If Trump meeting is illegal then Clinton dossier is as well

Mark my words. If Mueller tries reversing the election results then Trump WILL take down Clinton...they already have the evidence the investigation was already done she just wasn't charged because LITERALLY the FBI was on the payroll shit they were paying the idiot they were paying for the fake dirt on Trump!
 
If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too

How soon you leftists forget the Clinton Criminal Family actually PAID a British Spy who PAID RUSSIA for fake dirt on Trump...what Trump Jr SUPPOSEDLY talked about the Clinton Crime Family actually DID.
Not even close. There is a difference between hiring a professional to do research and and accepting an invitation from an enemy government who prefers one candidate over the other. The likelyhood of undue influence is extremely high in the second case.

Also remember that Steele, when he discovered just how damning the evidence was, went to the FBI with it while tRump lied about it repeatedly instead of reporting it as they should have.

There is no equivalency at all.
 
If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too

How soon you leftists forget the Clinton Criminal Family actually PAID a British Spy who PAID RUSSIA for fake dirt on Trump...what Trump Jr SUPPOSEDLY talked about the Clinton Crime Family actually DID.
Not even close. There is a difference between hiring a professional to do research and and accepting an invitation from an enemy government who prefers one candidate over the other. The likelyhood of undue influence is extremely high in the second case.

Also remember that Steele, when he discovered just how damning the evidence was, went to the FBI with it while tRump lied about it repeatedly instead of reporting it as they should have.

There is no equivalency at all.
Dumb ass they PAID a spy FOREIGN AT THAT who used those funds to PAY Russian Spies for FAKE evidence against Trump,THEN the FBI paid this FOREIGN SPY to do the same thing!
 
If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too

How soon you leftists forget the Clinton Criminal Family actually PAID a British Spy who PAID RUSSIA for fake dirt on Trump...what Trump Jr SUPPOSEDLY talked about the Clinton Crime Family actually DID.
Not even close. There is a difference between hiring a professional to do research and and accepting an invitation from an enemy government who prefers one candidate over the other. The likelyhood of undue influence is extremely high in the second case.

Also remember that Steele, when he discovered just how damning the evidence was, went to the FBI with it while tRump lied about it repeatedly instead of reporting it as they should have.

There is no equivalency at all.
So what did the Russians tell trump that was so danming?
What did they tell trump trump that toppled Hillary?
What??? That she has a fat ass?
 
If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too

How soon you leftists forget the Clinton Criminal Family actually PAID a British Spy who PAID RUSSIA for fake dirt on Trump...what Trump Jr SUPPOSEDLY talked about the Clinton Crime Family actually DID.
Not even close. There is a difference between hiring a professional to do research and and accepting an invitation from an enemy government who prefers one candidate over the other. The likelyhood of undue influence is extremely high in the second case.

Also remember that Steele, when he discovered just how damning the evidence was, went to the FBI with it while tRump lied about it repeatedly instead of reporting it as they should have.

There is no equivalency at all.
Dumb ass they PAID a spy FOREIGN AT THAT who used those funds to PAY Russian Spies for FAKE evidence against Trump,THEN the FBI paid this FOREIGN SPY to do the same thing!
You are drawing false equivalencies to try to excuse the behavior of tRump the lessor.
 
If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too

How soon you leftists forget the Clinton Criminal Family actually PAID a British Spy who PAID RUSSIA for fake dirt on Trump...what Trump Jr SUPPOSEDLY talked about the Clinton Crime Family actually DID.
Turley's of course right. Not to say "I told you so" but he says it much more clearly than I. HOWEVER he doesn't discuss the substance of the meeting. Trump admitted the Maginsky Act was brought up by the Russian "lobbyist"/spy. They WANTED SOMETHING FROM TRUMP.

That's a whole different animal from a campaign, ANY CAMPAIGN, paying an investigator to pay others for information, even paying intelligence officials of a foreign govt. Anyone should be able to do that, and as Turley "hypothesizes" to criminalize that would have serious 1st Amendment problems.

