Natural Citizen
American Made
- Aug 8, 2016
- 27,746
- 27,302
- 2,445
I thought so too....but apparently, if one "cleverly" bypasses that by calling a poster a "groomer" instead of the word "pedophile", it's ok.
Your fake outrage is fake.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought so too....but apparently, if one "cleverly" bypasses that by calling a poster a "groomer" instead of the word "pedophile", it's ok.
#ThreadKill
I thought so too....but apparently, if one "cleverly" bypasses that by calling a poster a "groomer" instead of the word "pedophile", it's ok.
I dunno. A certain (protected) poster has recently cast that unbelievably offensive accusation at me directly and frequently. No consequence. In fact, I got a warning for mentioning it to a mod.I thought so too....but apparently, if one "cleverly" bypasses that by calling a poster a "groomer" instead of the word "pedophile", it's ok.
Unless they are possessed of course.Schools can't talk.
Schools can't talk.I have an idea. Stop supporting schools talking to kids about mutilating their bodies before they reach the age of majority and I won't call you a groomer.
Well that's an interesting take. You believing that being called a pedophile is "fake outrage".
Do we have a TOS against calling INCELs out?
And is there a TOS note about calling a white-wing terrorist a white-wing terrorist?
I'd expand upon that to include those who would support, and foster the creation of spaces, or practices, that give shelter to those who would be inclined to engage in grooming. They are co-conspirators, and just as guilty.
Clearly this is rhetorical...why is it still allowed when posters are called "groomers'.
Ok...then I will post accordingly.
I thought so too....but apparently, if one "cleverly" bypasses that by calling a poster a "groomer" instead of the word "pedophile", it's ok.