If Obama had 6 kids from 3 different women...

[Carla_Danger]

Imagine the double standard, where you would defend Obama's having 6 kids with three different women, but knock Trump for the same. And if we dared attack Obama for it, you would call us racists.

Can it. Hypocrite.

Huh?

HUH

Can you not read and comprehend? Try harder.

What you've posted makes no sense because the left hasn't been attacking The Donald over this issue....BUT HAD IT BEEN THE OTHER WAY AROUND, NOW THAT'S A DIFFERENT STORY, isn't it?

 

[ptbw forever]

Imagine the double standard, where you would defend Obama's having 6 kids with three different women, but knock Trump for the same. And if we dared attack Obama for it, you would call us racists.

Can it. Hypocrite.

Huh?

HUH

Can you not read and comprehend? Try harder.

What you've posted makes no sense because the left hasn't been attacking The Donald over this issue....BUT HAD IT BEEN THE OTHER WAY AROUND, NOW THAT'S A DIFFERENT STORY, isn't it?

Damn you are dumb.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Imagine the double standard, where you would defend Obama's having 6 kids with three different women, but knock Trump for the same. And if we dared attack Obama for it, you would call us racists.

Can it. Hypocrite.

I wouldn't defend it.

Yet here you are... defending it.

He bangs republicans because no democrats are that hot

 

[TemplarKormac]

Imagine the double standard, where you would defend Obama's having 6 kids with three different women, but knock Trump for the same. And if we dared attack Obama for it, you would call us racists.

Can it. Hypocrite.

Huh?

HUH

Can you not read and comprehend? Try harder.

What you've posted makes no sense because the left hasn't been attacking The Donald over this issue....BUT HAD IT BEEN THE OTHER WAY AROUND, NOW THAT'S A DIFFERENT STORY, isn't it?

Sure, and posting in caps will make your point clearer. Is there one you're trying to make?

 

[Carla_Danger]

Imagine the double standard, where you would defend Obama's having 6 kids with three different women, but knock Trump for the same. And if we dared attack Obama for it, you would call us racists.

Can it. Hypocrite.

I wouldn't defend it.

Yet here you are... defending it.

I am? How?

Oh you're not? Well damn. I'm glad you agree it's fucked up.

Well it is. But it is also irrelevant. Not your place or mine to judge. Also, why are we even focusing on this? What bearing on American politics could this possibly have?

Now that is rich! I think we all know how the right would have reacted to Obama having children with 3 different wives.

Not your place or mine to judge...LOL!

 

[TemplarKormac]

Imagine the double standard, where you would defend Obama's having 6 kids with three different women, but knock Trump for the same. And if we dared attack Obama for it, you would call us racists.

Can it. Hypocrite.

I wouldn't defend it.

Yet here you are... defending it.

I am? How?

Oh you're not? Well damn. I'm glad you agree it's fucked up.

Well it is. But it is also irrelevant. Not your place or mine to judge. Also, why are we even focusing on this? What bearing on American politics could this possibly have?

Now that is rich! I think we all know how the right would have reacted to Obama having children with 3 different wives.

Not your place or mine to judge...LOL!

I personally don't care what someone does in their private life. But here you are, judging "the right" for what you "know" would have been their reaction to Obama having three different wives. You're as much of a judge as Marilyn Mosby is an Attorney General.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Imagine the double standard, where you would defend Obama's having 6 kids with three different women, but knock Trump for the same. And if we dared attack Obama for it, you would call us racists.

Can it. Hypocrite.

I wouldn't defend it.

Yet here you are... defending it.

He bangs republicans because no democrats are that hot

Seems like he prefers to bang foreigners

 

[Carla_Danger]

There you have it OldSchool...they wouldn't have said a damn thing about it. Who are they to judge. LMAO!

 

[bill718]

...what would republicans say about him? Can you imagine the vicious attacks against his character that he would have faced?

Yep, and I can imagine pooka dotted unicorns too.

You are a retard.

Pooka Dotted? It's polka dotted, little guy. You left out the L. Who is the retard now?? ( You're not winning many of these...are you??)

 

[ptbw forever]

...what would republicans say about him? Can you imagine the vicious attacks against his character that he would have faced?

Yep, and I can imagine pooka dotted unicorns too.

You are a retard.

Pooka Dotted? It's polka dotted, little guy. You left out the L. Who is the retard now?? ( You're not winning many of these...are you??)

On the contrary, I win ALL of these.
Observe:


Polka is a type of music, not a dot.

