How is this offensive?

The far right cons are acting stupidly yet again.
answer the op plz
I have enough leftist trolls in this thread

There has to be some kind of law against Jake the Fake Starkey accusing anyone of being stupid, as it could be considered an act that could place the locality where he currently resides in imminent danger of Divine Smiting.
dealing with fools who still believe that political correctness has a future, but the fact is those days are over. they can remove all the paintings from college campuses they want, they're only dumbing themselves down in the process. meanwhile, no one is submitting to their emotional blackmail anymore, especially when all they can do to retaliate is spout more insults. so, yeah, let them keep calling us stupid, see how it goes for them.
 
694940094001_5083756451001_823ab713-e710-4057-8184-ac26f9105178.jpg


Please tell me why this is offensive and give a detailed reason as to why.

It's not offensive, it's only offensive to Politically Correct Bedwetters.
 
That was not conservatives. That was John Ashcroft.
Then what's the OP's point? There wasn't even any context provided. Obviously someone was offended, but I doubt he or she had Ashcroft's standing.
This is a difference between the left and the right.

Liberals will tolerate Marxists, Black Lies Matter, pedophiles like certain Hollyweird directors, and so on, but cannot tolerate anyone questioning their sacred cows from the right, like the cost effectiveness of the ACA or letting the NEA run our national educational system into the ground the way they have.

It also carries over to how each side handles their wack-jobs. While the right has, believe it or not, expelled its openly racist whites from the Zone of Tolerance, the left has not done so similarly with those blacks who want to kill Whitey and those Hispanics who follow racist philosophies of a dead Mexican Nazi collaborator nor their ideological wack jobs who want to use publicly funded art to attack everyone else's deeply held morals and wreck their careers if they dont fall on their faces in submission to the Leftist Hope for the Future.

And until liberals start to respect their conservative leaning counterparts and give them preference to the wack jobs in their side of the spectrum, things are only going to polarize more and get more hostile.
 
"Whites" did not know the country, were not strong enough to carry their own supplies, did not know enough to live off the land....

you don't row a canoe from the front and white men, back then, are stupid enough to stand up in a canoe. They do not have a a weighted keel nor are they flat bottom rafts or barges

The white man needed the natives to help them survive.

Silly white man

:)
 
"Whites" did not know the country, were not strong enough to carry their own supplies, did not know enough to live off the land....

you don't row a canoe from the front and white men, back then, are stupid enough to stand up in a canoe. They do not have a a weighted keel nor are they flat bottom rafts or barges

The white man needed the natives to help them survive.

Silly white man

:)
Yet somehow the white man figured out not only how to utilize the knowledge of those he found here, but to dominate the entire continent. Silly white man?
 
"Whites" did not know the country, were not strong enough to carry their own supplies, did not know enough to live off the land....

you don't row a canoe from the front and white men, back then, are stupid enough to stand up in a canoe. They do not have a a weighted keel nor are they flat bottom rafts or barges

The white man needed the natives to help them survive.

Silly white man

:)
Yet somehow the white man figured out not only how to utilize the knowledge of those he found here, but to dominate the entire continent. Silly white man?

White man had Chinese gun powder and Damascus/Anatolia steel
 
Yet somehow the white man figured out not only how to utilize the knowledge of those he found here, but to dominate the entire continent. Silly white man?
Well, that depends on the culture of the specific white men that settled an area. The Spanish and Portugese were very different from the Anglos, the latter of whom were so poorly financed and pitifully supplied that they had to depend on the Amerindians to learn the new ecology.

The Anglos had to learn from everyone to survive back in that day, their island being so small and infested with angry Celts and Scots. :D
 
"Whites" did not know the country, were not strong enough to carry their own supplies, did not know enough to live off the land....

you don't row a canoe from the front and white men, back then, are stupid enough to stand up in a canoe. They do not have a a weighted keel nor are they flat bottom rafts or barges

The white man needed the natives to help them survive.

Silly white man

:)

You don't row a canoe at all, can paddle front, back or both just fine, a river canoe full of supplies or pelts is weighted enough to assist in stabilization, they aren't in class 4/5 rapids and the man standing in the front probably isn't an accountant from Topeka on a weekend trip with his buds.
 
"Whites" did not know the country, were not strong enough to carry their own supplies, did not know enough to live off the land....

you don't row a canoe from the front and white men, back then, are stupid enough to stand up in a canoe. They do not have a a weighted keel nor are they flat bottom rafts or barges

The white man needed the natives to help them survive.

Silly white man

:)
Yet somehow the white man figured out not only how to utilize the knowledge of those he found here, but to dominate the entire continent. Silly white man?

White man had Chinese gun powder and Damascus/Anatolia steel
Again, white man use weapons that make wooden arrows useless. Silly white man?

IOW, who is smarter, the guy who invents the wheel and stops, or the guy who takes the wheel and makes a car?
 
You don't row a canoe at all, can paddle front, back or both just fine, a river canoe full of supplies or pelts is weighted enough to assist in stabilization, they aren't in class 4/5 rapids and the man standing in the front probably isn't an accountant from Topeka on a weekend trip with his buds.
There is a huge difference between risky, doable, and optimal.
 
Again, white man use weapons that make wooden arrows useless. Silly white man?
Wooden arrows had a higher rate of fire than single shot muskets and pistols up to the mid 1800s and those Amerindians were far more accurate with them up to about 200 yards.
 
"Whites" did not know the country, were not strong enough to carry their own supplies, did not know enough to live off the land....

you don't row a canoe from the front and white men, back then, are stupid enough to stand up in a canoe. They do not have a a weighted keel nor are they flat bottom rafts or barges

The white man needed the natives to help them survive.

Silly white man

:)

You don't row a canoe at all, can paddle front, back or both just fine, a river canoe full of supplies or pelts is weighted enough to assist in stabilization, they aren't in class 4/5 rapids and the man standing in the front probably isn't an accountant from Topeka on a weekend trip with his buds.
The incident as pictured didn't happen, it was painted that way to increase drama and tell a story. A bunch of people sitting in canoes is nowhere near as dramatic as a bunch of people sitting in canoes with one guy standing, indicating that he's the leader. Think Washington crossing the Delaware.
 
The incident as pictured didn't happen, it was painted that way to increase drama and tell a story. A bunch of people sitting in canoes is nowhere near as dramatic as a bunch of people sitting in canoes with one guy standing, indicating that he's the leader. Think Washington crossing the Delaware.

Unless you talked to the artist, you don't know what happened or what they were trying to present/depict. For all you know the artist could be depicting dude standing in the front canoe had a serious leg cramp or just got through taking a piss. If it makes you feel better to think that it is all a bunch of hoopla intended to send a different message that you have no way of knowing ... I think your idea stinks and like mine better.

How's that for dramatic?
 
"Whites" did not know the country, were not strong enough to carry their own supplies, did not know enough to live off the land....

you don't row a canoe from the front and white men, back then, are stupid enough to stand up in a canoe. They do not have a a weighted keel nor are they flat bottom rafts or barges

The white man needed the natives to help them survive.

Silly white man

:)
Yet somehow the white man figured out not only how to utilize the knowledge of those he found here, but to dominate the entire continent. Silly white man?

White man had Chinese gun powder and Damascus/Anatolia steel
Again, white man use weapons that make wooden arrows useless. Silly white man?

IOW, who is smarter, the guy who invents the wheel and stops, or the guy who takes the wheel and makes a car?

Till white man, wooden arrows were all they needed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top