The question for Mueller is whether there's evidence tending to show that Trump "conspired" with Russia to affect US policy for help OR whether there's evidence tending to show Trump knowingly used illegally hacked information. Those things are crimes above and separate from stupidly meeting with Russians instead of sending a "cutout," like Steel.
 
If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too

How soon you leftists forget the Clinton Criminal Family actually PAID a British Spy who PAID RUSSIA for fake dirt on Trump...what Trump Jr SUPPOSEDLY talked about the Clinton Crime Family actually DID.
Turley's of course right. Not to say "I told you so" but he says it much more clearly than I. HOWEVER he doesn't discuss the substance of the meeting. Trump admitted the Maginsky Act was brought up by the Russian "lobbyist"/spy. They WANTED SOMETHING FROM TRUMP.

That's a whole different animal from a campaign, ANY CAMPAIGN, paying an investigator to pay others for information, even paying intelligence officials of a foreign govt. Anyone should be able to do that, and as Turley "hypothesizes" to criminalize that would have serious 1st Amendment problems.

The question for Mueller is whether there's evidence tending to show that Trump "conspired" with Russia to affect US policy for help OR whether there's evidence tending to show Trump knowingly used illegally hacked information. Those things are crimes above and separate from stupidly meeting with Russians instead of sending a "cutout," like Steel.
Trump is doing a SHITTY job of befriending Russia by asking NATO to increase their funding,slapping sanctions on Russia and Russians,expelling Russian diplomats from the USA etc etc.
 
If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too

How soon you leftists forget the Clinton Criminal Family actually PAID a British Spy who PAID RUSSIA for fake dirt on Trump...what Trump Jr SUPPOSEDLY talked about the Clinton Crime Family actually DID.
Turley's of course right. Not to say "I told you so" but he says it much more clearly than I. HOWEVER he doesn't discuss the substance of the meeting. Trump admitted the Maginsky Act was brought up by the Russian "lobbyist"/spy. They WANTED SOMETHING FROM TRUMP.

That's a whole different animal from a campaign, ANY CAMPAIGN, paying an investigator to pay others for information, even paying intelligence officials of a foreign govt. Anyone should be able to do that, and as Turley "hypothesizes" to criminalize that would have serious 1st Amendment problems.

The question for Mueller is whether there's evidence tending to show that Trump "conspired" with Russia to affect US policy for help OR whether there's evidence tending to show Trump knowingly used illegally hacked information. Those things are crimes above and separate from stupidly meeting with Russians instead of sending a "cutout," like Steel.
Trump is doing a SHITTY job of befriending Russia by asking NATO to increase their funding,slapping sanctions on Russia and Russians,expelling Russian diplomats from the USA etc etc.
Whatever, Trumbot
 
If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too

How soon you leftists forget the Clinton Criminal Family actually PAID a British Spy who PAID RUSSIA for fake dirt on Trump...what Trump Jr SUPPOSEDLY talked about the Clinton Crime Family actually DID.


mark my words you moron ..

:haha:
Well, I'm curious to see what, if anything, Mueller has to show Trump promised a quid pro quo or knew he was using information illegally obtained to further his interests.
 
If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too

How soon you leftists forget the Clinton Criminal Family actually PAID a British Spy who PAID RUSSIA for fake dirt on Trump...what Trump Jr SUPPOSEDLY talked about the Clinton Crime Family actually DID.
Not even close. There is a difference between hiring a professional to do research and and accepting an invitation from an enemy government who prefers one candidate over the other. The likelyhood of undue influence is extremely high in the second case.

Also remember that Steele, when he discovered just how damning the evidence was, went to the FBI with it while tRump lied about it repeatedly instead of reporting it as they should have.

There is no equivalency at all.
Dumb ass they PAID a spy FOREIGN AT THAT who used those funds to PAY Russian Spies for FAKE evidence against Trump,THEN the FBI paid this FOREIGN SPY to do the same thing!

