Looks like a blogger struck back at that paper and released the names and addresses of all of its employees to the public.
And this is exactly why escalation is a bad idea. Just as the idea that the answer to guns is more guns. Escalation never ends well.
It's not escalation. Turnabout is fair play. He published data culled from public sources so data on him from public sources was published.
You do realize that your first sentence and your second contradict each other? Ruh-roh.
Looks like a blogger struck back at that paper and released the names and addresses of all of its employees to the public.
And this is exactly why escalation is a bad idea. Just as the idea that the answer to guns is more guns. Escalation never ends well.
Was only a matter of time honestly before someone did this, and I'm talking about both sides.
It surprises me very little, but the paper is still very much in the wrong here. They exposed more people than just those that own guns.
And just how did the paper do that?
If the paper is wrong to publish public info, then you're saying it should not be public info?
Presumably you are, so back to the unanswered question: if owning/using guns is such a panacea, why are gun owners ashamed of that info? Why are they proud to own guns yet ashamed to own the ownership?
I gotta say when I first read "Was only a matter of time" I misread it as "War is only a matter of time". No such luck.
PS - love the Eddie Murphy avatar