How many Americans have to suffer, go bankrupt or even die before the GOP is satisfied?

Come on. We know that if you slash funding from healthcare, old people will be kicked out of homes, people with diabetes will no longer be able to afford care, people with sick children will either go bankrupt or see their kid die. Many disabled will no longer get proper care.

We know this. Cut funding for healthcare and this is what happens. It can't be denied.

So how many Americans need to suffer? How many have to die? Before Republicans are satisfied? They must have some goal, some target. What it is? What is their target?

A better question is...HOW MANY TIMES IS R-DERP GOING TO START NEW THREADS THAT ARE THE SAME TIRED NONSENSE HE'S BEEN POSTING FOR YEARS NOW!!!!
Yea,
Because GOP policies are "new".
They are even worse than they were before.
Now they want millions to suffer.
How many of those millions will die?
How ever many it is, I suspect the GOP will feel it's not enough.

The GOP is saddled with having to "fix" the Affordable Health Care Act, R-Derp...something that was set up to fail by you liberals!
 
Come on. We know that if you slash funding from healthcare, old people will be kicked out of homes, people with diabetes will no longer be able to afford care, people with sick children will either go bankrupt or see their kid die. Many disabled will no longer get proper care.

We know this. Cut funding for healthcare and this is what happens. It can't be denied.

So how many Americans need to suffer? How many have to die? Before Republicans are satisfied? They must have some goal, some target. What it is? What is their target?

udhcs.jpg
 
How many children have to be slaughtered by abortions before the LEFT is happy?
Zero children.
A fetus is not children.
Besides, if you don't care about the child, why care about the fetus? At least, you can hold a child.


So the dictionaries are wrong?

Why should I believe you over them?
So you admit you have no interest in helping children, only the fetus.

Do you know any children who skipped the fetal stage of their life?
Of course not. That's why I believe in helping the mother. Unless you know a fetus without a mother.

According to you, a fetus is not a child. . .

So, what is she the "mother" of?
 
Look at these right wingers. Insisting they have a heart because they pretend to care about a fetus. It's how they change the subject.

Look at the millions of children already killed by abortions which you and your ilk defend without shame and then you claim to have a heart and care about children?

Fuck you all. You have no credibility on any of it and finally, the people across the country are seeing it.

Republicans of course will continue to care for the poor and the needy without a full on socialistic approach which is all you leftardz REALLY want and care about.

The Constitution says we all have an equal right to our lives and to the equal protections of our laws. It does not guarantee a free ride from cradle to grave.
 
Look at these right wingers. Insisting they have a heart because they pretend to care about a fetus. It's how they change the subject.

Look at the millions of children already killed by abortions which you and your ilk defend without shame and then you claim to have a heart and care about children?

Fuck you all. You have no credibility on any of it and finally, the people across the country are seeing it.

Republicans of course will continue to care for the poor and the needy without a full on socialistic approach which is all you leftardz REALLY want and care about.

The Constitution says we all have an equal right to our lives and to the equal protections of our laws. It does not guarantee a free ride from cradle to grave.
Republicans of course will continue to care for the poor and the needy


laughter.gif


Come on. Be honest. Republicans only care for needy billionaires.

If someone needs help because of a catastrophic illness, your f*cking kind calls that "CRADLE TO GRAVE". Republicans are heartless and dishonest monsters. Remember when Republicans were insulted because of the throw grandma off a cliff ad?
Turns out they really feel that way.
 
Look at these right wingers. Insisting they have a heart because they pretend to care about a fetus. It's how they change the subject.

Look at the millions of children already killed by abortions which you and your ilk defend without shame and then you claim to have a heart and care about children?

Fuck you all. You have no credibility on any of it and finally, the people across the country are seeing it.

Republicans of course will continue to care for the poor and the needy without a full on socialistic approach which is all you leftardz REALLY want and care about.

The Constitution says we all have an equal right to our lives and to the equal protections of our laws. It does not guarantee a free ride from cradle to grave.
Republicans of course will continue to care for the poor and the needy


laughter.gif


Come on. Be honest. Republicans only care for needy billionaires.

If someone needs help because of a catastrophic illness, your f*cking kind calls that "CRADLE TO GRAVE". Republicans are heartless and dishonest monsters. Remember when Republicans were insulted because of the throw grandma off a cliff ad?
Turns out they really feel that way.

