- Aug 8, 2016
- 26,316
- 25,447
- 2,445
I thought so too....but apparently, if one "cleverly" bypasses that by calling a poster a "groomer" instead of the word "pedophile", it's ok.
Your fake outrage is fake.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I thought so too....but apparently, if one "cleverly" bypasses that by calling a poster a "groomer" instead of the word "pedophile", it's ok.
#ThreadKill
I thought so too....but apparently, if one "cleverly" bypasses that by calling a poster a "groomer" instead of the word "pedophile", it's ok.
I dunno. A certain (protected) poster has recently cast that unbelievably offensive accusation at me directly and frequently. No consequence. In fact, I got a warning for mentioning it to a mod.I thought so too....but apparently, if one "cleverly" bypasses that by calling a poster a "groomer" instead of the word "pedophile", it's ok.
Unless they are possessed of course.Schools can't talk.
Well that's an interesting take. You believing that being called a pedophile is "fake outrage".
Do we have a TOS against calling INCELs out?Do you think people here like being called "incell" all the time?
You can dish it, but can't take it.
Schools can't talk.I have an idea. Stop supporting schools talking to kids about mutilating their bodies before they reach the age of majority and I won't call you a groomer.
That's telling.I dunno. A certain (protected) poster has recently cast that unbelievably offensive accusation at me directly and frequently. No consequence. In fact, I got a warning for mentioning it to a mod.
And is there a TOS note about calling a white-wing terrorist a white-wing terrorist?
Well that's an interesting take. You believing that being called a pedophile is "fake outrage".
Do we have a TOS against calling INCELs out?
And is there a TOS note about calling a white-wing terrorist a white-wing terrorist?
I'd expand upon that to include those who would support, and foster the creation of spaces, or practices, that give shelter to those who would be inclined to engage in grooming. They are co-conspirators, and just as guilty.
Clearly this is rhetorical...why is it still allowed when posters are called "groomers'.
Ok...then I will post accordingly.We don't have a TOS against calling people groomers.
Or traitor
Or domestic terrorist.
Grow up
Ok...then I will post accordingly.
I thought so too....but apparently, if one "cleverly" bypasses that by calling a poster a "groomer" instead of the word "pedophile", it's ok.