I can imagine whatever I want anyway.

 

[bill718]

...what would republicans say about him? Can you imagine the vicious attacks against his character that he would have faced?

Yep, and I can imagine pooka dotted unicorns too.

You are a retard.

Pooka Dotted? It's polka dotted, little guy. You left out the L. Who is the retard now?? ( You're not winning many of these...are you??)

On the contrary, I win ALL of these.


Polka is a type of music, not a dot.

I refuse to spell it the same way.

Look it up in the dictionary, Google or anywhere else. Polka Dot is the correct spelling

Final Score: Liberals - 1 Conservatives - 0 (Again!!)

 

[ptbw forever]

...what would republicans say about him? Can you imagine the vicious attacks against his character that he would have faced?

Yep, and I can imagine pooka dotted unicorns too.

You are a retard.

Pooka Dotted? It's polka dotted, little guy. You left out the L. Who is the retard now?? ( You're not winning many of these...are you??)

On the contrary, I win ALL of these.


Polka is a type of music, not a dot.

I refuse to spell it the same way.

Look it up in the dictionary, Google or anywhere else. Polka Dot is the correct spelling

Final Score: Liberals - 1 Conservatives - 0 (Again!!)

You didn't pay close attention to my post.

I can imagine whatever type of unicorns I want.

I imagined pooka dotted ones.

 

[Asclepias]

Why are we focusing on this? I was just throwing it out there. It seems like YOU'RE the one focusing on it.

You're the one who posted the thread. Your move, smart-mouth.

My move? I made the move with the OP. What would you have said about Obama if he'd had 6 children from 3 different women? I dare you to answer.

I did. If you aren't satisfied with my answer, that's not my problem. If you thought this wasn't such an issue, why did you "throw it out there"? Why critique me for focusing on it? Your is a trap question with no right answer.

I will say that people would still have voted for him one way or another, just like people will vote for Trump. Personally, I don't approve of Trump's marital affairs, but that's not what influences my vote, in fact that's the very last thing I would consider. Instead of discussing policy, you're stirring the pot of shit. I'm interested in Trump's policy positions, not his familial situation.

So you guys are OK with having a skank as a FLOTUS too? Where did all those repub values go?

 

[buckeye45_73]

Why are we focusing on this? I was just throwing it out there. It seems like YOU'RE the one focusing on it.

You're the one who posted the thread. Your move, smart-mouth.

My move? I made the move with the OP. What would you have said about Obama if he'd had 6 children from 3 different women? I dare you to answer.

I did. If you aren't satisfied with my answer, that's not my problem. If you thought this wasn't such an issue, why did you "throw it out there"? Why critique me for focusing on it? Your is a trap question with no right answer.

I will say that people would still have voted for him one way or another, just like people will vote for Trump. Personally, I don't approve of Trump's marital affairs, but that's not what influences my vote, in fact that's the very last thing I would consider. Instead of discussing policy, you're stirring the pot of shit. I'm interested in Trump's policy positions, not his familial situation.

So you guys are OK with having a skank as a FLOTUS too? Where did all those repub values go?

How is she a skank? Because she's hot....she can't help democrats are fucking ugly

And we've survived screech and mooch.

 

[ptbw forever]

Why are we focusing on this? I was just throwing it out there. It seems like YOU'RE the one focusing on it.

You're the one who posted the thread. Your move, smart-mouth.

My move? I made the move with the OP. What would you have said about Obama if he'd had 6 children from 3 different women? I dare you to answer.

I did. If you aren't satisfied with my answer, that's not my problem. If you thought this wasn't such an issue, why did you "throw it out there"? Why critique me for focusing on it? Your is a trap question with no right answer.

I will say that people would still have voted for him one way or another, just like people will vote for Trump. Personally, I don't approve of Trump's marital affairs, but that's not what influences my vote, in fact that's the very last thing I would consider. Instead of discussing policy, you're stirring the pot of shit. I'm interested in Trump's policy positions, not his familial situation.

So you guys are OK with having a skank as a FLOTUS too? Where did all those repub values go?

There is nothing skanky about Melania.

 

[bill718]

...what would republicans say about him? Can you imagine the vicious attacks against his character that he would have faced?

Yep, and I can imagine pooka dotted unicorns too.

You are a retard.

Pooka Dotted? It's polka dotted, little guy. You left out the L. Who is the retard now?? ( You're not winning many of these...are you??)

On the contrary, I win ALL of these.


Polka is a type of music, not a dot.