Heartless monsters kill children and deny that's what they are doing. . .


Supporting charitable efforts while also requiring parents to step up and provide for themselves and their children is hardly comparable to doing that.

So, when you or anyone on your side of tge fence try accusing others of being "heartless" it barbaric?

Your attempts at ridicule are discredited by the real blood of the real aborted children on uour hands.
 
Come on. We know that if you slash funding from healthcare, old people will be kicked out of homes, people with diabetes will no longer be able to afford care, people with sick children will either go bankrupt or see their kid die. Many disabled will no longer get proper care.

We know this. Cut funding for healthcare and this is what happens. It can't be denied.

So how many Americans need to suffer? How many have to die? Before Republicans are satisfied? They must have some goal, some target. What it is? What is their target?

They can careless, they just want a tax cut at the expense of the working man and the poor, disable and aged. Most of them are disgusting.
 
Look at these right wingers. Insisting they have a heart because they pretend to care about a fetus. It's how they change the subject.

Look at the millions of children already killed by abortions which you and your ilk defend without shame and then you claim to have a heart and care about children?

Fuck you all. You have no credibility on any of it and finally, the people across the country are seeing it.

Republicans of course will continue to care for the poor and the needy without a full on socialistic approach which is all you leftardz REALLY want and care about.

The Constitution says we all have an equal right to our lives and to the equal protections of our laws. It does not guarantee a free ride from cradle to grave.
Republicans of course will continue to care for the poor and the needy


laughter.gif


Come on. Be honest. Republicans only care for needy billionaires.

If someone needs help because of a catastrophic illness, your f*cking kind calls that "CRADLE TO GRAVE". Republicans are heartless and dishonest monsters. Remember when Republicans were insulted because of the throw grandma off a cliff ad?
Turns out they really feel that way.

Heartless monsters kill children and deny that's what they are doing. . .


Supporting charitable efforts while also requiring parents to step up and provide for themselves and their children is hardly comparable to doing that.

So, when you or anyone on your side of tge fence try accusing others of being "heartless" it barbaric?

Your attempts at ridicule are discredited by the real blood of the real aborted children on uour hands.

Haven't you heard that BC and condons help, and less people are getting abortions. When you say you want to give free BC , I'll believe you.
 
How many children have to be slaughtered by abortions before the LEFT is happy?
Zero children.
A fetus is not children.
Besides, if you don't care about the child, why care about the fetus? At least, you can hold a child.


So the dictionaries are wrong?

Why should I believe you over them?

I do not believe you are pro life, I am, that is why I believe in PP who gives BC and Condon's to the poor. You are only against Title X.
 
Look at these right wingers. Insisting they have a heart because they pretend to care about a fetus. It's how they change the subject.

Look at the millions of children already killed by abortions which you and your ilk defend without shame and then you claim to have a heart and care about children?

Fuck you all. You have no credibility on any of it and finally, the people across the country are seeing it.

Republicans of course will continue to care for the poor and the needy without a full on socialistic approach which is all you leftardz REALLY want and care about.

The Constitution says we all have an equal right to our lives and to the equal protections of our laws. It does not guarantee a free ride from cradle to grave.
Republicans of course will continue to care for the poor and the needy


laughter.gif


Come on. Be honest. Republicans only care for needy billionaires.

If someone needs help because of a catastrophic illness, your f*cking kind calls that "CRADLE TO GRAVE". Republicans are heartless and dishonest monsters. Remember when Republicans were insulted because of the throw grandma off a cliff ad?
Turns out they really feel that way.

Heartless monsters kill children and deny that's what they are doing. . .


Supporting charitable efforts while also requiring parents to step up and provide for themselves and their children is hardly comparable to doing that.

So, when you or anyone on your side of tge fence try accusing others of being "heartless" it barbaric?

Your attempts at ridicule are discredited by the real blood of the real aborted children on uour hands.

Haven't you heard that BC and condons help, and less people are getting abortions. When you say you want to give free BC , I'll believe you.

Let's make a deal. I will go along with the complete and total providing of birth control and sex education (even though nothing is ever actually free) if you will go along with a total ban on elective abortions.

Deal?

I didn't think so.

So much for your fucking red herring.
 
Look at these right wingers. Insisting they have a heart because they pretend to care about a fetus. It's how they change the subject.

Look at the millions of children already killed by abortions which you and your ilk defend without shame and then you claim to have a heart and care about children?

