Cancer causing agent SV40 found in covid vaccines

Rust_Cohle

Diamond Member
Nov 6, 2021
5,805
6,423
1,938
[Redacted]
The actual study

https://osf.io/b9t7m/

Quote

“It’s in both Moderna and Pfizer. We looked at the bivalent vaccines for both Moderna and Pfizer and only the monovalent vaccines for Pfizer because we didn’t have access to monovalent vaccines for Moderna. In all three cases, the vaccines contain double-stranded DNA contamination. If you sequence that DNA, you’ll find that it matches what looks to be an expression vector that’s used to make the RNA…

“Whenever we see DNA contamination, like from plasmids, ending up in any injectable, the first thing people think about is whether there’s any E. coli endotoxin present because that creates anaphylaxis for the injected. And, of course, your viewers and listeners are probably aware there’s a lot of anaphylaxis going on, not only on TV but in the VAERS database. You can see people get injected with this and drop. That could be the background from this E. coli process of manufacturing the DNA…

“At least on the Pfizer side of things, it has what’s known as an SV40 promoter. This is an oncogenic virus piece. It’s not the entire virus. However, the small piece is known to drive very aggressive gene expression. And the concern that people, even at the FDA, have noted in the past whenever injecting double-stranded DNA is that these things can then integrate into the genome. If you’re not careful with how you manufacture these things, and you have excess amounts of this DNA, your concern for genome integration goes up…

“If you get an SV40 promoter in front of an oncogene, you will end up with a high expression of a gene that can drive cancer, it will be a very rare event, but you don’t need many of these cells to be hit with something like this for it to take off. SV40 actually plagued, granted it was the full viral genome, not just the promoter, but this has plagued previous vaccine programs. The polio vaccine is one of them that they were concerned that this may have contributed to cancer from that vaccine. So, there’s a history of being concerned over SV40.

“Having the promoter inside some of these vectors isn’t necessary. It seems to be superfluous oversight they could have eliminated, yet it’s still there because they ran this out the door so quickly, they didn’t really have time to get rid of superfluous parts of the plasmid. So, that piece of DNA is something we really need to pay attention to. We’ve made quantitative PCR assays to hunt for this. So several researchers around the globe are now running these assays to look for how much of this DNA is floating around after people have been vaccinated.”

Amfob85WV0iI.jpeg



Uh oh vaxxies??? Not looking good now. So on top of heart conditions you now run high risk of cancer. You were warned and instead you trusted Fauci and Biden. Enjoy your medical issues 👍
 
Well, isn't that special. If you are not genetically prone to cancer the vaccine will make sure you have a fighting chance to get it. Nothing like a versatile bio weapon.


I noticed there was a thread on this but it was closed due to improper posting which is now common place here. This is serious business and these things need to be known and challenged.
 
Well, isn't that special. If you are not genetically prone to cancer the vaccine will make sure you have a fighting chance to get it. Nothing like a versatile bio weapon.


I noticed there was a thread on this but it was closed due to improper posting which is now common place here. This is serious business and these things need to be known and challenged.
This serious business has been pre-castrated by media fascism, including the Twitter Gestapo. We've known about the SV40 for some time, it's not recent news. To prove it's not recent news, however, requires the internet history of publishing this news.

Reading prisoners can no longer follow the pioneers of this SV40/phage reporting without being identified. The major pioneers included McKernan and Jikky in Australia:


 
Well, isn't that special. If you are not genetically prone to cancer the vaccine will make sure you have a fighting chance to get it. Nothing like a versatile bio weapon.


I noticed there was a thread on this but it was closed due to improper posting which is now common place here. This is serious business and these things need to be known and challenged.

Oh look, the forum conspiracy nut has latched on to yet another conspiracy.

This is my shocked face --> :rolleyes:

 
Oh look, the forum conspiracy nut has latched on to yet another conspiracy.

This is my shocked face --> :rolleyes:

So the moderators hate scientific fact. Big fucking deal. No one values their opinions anyway.
 
The actual study

https://osf.io/b9t7m/

Quote

“It’s in both Moderna and Pfizer. We looked at the bivalent vaccines for both Moderna and Pfizer and only the monovalent vaccines for Pfizer because we didn’t have access to monovalent vaccines for Moderna. In all three cases, the vaccines contain double-stranded DNA contamination. If you sequence that DNA, you’ll find that it matches what looks to be an expression vector that’s used to make the RNA…

“Whenever we see DNA contamination, like from plasmids, ending up in any injectable, the first thing people think about is whether there’s any E. coli endotoxin present because that creates anaphylaxis for the injected. And, of course, your viewers and listeners are probably aware there’s a lot of anaphylaxis going on, not only on TV but in the VAERS database. You can see people get injected with this and drop. That could be the background from this E. coli process of manufacturing the DNA…

“At least on the Pfizer side of things, it has what’s known as an SV40 promoter. This is an oncogenic virus piece. It’s not the entire virus. However, the small piece is known to drive very aggressive gene expression. And the concern that people, even at the FDA, have noted in the past whenever injecting double-stranded DNA is that these things can then integrate into the genome. If you’re not careful with how you manufacture these things, and you have excess amounts of this DNA, your concern for genome integration goes up…

“If you get an SV40 promoter in front of an oncogene, you will end up with a high expression of a gene that can drive cancer, it will be a very rare event, but you don’t need many of these cells to be hit with something like this for it to take off. SV40 actually plagued, granted it was the full viral genome, not just the promoter, but this has plagued previous vaccine programs. The polio vaccine is one of them that they were concerned that this may have contributed to cancer from that vaccine. So, there’s a history of being concerned over SV40.

“Having the promoter inside some of these vectors isn’t necessary. It seems to be superfluous oversight they could have eliminated, yet it’s still there because they ran this out the door so quickly, they didn’t really have time to get rid of superfluous parts of the plasmid. So, that piece of DNA is something we really need to pay attention to. We’ve made quantitative PCR assays to hunt for this. So several researchers around the globe are now running these assays to look for how much of this DNA is floating around after people have been vaccinated.”

View attachment 802582


Uh oh vaxxies??? Not looking good now. So on top of heart conditions you now run high risk of cancer. You were warned and instead you trusted Fauci and Biden. Enjoy your medical issues 👍
It's nice to know these facts. However, we also know there are small chances of dying or having complications from any vaccine, including those given to infants and small children as they grow up. The question I have, is it a greater chance of catching cancer or heart problems than any of the child vaccines that can cause deaths too?
 
So the moderators hate scientific fact. Big fucking deal. No one values their opinions anyway.

LOL

This has nothing to do with moderators FruitLoops. This is just you, falling for yet another conspiracy.
 
Are you kidding? SV40 hasn't been used in vaccines since the early 1960's
They saw it on the internet, so it must be true.


Then, when none of the media bothers with the latest internet hoax, they'll say it's a big coverup and a conspiracy.

Wash, rinse, repeat. Such is life in a cult.
 
They saw it on the internet, so it must be true.


Then, when none of the media bothers with the latest internet hoax, they'll say it's a big coverup and a conspiracy.

Wash, rinse, repeat. Such is life in a cult.
Have you seen there was no fraud in 2020 on the internet? Hack, did you believe it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top