This is simple, Doc. The SERVER WAS ILLEGAL, any republican with all the clearance in the world would have exposed the fact.What makes you think that the classified information on her server wasn't available to anyone else with the need to know?
You seem to be assuming that the information in Clinton's emails was not available by normal security clearance channels. What evidence do you have to support that claim?
You are the only person I've ever heard make this particular argument.
This wasn't some obscure technicality, it was blatant and willful what she had done......and she knew it. Like I said earlier, she wasn't stupid. If she had
been stupid, she would never of had it scrubbed, and you know that.
No, the server was not "illegal". There was no law against using private email at the time Clinton was SoS.
The theoretical charges of "mishandling classified information" have nothing to do with her private server - those same laws would apply had she sent classified information over her official state.gov email address.
I understand that these issues have often been conflated by the press.
Before
It's not "political BS", it's the way things work.
As I said before, feel free to give an example of someone who was charged under the Espionage Act through unintentional conduct.
You won't be able to, because it's never happened.
Slow that camel down. First it started with "intentional", now we're moving to "intentional under the Espionage Act",...maybe you ought to find someone else to play your game.
The Espionage Act is the law that makes mishandling classified information a crime. That's the law we're talking about, isn't it?
Nope, like I said: First it started with "intentional", now we're moving to "intentional under the Espionage Act".
There was no mention of Espionage Act, there was no mention of classified information....you only referred to "intent", as did I. Now piss off.
There's no need to whine, just because you lost track of the conversation.
What did you think we were talking about, if not Hillary Clinton and classified information?
Yeah, no need to move the goalpost either. Aside from that issue, what I find a bit troubling is that you are identified as a "senior mod". I would have thought a "mod" would have a lesser degree of bias, and not play games, but evidently that's not how things work. Needless to say, it was an interesting conversation, thanks.
I'm not moving any goalposts. I'm talking about the same thing I've been talking about since the beginning of this conversation - whether Hillary Clinton committed a crime.
As for your whining about me being a moderator - how very original.