Interesting argument against the Ground Zero Mosque

What does all this nonsense have to do with the fact that Muslims are rude and dont give a fuck about whether or not this mosque is going to cause tons of problems where it is being built.

Nothing!


Its all a distraction from the fact that they dont care!

I have a feeling that WE are going to get tired of grabbing our ankles for Islam real soon.
:evil:
 
Until the source of the money is made "transparent", this project should be stopped.

Allowing Islamofascists to set up a victory monument (originally named Cordoba House - think about it) near Ground Zero is beyond insanity.

It's still called "Cordoba House".

And there's no legal basis for them to make the source "transparent".
 
How can anyone who is against this Mosque because the people behind it are Muslims speak about defending the Constitution again when they are so willingly wanting to tear it up to suit their agenda in this case?


You can say that all you want - but that doesn't make it true.

We want to know which Muslims are behind it. If it's the ones who support AQ and the spread of Sharia Law, then opposing it is perfectly consistent with Protecting The Constitution.
 
Last edited:
Until the source of the money is made "transparent", this project should be stopped.

Allowing Islamofascists to set up a victory monument (originally named Cordoba House - think about it) near Ground Zero is beyond insanity.

It's still called "Cordoba House".

And there's no legal basis for them to make the source "transparent".


I had heard they were changing the name - perhaps that is just a rumor.

When an enemy has declared war upon a country, a country has every right to make sure that that enemy is not engaged in an invasion.

As this is also a religious project for which tax exemption will most likely be sought, we also have the right to know if that exemption is valid based upon who is sponsoring and running the operation.
 
How can anyone who is against this Mosque because the people behind it are Muslims speak about defending the Constitution again when they are so willingly wanting to tear it up to suit their agenda in this case?


You can say that all you want - but that doesn't make it true.

We want to know which Muslims are behind it. If its the ones who support AQ and the spread of Sharia Law, then opposing it is perfectly consistent with Protecting The Constitution.

Well said.... Where is the money coming from? Why cant they answer that?

Plus... I say if all is on the up & up, let them do it, but it would be a really great oppurtunity for the Muslim world here in America to mend some fences by just choosing to build it elsewhere. What is so wrong with that? It would go a long way with me... and that is saying alot! (b/c as it stands, I cant stand them)
 
Until the source of the money is made "transparent", this project should be stopped.

Allowing Islamofascists to set up a victory monument (originally named Cordoba House - think about it) near Ground Zero is beyond insanity.

It's still called "Cordoba House".

And there's no legal basis for them to make the source "transparent".


I had heard they were changing the name - perhaps that is just a rumor.

When an enemy has declared war upon a country, a country has every right to make sure that that enemy is not engaged in an invasion.

As this is also a religious project for which tax exemption will most likely be sought, we also have the right to know if that exemption is valid based upon who is sponsoring and running the operation.

Except that's not the law.

But if you're convinced you're right, file a FOIA request. The organization has already been granted 501(c)3 status.

The Cordoba Initiative is what it's called.
 
do you think that is a longer list than what could be gathered of american christians pilphering the assholes of young children?
Please post the scripture they are following before you attribute it to "Christian behavior"


Deuteronomy 22:28-29 (King James Version)

28If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;

29Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.
Seek help ,context matters the rulings begin here.

Deuteronomy 22:13
 
It was reported on Fox News this AM that they are lying about this from the get go. They don't even own all the property they propose to build this shrine of everlasting peace on. Con Ed owns half of it. Con Ed is a public entity so the people should have a say so.. I vote NO.. build it anywhere but there. If they would lie about owning the property what else are they willing to lie about??
 
Until the source of the money is made "transparent", this project should be stopped.

Allowing Islamofascists to set up a victory monument (originally named Cordoba House - think about it) near Ground Zero is beyond insanity.

It's still called "Cordoba House".

And there's no legal basis for them to make the source "transparent".
it looks like the name has been changed

Cordoba House - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Park51???? :confused:
 
Until the source of the money is made "transparent", this project should be stopped.

Allowing Islamofascists to set up a victory monument (originally named Cordoba House - think about it) near Ground Zero is beyond insanity.

It's still called "Cordoba House".

And there's no legal basis for them to make the source "transparent".
it looks like the name has been changed

Cordoba House - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The website doesn't mention that.

Cordoba House - New York City | Cordoba
 

Forum List

Back
Top