Fuck you all. You have no credibility on any of it and finally, the people across the country are seeing it.

Republicans of course will continue to care for the poor and the needy without a full on socialistic approach which is all you leftardz REALLY want and care about.

The Constitution says we all have an equal right to our lives and to the equal protections of our laws. It does not guarantee a free ride from cradle to grave.
Republicans of course will continue to care for the poor and the needy


laughter.gif


Come on. Be honest. Republicans only care for needy billionaires.

If someone needs help because of a catastrophic illness, your f*cking kind calls that "CRADLE TO GRAVE". Republicans are heartless and dishonest monsters. Remember when Republicans were insulted because of the throw grandma off a cliff ad?
Turns out they really feel that way.

Heartless monsters kill children and deny that's what they are doing. . .


Supporting charitable efforts while also requiring parents to step up and provide for themselves and their children is hardly comparable to doing that.

So, when you or anyone on your side of tge fence try accusing others of being "heartless" it barbaric?

Your attempts at ridicule are discredited by the real blood of the real aborted children on uour hands.
Like I said, you can't pretend to care about the fetus if you don't care about the baby. So stop the bullsh!t already.

44 - Palin Slashed Funding for Teen Moms

PH2008090202312.jpg
 
Look at these right wingers. Insisting they have a heart because they pretend to care about a fetus. It's how they change the subject.

Look at the millions of children already killed by abortions which you and your ilk defend without shame and then you claim to have a heart and care about children?

Fuck you all. You have no credibility on any of it and finally, the people across the country are seeing it.

Republicans of course will continue to care for the poor and the needy without a full on socialistic approach which is all you leftardz REALLY want and care about.

The Constitution says we all have an equal right to our lives and to the equal protections of our laws. It does not guarantee a free ride from cradle to grave.
Republicans of course will continue to care for the poor and the needy


laughter.gif


Come on. Be honest. Republicans only care for needy billionaires.

If someone needs help because of a catastrophic illness, your f*cking kind calls that "CRADLE TO GRAVE". Republicans are heartless and dishonest monsters. Remember when Republicans were insulted because of the throw grandma off a cliff ad?
Turns out they really feel that way.

Heartless monsters kill children and deny that's what they are doing. . .


Supporting charitable efforts while also requiring parents to step up and provide for themselves and their children is hardly comparable to doing that.

So, when you or anyone on your side of tge fence try accusing others of being "heartless" it barbaric?

Your attempts at ridicule are discredited by the real blood of the real aborted children on uour hands.
Like I said, you can't pretend to care about the fetus if you don't care about the baby. So stop the bullsh!t already.

44 - Palin Slashed Funding for Teen Moms

PH2008090202312.jpg
Deal or no deal?
 
Oddly enough, though the Right always claims that democrats promote and approve of abortion, I have never once heard anyone doing that. Democrats approve of keeping the procedure legal, not advocating that anyone abort. It is equivalent to me claiming that republicans advocate killing our aged, when they protest the cost of tax funded health care.
 
Oddly enough, though the Right always claims that democrats promote and approve of abortion, I have never once heard anyone doing that. Democrats approve of keeping the procedure legal, not advocating that anyone abort. It is equivalent to me claiming that republicans advocate killing our aged, when they protest the cost of tax funded health care.

Your claims that you neither promote nor approve of abortions are undermined by your steadfast reactionary actions of trying to keep it legal.

Your actions speak louder than your words.
 
Come on. We know that if you slash funding from healthcare, old people will be kicked out of homes, people with diabetes will no longer be able to afford care, people with sick children will either go bankrupt or see their kid die. Many disabled will no longer get proper care.

We know this. Cut funding for healthcare and this is what happens. It can't be denied.

So how many Americans need to suffer? How many have to die? Before Republicans are satisfied? They must have some goal, some target. What it is? What is their target?

A better question is...HOW MANY TIMES IS R-DERP GOING TO START NEW THREADS THAT ARE THE SAME TIRED NONSENSE HE'S BEEN POSTING FOR YEARS NOW!!!!
Yea,
Because GOP policies are "new".
They are even worse than they were before.
Now they want millions to suffer.
How many of those millions will die?
How ever many it is, I suspect the GOP will feel it's not enough.

Stop with the drama queen histrionics, R-Derp! The ACA was deliberately written to fail by you progressives and now it has to be fixed. That's reality.
 