An ex-foreign spy who had worked with and alongside US spies in the past.
 
If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too

How soon you leftists forget the Clinton Criminal Family actually PAID a British Spy who PAID RUSSIA for fake dirt on Trump...what Trump Jr SUPPOSEDLY talked about the Clinton Crime Family actually DID.
Turley's of course right. Not to say "I told you so" but he says it much more clearly than I. HOWEVER he doesn't discuss the substance of the meeting. Trump admitted the Maginsky Act was brought up by the Russian "lobbyist"/spy. They WANTED SOMETHING FROM TRUMP.

That's a whole different animal from a campaign, ANY CAMPAIGN, paying an investigator to pay others for information, even paying intelligence officials of a foreign govt. Anyone should be able to do that, and as Turley "hypothesizes" to criminalize that would have serious 1st Amendment problems.

The question for Mueller is whether there's evidence tending to show that Trump "conspired" with Russia to affect US policy for help OR whether there's evidence tending to show Trump knowingly used illegally hacked information. Those things are crimes above and separate from stupidly meeting with Russians instead of sending a "cutout," like Steel.
Trump is doing a SHITTY job of befriending Russia by asking NATO to increase their funding,slapping sanctions on Russia and Russians,expelling Russian diplomats from the USA etc etc.
Whatever, Trumbot
BRILLIANT REPLY!
 
If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too

How soon you leftists forget the Clinton Criminal Family actually PAID a British Spy who PAID RUSSIA for fake dirt on Trump...what Trump Jr SUPPOSEDLY talked about the Clinton Crime Family actually DID.
Not even close. There is a difference between hiring a professional to do research and and accepting an invitation from an enemy government who prefers one candidate over the other. The likelyhood of undue influence is extremely high in the second case.

Also remember that Steele, when he discovered just how damning the evidence was, went to the FBI with it while tRump lied about it repeatedly instead of reporting it as they should have.

There is no equivalency at all.
Dumb ass they PAID a spy FOREIGN AT THAT who used those funds to PAY Russian Spies for FAKE evidence against Trump,THEN the FBI paid this FOREIGN SPY to do the same thing!

An ex-foreign spy who had worked with and alongside US spies in the past.
And? Doesn't make it LEGAL nor Moral or Ethical to pay a foreign spy who paid more foreign spies including ones from countries you leftists are whining meddled in the election to get dirt on your opponent.
 
If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too

How soon you leftists forget the Clinton Criminal Family actually PAID a British Spy who PAID RUSSIA for fake dirt on Trump...what Trump Jr SUPPOSEDLY talked about the Clinton Crime Family actually DID.
Turley's of course right. Not to say "I told you so" but he says it much more clearly than I. HOWEVER he doesn't discuss the substance of the meeting. Trump admitted the Maginsky Act was brought up by the Russian "lobbyist"/spy. They WANTED SOMETHING FROM TRUMP.

That's a whole different animal from a campaign, ANY CAMPAIGN, paying an investigator to pay others for information, even paying intelligence officials of a foreign govt. Anyone should be able to do that, and as Turley "hypothesizes" to criminalize that would have serious 1st Amendment problems.

The question for Mueller is whether there's evidence tending to show that Trump "conspired" with Russia to affect US policy for help OR whether there's evidence tending to show Trump knowingly used illegally hacked information. Those things are crimes above and separate from stupidly meeting with Russians instead of sending a "cutout," like Steel.
Trump is doing a SHITTY job of befriending Russia by asking NATO to increase their funding,slapping sanctions on Russia and Russians,expelling Russian diplomats from the USA etc etc.
Whatever, Trumbot
BRILLIANT REPLY!
There was nothing else to be said, Trumpbot. Either evidence will show Trump conspired with Putin to gain illegal advantage or Trump illegally tried to hide connections ... or evidence won't show.
 
