How George W. Bush's Two Tax Cuts, 2001 and 2003 Screwed The Pooch

Campbell

Gold Member
Aug 20, 2015
3,866
646
255
4-14-04tax-f1.jpg


Tax cuts for the wealthy is OK if the country can afford them. When borrowing from foreign banks to fund them.....NOT SO MUCH!

This includes the expenditures associated with the two wars...one totally unnecessary

.................................Total U S Debt.......................................


09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 ( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)(President Clinton raised tax rates while he still had a Democrat congress)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)((Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

6a00d83451c45669e201675ecf1529970b-550wi


Between 1981 and 1992, the national debt held by the public quadrupled. The annual budget deficit grew to $290 billion in 1992, the largest ever, and was projected to grow to more than $455 billion by Fiscal Year (FY) 2000. As a result of the tough and sometimes unpopular choices made by President Clinton, and major deficit reduction legislation passed in 1993 and 1997, we have seen eight consecutive years of fiscal improvement for the first time in America's history.
  • Largest Surplus Ever: The surplus in FY 2000 is $237 billion—the third consecutive surplus and the largest surplus ever.
  • Largest Three-Year Debt Pay-Down Ever: Between 1998-2000, the publicly held debt was reduced by $363 billion—the largest three-year pay-down in American history. Under Presidents Reagan and Bush, the debt held by the public quadrupled. Under the Clinton-Gore budget, we are on track to pay off the entire publicly held debt on a net basis by 2009.
  • Lower Federal Government Spending: After increasing under the previous two administrations, federal government spending as a share of the economy has been cut from 22.2 percent in 1992 to 18 percent in 2000—the lowest level since 1966.
  • Reduced Interest Payments on the Debt: In 1993, the net interest payments on the debt held by the public were projected to grow to $348 billion in FY 2000. In 2000, interest payments on the debt were $125 billion lower than projected.
  • Americans Benefit from Reduced Debt: Because of fiscal discipline and deficit and debt reduction, it is estimated that a family with a home mortgage of $100,000 might expect to save roughly $2,000 per year in mortgage payments, like a large tax cut.
  • Double Digit Growth in Private Investment in Equipment and Software: Lower debt will help maintain strong economic growth and fuel private investments. With government no longer draining resources out of capital markets, private investment in equipment and software averaged 13.3 percent annual growth since 1993, compared to 4.7 percent during 1981 to 1992.



To Establish Fiscal Discipline, President Clinton:
  • Enacted the 1993 Deficit Reduction Plan without a Single Republican Vote. Prior to 1993, the debate over fiscal policy often revolved around a false choice between public investment and deficit reduction. The 1993 deficit reduction plan showed that deficit and debt reductions could be accomplished in a progressive way by slashing the deficit in half and making important investments in our future, including education, health care, and science and technology research. The plan included more than $500 billion in deficit reduction. It also cut taxes for 15 million of the hardest-pressed Americans by expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit; created the Direct Student Loan Program; created the first nine Empowerment Zones and first 95 Enterprise Communities; and passed tax cuts for small businesses and research and development.
  • Negotiated the Balanced Budget Agreement of 1997. In his 1997 State of the Union address, President Clinton announced his plan to balance the budget for the first time in 27 years. Later that year, he signed the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, a major bipartisan agreement to eliminate the national budget deficit, create the conditions for economic growth, and invest in the education and health of our people. It provided middle-class tax relief with a $500 per child tax credit and the Hope Scholarship and Lifetime Learning tax credits for college. It also created the Children's Health Insurance Program to serve up to 5 million children and made landmark investments in education initiatives including educational technology, charter schools, Head Start, and Pell Grants. Finally, it added 20 more Empowerment Zones and 20 more rural Enterprise Communities, included the President's plan to revitalize the District of Columbia, and continued welfare reform though $3 billion in new resources to move welfare recipients to private-sector jobs.
  • Dedicated the Surplus to Save Social Security and Reduce the National Debt. In his 1998 and 1999 State of the Union addresses, President Clinton called on the nation to save the surplus until the solvency of Social Security is assured. He also repeatedly vetoed large Republican tax cut bills that would have jeopardized our nation's fiscal discipline. The President's actions led to a bipartisan consensus on saving the surplus and paying down the debt.
  • Extended Medicare Solvency from 1999 to 2025. When President Clinton took office, Medicare was expected to become insolvent in 1999, then only six years away. The 1993 deficit reduction act dedicated some of the taxes paid by Social Security beneficiaries to the Medicare Trust Fund and extended the life of Medicare by three years to 2002. Thanks to additional provisions to combat waste, fraud and abuse and bipartisan cooperation in the 1997 balanced budget agreement, Medicare is now expected to remain solvent until 2025.
 
Last edited:
Okay...the dipshit shrub generated huge deficits.

Then, his successor generated even larger deficits, but he gets a pass. Why?
 
Okay...the dipshit shrub generated huge deficits.

Then, his successor generated even larger deficits, but he gets a pass. Why?

So far the Obama administration has been required to borrow over $2 trillion just to pay the interest on the debt which was inherited. These foreign banks are funny about that....they charge interest:

Let's look at how the president stacks up against his predecessors...Oh, you can bet your ass that now that we're not having a formal war with anyone it's just gonna get better and better:

MW-AR658_spendi_20120521163312_ME11.jpg
 
Last edited:
Okay...the dipshit shrub generated huge deficits.

Then, his successor generated even larger deficits, but he gets a pass. Why?

You have no idea what last year's deficit was, do you?

