for our health. Works better in the longrun than legislation through the Feds which meets with rejection.
Corporations have to listen to consumers, or they will go out of business if they don't keep up with demands.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
A lot of people claim baking soda kills cancer too. It also is super-cheap and so we're not supposed to know about it either.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
[
One friend of mine said a relative of his had to go to Mexico to get some treatment
he thought was based on apricot pits, so maybe it was concentrated Vitamin C.

The article i quoted is about INTRAVENOUS vit C. Concentrating it does not really help if you still take it orally, as the stomach breaks it down. You want it in the blood so it gets to the cancer cells intact.
 

Forum List

Back
Top