Oddly enough, though the Right always claims that democrats promote and approve of abortion, I have never once heard anyone doing that. Democrats approve of keeping the procedure legal, not advocating that anyone abort. It is equivalent to me claiming that republicans advocate killing our aged, when they protest the cost of tax funded health care.

Your claims that you neither promote nor approve of abortions are undermined by your steadfast reactionary actions of trying to keep it legal.

Your actions speak louder than your words.

Logic is hardly your forte', Chuz. i do not have to approve or promote abortions just because I believe that it is a woman's right to control her own body, and not the right of the government. In fact, I am totally neutral about abortions, personally. From a pragmatic point of view, I believe that abortions are inevitable, especially with the world population at almost 10 billion people, having grown from 3 billion people in my lifetime.. That still does not mean that I approve or promote abortions.
 
Last edited:
Come on. We know that if you slash funding from healthcare, old people will be kicked out of homes, people with diabetes will no longer be able to afford care, people with sick children will either go bankrupt or see their kid die. Many disabled will no longer get proper care.

We know this. Cut funding for healthcare and this is what happens. It can't be denied.

So how many Americans need to suffer? How many have to die? Before Republicans are satisfied? They must have some goal, some target. What it is? What is their target?

A better question is...HOW MANY TIMES IS R-DERP GOING TO START NEW THREADS THAT ARE THE SAME TIRED NONSENSE HE'S BEEN POSTING FOR YEARS NOW!!!!
Yea,
Because GOP policies are "new".
They are even worse than they were before.
Now they want millions to suffer.
How many of those millions will die?
How ever many it is, I suspect the GOP will feel it's not enough.

Stop with the drama queen histrionics, R-Derp! The ACA was deliberately written to fail by you progressives and now it has to be fixed. That's reality.

if you are so sure that it is going to fail, then allow it to do so to prove your point. Personally, I do not believe that it is going to fail. And BTW, repealing ACA does not "fix" it.
 
Come on. We know that if you slash funding from healthcare, old people will be kicked out of homes, people with diabetes will no longer be able to afford care, people with sick children will either go bankrupt or see their kid die. Many disabled will no longer get proper care.

We know this. Cut funding for healthcare and this is what happens. It can't be denied.

So how many Americans need to suffer? How many have to die? Before Republicans are satisfied? They must have some goal, some target. What it is? What is their target?

A better question is...HOW MANY TIMES IS R-DERP GOING TO START NEW THREADS THAT ARE THE SAME TIRED NONSENSE HE'S BEEN POSTING FOR YEARS NOW!!!!
Yea,
Because GOP policies are "new".
They are even worse than they were before.
Now they want millions to suffer.
How many of those millions will die?
How ever many it is, I suspect the GOP will feel it's not enough.

Stop with the drama queen histrionics, R-Derp! The ACA was deliberately written to fail by you progressives and now it has to be fixed. That's reality.

if you are so sure that it is going to fail, then allow it to do so to prove your point. Personally, I do not believe that it is going to fail. And BTW, repealing ACA does not "fix" it.

How can you say it's not failing, Vandals? Costs are skyrocketing and more and more insurance companies are pulling out of marketplaces. Do you really not understand that the ACA was designed to fail? It was supposed to fail so Hillary Clinton could then force Congress to implement Single Payer. That was the progressive plan...only Hillary didn't win.
 
Oddly enough, though the Right always claims that democrats promote and approve of abortion, I have never once heard anyone doing that. Democrats approve of keeping the procedure legal, not advocating that anyone abort. It is equivalent to me claiming that republicans advocate killing our aged, when they protest the cost of tax funded health care.

Your claims that you neither promote nor approve of abortions are undermined by your steadfast reactionary actions of trying to keep it legal.

Your actions speak louder than your words.

Logic is hardly your forte', Chuz. i do not have to approve or promote abortions just because I believe that it is a woman's right to control her own body, and not the right of the government. In fact, I am totally neutral about abortions, personally. From a pragmatic point of view, I believe that abortions are inevitable, especially with the world population at almost 10 billion people, having grown from 3 billion people in my lifetime.. That still does not mean that I approve or promote abortions.


Logic is not my problem. Dealing with those (like you) who are steeped in denial is my problem.

For example... let's consider this simple question and your (predictable denial) response to it.

Does an abortion kill a human child?

Yes or no?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top