I refuse to spell it the same way.

Look it up in the dictionary, Google or anywhere else. Polka Dot is the correct spelling

Final Score: Liberals - 1 Conservatives - 0 (Again!!)

You didn't pay close attention to my post.

I can imagine whatever type of unicorns I want.

I imagined pooka dotted ones.

I paid very close attention to your post, and understood what you were trying to say...you just didn't spell it correctly. So, let's just quit while I'm ahead.

 

[Asclepias]

Why are we focusing on this? I was just throwing it out there. It seems like YOU'RE the one focusing on it.

You're the one who posted the thread. Your move, smart-mouth.

My move? I made the move with the OP. What would you have said about Obama if he'd had 6 children from 3 different women? I dare you to answer.

I did. If you aren't satisfied with my answer, that's not my problem. If you thought this wasn't such an issue, why did you "throw it out there"? Why critique me for focusing on it? Your is a trap question with no right answer.

I will say that people would still have voted for him one way or another, just like people will vote for Trump. Personally, I don't approve of Trump's marital affairs, but that's not what influences my vote, in fact that's the very last thing I would consider. Instead of discussing policy, you're stirring the pot of shit. I'm interested in Trump's policy positions, not his familial situation.

So you guys are OK with having a skank as a FLOTUS too? Where did all those repub values go?

How is she a skank? Because she's hot....she can't help democrats are fucking ugly

And we've survived screech and mooch.

Skanks arent hot. Theyre just trashy. A FLOTUS shouldnt have her bare ass floating around on the internet.

 

[bill718]

You're the one who posted the thread. Your move, smart-mouth.

My move? I made the move with the OP. What would you have said about Obama if he'd had 6 children from 3 different women? I dare you to answer.

I did. If you aren't satisfied with my answer, that's not my problem. If you thought this wasn't such an issue, why did you "throw it out there"? Why critique me for focusing on it? Your is a trap question with no right answer.

I will say that people would still have voted for him one way or another, just like people will vote for Trump. Personally, I don't approve of Trump's marital affairs, but that's not what influences my vote, in fact that's the very last thing I would consider. Instead of discussing policy, you're stirring the pot of shit. I'm interested in Trump's policy positions, not his familial situation.

So you guys are OK with having a skank as a FLOTUS too? Where did all those repub values go?

How is she a skank? Because she's hot....she can't help democrats are fucking ugly

And we've survived screech and mooch.

Skanks arent hot. Theyre just trashy. A FLOTUS shouldnt have her bare ass floating around on the internet.

Let us not attack wives.

 

[Asclepias]

Why are we focusing on this? I was just throwing it out there. It seems like YOU'RE the one focusing on it.

You're the one who posted the thread. Your move, smart-mouth.

My move? I made the move with the OP. What would you have said about Obama if he'd had 6 children from 3 different women? I dare you to answer.

I did. If you aren't satisfied with my answer, that's not my problem. If you thought this wasn't such an issue, why did you "throw it out there"? Why critique me for focusing on it? Your is a trap question with no right answer.

I will say that people would still have voted for him one way or another, just like people will vote for Trump. Personally, I don't approve of Trump's marital affairs, but that's not what influences my vote, in fact that's the very last thing I would consider. Instead of discussing policy, you're stirring the pot of shit. I'm interested in Trump's policy positions, not his familial situation.

So you guys are OK with having a skank as a FLOTUS too? Where did all those repub values go?

There is nothing skanky about Melania.

I forgot you have very very low standards.

 

[Asclepias]

My move? I made the move with the OP. What would you have said about Obama if he'd had 6 children from 3 different women? I dare you to answer.

I did. If you aren't satisfied with my answer, that's not my problem. If you thought this wasn't such an issue, why did you "throw it out there"? Why critique me for focusing on it? Your is a trap question with no right answer.

I will say that people would still have voted for him one way or another, just like people will vote for Trump. Personally, I don't approve of Trump's marital affairs, but that's not what influences my vote, in fact that's the very last thing I would consider. Instead of discussing policy, you're stirring the pot of shit. I'm interested in Trump's policy positions, not his familial situation.

So you guys are OK with having a skank as a FLOTUS too? Where did all those repub values go?

How is she a skank? Because she's hot....she can't help democrats are fucking ugly

And we've survived screech and mooch.

Skanks arent hot. Theyre just trashy. A FLOTUS shouldnt have her bare ass floating around on the internet.

Let us not attack wives.

Mail order or just regular ones?