No idea at all.....
 
what a bias article. Bill clinton introduced a budget that was so out of line that even his own party voted against it.
then they lost both the house and senate and republicans and Newt Gingrich brought the contract for America and reduced the budget
and the dems couldn't get rid of newt fast enough
Now the dems brag how they balance the budget in those years
You dems have been very dishonest about the budget those years
...and how the dems cheered bubba's fiscal resonsibilty during 2012 convention speech, but when it was actually being done in 94 you guys demonized gingrich. Hilarious.
 
Gipper,
Does this mean anything to you?

us-federal-debt-by-president-political-party.jpg

You are using Debt as figure to gauge when it was Bush who threw the bus over the cliff at start. You are blaming Obama for not pressing the brake enough but look he has drastically reduced spending compared to any predecessor.
Obama inherited a 1.4 trillion deficit and brought it to under 0.6 trillion deficit.
bush_obama_deficit_2014.jpg


Compare that to the way real countries look at borrowing i.e. compared to GDP

upload_2015-9-23_13-31-46.png


Obama has it below average and if the GOP administrations hadn't racked up so much debt he who be a lot closer to breaking even, as most of the shortfall now is interest payments from the Reagan and two Bush administrations.

Then you have to count in a war that could have been easily avoided. You have to laugh at RWers when they talk about spending.
How the US public was defrauded by the hidden cost of the Iraq war | Michael Boyle

$3.7 trillion spend in a sh*t hole in the ME.. Congratulations...
Let the adults talk while you wind up for another war with Iran, again for no good f*cking reason. You played your WMD card once already.
 
Gipper,
Does this mean anything to you?

us-federal-debt-by-president-political-party.jpg

You are using Debt as figure to gauge when it was Bush who threw the bus over the cliff at start. You are blaming Obama for not pressing the brake enough but look he has drastically reduced spending compared to any predecessor.
Obama inherited a 1.4 trillion deficit and brought it to under 0.6 trillion deficit.
bush_obama_deficit_2014.jpg


Compare that to the way real countries look at borrowing i.e. compared to GDP

View attachment 50714

Obama has it below average and if the GOP administrations hadn't racked up so much debt he who be a lot closer to breaking even, as most of the shortfall now is interest payments from the Reagan and two Bush administrations.

Then you have to count in a war that could have been easily avoided. You have to laugh at RWers when they talk about spending.
How the US public was defrauded by the hidden cost of the Iraq war | Michael Boyle

$3.7 trillion spend in a sh*t hole in the ME.. Congratulations...
Let the adults talk while you wind up for another war with Iran, again for no good f*cking reason. You played your WMD card once already.
Yeppp.
 
This should blow your left brain...it is truly amazing how EASILY Big Ears can dupe his partisan worshipers.

The truth...can you accept it?

Obama has boasted about the shrinking of the budget deficit from the more than $1 trillion seen in the first four years of his presidency. But even with that reduction, budget deficits under Obama are on track to stay higher than the highest deficit seen under President George W. Bush.

President Bush was seen by many as a big spender who squandered a rare budget surplus. But according to the Office of Management and Budget, Bush’s highest annual budget deficit was $458 billion.

That’s still $25 billion less than Obama’s lowest deficit: $483 billion in the just-finished 2014 fiscal year, and several years into what Obama himself has called an economic recovery.

So for all of Obama’s boasting this week, Obama still hasn’t managed to preside over a deficit that’s lower than Bush’s highest deficit.
 
And this....its fun blowing up left wing propaganda...

“The federal debt has already grown more during Obama’s first six years than under all previous U.S. presidents combined, at least in nominal dollars with no adjustment for inflation. The debt owed to the public stands at about $13 trillion, an increase of 106 percent since Obama first took office. Total debt, counting money the government owes to itself, stands at $18.1 trillion, up 70 percent. Both debt figures continue to grow, though less rapidly than during Obama’s first few years when annual deficits topped $1 trillion for four years running.
Letter: National debt is out of control
 
So far the Obama administration has been required to borrow over $2 trillion just to pay the interest on the debt which was inherited. These foreign banks are funny about that....they charge interest:
Huh? All the spending is mandatory somehow with no money to the debt unless it's borrowed in addition to. You don't have a brain, you have a vessel that houses propaganda.
 
Cause I'm sure an increase of spending and the fact that the projected surplus was based on data the Clinton's falsified had nothing to do with anything.

Nope. It's the fact that your neighbor got to keep more of the money he worked his butt off for.
 
So far the Obama administration has been required to borrow over $2 trillion just to pay the interest on the debt which was inherited. These foreign banks are funny about that....they charge interest:
Huh? All the spending is mandatory somehow with no money to the debt unless it's borrowed in addition to. You don't have a brain, you have a vessel that houses propaganda.

LMAO!!! The Repubican party and Faux News make up their own facts. Always have, Always Will!!
Here's a little unexpected revelation:

 
Last edited:
these laughable left-wing losers and their charts!!!

charts wont tell you much; statistics can be what you want them to be

obama ADDED OVER $200 BILLION TO THE LAST "BUSH" BUDGET DEFICIT


Bush's highest deficits were when Democrats held the budget purse strings. Bush's lowest were when Republicans held the budget purse strings

OBAMA'S HIGHEST BUDGET DEFICITS OCCURED WHEN DEMOCRATS HELD THE BUDGET PURSE STRINGS

Obama's LOWEST budget deficits happened with REPUBLICANS HOLDING THE POWER OF THE PURSE

libs are losers who lie TO THEMSELVES
 
I SEE a left-wing loser crying that others are lying?

how can we simply things so as to reveal what abject clowns left-wingers are who lie TO THEMSELVES ON THE REGULAR?

Maybe if i put it this way. what Bush/Republican spending did Democrats reject with a majority of their own Party member's votes???
 

Forum List

Back
Top