If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too

How soon you leftists forget the Clinton Criminal Family actually PAID a British Spy who PAID RUSSIA for fake dirt on Trump...what Trump Jr SUPPOSEDLY talked about the Clinton Crime Family actually DID.
Not even close. There is a difference between hiring a professional to do research and and accepting an invitation from an enemy government who prefers one candidate over the other. The likelyhood of undue influence is extremely high in the second case.

Also remember that Steele, when he discovered just how damning the evidence was, went to the FBI with it while tRump lied about it repeatedly instead of reporting it as they should have.

There is no equivalency at all.
Dumb ass they PAID a spy FOREIGN AT THAT who used those funds to PAY Russian Spies for FAKE evidence against Trump,THEN the FBI paid this FOREIGN SPY to do the same thing!

An ex-foreign spy who had worked with and alongside US spies in the past.
And? Doesn't make it LEGAL nor Moral or Ethical to pay a foreign spy who paid more foreign spies including ones from countries you leftists are whining meddled in the election to get dirt on your opponent.

The question here is that we don't really know what's going on.

Digging up dirt on your opponents isn't illegal.

But interference from foreign governments is.

So, if you go ask some Brit for information. Then it's okay.

If you go ask the Russian government for stuff, then that's entirely different.
 
Did I get side tracked? the investigations intent is to show that Russia interfered in our election to advance its own agenda, cause a divide & create a weaker America. some may think or have made it a personal attack against Trump, when the reality is a need to safeguard America against out side interference.
 
If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too

How soon you leftists forget the Clinton Criminal Family actually PAID a British Spy who PAID RUSSIA for fake dirt on Trump...what Trump Jr SUPPOSEDLY talked about the Clinton Crime Family actually DID.
Not even close. There is a difference between hiring a professional to do research and and accepting an invitation from an enemy government who prefers one candidate over the other. The likelyhood of undue influence is extremely high in the second case.

Also remember that Steele, when he discovered just how damning the evidence was, went to the FBI with it while tRump lied about it repeatedly instead of reporting it as they should have.

There is no equivalency at all.
Dumb ass they PAID a spy FOREIGN AT THAT who used those funds to PAY Russian Spies for FAKE evidence against Trump,THEN the FBI paid this FOREIGN SPY to do the same thing!

An ex-foreign spy who had worked with and alongside US spies in the past.
And? Doesn't make it LEGAL nor Moral or Ethical to pay a foreign spy who paid more foreign spies including ones from countries you leftists are whining meddled in the election to get dirt on your opponent.

The question here is that we don't really know what's going on.

Digging up dirt on your opponents isn't illegal.

But interference from foreign governments is.

So, if you go ask some Brit for information. Then it's okay.

If you go ask the Russian government for stuff, then that's entirely different.

Well, I think anyone can ask anyone what they know. Or should be able to. That's the point of Turley's piece linked to the OP

But Turley didn't address whether its ok to ask for illegally obtained information and use it, or whether to agree to change US policy to get something. Not that its proven Trump did any of that.
 
If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too

How soon you leftists forget the Clinton Criminal Family actually PAID a British Spy who PAID RUSSIA for fake dirt on Trump...what Trump Jr SUPPOSEDLY talked about the Clinton Crime Family actually DID.
Not even close. There is a difference between hiring a professional to do research and and accepting an invitation from an enemy government who prefers one candidate over the other. The likelyhood of undue influence is extremely high in the second case.

Also remember that Steele, when he discovered just how damning the evidence was, went to the FBI with it while tRump lied about it repeatedly instead of reporting it as they should have.

There is no equivalency at all.
Who accepted an invitation from an enemy government? A Russian music industry individual approached the Trump camp and suggested he could put them together with someone who had dirt on the Hildebeast, who turned out to be the babe Russian attorney, and no such dirt was forthcoming in the meeting. If it had been however the Trump camp could have used it and not broken any law.

Inconvenient truths are a bitch sometimes, huh?
 

Forum List

Back
Top