I was always leery of hydrochloroquine

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

neither do you , because you refuse to, despite all evidence posted

but then, you're not here for that John


~S~

So are you but what about me? You are a poser, sparkilicious, nothing more.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Didn't read the articles John?

well allow me to provide a synopsis

the WHO declared HQC a danger based on ONE lancet study

Lancet REDACTED it

You're WHO science was thrown under the bus

~S~

Thats not accurate. The negative side effects of it have been known for a long time

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

neither do you , because you refuse to, despite all evidence posted

but then, you're not here for that John


~S~

 

[MarathonMike]

IOW, to ignore medical and scientific advice is stupid. Drink the bleach, stick the wand light up your ass, eat the paste.

Do you just repeat stupid Democrat sound bytes?

 

[MarathonMike]

Thats not accurate. The negative side effects of it have been known for a long time

The positive effects of HCQ and Ivermectin were systematically suppressed by the WHO and the rest of the Big Pharma Vax Coalition.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The positive effects of HCQ and Ivermectin were systematically suppressed by the WHO and the rest of the Big Pharma Vax Coalition.

Regarding covid? That's an idiotic lie. You should be ashamed of yourself.

 

[MarathonMike]

Regarding covid? That's an idiotic lie. You should be ashamed of yourself.

If you would do some research rather than just let loose with another nasty response you would know that is true. All we heard from your Covid masters was HCQ was bleach and Ivermectin was horse de-wormer. A countless number of people suffered and died unnecessarily from Big Pharma's smear campaign.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If you would do some research rather than just let loose with another nasty response you would know that is true. All we heard from your Covid masters was HCQ was bleach and Ivermectin was horse de-wormer. A countless number of people suffered and died unnecessarily from Big Pharma's smear campaign.

You are spreading dangerous lies and should be ashamed of yourself. Truly shameful.

 

[MarathonMike]

You are spreading dangerous lies and should be ashamed of yourself. Truly shameful.

Read this, oh faithful Fauci minion.

Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has shown efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in some but not all studies. We hypothesized that a systematic review would show HCQ to be effective against COVID-19, more effective when provided earlier, not associated ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[sparky]

Thats not accurate. The negative side effects of it have been known for a long time

All medications have side effects that studies reveal FFI

HQC and it's derivatives all have their studies available, along with the redacted one i posted

Conversely , our FDA locked Pfizer's studies away for 70 years, then took it off the market

Pfizer does not want their medications 'negative side effects' know

Pfizer , who has been hit by multiple past big $$$$ lawsuits, may be facing their biggest yet

But i digress, , you want to hang your hat on negative side effects?

Then you'd need to KNOW what they are .....

~S~

 

[sparky]

If you would do some research rather than just let loose with another nasty response you would know that is true. All we heard from your Covid masters was HCQ was bleach and Ivermectin was horse de-wormer. A countless number of people suffered and died unnecessarily from Big Pharma's smear campaign.

Devolving into ad hominems and non sequiturs while faced with facts would get one booted off a HS debate Mike

Not allowing them to drag their opponent down to their level makes their defeat even more obvious

Big Pharma needs better help to win this one......
~S~

 

[krichton]

From march 2020...... to Oct 2020

Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has shown efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in some but not all studies. We hypothesized that a systematic review would show HCQ to be effective against COVID-19, more effective when provided earlier, not associated ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

HCQ was found to be consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting. It was also found to be overall effective in inpatient studies. No unbiased study found worse outcomes with HCQ use. No mortality or serious safety adverse events were found. HCQ is consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting, it is overall effective against COVID-19, it has not produced worsening of disease and it is safe.

~S~

"Studies." Pooling together a bunch of tiny and flawed "studies" with a few ppl in each case is not how you conduct a real study. Actual studies using randomized double blind tests with hundreds of ppl have been conducted to test the effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine, and none have come back to confirm it's effectiveness against covid. There isn't a government in the world that used hydroxy as part of their treatment protocols to treat covid. Some have tried and concluded it was snake oil, very quickly. The only place where hydroxy is widely accepted as a treatment is on facebook. These are old conspiracy theories. Find something new.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30389-8/fulltext

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2016638

Azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine in hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19: a randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled trial - PubMed

The combination of azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine did not improve survival or length of hospitalisation in patients with COVID-19.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2012410 (this one isn't a randomized double blind but just observational study)

 

[sparky]

"Studies." Pooling together a bunch of tiny and flawed "studies" with a few ppl in each case is not how you conduct a real study. Actual studies using randomized double blind tests with hundreds of ppl have been conducted to test the effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine, and none have come back to confirm it's effectiveness against covid. There isn't a government in the world that used hydroxy as part of their treatment protocols to treat covid. Some have tried and concluded it was snake oil, very quickly. The only place where hydroxy is widely accepted as a treatment is on facebook. These are old conspiracy theories. Find something new.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30389-8/fulltext

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2016638

Azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine in hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19: a randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled trial - PubMed

The combination of azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine did not improve survival or length of hospitalisation in patients with COVID-19.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2012410 (this one isn't a randomized double blind but just observational study)

Yes, we can find pro & con studies Kritch
Even fauci's NIH admits to this>

Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has shown efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in some but not all studies. We hypothesized that a systematic review would show HCQ to be effective against COVID-19, more effective when provided earlier, not associated ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A total of 43 reports were found that examined HCQ treatment for COVID-19 patients. Twenty-five reported positive clinical efficacy from providing HCQ to for COVID-19 patients; 15 showed no improvement with HCQ and three showed worse clinical results in patients who received HCQ

Some (lancet) have redacted their studies

~S~

 

[PeterPilot]

You are spreading dangerous lies and should be ashamed of yourself. Truly shameful.

He is speaking the truth, and we know that in a time of universal deception (now), speaking the truth is a radical act.

You are frightened by the truth, you cannot handle the truth, hence your response.

 

[krichton]

Yes, we can find pro & con studies Kritch
Even fauci's NIH admits to this>

Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has shown efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in some but not all studies. We hypothesized that a systematic review would show HCQ to be effective against COVID-19, more effective when provided earlier, not associated ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A total of 43 reports were found that examined HCQ treatment for COVID-19 patients. Twenty-five reported positive clinical efficacy from providing HCQ to for COVID-19 patients; 15 showed no improvement with HCQ and three showed worse clinical results in patients who received HCQ

Some (lancet) have redacted their studies

~S~

The 43 observational studies you point to are inconclusive, unsurprising because they're just observational and not actual studies. You have some observations showing improvement and some showing none. That doesn't tell us jack shit about efficacy. This is why we need to only rely on randomized double blind studies or at least randomized controlled studies, all of which have come back showing us that HCQ doesn't do anything against covid.

The NIH has said that HCQ doesn't work! Stop drinking the koolaid. It's over.

 

[sparky]

The 43 observational studies you point to are inconclusive, unsurprising because they're just observational and not actual studies. You have some observations showing improvement and some showing none. That doesn't tell us jack shit about efficacy. This is why we need to only rely on randomized double blind studies or at least randomized controlled studies, all of which have come back showing us that HCQ doesn't do anything against covid.

The NIH has said that HCQ doesn't work! Stop drinking the koolaid. It's over.

Realize the WHO based their HCQ stance on just that Krich,

An observational study via Lancet

Said 'Lancet' study has been redacted

REDACTED

IF you had read the thread, you'd have know this

~S~

 

[krichton]

Realize the WHO based their HCQ stance on just that Krich,

An observational study via Lancet

Said 'Lancet' study has been redacted

REDACTED

IF you had read the thread, you'd have know this

~S~

It's over. There isn't a single government or health agency in the world prescribing hcq as a treatment against Covid. There's no proof it works any better than injecting disinfectant to kill covid. Facebook doctors are the only ppl still prescribing it.

 

[sparky]

There's no proof it works any better than injecting disinfectant to kill covid.

Neither does Fauci's snake oil Kritch

you know, the s.o.b. that had a hand in creating C19

the fool that's lying to Congress , and heavily guarded via SS

It starting to sound like it'll be over for him soon....

~S~

 

[sjay]

All medications have side effects that studies reveal FFI

HQC and it's derivatives all have their studies available, along with the redacted one i posted

Conversely , our FDA locked Pfizer's studies away for 70 years, then took it off the market

Pfizer does not want their medications 'negative side effects' know

Pfizer , who has been hit by multiple past big $$$$ lawsuits, may be facing their biggest yet

But i digress, , you want to hang your hat on negative side effects?

Then you'd need to KNOW what they are .....

~S~

still spreading more lies sparky alias chicken steve, phizer vaccine is still available and effective 99.9% of doctors and scientists back vaccines for covid

 

[PeterPilot]

Regarding covid? That's an idiotic lie. You should be ashamed of yourself.

You've been asleep at the switch FFI. RFK Jr. covered all that in his book, with copious footnotes and references.